Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.
This was a good move for value. Hurst is pretty useless and the 3rd is a little late so this is pretty fair. If you have depth at RB, I like getting Lamb. I think Sanders and Gaskin could be a touch overrated but this might not look great this year but in the future you will like the returns on investment for this deal.
This is an amazing trade for you. I like Jacobs but not sure how you got this much value after they signed Drake and shipped out 3/5 of their O-line. Good move.
Agree. I shopped Jacobs since January and I was finally able to move him and Fitz/Heinicke for 1.11 (Sermon - I have Mostert) and 4.11 (Rountree).
Interesting, yesterday in one of my Zealots PPR leagues 1.11, 3.05 and a 2022 1st and 3rd were traded for 1.07 and Javonte Williams was the pick too. I prefer the deal you made.
Word on the street is that Miller is all but done in Chicago, I can't believe someone gave you a 2nd for that package. Well done.
That’s quite the trade!
Wow. Big trade. Ok here goes.
I think I agree but it's fairly close. Looks like a trade of 6 good pieces for 3 really good, with some throw-ins.
Who ended up going with these picks?
Did Team B attempt to justify this trade? I would love to hear how anyone thought this trade made their team better.
How did they vote to allow it to stand? That is a potential league crippling trade! It is so unbalanced, it makes no sense for any reasonable dynasty owner to even consider! It would be cause for me to leave. The fact they reviewed it and thought it reasonable enough to stand is absurd also.
You may have missed the part where the board forced Team A to include Marlon Mack to make it even.
Saw that, Thanks! .... but that was already too much poison to consume in the the whole package...
Part of me says that's overkill.
LOL. I was going to reply to the commissioner when he told me that saying you could argue Aiyuk is on the wrong side of this deal and it still may not be even.
Depending on the league, Swift vs aiyuk is arguable (I'm not big on Swift, but others are). But yeah, the trade is abysmal
Doesn’t matter what my team is, I’m
outing of that league the second a commish doesn’t automatically reverse that kind of BS.I love Jefferson but Ridley is a monster too and Williams was a good get. I think this is a pretty fair trade if you can weather the storm of Watson missing time.
This is a good move for you. Not sure why the other guy would do this personally but great trade for you.
This is just terrible and doesn't even include any picks that you could argue for upside. I am a commissioner in 1 dynasty league and 3 other leagues and this trade I would veto without putting to a vote personally. That might be the worst trade I have seen posted on here. I don't blame you for being upset and not sure how the league voted to allow it.
I’d walk away from that one. Any league that doesn’t bat an eye at an abomination like that is not one you want to be a part of.
Yeah that one is pretty bad. I've never vetoed a trade unilaterally as commish but I have put a couple up to a vote per the relevant bylaws in place. I am surprised it was voted to be upheld frankly. I even once had an owner leave the league because I refused to unilaterally veto it. For reference it was 3 years ago and it was Wentz for Dede Westbrook in 1QB. *shrugs*
Regarding the Bolded...........11 teams voted? what about the 12th team? Is the 12th team you? I am confused by this trade board thing.
In January in a 12 team SF with enhanced TE PPR I was offered McLaurin for Logan Thomas and my 5th and 6th round rookie picks. The owner making the offer is a lowballer that makes the most trades in the league by far.
I just clicked Accept and shook my head.Are either teams involved in this trade a member of the trade board?
To clarify, the vote went to a "board of traders" or something - and not an actual league vote. The commissioner i suppose has an arbitrary group of 10 other people he will send votes out to, and they voted 6-5 in favor of upholding the deal.
I would also like to know who makes up this trade board - it certainly was not a league wide vote by any means. FYI this is a Die Hards League (no idea how many of them their are in total) but this league has been around since 2011, I've been in since 2013 and never had any problems with flagrant trades like this or the way anything was run in general. But this arbitrary vote and a blanket BS justification doesn't sit well with me at all. Definitely appreciate everyone's feedback as I will use it in my rebuttal email to try to get the commissioner to reconsider this before I threaten to leave this season.
Oh wow yeah I guess I missed that. That is pretty strange. Well the board made him throw in a Marlon Mack coming off an achilles tear so I'm pretty sure it is all square now. Pffffffft
"Okay the Board of Traders voted 6-5 to allow the trade to stand if Team A adds something on to his side of the trade. Some felt the trade should be vetoed but the while the majority did feel it wasn’t a trade they would do, it wasn’t so earth shattering that it should be vetoed. They all agreed there was no collusion however.
