Jump to content
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

****OFFICIAL 2021 OFF- SEASON DYNASTY TRADES****


Recommended Posts

15 hours ago, Dez said:

12 team DFWC PPR.  Pending your view of these 2 polarizing players will be the reason you side for 1 or the other.  I can see it both ways.

Montgomery

for

Hyde

2018 2nd (projects to be late)

 

15 hours ago, FreeBaGeL said:

Hyde generally has a little more value straight up.  I prefer hyde, so I'd definitely take that side along with the pick.  Could definitely go either way in the end though.

I'm surprised to hear that. I've not been paying a lot of attention to dynasty ADP but in redraft Monty is for sure consistently going over Hyde. Hyde normally in 5th round range, Montgomery in 4th round range and he's younger and seems to have more support from his current coaching staff. I believe you, just surprised.

12 hours ago, -OZ- said:

I think the pick is on the wrong side.  But I'm delusional enough to think Hyde will be a high rb2. Not real big on monty.

 

I am part owner of the  team that gave up Monty. I think my co-owner has a preference for Hyde, I prefer Montgomery straight up but still was 100% good with the trade. We did one of those startup and collect first round pick jobs last year and ended up with not only 12 of the first 15 picks but 1-6 and the league is determined to try and not let it work for us.  I'd say more  than half the league openly discusses on the league MB  to collude against us an not trade with us, worst league mates I've ever encountered. Colluding in plain site. Their rational on not trading with us is because we had so many draft picks our roster is deep and we have tough cuts so they are all saying we are dumb to have collected so many picks(I've never heard that before) and if no one trades with us we'll be forced to cut quality players.

Because we had so many picks we own most of this years rookie RB class, all the one's we wanted anyway. So we have been trying to trim roster space and Monty was ideal candidate to move but no one was paying much for him in this league. So while I personally prefer Montgomery I was good with the trade because I felt the assets of Hyde/second would be easier to move then the asset of Montgomery which had like one buyer interested, the guy that bought him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, barackdhouse said:

12 team PPR

Team A - Martavis, 2018 5th

Team B - John Ross, 2018 2nd (mid to late)

Martavis easy for me because I know he's good, ready to put in your lineup right now today and while he carries off the field risk I feel like Ross carries a lot of on the field injury risk that would worry me every bit as much.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, menobrown said:

I'd say more  than half the league openly discusses on the league MB  to collude against us an not trade with us, worst league mates I've ever encountered. Colluding in plain site. Their rational on not trading with us is because we had so many draft picks our roster is deep and we have tough cuts so they are all saying we are dumb to have collected so many picks(I've never heard that before) and if no one trades with us we'll be forced to cut quality players.

 

Wow, that's pretty crappy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, menobrown said:

 I'd say more  than half the league openly discusses on the league MB  to collude against us an not trade with us, worst league mates I've ever encountered. Colluding in plain site. Their rational on not trading with us is because we had so many draft picks our roster is deep and we have tough cuts so they are all saying we are dumb to have collected so many picks(I've never heard that before) and if no one trades with us we'll be forced to cut quality players.

They are right, up until one of them realizes they can wait until the last minute and break rank and get great deals.  Because you will be overloaded, and you will have tough cuts.  If I were in that league I would totally lead that charge publicly and immediately contact you direct and work out a bunch of last minute trades.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Hankmoody said:

They are right, up until one of them realizes they can wait until the last minute and break rank and get great deals.  Because you will be overloaded, and you will have tough cuts.  If I were in that league I would totally lead that charge publicly and immediately contact you direct and work out a bunch of last minute trades.

No offense but I think doing anything publicly where you try and unite forces with other league members or suggest leagues members unite is collusion and I disdain it feel it's not in the spirit of this hobby. I'll also add, at least when it comes to me, colluding against me is not the best way to ever think I'm going to cut you a good deal on a potential cut. I'd rather just cut someone and make you bid on him with the rest of the colluders and if that is cutting off my nose to save my face so be it.

As for them being right I have tried to impress upon them that they are are welcome to submit blind bids on our scraps after we cut them and drain their FA money competing against each other or deal with us reasonably and if they don't someone else likely will so their choice. Either way having to many good players is a good problem to have, those jackals keep laughing at us like we screwed ourselves having to many good players and it's the strangest thought process I've ever seen.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, menobrown said:

No offense but I think doing anything publicly where you try and unite forces with other league members or suggest leagues members unite is collusion and I disdain it feel it's not in the spirit of this hobby. I'll also add, at least when it comes to me, colluding against me is not the best way to ever think I'm going to cut you a good deal on a potential cut. I'd rather just cut someone and make you bid on him with the rest of the colluders and if that is cutting off my nose to save my face so be it.

As for them being right I have tried to impress upon them that they are are welcome to submit blind bids on our scraps after we cut them and drain their FA money competing against each other or deal with us reasonably and if they don't someone else likely will so their choice. Either way having to many good players is a good problem to have, those jackals keep laughing at us like we screwed ourselves having to many good players and it's the strangest thought process I've ever seen.

 

Meno, is this an FFPC league? I so, I hope you are beating their asses every year.

On one hand if it isn't specifically prohibited in the rules, (defined as collusion) it is difficult to raise objections.

On the other hand, I see no upside in participating in that type of discussion on a message. It will only foster bad blood, making it more difficult to negotiate with the targeted owner in the future. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, menobrown said:

No offense but I think doing anything publicly where you try and unite forces with other league members or suggest leagues members unite is collusion and I disdain it feel it's not in the spirit of this hobby. I'll also add, at least when it comes to me, colluding against me is not the best way to ever think I'm going to cut you a good deal on a potential cut. I'd rather just cut someone and make you bid on him with the rest of the colluders and if that is cutting off my nose to save my face so be it.

As for them being right I have tried to impress upon them that they are are welcome to submit blind bids on our scraps after we cut them and drain their FA money competing against each other or deal with us reasonably and if they don't someone else likely will so their choice. Either way having to many good players is a good problem to have, those jackals keep laughing at us like we screwed ourselves having to many good players and it's the strangest thought process I've ever seen.

 

Maybe my tone didn't come through, but my post was all about the gamesmanship of it.  "Heck yeah, we should totally cut them out" "psst, I'll be shooting you an offer out in a moment".  They might be right that you have a surplus and will have tough cuts, but they are kidding themselves if they think banding together like that will do any good.

I wouldn't condone a serious attempt at collusion like that.  My tone probably didn't come through because I don't take something like that seriously.  My guess is that this group doesn't have a lot of experience with this type of league because this kind of thing can't be successful because someone will always break the picket line.  I would be all about the few that think they can pull it off to fool themselves and stay out of it - they are only hurting themselves by not creating more competition for me/us and raising the prices. 

And you're right, even if it goes that way and you end up cutting guys, there is going to be blood in the water on the waiver bidding - and probably overpaying to make sure they win the bid compared to what they could have gotten in a trade.  Their attempt to cut you out will end up hurting them collectively more than it will you.  That kind of folly is hard for me to see as a legit threat.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, barackdhouse said:

12 team PPR

Team A - Martavis, 2018 5th

Team B - John Ross, 2018 2nd (mid to late)

Rebuild, competing, or otherwise..easy side to Bryant (and Ross was higher on my board than most boards). 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Hankmoody said:

Maybe my tone didn't come through, but my post was all about the gamesmanship of it.  "Heck yeah, we should totally cut them out" "psst, I'll be shooting you an offer out in a moment".  They might be right that you have a surplus and will have tough cuts, but they are kidding themselves if they think banding together like that will do any good.

I wouldn't condone a serious attempt at collusion like that.  My tone probably didn't come through because I don't take something like that seriously.  My guess is that this group doesn't have a lot of experience with this type of league because this kind of thing can't be successful because someone will always break the picket line.  I would be all about the few that think they can pull it off to fool themselves and stay out of it - they are only hurting themselves by not creating more competition for me/us and raising the prices. 

And you're right, even if it goes that way and you end up cutting guys, there is going to be blood in the water on the waiver bidding - and probably overpaying to make sure they win the bid compared to what they could have gotten in a trade.  Their attempt to cut you out will end up hurting them collectively more than it will you.  That kind of folly is hard for me to see as a legit threat.

I'm sorry, I was really not trying to single you out or make you feel need to explain.

You are right someone will always break the picket line. In fact someone did during the rookie draft and it was a huge relief. It really solved the lions share of our cut problems and now just need to trim a few more and we got a whole training camp of hype to do that. And the league was high pissed when the guy dealt with us, especially when he was one of the teams saying to not deal with us to he kind of used your strategy, well in fact they all have. Every single one of them who said publicly not to deal with us made us offers but most are one sided thinking they got us bent over the barrel but we got a fair offer and jumped on it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, menobrown said:

I'm sorry, I was really not trying to single you out or make you feel need to explain.

You are right someone will always break the picket line. In fact someone did during the rookie draft and it was a huge relief. It really solved the lions share of our cut problems and now just need to trim a few more and we got a whole training camp of hype to do that. And the league was high pissed when the guy dealt with us, especially when he was one of the teams saying to not deal with us to he kind of used your strategy, well in fact they all have. Every single one of them who said publicly not to deal with us made us offers but most are one sided thinking they got us bent over the barrel but we got a fair offer and jumped on it.

It's all good.  My original post could have been miscontrued so the clarification was needed anyway.  I was just amused that people actually think that a bunch of players could ever hold out like that.  Funny to hear that their "attempt" didn't last the first wave of opportunity.  If they aren't idiots they will realize that they can't win a stalemate because no owner worth his salt is going to let it get to that.  I post in every league, at every cut deadline "PM me your cuts, one man's trash, yadda yadda" because I know I can get bargains easier there than I can in a FAAB competition. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, menobrown said:

I'm sorry, I was really not trying to single you out or make you feel need to explain.

You are right someone will always break the picket line. In fact someone did during the rookie draft and it was a huge relief. It really solved the lions share of our cut problems and now just need to trim a few more and we got a whole training camp of hype to do that. And the league was high pissed when the guy dealt with us, especially when he was one of the teams saying to not deal with us to he kind of used your strategy, well in fact they all have. Every single one of them who said publicly not to deal with us made us offers but most are one sided thinking they got us bent over the barrel but we got a fair offer and jumped on it.

It's always fun when half the league gangs up against your team.  Happened in two out of my three FFPC leagues. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Some trades I'm not involved in any

Joe Williams for Kevin White (0.5 PPR)

Duke Johnson for Theo Riddick (0.5 PPR)

Jarvis Landry for 1.6 (Perine) (0.5 PPR)

LeSean McCoy for Tevin Coleman (0.5 PPR)

Elliott for David Johnson and Carlos Hyde (1 PPR)

Landry for Enuwa, Reed (1 PPR)

Crowell for DeMarco, Gabriel, late 2018 2nd (no PPR)

Melvin Gordon for Crowell, mid 2018 1st (1 PPR)

1.1 (Fournette), 2018 4th for Allen Robinson, 1.7 (OJ Howard), 2019 2nd

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, thriftyrocker said:

Some trades I'm not involved in any

Joe Williams for Kevin White (0.5 PPR)

Duke Johnson for Theo Riddick (0.5 PPR)

Jarvis Landry for 1.6 (Perine) (0.5 PPR)

LeSean McCoy for Tevin Coleman (0.5 PPR)

Elliott for David Johnson and Carlos Hyde (1 PPR)

Landry for Enuwa, Reed (1 PPR)

Crowell for DeMarco, Gabriel, late 2018 2nd (no PPR)

Melvin Gordon for Crowell, mid 2018 1st (1 PPR)

1.1 (Fournette), 2018 4th for Allen Robinson, 1.7 (OJ Howard), 2019 2nd

Wow.  Since when is Zeke worth that much more than DJ to have to add Hyde?  Steal for whoever got DJ and Hyde

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Sitch said:

Wow.  Since when is Zeke worth that much more than DJ to have to add Hyde?  Steal for whoever got DJ and Hyde

I don't think it's bad.  They are a toss up short term and Elliott is 3.5 years younger.  Paying Hyde for that extra 3.5 years of youth isn't a bad move.

Elliott - 7/22/95

DJ - 12/16/91

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, ILUVBEER99 said:

I don't think it's bad.  They are a toss up short term and Elliott is 3.5 years younger.  Paying Hyde for that extra 3.5 years of youth isn't a bad move.

Elliott - 7/22/95

DJ - 12/16/91

Agree the age is a big factor plus you have to factor in stuff like Palmer is very much year to year and that's a concern for DJ if they have an issue getting a quality replacement because running against a stacked box was one of his few weak area's last year. Meanwhile I think Dallas keeps the main core of their OL intact for at least most if not all of the duration of Elliot's rookie deal which means you are likely looking at 4 more years of running behind a dominant OL.

 Hyde would not close the DJ gap on Elliot for me.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, ILUVBEER99 said:

I don't think it's bad.  They are a toss up short term and Elliott is 3.5 years younger.  Paying Hyde for that extra 3.5 years of youth isn't a bad move.

Elliott - 7/22/95

DJ - 12/16/91

They are not a toss-up in the short-term imo.  They are a toss-up overall because Elliot is 3.5 years younger.  The youth advantage is already factored in to their value being equal and is the only reason DJ isn't way ahead.

DJ outscored Elliot by 80 points last year.  Or to put it another way, the point difference between DJ and Elliot was the same as the point difference between Elliot and Mark Ingram.

Edited by FreeBaGeL
  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, FreeBaGeL said:

They are not a toss-up in the short-term imo.  They are a toss-up overall because Elliot is 3.5 years younger.  The youth advantage is already factored in to their value being equal and is the only reason DJ isn't way ahead.

DJ outscored Elliot by 80 points last year.  Or to put it another way, the point difference between DJ and Elliot was the same as the point difference between Elliot and Mark Ingram.

Elliot put up almost 2k total yards in 15 games his rookie season.

I'd put the FF betting line at about 60/40 in favor of DJ, but wouldn't be surprised one bit if Elliott outscored him.  So basically a toss up IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, FreeBaGeL said:

They are not a toss-up in the short-term imo.  They are a toss-up overall because Elliot is 3.5 years younger.  The youth advantage is already factored in to their value being equal and is the only reason DJ isn't way ahead.

DJ outscored Elliot by 80 points last year.  Or to put it another way, the point difference between DJ and Elliot was the same as the point difference between Elliot and Mark Ingram.

 

It's not quite a toss up for 2017 but it's about as close as you can get. I got Bell/DJ as 1A/1b and Elliot #3.

Last year was last year and  I also think Elliot will be better this season, especially as a receiving threat, and I think the gap closes a good amount. ILUVBEER mentioned he'd put odds of Elliot outdoing him in the 40% range as well and that's about how I'd see it but I still won't call it dead even which means it's not a  toss up because I would take DJ for 2017.

Now you said short term, not necessarily 2017. If short terms is a two or three year window I'd either take Elliot straight up or at worse label it a true coin flip toss up. Why? Got a head coach battling some health issues and a QB and both top WR's who could all be gone after this season. To much unknown and instability is a concern for me especially when it impacts the passing game for a player who relies so heavily on his receiving.  Due to Bell's injury history and what I view as strong chance he hits UFA next season, even if I"m just talking the next 2-3 years, which for some is short term, I'd likely take Elliot over both of them and again at a minimum would categorize it as a toss up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 team -2 QB start, tiered PPR(.5 pt. for RB, 1 pt. WR,1.5 for TE) Dynasty league with IDP 

Team A is same team for all four trades

1) Team B received:

D Murray, D Henry, Paul Perkins, Shane Vereen, Calais Cambell and  2.2 

Team A relieved:

Tom Savage, Jonathan Stewart, Cameron Artis-Payne, Chris Ivory, Jerick McKinnon, Latavius Murray, Pierre Garçon, Stephon Tuitt & 1.5

2) Team B recieved: 

A. Dalton, A.J. McCarron, D. Baldwin, Jordan Reed, 4.2, 5.2 & 6.2

Team A recieved:

T.J. Yeldon, M.Thomas, 2018 1st rounder(likely 6-10 range)

3) Team B recieved:

Terrelle Pryor, Khalil Mack & 3.2

Team A recieved:

Ty Montgomery, Allen Hurns, Ben Heeney, 2.9, 5.9 & 8.9

4) Team B recieved: 

M. Bennett

Team A recieved:

Zach Brown 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, 32 Counter Pass said:

Team A gives L. Miller & D. Baldwin

Team B gives A. Abdullah & S. Diggs

Prefer Miller & Baldwin. But it's close, and don't fault anyone for wanting to take a chance on Abdullah since we haven't really seen him get much of a chance yet. Whereas Miller's ceiling is pretty well established at this point.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

FFPC  

Team A gives:
Antonio Brown (WR), PIT 
DeMarco Murray (RB), TEN 
Theo Riddick (RB), DET 
Samaje Perine (RB), WAS 
2018 2nd Round Draft Pick (expected to be late)

Team B gives:
Ezekiel Elliott (RB), DAL
Stefon Diggs (WR), MIN 
Jack Doyle (TE), IND 
Erik Swoope (TE), IND 

Edited by 32 Counter Pass
Added league context
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On July 12, 2017 at 3:09 PM, thriftyrocker said:

Some trades I'm not involved in any

Joe Williams for Kevin White (0.5 PPR)

Duke Johnson for Theo Riddick (0.5 PPR)

Jarvis Landry for 1.6 (Perine) (0.5 PPR)

LeSean McCoy for Tevin Coleman (0.5 PPR)

Elliott for David Johnson and Carlos Hyde (1 PPR)

Landry for Enuwa, Reed (1 PPR)

Crowell for DeMarco, Gabriel, late 2018 2nd (no PPR)

Melvin Gordon for Crowell, mid 2018 1st (1 PPR)

1.1 (Fournette), 2018 4th for Allen Robinson, 1.7 (OJ Howard), 2019 2nd

I'm going to go try and get Gordon of that right now. I have a feeling I'll be laughed at. But my first should be late (lost in the super bowl last year).

ETA: Insta reject :lol: 

Edited by Sebowski
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, 32 Counter Pass said:

FFPC  

Team A gives:
Antonio Brown (WR), PIT 
DeMarco Murray (RB), TEN 
Theo Riddick (RB), DET 
Samaje Perine (RB), WAS 
2018 2nd Round Draft Pick (expected to be late)

Team B gives:
Ezekiel Elliott (RB), DAL
Stefon Diggs (WR), MIN 
Jack Doyle (TE), IND 
Erik Swoope (TE), IND 

Zeke for me, but it's fair.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, jeaton6 said:

12 Team PPR

Gave: Burkhead/2018 1 (late)

Got: Martavis

I'm back on the train.

At that price I'll take Joes younger brother

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/10/2017 at 8:40 PM, barackdhouse said:

12 team PPR 

Team A - Juju, Paul Richardson

Team B - Carlos Henderson, D'Onta Foreman, 2018 3rd.

 

Then the same two teams swapped PRich back. With a 2018 3rd added on to get Rob Kelley.

So, in the end:

Juju and Kelley

Carlos, Foreman, two 2018 3rds

Edited by barackdhouse
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, 32 Counter Pass said:

FFPC  

Team A gives:
Antonio Brown (WR), PIT 
DeMarco Murray (RB), TEN 
Theo Riddick (RB), DET 
Samaje Perine (RB), WAS 
2018 2nd Round Draft Pick (expected to be late)

Team B gives:
Ezekiel Elliott (RB), DAL
Stefon Diggs (WR), MIN 
Jack Doyle (TE), IND 
Erik Swoope (TE), IND 

This is very close but I would probably go Zeke side

Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, Rebel Ted said:

Jordan Howard, Terelle Pryor, 1.05 for Odell Beckham and M. Sanu. 

ODB and the pick;

Although I can see a RB needy team doing the deal.  Overall, Howard (and the Bears) need to demonstrate some staying power before i do this deal.  Same for Pryor.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That ODB trade sounds pretty fair and if anything I'd prefer the ODB side.

I think that it's a good illustration on the advantages of trading up early in a startup dynasty draft.  In terms of picks in my league that trade would have been 1.12, 3.06, 4.11 for 1.04, 20.12.  From a picks standpoint most people would see that as a massive ripoff in favor of the side moving back to 1.12, but in terms of players people prefer the 1.04 side.  In reality, in a startup, you could trade up from 1.12 to 1.04 range for a lot less than your 3rd and 4th rounder and get one of the big 4 for far less than most people would deem acceptable when looking at the actual players.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Gottabesweet changed the title to ****OFFICIAL 2021 OFF- SEASON DYNASTY TRADES****

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...