Thats literally LOL funny right thereRun It Up said:And much like when Derrick Henry won the Heisman, Cam didnt deserve the mvp then either. Besides the point, but youre right that was the season that is the exception to the rule with still a sub 60% completion rate.
That's always an issue with rookies - but even more so with him like you say.I love CMAC and want him to succeed, but I have no fn clue how to project this guy for 2017.
I'd be happy with that as a rookie!That's always an issue with rookies - but even more so with him like you say.
My early projections: 720 rushing yards - 4 TDs / 44 receptions for 370 yards - 3 TDs
Payton wouldn't let him. He ran it 200+ times for 3 years straight at Miami averaging 4.3 ypc or better each year. Plus another 35+ catches. He could carry the load.
I love the talent but I really wish he had ended up somewhere else.Bump. I miss seeing my guy's name on the first few pages. I've read enough about Dalvin Cook and Joe Mixon. McCaffrey is better than both.
Same here. If he does fail, it'll be due to Cam and the Panthers, not McCaffrey himself.I love the talent but I really wish he had ended up somewhere else.
It's not the ideal landing spot but it could have been worse.I love the talent but I really wish he had ended up somewhere else.
No.
OK, is RunItUp the former "Brewtown" guy from here? I'm starting to see some parallels.
I mean, come on. I don't like Cam, but it's not like he's inept. How hard is it to hand the ball off or throw a screen? Things change. It seems like the Panthers want to.Same here. If he does fail, it'll be due to Cam and the Panthers, not McCaffrey himself.
When I say "fail" I mean "doesn't live up to the hype and isn't as involved as we would hope". Totally agree that they want to, but history of Cam himself doesn't provide much optimism about using McCaffrey properly. I can see it now, 5 yard check down bullet to his face. That's my issue, but I do believe Cam can make adjustments and get McCaffrey in good situations. Cam is the question mark of utilizing him, not McCaffrey's talent. In a way it would be on McCaffrey too, but like any player it's not all their fault for a coach not using them. First thing that popped in my mind was Ryan Mathews in SD with Norv Turner constantly taking him off the field.I mean, come on. I don't like Cam, but it's not like he's inept. How hard is it to hand the ball off or throw a screen? Things change. It seems like the Panthers want to.
If he fails they can all share some of the blame.
I get that Cam at this point is more likely to take off running than dump off to a RB, but not all passes to RBs are of the dump off variety. If the Panthers make a concerted effort to call more RB screens or passes into the flat, I think Cam would be fine making those throws. In prior seasons their pass catching back was Fozzy Whitaker - how many teams are going to run their offense through him?When I say "fail" I mean "doesn't live up to the hype and isn't as involved as we would hope". Totally agree that they want to, but history of Cam himself doesn't provide much optimism about using McCaffrey properly. I can see it now, 5 yard check down bullet to his face. That's my issue, but I do believe Cam can make adjustments and get McCaffrey in good situations. Cam is the question mark of utilizing him, not McCaffrey's talent. In a way it would be on McCaffrey too, but like any player it's not all their fault for a coach not using them. First thing that popped in my mind was Ryan Mathews in SD with Norv Turner constantly taking him off the field.
If CMC is just getting hand offs and screens than it is a major fail.I mean, come on. I don't like Cam, but it's not like he's inept. How hard is it to hand the ball off or throw a screen? Things change. It seems like the Panthers want to.
If he fails they can all share some of the blame.
I didn't feel the need to go through an entire playbook.If CMC is just getting hand offs and screens than it is a major fail.
Did I miss something, what is this in reference to?
OK, is RunItUp the former "Brewtown" guy from here? I'm starting to see some parallels.
It's a reference to a guy named Brewtown who use to be around here. He's pretty famous around these parts.Did I miss something, what is this in reference to?
Either way I've been here for years, rocking my peers and putting suckers in fear - making the tears rain down like a monsoon.
Ok, I get what you are saying. I just think CMC should be used in the slot at times and run more advanced routes like a Woodhead, Riddick, Tyreek Hill. Those routes will require Cam to be play a kind of football that he hasn't really shown yet. I just find the Panthers offense confusing and I'm not sure if it has been constructed well.I didn't feel the need to go through an entire playbook.
We've also had recent reports that Rivera viewed Stewart's role as remaining the same as in past years with him set to be the primary back (See here for example: http://www.panthers.com/news/article-2/Three-Questions-2017-Running-Backs/088c1f19-2db9-4aa6-a637-9ef77e469da6).In the post-draft press conference, GM Dave Gettleman compared McCaffrey to Curtis Martin and said he was one of the best “tackle-box runners” he’s ever seen. Martin had 10-straight seasons of 300+ touches, so the comparison should be an eye opener for dynasty owners. If McCaffrey can get even 200 carries per season, he will be a high end RB1 due to his pass game usage. On the other hand, head coach Ron Rivera compared McCaffrey to Reggie Bush and Darren Sproles. Sproles has never had a 100+ carry season and Bush reached 160 carries just three times in 11 years.
http://subscribers.footballguys.com/apps/article.php?article=hinderytradevalue0517
That's interesting thanks for sharing.The Dave Gettleman firing today is interesting and I can't help but view it as a slight negative in regard to McCaffrey going forward. The McCaffrey pick felt like more of a GM decision that the head coach just went along with than one where everyone was 100% on board and excited. And now the GM is gone and I wonder if the very early returns on McCaffrey had any role in the decision.
I always like to watch the GM/Coach press conferences of the top skill position draft picks to get an idea about how the team envisions them fitting in to their plans. I thought there was a real disconnect in how Rivera talked about McCaffrey vs. how Gettleman talked about him. I mentioned it briefly in my post-draft rookie rankings:
We've also had recent reports that Rivera viewed Stewart's role as remaining the same as in past years with him set to be the primary back (See here for example: http://www.panthers.com/news/article-2/Three-Questions-2017-Running-Backs/088c1f19-2db9-4aa6-a637-9ef77e469da6).
In short, I'm worried about McCaffrey's fantasy impact this year and think he's being overdrafted at his current ADP. I've also bumped him down to 5th in rookie dynasty rankings.
I do exactly the same thing. This lets you know, or at least gives you the sense, if the guy I've been targeting pre-draft based on skill set is someone the offensive coordinator, head coach, GM, and/or position coach envision having the role I'd hoped he'll have a chance to earn. When they don't agree, give the BPA line, or give tepid endorsements in the post draft pressers, I tend to look a little more closely and usually move that player down a notch or two, to manage my expectations.I always like to watch the GM/Coach press conferences of the top skill position draft picks to get an idea about how the team envisions them fitting in to their plans. I thought there was a real disconnect in how Rivera talked about McCaffrey vs. how Gettleman talked about him. I mentioned it briefly in my post-draft rookie rankings:
If he's Danny Woodhead 2.0 he is being drafted way too early. I personally don't feel people are factoring in Stewart enough. I'm going to pass on him in his current ADP unless he slides a couple of rounds (which I don't expect will happen). At his current ADP in PPR I think the safer play is one of the WR's around there, i.e. Sammy Watkins or Davante Adams. If it was a Dynasty league I'd be higher on him.He could very easily end up as Danny Woodhead 2.0. That's not terrible, particularly in a PPR league, indeed is pretty valuable, but it's not the same as being, say, LeSean McCoy 2.0.
Agreed. People don't seem to realize Stewart will lead this team in rushing attempts and yards in the games he plays.If he's Danny Woodhead 2.0 he is being drafted way too early. I personally don't feel people are factoring in Stewart enough. I'm going to pass on him in his current ADP unless he slides a couple of rounds (which I don't expect will happen). At his current ADP in PPR I think the safer play is one of the WR's around there, i.e. Sammy Watkins or Davante Adams. If it was a Dynasty league I'd be higher on him.
The clock is about to strike midnight on StewartIMO, a good percentage of the naysayers almost seem to base their thoughts as if it's redraft and not dynasty. Stewart has, what, a couple years at the most to make an impact here?
Exactly ...The clock is about to strike midnight on Stewart