Jump to content
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

****OFFICIAL 2021 IN- SEASON DYNASTY TRADES****


Recommended Posts

7 hours ago, PantherThunder said:

Burrow for a future #1? I will take Burrow all day

Amari Cooper? I like him but your last QB and a rookie 

Not sure I understand where you are going

 

Future 1 over Burrow all day in 1QB league. If benches are short, like FFPC,  I love this deal for you 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 team ppr sf

Gave up Golladay and Rondale Moore and another teams 22 2nd

Got Keenan Allen and a different teams 22 2nd

Both 22 2nds are going to be random, he asked to have them included, neither team is a definite contender or rebuilder as this trade was just after a startup draft and we both had accumulated extra future 2nds.  Golladay went in the 8th and Moore in the 10th while Allen went in the 6th.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Twenty-Four Eighty-Four said:

I like this one. I'm still a Jeudy believer.

even if Rodgers rumors aren't true, I like his long term upside better than Hollywood. And if Rodgers ends up in Denver its a grand slam for me. Either way, Jeudy is my #6 WR on this roster so I'm in pretty good shape ;)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

12 team ppr QB/2RB/3WR/TE/FL

 

Team A gave up 

Henderson, Darrell LAR RB; 

Gallup, Michael DAL WR;

Year 2021 Draft Pick 1.05 - OTC (Etienne was picked)

Team B gave up 

Hopkins, DeAndre ARI WR;

Year 2021 Draft Pick 2.08

Edited by Dr. Octopus
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Dr. Octopus said:

12 team ppr QB/2RB/3WR/TE/FL

 

Team A gave up 

Henderson, Darrell LAR RB; 

Gallup, Michael DAL WR;

Year 2021 Draft Pick 1.05 - OTC (Etienne was picked)

Team B gave up 

Hopkins, DeAndre ARI WR;

Year 2021 Draft Pick 2.08

I like B side.  There are a lot of mouths to feed in Dallas and difficult to see who the odd man out is in a couple years (Cooper?  Gallup?  Both?).  I don't love Etienne, as I am not a Urban Meyer believer.  I would rather get the next 3 to 4 years out of Hopkins than the dice roll that is Gallup/Etienne and 2.08 is better than Henderson.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/14/2021 at 3:30 PM, mzkp54 said:

12 team 1 QB PPR league. 
 

gave: Burrow

got: ‘22 1st (1.02 this year)

 

gave: Tannehill, 1.06

got: Cooper 

 

leaves me without a QB right now, but value felt too good to pass up in a 1 QB league. 

I like the value for Burrow but not sure I trade both of my QBs.  I think this could be Cooper's last year in Dallas when his guaranteed money runs out so might not have made the 2nd one if I believed in who I would get at 6 at all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, Edgar said:

In a week Nuk is 29. So yeah. If you can get a blue chip for a 9th year WR, it’s good roster management to cash out

It is good to cash out if you do it right.  I love Pitts and not sure you could get another 1st in some leagues but maybe a future one.  Definitely should have been more included than just 1.6 for him.  He is too good for that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ffmail4me said:

even if Rodgers rumors aren't true, I like his long term upside better than Hollywood. And if Rodgers ends up in Denver its a grand slam for me. Either way, Jeudy is my #6 WR on this roster so I'm in pretty good shape ;)

If that's the case, I try to flip Jeudy for something else if you need. Good work.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, frae said:

12 team ppr sf

Gave up Golladay and Rondale Moore and another teams 22 2nd

Got Keenan Allen and a different teams 22 2nd

Both 22 2nds are going to be random, he asked to have them included, neither team is a definite contender or rebuilder as this trade was just after a startup draft and we both had accumulated extra future 2nds.  Golladay went in the 8th and Moore in the 10th while Allen went in the 6th.  

I much rather have the Golladay side.  I like the spot Moore is in and I expect Golladay to not be too much different than Keenan albeit more volatile.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Gally said:

I much rather have the Golladay side.  I like the spot Moore is in and I expect Golladay to not be too much different than Keenan albeit more volatile.  

Maybe so, but historically FA WR's on new teams are not great bets and Golladay has never been able to separate from anyone thus he always has those good contested catch numbers.  I prefer getting out of the Daniel Jones needs to be good side and feel good about 2 years of Allen with Herbert.  Moore is definitely a wild card, but I'd rather bet on the multiple hit WR in Allen than a round 2 WR, overall I found it fair because he gets 2 shots but I get the more stable side.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, frae said:

12 team ppr sf

Gave up Golladay and Rondale Moore and another teams 22 2nd

Got Keenan Allen and a different teams 22 2nd

Both 22 2nds are going to be random, he asked to have them included, neither team is a definite contender or rebuilder as this trade was just after a startup draft and we both had accumulated extra future 2nds.  Golladay went in the 8th and Moore in the 10th while Allen went in the 6th.  

I totally get your side.  If I was trying to compete this year and thought I had a good chance then I totally get your side.  I like Allen over Kenny G definitely.  If I was trying to build, I might side with Kenny G/Moore with Moore's upside.  Pretty fair trade and I agree that FA WRs aren't the best of options.  Barkley is the only Giant fantasy option I want any part of personally.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, frae said:

overall I found it fair because he gets 2 shots but I get the more stable side.

That is exactly the crux of the trade.  Do you want the higher upside/downside or the more stable performer?  Fair for sure.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, kutta said:

12 Team PPR, not involved.

Team A gets Mike Davis

Team B gets 2021 2.03

 

This is fair enough.  Might be pricey for Davis as I am not really high on him and think he only really might have this year but I'm not as high on the end of the 1st/top of 2nd in this draft as some others so nothing wrong if you you needed RB help and are trying to win now.

I like that it was done after the NFL draft.  Too many people pull the trigger on a trade like this before the draft and then the team goes and drafts a RB to compete for touches.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, Catbird said:

Have to agree with Edgar here. 29 for a receiver means you don't have a lot (any?) top level seasons left. I have Hopkins on half my teams and he is a forever favorite. Still, 6 guys in the game have more receiving yards than Nuk and 3 of those are Fitz, Jason Whitten and Desean Jackson who are not going to be starters ever again. Julio is the single example still playing of a guy older than Nuk who may this year be playing at a top level (apologies, perhaps, to AJ and conceivably Antonio Brown). I don't claim the ability to know if Pitts will be the real deal, but its unlikely that Nuk has more than a year of top 10 or 20 production left, where if Pitts is as advertised he should have a good eight years ahead of high quality production. Unless Hopkins makes you league champion this year, I don't see how the odds don't favor the rest of Pitts' career pretty easily over the rest of Nuk's..

I remember an analysis that showed a WR who is still producing as a WR1 at age 29/30 actually tends to continue  to produce for another 2-4 years. I actually think Nuk could be one of those guys. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, tombonneau said:

I remember an analysis that showed a WR who is still producing as a WR1 at age 29/30 actually tends to continue  to produce for another 2-4 years. I actually think Nuk could be one of those guys. 

Totally agreed and even Pitts isn't a for sure thing.  I think D-Hop is worth more than a mid 1st for sure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, Jonesin For Some Football said:

Totally agreed and even Pitts isn't a for sure thing.  I think D-Hop is worth more than a mid 1st for sure.

Sorry but I gotta have the old wr discount.  I would much rather have Pitts, Waddle, or Williams.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 team SF 0.5 PPR

Gave R. Stevenson, my 2022 4th, HIS 2022 4th, HIS 2022 1st

Got 2023 1st, 2022 2nd, 2023 3rd

 

Trade partner wanted his own 2022 1st back that I acquired last season. I had three 2022 1sts, so I moved one to 2023 and picked up another draft pick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, kutta said:

12 Team PPR, not involved.

Team A gets Mike Davis

Team B gets 2021 2.03

 

The one league of mine he was cut he got drafted at 2.4 so in that sense this seems fair but I'd not pay it for Davis no matter the makeup of the team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Chad Parsons said:

12tm 1QB

Trey Sermon (post-drafting), 22 2nd, 22 3rd (later projection)

FOR

Tyler Lockett, 22 1st (mid?)

That's a good deal for the person getting lockett. I just drafted Sermon at 1.12 in PPR. I don't need a WR, but now I wonder what I could get for him. I'll sell for that kind of haul lol. I got no bites when I put him on the block

Edited by Helaire-ious
  • Love 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Chad Parsons said:

12tm 1QB

Trey Sermon (post-drafting), 22 2nd, 22 3rd (later projection)

FOR

Tyler Lockett, 22 1st (mid?)

I think it's pretty even.

Sermon's my 7th ranked player in this draft and I'd have to think that 2022 first is as good or better. Fact it's a risk and I got to wait a year for it so I lean Sermon over the 2022#1 by a tad, maybe more than a tad if I need a RB.

Locket's probably worth more then a 2nd and a 3rd but he's also a diminutive 29 year old speed WR and I don't usually put a massive value on those guys and sure not giving up a 2022#1 for him. A later projected second and a third however seems like a good deal, especially if you have a need.

Maybe slight value to team getting Locket but can see both sides. Let me put it another way on most of my teams I'd prefer the Sermon side even if I thought I was "losing" the trade.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Jonesin For Some Football said:

If you are playing for the future, I guess.  I don't see people winning a ton of titles making these types of moves regularly.  This just screams rookie fever to me.

I would respectfully argue trading players like Hopkins before it's to late  is exactly how you win a ton of titles or at least stay relevant without needing to take a few steps(years) back and reload.

Different ways to reach success in dynasty but for me personally I feel like the trades where I've been on side dealing off the older aging player whose value I fear is about to fall off has been almost universally nothing but success. I used to never be the kind of person who bought players like this but did a few times in last 2 seasons and I would label those moves as a universal failure.

  • Like 1
  • Love 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Chad Parsons said:

12tm 1QB

Trey Sermon (post-drafting), 22 2nd, 22 3rd (later projection)

FOR

Tyler Lockett, 22 1st (mid?)

Free rental of Lockett, essentially.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, menobrown said:

I would respectfully argue trading players like Hopkins before it's to late  is exactly how you win a ton of titles or at least stay relevant without needing to take a few steps(years) back and reload.

Different ways to reach success in dynasty but for me personally I feel like the trades where I've been on side dealing off the older aging player whose value I fear is about to fall off has been almost universally nothing but success. I used to never be the kind of person who bought players like this but did a few times in last 2 seasons and I would label those moves as a universal failure.

My experience has been the exact opposite.  While other owners are going after the shiny new toys every year I pick up the above average aging vets and continue to be in contention year after year.  This is by not necessarily giving up 1st round capital but picks for proven serviceable vets.  

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Gally said:

My experience has been the exact opposite.  While other owners are going after the shiny new toys every year I pick up the above average aging vets and continue to be in contention year after year.  This is by not necessarily giving up 1st round capital but picks for proven serviceable vets.  

Recycling aging studs for young studs doesn't have to be about shiny rookies. For example, FantasyPros dynasty consensus rankings has DHop ahead of proven 22 year old Ceedee Lamb, straight up. Lamb's coming off a 1000 yard rookie season. Sure, your production takes a hit in the current year, but you come out ahead the following six years. Then when Ceedee is 29 and others in the fantasy community still consider him young and immune to regression like current day DHop, you trade him to them for the next 22 year old stud.

It's how monster teams get built and you never rebuild, because you just reload.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Edgar said:

Recycling aging studs for young studs doesn't have to be about shiny rookies. For example, FantasyPros dynasty consensus rankings has DHop ahead of proven 22 year old Ceedee Lamb, straight up. Lamb's coming off a 1000 yard rookie season. Sure, your production takes a hit in the current year, but you come out ahead the following six years. Then when Ceedee is 29 and others in the fantasy community still consider him young and immune to regression like current day DHop, you trade him to them for the next 22 year old stud.

It's how monster teams get built and you never rebuild, because you just reload.

Great in theory, but who is dealing Ceedee for anything other than top 5 asset value? Probably top 3. I agree if you can flip DHop for Ceedee do it. 

I tried to do something similar in making a deal on draft day for the guy who took Etienne. Now that he had RB depth I made an offer for Akers but he had no interest in moving him. We ended up making the deal for the unknown ETN. Everyone knows that the year 2 guy who has already shown is more valuable than a pick or an aging vet. They are the top commodity in dynasty.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Edgar said:

Recycling aging studs for young studs doesn't have to be about shiny rookies. For example, FantasyPros dynasty consensus rankings has DHop ahead of proven 22 year old Ceedee Lamb, straight up. Lamb's coming off a 1000 yard rookie season. Sure, your production takes a hit in the current year, but you come out ahead the following six years. Then when Ceedee is 29 and others in the fantasy community still consider him young and immune to regression like current day DHop, you trade him to them for the next 22 year old stud.

It's how monster teams get built and you never rebuild, because you just reload.

This can be done in multiple ways.  You really need to find a balance but most owners don't.  Guys that always search for youth and playing for next year perpetually do that and never play for this year.  The best owners find the balance between youth and veterans and always stay in the top of the standings.  In my experience the teams that always trade the still relevant DHop for the rookie tend to be disappointed by the rookies early on because instead of them being a complimentary piece they expect top 10 production right from the get go (which rarely happens) so they move on because the player wasn't was expected.  My success has been driven by looking at shorter windows (2 yrs) and treating it a lot like a redraft by increasing the acquisition of guys like DHop or underperforming rookies that have changed situations (new QB, new position, new team, veteran leaving, etc).  The dynasty mentality of 5 yr windows or always needing the rookies tends to lead to owners always playing for next year (which never comes).  

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, tombonneau said:

Great in theory, but who is dealing Ceedee for anything other than top 5 asset value? Probably top 3. I agree if you can flip DHop for Ceedee do it. 

I tried to do something similar in making a deal on draft day for the guy who took Etienne. Now that he had RB depth I made an offer for Akers but he had no interest in moving him. We ended up making the deal for the unknown ETN. Everyone knows that the year 2 guy who has already shown is more valuable than a pick or an aging vet. They are the top commodity in dynasty.

This feeds into my point.  It is much easier to get the aging veteran that still has value in the current year because people want the shiny new toy so the value is so much better.  This is where the balance comes in.  If you can get the Lamb/Akers for reasonable prices of course you do it unfortunately that very rarely happens.  The key is finding the disappointing 2nd/3rd year guys that have a reason to improve and getting them at a discount. That is where you get true value.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

Not involved 12 Team 1 QB 0.5 PPR / 1.0 PPR TE

Team A gave up QB R Tannehill & 2022 1st 

Team B gave up 2.01 

Note:  Team A is 2020 Champ, has 1.12 pick and Buff QB Josh Allen (& Jimmy G) 

 

Edit to add additional trade just occured.... I am involved... 1-3 RB / 2-5 WR 

I gave up Phil RB Miles Sanders

I got Balt WR Hollywood Brown, 2022 1st (from above Team A gave up) & 4.04 pick 

Edited by Birdie048
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Chad Parsons said:

12tm 1QB

Trey Sermon (post-drafting), 22 2nd, 22 3rd (later projection)

FOR

Tyler Lockett, 22 1st (mid?)

Sermon and Lockett have similar ADP’s based on DLF so this is an almost free upgrade to a nice 1st next year IMO. Even if their ADPs head in opposite directions by this time next year, mid-1sts have a lot of trade value in season and have a nice shot of easily turning into early 1sts with just a key injury or under-performing player.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, Chad Parsons said:

12tm 1QB

Trey Sermon (post-drafting), 22 2nd, 22 3rd (later projection)

FOR

Tyler Lockett, 22 1st (mid?)

I like Sermon and I think he goes in the top 10 in a lot of drafts so I don't see much issue with this if you believe in him in SF as that is a great place for a RB if he takes over.  This seems pretty fair to me as I don't see Lockett with a ton of value personally.  He is way too hit or miss for me to like having him in my lineup.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, menobrown said:

I would respectfully argue trading players like Hopkins before it's to late  is exactly how you win a ton of titles or at least stay relevant without needing to take a few steps(years) back and reload.

Different ways to reach success in dynasty but for me personally I feel like the trades where I've been on side dealing off the older aging player whose value I fear is about to fall off has been almost universally nothing but success. I used to never be the kind of person who bought players like this but did a few times in last 2 seasons and I would label those moves as a universal failure.

I agree in a lot of situations personally but some players last longer than others and the deal has to be right.  Selling a 29 year old Tyler Lockett is different than selling a soon to be 29 year old D-Hop. 

I just feel that some aging players are worth more than a mid-1st and Hopkins is one of those guys.  Just my take but yes knowing "when" to sell vets in dynasty can help you win titles but selling them just to get a 1st round pick when the value isn't right isn't the way to win to me.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, IHEARTFF said:

.5 ppr start 4-5 WR

A got 1.3

B got Dak, Julio

I like the talent at 1.3 but Dak and Julio going to a good team can win a chip this year and that is what we play for.  Feels like team A could have got more for those 2 players but that is a high end asset.  I like it for Team B, especially when they raise the trophy this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 tm sf

gave 2.8 2.12 and 3.02

got 2.01 and 4.07

Came up and took Mac Jones with the pick, may yet trade him but 2.8 is a danger zone for me. You are hoping Marshall falls there or you are taking Toney just on capital.  Could still move Jones as I have Dak, Deshaun and Matt Ryan, but never anything wrong with having starting qb depth.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some trades in my leagues past few days and I'm not involved in any, thought they were all varying degrees of terrible.

FFPC:

Team A gave: Najee Harris

Team B gave: Terry McLaurin, Mike Williams, Firkser, Amon St. Brown and 6th in 2022.

Not FFPC, 12 team, single PPR, QRRWWTFF

Team A gave: 2022#1 (was pick 3 last year)

Team B got: 2.2 and 2.3

***Team B already had pick 2.4 and proceeded to pick Gainwell and Herbert  with the picks they got and Lawrence at 2.4****

Team A(same team A as above) gave: Deshaun Watson and Mecole Hardman

Team B gave: a 4th round pick and Gronk.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, menobrown said:

Some trades in my leagues past few days and I'm not involved in any, thought they were all varying degrees of terrible.

FFPC:

Team A gave: Najee Harris

Team B gave: Terry McLaurin, Mike Williams, Firkser, Amon St. Brown and 6th in 2022.

Not FFPC, 12 team, single PPR, QRRWWTFF

Team A gave: 2022#1 (was pick 3 last year)

Team B got: 2.2 and 2.3

***Team B already had pick 2.4 and proceeded to pick Gainwell and Herbert  with the picks they got and Lawrence at 2.4****

Team A(same team A as above) gave: Deshaun Watson and Mecole Hardman

Team B gave: a 4th round pick and Gronk.

I'm not a fan of any of these at all.  I know people like Scary Terry and I do think St. Brown has some upside but that is a bunch of pennies for Harris in the 1st.

The 2nd was terrible.  I would never give a 1st for those picks personally if there was any chance that 1st would be high.  Gainwell and Herbert don't have a ton of value right now in the places they ended up.

I also don't think that is anywhere near enough for Watson.  He is elite and won't miss more than this year (if he misses the entire thing).  Gronk and a 4th just doesn't move the needle at all for me.  These are the type of trades I hate to see in my leagues.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Jonesin For Some Football said:

I also don't think that is anywhere near enough for Watson.  He is elite and won't miss more than this year (if he misses the entire thing).  Gronk and a 4th just doesn't move the needle at all for me.  These are the type of trades I hate to see in my leagues.

I thought this was the worst trade of all. Gronk is close to worthless,  Hardman alone worth a 4 IMO so this is free Watson. Also think at most Watson misses this year but I actually lean on him being cleared to play at some point in 2021 if he wants to but regardless he's at most a year away.

The trade of his #1 used to pick those RB's is awful but at least they got a shot. Of course he could have just not picked Lawrence(he has Justin Herbert so was ok without Watson for awhile), and picked Gainwell at 2.4. He'd have retained his #1 in 2022, still had Watson.  In essence in a one start QB league he gave up Watson and his 2022#1 for Lawrence and Khalil Herbert. Oof.

This is a 10+ year old league  and I called him out for it during the draft and rest of the league left me hanging like I was the bad guy.

The Najee trade is also bad but that's one weird situation with that team. That team is on it's 4th owner already this off-season. I don't know what's up with the team but I think one of the guys who runs Dynasty Depot was owner 3, he drafted Najee, sold the team a few days after. So at least it's not as bad as picking Najee 1.1 and dealing him off but the whole thing is kind of odd.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Birdie048 said:

Edit to add additional trade just occured.... I am involved... 1-3 RB / 2-5 WR 

I gave up Phil RB Miles Sanders

I got Balt WR Hollywood Brown, 2022 1st (from above Team A gave up) & 4.04 pick 

Depending on the pick it could be okay, but I do like Miles Sanders.  I think he has great speed and if he can stay healthy + better QB play (I know that isn't guaranteed) - he could be a RB1.  I think there could have been a better WR for you than Marquise Brown.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A controversial trade went down in one of my FFPC leagues.  Some of the other owners protested it but FFPC upheld it.

Team A gets:  CeeDee Lamb, DJ Moore, Jonnu Smith, 2022 6th, 2022 7th

Team B gets: Allen Robinson, Amari Cooper, Darren Waller, Deebo Samuel, 2022 2nd, 2022 4th

This kind of fits in with the discussion above about trading players before they fall off the cliff but IMO this is an example of somebody giving up way too much to try to reload with younger players.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Gottabesweet changed the title to ****OFFICIAL 2021 IN- SEASON DYNASTY TRADES****

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
  • Create New...