Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.
He had one big game, a few mediocre games and a HUGE stinker in Week 17. I do not own either RB, but I'm not sure why "we" moved past Henderson when he performed just as well for most of the season as the offseason darling Akers.
Not sure why you're baffled, because it seemed pretty clear who the main RB was and it was Akers. I'm one of those Henderson guys who fought tooth and nail for him, but unlike some, I know when I'm defeated.
That HUGE stinker came when he played with a high ankle sprain (the same injury that landed Henderson on IR). I think he deserves a pass on that one.
I actually agree with the bolded - I just don't think Henderson is going away though like some seem to think.
I don't see anyone saying that Henderson is going away, but I do see some suggesting a full on split, which you "liked".
Just a fair reminder, after 2019 Tyler Higbee finished the last ~6 weeks of the season as PPR dynamite at TE and almost everyone was sure this meant he was going to have a huge 2020 (which we all know he didn't). Obviously different position and everything, but we should probably be a little wary of the fickle nature of McVay and the Ram's offense.
The point is, you're projecting- not a single person has said Henderson is going away as you claim, while others have said it's going to be a full on rbbc.
Sure, which is why I put the disclaimer that nothing is guaranteed. However, Higbee had 3 1/2 seasons of nothing prior to that, and that good stretch came while Everett was injured. There were red flags all over that "surge".
For me it's less about CEH or Metcalf and about value of having two young first or nearly first round pedigreed RB's or one RB with a Chase or PItts.
I'll jump on board with the 1st one being terrible. No way that 2nd should be included at all. The 2nd was an overpay for Zeke but I don't have a problem with it for win now team as he should have a big season this year and maybe 1 more after. The last one is probably a little light for Gibson but depending on where that 22 pick ends up it could even out nicely for Team E but not good business to do deals like this.
That is very true but Akers was banged up and with no off-season it took some rookies a while to settle in. I think it is obvious which one is more talented. Henderson will still get work for sure but Brown being gone helps them both too. I agree that you could make an argument for Akers or Swift depending on your preference though.
Except in 1 of my 16 team leagues someone did a step down and still got Metcalf. I posted this a while ago.
I know everyone is down on him but that's a free Reagor.
Give me the 1.9.
Reagor by a long shot in the first one even though he may not amount to much but I'm hoping he does. I go AB and 1.9 here but it is close. I could see it if you really believe in Shenault.
Split of carries once Akers took over the backfield (last 4 games of regular season and 2 playoff games)
So, at this stage of his career you like Keenan Allen over Waddle, Smith, ETN, and Williams? Assuming Harris, Chase, and Pitts are gone.
I can see either side if you are trying to win now but the 1.06 is where the value is here for sure. Allen should have a good year and I'd rather have Mostert to Beasley but he has to stay healthy.
Probably but if you win the Chip this year, then it wouldn't matter. Smith/Waddle are still both undersized and in places that aren't notorious for WRs blowing up recently with QBs that are unproven. SF though, the pick has to be the better choice but if you want to win, Allen is worth much more than one of those other WRs.
If it wasn't SF and 0.5PPR I'd stick with Keenan, especially if you had any kind of playoff hopes, but those two factors make this a pretty clear win to me. Congrats.
I have a contender roster but Watson and Rodgers at QB, plus just got hit by the JRob grenade so this felt like a good move to stay competitive but set up for the future a little.
Funny thing is, based on the trade, Team A has a better shot than B to not be bad any more.
Great get for J Rob. Neither Davis or Engram are league winners but great depth pieces for a back up RB.
With all of those kids from different Moms, maybe he has to start playing again to cover his child support payments.Assuming the 1 QB format... This seems like rookie draft love to an extreme. Montgomery needs to get some credit for what he's done thus far. This is great value for the 1.10 and the 2.3 and Watkins in this deal are throw aways
Oof. Basically just gave Hill and Henry away. Even in a rebuilding scenario, that's about 25 cents on the dollar.
I am pretty big on Chark this year and moving forward but I don't think I could do this. Mmmmmaybe if I were really in love with Pitts and he was OTC at 1.05 and I was already really strong at RB. Henry and Hill for Pitts and Chark? That might not seem so crazy a year from now. Today I don't like it. The 1.10 doesn't help it enough.
