Jump to content
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

****OFFICIAL 2021 OFF- SEASON DYNASTY TRADES****


Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, ILUVBEER99 said:

How is Guice a better prospect?  Fournette was drafted 4th overall in the NFL draft and showed top notch talent in the NFL.  

Pass catching alone makes me rank them almost the same. I still have Fournette ahead because of what he's proved so far but Guice is the better prospect to me with an all around game for fantasy purposes.  I have very little doubt that Guice will outproduce Fournette when he plays, the only difference is you have to wait to see Guice do it, but it will happen.

There was plenty of speculation on why Guice slipped to the 2nd.  So feel free to keep grasping at that, but there were plenty of people that do that sort of thing professionally to project their slot that had him as a 1st round guy, just like Fournette.  I liked Guice more as a prospect than Fournette before their draft position.  

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 34k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • menobrown

    1850

  • One More Rep

    1306

  • barackdhouse

    1167

  • FreeBaGeL

    1042

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

No, they won't accept

You mean it went down in a league you used to be in??  I’d go ful Vontae Davis on that league asap 

Barkley on this one, it isn't that close

2 minutes ago, Zyphros said:

I liked Guice more as a prospect than Fournette before their draft position.  

Fair, but you're one of the only ones that felt that way.  Fournette was a lock top 10 NFL draft pick before the draft.  Guice was a possible 1st round pick.

You could be right in the end, but very few had Guice on the same level coming into the draft.

Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, Zyphros said:

Guess I'm the only one that prefers Guice :shrug:.  He alone is a better prospect than Fournette (maybe that's where I differ than most) so adding a 1st to a rebuild plus the better player?  Sign me up.

Just for reference I did 1 FFPC startup this year Guice went 3.08 while Fournette went 1.12.  Basically a 3rd and 4th for a 1st in a startup draft, and I prefer 2 premier players I can find in the 20's-30's rather than 1 in the 1st.  

How is a random 2019 1st worth a 4th in a startup? Is that the standard going rate?

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

12 team ppr qrwwwftkd

Vardar gives up Rivers, Philip LAC QB and Year 2018 Draft Pick 4.03 and Year 2019 Round 1 Draft Pick from Vardar and Year 2019 Round 2 Draft Pick from Vardar
and icemen  gives up Wilson, Russell SEA QB and Year 2019 Round 3 Draft Pick from icemen  and Year 2019 Round 4 Draft Pick from icemen

picks are pretty random, both teams were playoff teams last season

 

Edited by jadensdad
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, jadensdad said:

12 team ppr qrwwwftkd

Vardar gives up Rivers, Philip LAC QB and Year 2018 Draft Pick 4.03 and Year 2019 Round 1 Draft Pick from Vardar and Year 2019 Round 2 Draft Pick from Vardar
and icemen  gives up Wilson, Russell SEA QB and Year 2019 Round 3 Draft Pick from icemen  and Year 2019 Round 4 Draft Pick from icemen

picks are pretty random, both teams were playoff teams last season

 

in a 1 qb league I'll take the 1st and 2nd round picks

easily actually. even if the 1st is low

Edited by Dr. Dan
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
11 hours ago, kutta said:

How is a random 2019 1st worth a 4th in a startup? Is that the standard going rate?

 

7 hours ago, JPeso said:

Agreed. Random 1st is worth more like a 6th/7th than 4th. 

In my experience in FFPC future 1sts are usually 4th-6th in startup drafts.  Usually what happens is the team giving up those 1sts are selling out for year 1 so they tend to be later 1sts.  I might be a bit off with that and if they are late, I could see how it's closer to the 6th than 4th so that makes sense.  

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
On 8/17/2018 at 1:15 PM, Aunt Jemima said:

FFPC today, Team A is probable playoff team competing for this year, Team B is rebuilding

Team A gives Guice and Team A's 2019 1st

Team B gives Fournette

So a rebuilding team traded away sure fire stud second year RB? I like Guice a lot but we can’t say for sure he can play at this level and that first is likely to be late.

At best this may turn out to be a wash.

Link to post
Share on other sites
16 hours ago, Raback said:

I prefer Guice as a player to Fournette as well.  The team situations come into play as well here.  If he is rebuilding Fournette is only going to hurt his draft pick so getting Guice for next year while improving his own draft pick is a win 

Having one good player isn’t going to hurt a rebuild. I mean even when rebuilding you should have a couple of good young players on your team or your rebuild is going to be a long undertaking.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
41 minutes ago, Zyphros said:

 

In my experience in FFPC future 1sts are usually 4th-6th in startup drafts.  Usually what happens is the team giving up those 1sts are selling out for year 1 so they tend to be later 1sts.  I might be a bit off with that and if they are late, I could see how it's closer to the 6th than 4th so that makes sense.  

I’m sure it happened, so not disputing it. More didn’t see it a lot. was more used to seeing 4th for 8th or 9th + 2019 1st. 

I had Guice and Fournette close before the injury. But i think LF will have bigger trade value come W6 then in the offseason assuming he’s healthy. Inevitably, 1-2 teams who want to compete will come knocking with a better package than that. Maybe I’m wrong. But pretty sure I’d be knocking on the door and pony up more than that if my other RBs were underperforming. And keep in mind I do really like Guice but a lost year is a lost year and to the teams in the playoffs Fournette will carry a lot more trade value. 

Edited by JPeso
Link to post
Share on other sites
17 hours ago, Zyphros said:

Pass catching alone makes me rank them almost the same. I still have Fournette ahead because of what he's proved so far but Guice is the better prospect to me with an all around game for fantasy purposes.  I have very little doubt that Guice will outproduce Fournette when he plays, the only difference is you have to wait to see Guice do it, but it will happen.

There was plenty of speculation on why Guice slipped to the 2nd.  So feel free to keep grasping at that, but there were plenty of people that do that sort of thing professionally to project their slot that had him as a 1st round guy, just like Fournette.  I liked Guice more as a prospect than Fournette before their draft position.  

Even before Guice slipped he was never considered anywhere near a top 5 pick.  Mocks before any of the off the field stuff came out had him anywhere from mid 1st to mid 2nd, which is very different than #4 overall.

Obviously everyone can feel differently about prospects but from a consensus standpoint as NFL prospects they weren't even close.  Receiving ability can certainly change things for fantasy purposes but it's not like we're talking McCaffrey vs. Jordan Howard here.  Guice was used even less as a receiver than Fournette in college and Fournette already has an NFL season with pretty solid receiving numbers under his belt.  His 16 game pace was 45 catches last year.  Are you really expecting Guice in Washington to exceed that very often?

Edited by FreeBaGeL
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, JPeso said:

I’m sure it happened, so not disputing it. More didn’t see it a lot. was more used to seeing 4th for 8th or 9th + 2019 1st. 

Yeah, standard going rate at least in FFPC startups I've been in is a startup 6th for a future 1st, or startup 5th for a future 1st+2nd.  This is so ironed out in the FFPC startups I've done that when people are doing startup trades in FFPC leagues I've been in they literally plug the value of the future 1st into trade calculators as pick 6.07.

Edited by FreeBaGeL
  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, FreeBaGeL said:

Even before Guice slipped he was never considered anywhere near a top 5 pick.  Mocks before any of the off the field stuff came out had him anywhere from mid 1st to mid 2nd, which is very different than #4 overall.

Obviously everyone can feel differently about prospects but from a consensus standpoint as NFL prospects they weren't even close.  Receiving ability can certainly change things for fantasy purposes but it's not like we're talking McCaffrey vs. Jordan Howard here.  Guice was used even less as a receiver than Fournette in college and Fournette already has an NFL season with pretty solid receiving numbers under his belt.  His 16 game pace was 45 catches last year.  Are you really expecting Guice in Washington to exceed that very often?

Maybe not, but in reality the Jags are stupid enough to take Fournette that high as well.  No RB should go that high in a draft.  Ever.  Saquon is the best RB prospect EVER, and he shouldn't have gone that high either.  I don't put much stock into how high Fournette went, because I view that as a dumb choice.

The simple answer?  Yes I do expect Guice to outperform Fournette in receiving regularly.  Chris Thompson will be 28 by next seasons start (almost 29), and there really isn't much of a receiving threat on that team to take targets away, at least right now.  I fully expect that offense to revolve around Guice in the future.  A lot depends on what they do in the draft for the next ~2 years but he's a centerpiece for sure, and if I get another 1st in return, it doesn't even make this a question for me.  I wouldn't take Fournette in the 1st myself and view him roughly at 15-18 overall so I guess that gap is smaller.  

Link to post
Share on other sites
49 minutes ago, JPeso said:

FFPC, both rosters stacked up. 

Team A Gave Christian Kirk, Ronald Jones

Team B Gave Mike Williams, Ian Thomas

Not a Ronald Jones fan but I prefer Kirk to Williams so I’d take Team B’s side easily 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Non-ppr league with decent sized bonuses for yardage milestones (5 pts for 100 yards and 5 pts for every 50 after that) and long TDs. In general, high volume RBs are very valuable as they consistently score better than other positions

Team A receives: Melvin Gordon/Jordy Nelson/Cameron Meredith

Team B receives: Tyreek Hill

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, gianmarco said:

Non-ppr league with decent sized bonuses for yardage milestones (5 pts for 100 yards and 5 pts for every 50 after that) and long TDs. In general, high volume RBs are very valuable as they consistently score better than other positions

Team A receives: Melvin Gordon/Jordy Nelson/Cameron Meredith

Team B receives: Tyreek Hill

 

In this format it was like Gordon would be the stand alone and the Hill side would be adding pieces. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
59 minutes ago, msudaisy26 said:

In this format it was like Gordon would be the stand alone and the Hill side would be adding pieces. 

Hard to say without knowing the bonuses for long TDs.  Tyreek blows everyone else in the league away in that category while Gordon has one 50+ yard TD in his entire career.

Link to post
Share on other sites
19 minutes ago, FreeBaGeL said:

Hard to say without knowing the bonuses for long TDs.  Tyreek blows everyone else in the league away in that category while Gordon has one 50+ yard TD in his entire career.

Without going into full scoring specifics, Hill was WR3 in this league last year at ~15 PPG. Melvin was RB5 also at ~15 PPG.

Only 6 WRs were over 12 PPG.

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, dwyadog said:

Dynasty

LeSean McCoy Allen Robinson and 2019 2nd (likely late)

for melvin Gordon 

12 team ppr.

Gordon.

And I’m not a Gordon fan, but I’m less of a Robinson fan.

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, FreeBaGeL said:

Cooks by a good bit for me. 

Not a Cooks fan so I would not pay a first and second for him. Having said that, I don't think that's a good exit price for him if that makes any sense. Probably doesn't. Said another way: not sure there is a strong market for him.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Cooks is one of those guys like Cooper and Jordan Howard- you like them or you don't. Hard to find a good market for him, and no one is ready to over-pay or even pay going rate for any of those it seems. 

 

As a fellow Cooks seller myself, I feel like this is similar to what I got, and I felt like I got a great deal. Considering next year's WR crop I am liking the pick side to that trade

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, Dr. Dan said:

Cooks is one of those guys like Cooper and Jordan Howard- you like them or you don't. Hard to find a good market for him, and no one is ready to over-pay or even pay going rate for any of those it seems. 

 

As a fellow Cooks seller myself, I feel like this is similar to what I got, and I felt like I got a great deal. Considering next year's WR crop I am liking the pick side to that trade

Any WR from next years class would be lucky to put up the numbers Cooks has in his first four seasons. 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, JackReacher said:

Many believe LAR won’t present the passing opps as NO and NE

They traded a first round pick and signed him to a mega contract. That doesn’t sound like the actions of a team that didn’t plan to use him and the Rams had the league’s top offense last season.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Dr. Octopus said:

They traded a first round pick and signed him to a mega contract. That doesn’t sound like the actions of a team that didn’t plan to use him and the Rams had the league’s top offense last season.

 

Top offense for sure, but if looking at raw passing attempts:

2017 Rams 518

2017 Pats 587

2016 Saints 674

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, JackReacher said:

Top offense for sure, but if looking at raw passing attempts:

2017 Rams 518

2017 Pats 587

2016 Saints 674

That was Goff’s second year starting. That could/should increase and I can’t imagine him not being at least the second most targeted player. Pats and Saints spread the ball around a lot (although Cooks did get plenty of targets).

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
30 minutes ago, Dr. Octopus said:

Any WR from next years class would be lucky to put up the numbers Cooks has in his first four seasons. 

next years class is quite exceptional where a late pick could be very high talent. I'm not saying cooks is garbage but I see a lot of potential studs in next years class. 

I'm someone who doesnt really think cooks is better than what he is, but that doesnt make him a bad wr, just a great wr2

Link to post
Share on other sites
44 minutes ago, Dr. Dan said:

next years class is quite exceptional where a late pick could be very high talent. I'm not saying cooks is garbage but I see a lot of potential studs in next years class. 

I'm someone who doesnt really think cooks is better than what he is, but that doesnt make him a bad wr, just a great wr2

I stand behind my statement. It doesnt matter how exceptional the class looks right now - frankly its too far away to even make any definitve statements, but even if Cooks is only a great wr2, the odds are stacked against landing a great wr2 with any random first.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Dr. Octopus said:

I stand behind my statement. It doesnt matter how exceptional the class looks right now - frankly its too far away to even make any definitve statements, but even if Cooks is only a great wr2, the odds are stacked against landing a great wr2 with any random first.

true. not a bad point. chances are the pick busts

Link to post
Share on other sites
11 hours ago, lardonastick said:

Non-ppr, start 1-2-3-1

John Brown

for

3.08

I’ll take my chances with Brown. Lots of positive buzz around him and he looks like he may have the injuries under control. It’s pretty hard to find a guy like him at 3.08.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Gottabesweet changed the title to ****OFFICIAL 2021 OFF- SEASON DYNASTY TRADES****

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...