JohnnyU
Footballguy
I’ll take the 1.7 if the 2022 1st is projected late.12 team PPR. 1 qb.
gave: 1.07, 2022 2nd
got: 1.11, 2022 1st
I’ll take the 1.7 if the 2022 1st is projected late.12 team PPR. 1 qb.
gave: 1.07, 2022 2nd
got: 1.11, 2022 1st
Having a hard time thinking why you'd want to move down in the draft to get a presumably late first rounder next year. Looks to me like, if things stay constant, you've given up the 1.07 and next year's 2.07 for the 1.11 this year and the 1.11 next year. Not a big fan, really, unless you're looking at a late riser and someone at 1.11 that others might be grabbing late in the first after the draft happens and you don't have a tier break. Then I could see it.12 team PPR. 1 qb.
gave: 1.07, 2022 2nd
got: 1.11, 2022 1st
Akers side12-team 1QB PPR
Cam Akers, Damien Harris, 1.04, 1.12, 2.08, 2.11
FOR
Christian McCaffrey, 1.06
Moving from 1.06 to 1.04 is not negligible, but ultimately this is CMC for Akers/1.12 and a bunch of nickels and I take CMC by a good bit in that equation.12-team 1QB PPR
Cam Akers, Damien Harris, 1.04, 1.12, 2.08, 2.11
FOR
Christian McCaffrey, 1.06
I'll take the roster spot12-team TE Prem Best Ball
Marvin Jones, Dan Arnold, David Njoku
FOR
John Brown, TY Hilton
Holy crikey. Earlier I listened to a debate between Taylor and CMC at 1.01 in a single QB FFPC startup. Among the biggest arguments that really caught my ear was the fact that CMC is still only 24. Every time I hear that I seem to be reminded of it. This will be his 25yo season but still. It bears repeating that getting 3 more elite CMC type seasons is not out of the question. The other strong point was that despite the (incredibly effing high) volume of touches for CMC, he is elite when it comes to avoiding big hits and shielding his body.12-team 1QB PPR
Cam Akers, Damien Harris, 1.04, 1.12, 2.08, 2.11
FOR
Christian McCaffrey, 1.06
I didn't forget that at all but I did forget he was only 24. I drew the 1 spot in a lot of leagues last year somehow. Variance was finally on my side and then ####. But I started the heck out of him in those 3 games and he *did* deliver those weeks. Other argument dude made was that he is like having a WR1 *and* a RB1 at the same time in just one spot.People are forgetting how good McCaffrey was when he played last year. Still a cheat code. I think he averaged around twenty-eight points last year in Half-PPR. Yeah, he did. That's just insane. You're trusting Sean McVay a lot with that deal. And Akers, too. I don't know. The 1.04 is right after the tier break of the big three and you're giving up the 1.06 for the 1.12, too.
Dunno. That's a tough one. The two second rounders might swing it the Akers way. Big boy trade, for sure.
Yeah give me the CMC side here.12-team 1QB PPR
Cam Akers, Damien Harris, 1.04, 1.12, 2.08, 2.11
FOR
Christian McCaffrey, 1.06
Yes, I would project the future 1st as mid-late.I’ll take the 1.7 if the 2022 1st is projected late.
My view on the 1.07 is that it will be one of Williams, Waddle, D. Smith. I am not that enamored with those options and at 1.11 I will pick from Lawrence, Bateman, Moore, Marshall, RB/WR riser. I need QB help so if Lawrence falls I am fine taking him otherwise I like those WR options very similar to what I would get at 1.07.Having a hard time thinking why you'd want to move down in the draft to get a presumably late first rounder next year. Looks to me like, if things stay constant, you've given up the 1.07 and next year's 2.07 for the 1.11 this year and the 1.11 next year. Not a big fan, really, unless you're looking at a late riser and someone at 1.11 that others might be grabbing late in the first after the draft happens and you don't have a tier break. Then I could see it.
David Johnson fits your profile perfectly and won a lot of leagues in his second year. I’m expecting something similar for Akers this year.Moving from 1.06 to 1.04 is not negligible, but ultimately this is CMC for Akers/1.12 and a bunch of nickels and I take CMC by a good bit in that equation.
I should definitely qualify this though that I was a known Akers doubter coming into the league and on top of that I loathe buying 2nd year RBs coming off a hot finish to their rookie year. I find them to be the worst value and worst risk/reward ratio in all of fantasy football.
Oh for sure, nothing is 100%. Just those guys bust more often than not while being priced as if they are sure things. They probably bust at a higher rate than top rookies while being more expensive than them. They are seen as "safer" but it's an illusion, and you're usually paying that premium for a lessor talent due to that illusion.David Johnson fits your profile perfectly and won a lot of leagues in his second year. I’m expecting something similar for Akers this year.
So you got the better qb, better 1st, and a 2.10 on top of it? Is the owners team name “Big Tasty?”FFPC SF
I gave Hurts, 1.05
I got Mayfield, 1.04, 2.10
I would much rather have Hurts than Mayfield, personally. Baker QB26 in PPG last year with everything going right in Cleveland. Snooze.So you got the better qb, better 1st, and a 2.10 on top of it? Is the owners team name “Big Tasty?”
Not everything went right. The weather conditions were crazy for a big stretch there last year. Biggest thing I saw with him is that I think he really took a step forward in his development. But I actually would rather have Hurts straight up myself. But this wasn't straight up and I like Mayfield more than most.I would much rather have Hurts than Mayfield, personally. Baker QB26 in PPG last year with everything going right in Cleveland. Snooze.
According to some rankings and calcs but I do think most people prefer Hurts. Mayfield is more or less guaranteed to be the franchise QB for 10 years where Hurts still has to become that guy. But yeah I like the bump and the 2.10 as well.So you got the better qb, better 1st, and a 2.10 on top of it? Is the owners team name “Big Tasty?”
This is a lot to give up but I still take the CMC side. Akers should be good but there is something to a player that can be RB1 every year for the next few. A good return but nothing guaranteed to be even close to the monster CMC is.12-team 1QB PPR
Cam Akers, Damien Harris, 1.04, 1.12, 2.08, 2.11
FOR
Christian McCaffrey, 1.06
Didn't Kerryon Johnson, as well?David Johnson fits your profile perfectly and won a lot of leagues in his second year. I’m expecting something similar for Akers this year.
Bateman's ADP as of now is number six. The RB/WR riser is definitely in play at 1.11. Sermon with third round draft capital, maybe? Even though we're at Footballguys and it's par for the course to pooh-pooh it, Matt Waldman's first ranking of him is having an industry effect, which will mean a subsequent rise in ADP. I do like your thinking that you can get a riser at eleven. That's what I was saying in my initial assessment. I get it if that's your thought, and it is.My view on the 1.07 is that it will be one of Williams, Waddle, D. Smith. I am not that enamored with those options and at 1.11 I will pick from Lawrence, Bateman, Moore, Marshall, RB/WR riser. I need QB help so if Lawrence falls I am fine taking him otherwise I like those WR options very similar to what I would get at 1.07.
Where do you see Batemans ADP at 6? Most rankings I see have him from 7-9Bateman's ADP as of now is number six. The RB/WR riser is definitely in play at 1.11. Sermon with third round draft capital, maybe? Even though we're at Footballguys and it's par for the course to pooh-pooh it, Matt Waldman's first ranking of him is having an industry effect, which will mean a subsequent rise in ADP. I do like your thinking that you can get a riser at eleven. That's what I was saying in my initial assessment. I get it if that's your thought, and it is.
Sure. I'm going off of DLF rookie ADP per their mocks.Where do you see Batemans ADP at 6? Most rankings I see have him from 7-9
what does the rest of the ADP show? top 12
Easy for your side12 team, SF, PPR start 2 IDP
Gave: Pittman, Roquan Smith
Got: ‘22 1st, Jaylon Smith, Lavonte David
Bateman over Smith and Waddle delegitimize these mocksrockaction said:Sure. I'm going off of DLF rookie ADP per their mocks.
It goes Harris, Chase, Etienne, Williams, Pitts, Bateman, Smith, Waddle, R. Moore, Lawrence, Gainwell, Marshall, E. Moore, J. Fields, A. Ra-St. Brown, Hubbard, Jermar Jefferson, Michael Carter
The informational note to the rankings is this:
"This ADP data is drawn from Rookie-Only dynasty mock drafts organized by @RyanMc23. These rookie mock drafts are not run year-round. They are only operated a few months every year, usually January through May. Once live rookie drafts begin occuring on MyFantasyLeague, the MFL Rookie ADP is used in place of the this data."
You're not drafting with what should be, you're drafting with what is. There's no illegitimacy in it.Bateman over Smith and Waddle delegitimize these mocks
You've been watching too much Dynasty Flock videos, he hammers anyone who tries to rank Bateman over Smith or Javonte Williams over ETN. I'm not saying he's wrong, but he is a "Group Think" kind of Youtuber. I personally like Waddle over both. Does that make me wrong? I don't know, but I have an opinion. Either way, I don't go go against "Group Think" without reason, my reasons. I personally rank them Chase, Waddle, Smith, Bateman. I think the difference between 3 and 4 are close and I could easily flip them and have it Chase, Waddle, Bateman, Smith. The outlier here is Elijah Moore, but the hype is greater than the reality IMO from a fantasy perspective. Now that doesn't mean an NFL team wouldn't draft Moore over one of these guys, but let's remember that Ruggs was the first WR taken in the NFL draft last year.Bateman over Smith and Waddle delegitimize these mocks
I was definitely leaning Bateman over Smith and Waddle prior to pro-days. Bateman supposedly had a massive size advantage but still had the speed, production, breakout age, etc. Things are a little closer/muddier now, draft capital and landing spot are going to influence their final true ADP a lot IMO, although I think Smith falls to the end of the tier for a lot of people scared off by his atypical size.Bateman over Smith and Waddle delegitimize these mocks
Meh. Reminds me of startup SF mocks a month ago when Austin Ekeler goes ahead of Trevor Lawrence. Then real SF drafts happen and Ekeler goes 5th-6th round and Lawrence never gets out of the firstYou're not drafting with what should be, you're drafting with what is. There's no illegitimacy in it.
Just because consensus experts rank them differently, or you think they should be different, doesn't take away from the volume and character of the mocks. They are the vox populi, and that's what you'll be drafting with or against. Jermar Jefferson and Chuba Hubbard in the top twenty are mighty questionable after their pro days, too, but that's where they are.
Before the NFL draft where we know landing spots means that all of this is speculation anyways. Not sure any of it is completely "legitimate". It is all a guess right now so take of it what you will.Bateman over Smith and Waddle delegitimize these mocks
That's a fair point. I guess I was just posting the best we have right now. Surely it will change, and not just because of the draft. When the rubber meets the road, there's sure to be alterations.Meh. Reminds me of startup SF mocks a month ago when Austin Ekeler goes ahead of Trevor Lawrence. Then real SF drafts happen and Ekeler goes 5th-6th round and Lawrence never gets out of the first
Meh. Reminds me of startup SF mocks a month ago when Austin Ekeler goes ahead of Trevor Lawrence. Then real SF drafts happen and Ekeler goes 5th-6th round and Lawrence never gets out of the first
I asked for his list since it was slightly different than most rankings I have seen. I did go back to the ADP for drafts and took another glance at it.That's a fair point. I guess I was just posting the best we have right now. Surely it will change, and not just because of the draft. When the rubber meets the road, there's sure to be alterations.
Where do you find FFPC ADP?FWIW in FFPC ADP (actual drafts, not mocks) Bateman is going a few picks before Waddle.
fantasymojo.comWhere do you find FFPC ADP?
Huh. Superflex? I traded Mostert last year around playoff time for the 2.07, so I'm pretty sure I'd do something similar like that again. Whether that is wise is another thing, but I think it was for my team, who is mediocre and needs a fluff, if not a rebuild.12 team, 0.5 PPR, SF
Mostert for 2.11/3.01
Let's remember the Raiders have a track record of falling in love with track speedlet's remember that Ruggs was the first WR taken in the NFL draft last year...
I don't think he got the better QB. Hurst is surely more risky but has a huge upside - Mayfield's ceiling is likely a low end QB1, but he's more likely to be a mid-range QB2 which are a dime a dozen.So you got the better qb, better 1st, and a 2.10 on top of it? Is the owners team name “Big Tasty?”
Maybe it's just that I'm getting older and less interested in fantasy football but each of the last few seasons I move closer and closer to not even caring about "ranking" the rookies until after the NFL draft.Before the NFL draft where we know landing spots means that all of this is speculation anyways. Not sure any of it is completely "legitimate". It is all a guess right now so take of it what you will.
It comes out to something approximate to Aiyuk and Marshall.FFPC, not involved:
Team A gave: Chubb, N'keal Harry
Team B gave: Aiyuk, 1.10, Rashaad Penny
I agree... there are a small group who excite me now, but until I see who lands where, I will not expend too much energy or time devising a plan or ranking. I need that crucial piece of info to make it real.Maybe it's just that I'm getting older and less interested in fantasy football but each of the last few seasons I move closer and closer to not even caring about "ranking" the rookies until after the NFL draft.
I have guys I really like a lot now - but outside of the "top" guys I'll figure it all out after I see the draft capital spent and landing spots on each player before I'll care about who is my WR6 v my WR7/8/9....
Not in SF, but I agree about Hurts.I don't think he got the better QB. Hurst is surely more risky but has a huge upside - Mayfield's ceiling is likely a low end QB1, but he's more likely to be a mid-range QB2 which are a dime a dozen.
I think people are being way too generous with Baker in assuming he will be a franchise QB for 10 years.According to some rankings and calcs but I do think most people prefer Hurts. Mayfield is more or less guaranteed to be the franchise QB for 10 years where Hurts still has to become that guy. But yeah I like the bump and the 2.10 as well.
I'm right here with you. I'll read up on the 1st round guys but that is more out of boredom because there is no football right now. The NFL draft changes way too much to be set on rankings now. I think age and patience has something to do with that. Lol.Maybe it's just that I'm getting older and less interested in fantasy football but each of the last few seasons I move closer and closer to not even caring about "ranking" the rookies until after the NFL draft.
I have guys I really like a lot now - but outside of the "top" guys I'll figure it all out after I see the draft capital spent and landing spots on each player before I'll care about who is my WR6 v my WR7/8/9....