Jump to content
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

QB Deshaun Watson - present at the start of Texans training camp.


Faust

Recommended Posts

 

22 minutes ago, BobbyLayne said:

Which is, like, just my opinion man.

Unlike the tape deck and the Creedence tape, they may actually have the boys downtown working on this one....in shifts.

:lol:

(I cut & pasted the 1st definition that came up in my Google search. ;) )

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, GregR said:

I haven't read all of the cases, but out of the first half dozen I did skim the summaries of, only one talked about flying someone in. 

Where does this flying in 15 women thing come from? 

This is the operator game, man - I only know what I've read in this topic. haha

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Hot Sauce Guy said:

This is the operator game, man - I only know what I've read in this topic. haha

Yes as far as I know, almost all of them have been local to where he was. One woman was in LA, but Watson was contacting her while he was in LA as well.  There was mention of one woman being flown in from Atlanta which is where Watson is from.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, GregR said:

Yes as far as I know, almost all of them have been local to where he was. One woman was in LA, but Watson was contacting her while he was in LA as well.  There was mention of one woman being flown in from Atlanta which is where Watson is from.   

At least, according to the single source of info from the accuser's side, if I understand this right.

I'mma let it breathe for a couple days. Wake me when there's news. I'll open the topic if I see @Faust has posted. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, The Show said:

I don’t doubt he’s done more than get massages. The question is was it consensual? And as far as there being 15,16, or 57 accusers, hell if there’s no consequences I might even give Buzbee a call and take my chances on a quick pay day. 
 

Put some %!£€!ing consequences on the other side and I’m pretty sure the numbers of accusations dry up pretty quick. 

I don't know if consequences is the right word, but if the lawyer files several cases as Jane Doe and nobody can find out who they are, we seem to be left trusting the vetting process of a person who could be not that motivated to properly vet the accusers. 

If everything was dropped right now, would Watson be able to discover who the accusers were with a defamation case or other way of forcing Buzbee to share it, or would the identities be forever locked in attorney client privilege or otherwise secret? 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, GregR said:

Yes as far as I know, almost all of them have been local to where he was. One woman was in LA, but Watson was contacting her while he was in LA as well.  There was mention of one woman being flown in from Atlanta which is where Watson is from.   

Today there were accusations where a new victim was in a room in California. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, GregR said:

Yes as far as I know, almost all of them have been local to where he was. One woman was in LA, but Watson was contacting her while he was in LA as well.  There was mention of one woman being flown in from Atlanta which is where Watson is from.   

And one was flown in from Atlanta. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, kittenmittens said:

I don't know if consequences is the right word, but if the lawyer files several cases as Jane Doe and nobody can find out who they are, we seem to be left trusting the vetting process of a person who could be not that motivated to properly vet the accusers. 

If everything was dropped right now, would Watson be able to discover who the accusers were with a defamation case or other way of forcing Buzbee to share it, or would the identities be forever locked in attorney client privilege or otherwise secret? 

 

At this point there will be litigation against this lawyer. And it is obviously over state lines. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Hot Sauce Guy said:

Watson's attorneys have every right to know who is accusing them. 

If it were you or I being accused, we would want to know who our accusers were. 

Do they?  I'm an idiot that is obviously clear, but do they have a legal right to know or can it remain anonymous? 

Oh obviously they can just figure it out with the dates and places. 

I'm dumb. 

Edited by kittenmittens
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Hot Sauce Guy said:

Oh, no question. I agree completely.  But when it comes to accusations like this, the only reason to Jane Doe anyone that I'm aware of is if

1. they are under-age (not applicable)

2. credible threat of danger should their ID be revealed, like testifying against the mob (don't see how that's the case with a high profile public figure like Watson) 

3. self-incrimination - this one might hold water, but not in a way that helps the accusers. 

I'm not an attorney - my pops is one, and I took 2 years of business law as part of my degree program so I know some things, but obviously we never went this deep. I do not profess to be a defense attorney. 

But like I said - it seems like the accusers would only be more credible if we knew that they were actually licensed massage professionals with clients who haven't been overtly sexual with them. Obscuring their names makes it more, not less likely that these are "working girls". 

4. The women are still working as massage therapists and are concerned clients might not want to hire them if they make accusations about clients. 

It's not the same, but too often victims of sexual assault find themselves ostracized by their friends. That's hopefully changing, it's been a while since I've been a prosecutor or worked in the field.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

He needs to settle, and settle ASAP.

Admit to his "illness" or admit to being a sex addict or whatever, go to therapy, and then go make 400 million more dollars.  

I can see why the ladies are not filing anything with police. Probably nothing would happen. So, go get some money for what he did, and call it a day.  

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, ghostguy123 said:

He needs to settle, and settle ASAP.

Admit to his "illness" or admit to being a sex addict or whatever, go to therapy, and then go make 400 million more dollars.  

I can see why the ladies are not filing anything with police. Probably nothing would happen. So, go get some money for what he did, and call it a day.  

 

You do realize it was reported that several of the encounters were sexually consensual.  Perhaps he tried on the others and failed and that is sexual harassment and he should try and settle ASAP as you said.  I still can't get past this flying in several massage therapist however.  Who does that?  Perhaps a favorite?  Don't you think this is looking more and more like a pay for sex thing?  Or some of it was and the others weren't?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, JohnnyU said:

You do realize it was reported that several of the encounters were sexually consensual.  Perhaps he tried on the others and failed and that is sexual harassment and he should try and settle ASAP as you said.  I still can't get past this flying in several massage therapist however.  Who does that?  Perhaps a favorite?  Don't you think this is looking more and more like a pay for sex thing?  Or some of it was and the others weren't?

Who knows.  Just end it.

It sucks to give up money, but sucks even more to be able to earn 50x the money you will need to give.

He more than likely did some technically not so legal things.  Jail worthy?  Probably not.  Banned from NFL worthy?  Maybe.  End it before it gets there.

Obviously that lawyer is counting on just that

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, ghostguy123 said:

Who knows.  Just end it.

It sucks to give up money, but sucks even more to be able to earn 50x the money you will need to give.

He more than likely did some technically not so legal things.  Jail worthy?  Probably not.  Banned from NFL worthy?  Maybe.  End it before it gets there.

Obviously that lawyer is counting on just that

He can settle all he wants but the nfl is already investigating. The horse has left the barn there. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Capella said:

He can settle all he wants but the nfl is already investigating. The horse has left the barn there. 

Of course, so settle, get agreements signed, minimize damage.

This isnt about money earned, it's about the gazillions he has yet to earn

That lawyer beetlejuice or whatever his name is will be salivating if Watson and his lawyers are thinking that way

Edited by ghostguy123
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, ghostguy123 said:

Of course, so settle, get agreements signed, minimize damage.

This isnt about money earned, it's about the gazillions he has yet to earn

That lawyer beetlejuice or whatever his name is will be salivating if Watson and his lawyers are thinking that way

beetlejuice, gotta love that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sure is easy to see who has Watson on their rosters in here.  Sad thread, and I'm of the mindset "innocent until proven guilty." I also believe where there is smoke, there is fire.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, iamkoza said:

https://www.yahoo.com/sports/where-things-stand-with-the-myriad-civil-lawsuits-filed-against-deshaun-watson-185850629.html

good quotes from a lawyer Craig Mordock, who specializes in sexual assault cases.

 

Thanks, this is excellent. 

From the article:

There is a well-worn legal axiom that if you have the facts on your side, you pound the facts. If you have the law on your side, you pound the law. If you have neither, you pound the table.

Thus far, Watson and his team have pounded the table 

 

 

Edited by kittenmittens
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, kittenmittens said:

Thanks, this is excellent. 

From the article:

There is a well-worn legal axiom that if you have the facts on your side, you pound the facts. If you have the law on your side, you pound the law. If you have neither, you pound the table.

Thus far, Watson and his team have pounded the table 

 

 

I am obviously not saying this is the case, but here is a hypothetical.

Let's say 10 women randomly came out and accused YOU of this stuff.  You were well known around town, known to have a lot of money,  and went to several different massage parlors.  There is documented proof you had a massage from all 10, though nothing inappropriate ever happened. 

What facts could you pound?  What law would you pound?

Serious question.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, ghostguy123 said:

I am obviously not saying this is the case, but here is a hypothetical.

Let's say 10 women randomly came out and accused YOU of this stuff.  You were well known around town, known to have a lot of money,  and went to several different massage parlors.  There is documented proof you had a massage from all 10, though nothing inappropriate ever happened. 

What facts could you pound?  What law would you pound?

Serious question.

I think that hypothetical is statistically impossible.  Plus you are forgetting there are women from other cities involved as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I tried to buy Watson “low” and was countered for (2) 2022 1sts, 2022 2nd, and C. Wentz for Watson.

It’s safe to say his value didn’t get lower in that league. I think it actually went higher.

Edited by smbkrypt24
1 QB league
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, ghostguy123 said:

I am obviously not saying this is the case, but here is a hypothetical.

Let's say 10 women randomly came out and accused YOU of this stuff.  You were well known around town, known to have a lot of money,  and went to several different massage parlors.  There is documented proof you had a massage from all 10, though nothing inappropriate ever happened. 

What facts could you pound?  What law would you pound?

Serious question.

If I went to 10 massages and acted appropriately, there would be proof of return visits to those same therapists as well.  So I would probably pound that fact.

But that didn't happen in Watson's case.  Most of the women refused another appointment from him.  And he even texted at least one therapist apologizing for making her uncomfortable during the massage.  So I don't think your hypothetical scenario is a good example.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, smbkrypt24 said:

I tried to buy Watson “low” and was countered for (2) 2022 1sts, 2022 2nd, and C. Wentz for Watson.

It’s safe to say his value didn’t get lower in that league. I think it actually went higher.

SF or 2QB? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Razors Edge said:

The overwhelming majority know this is nonsense. Why else would 14 women not come forward with names in the public light while hiding behind a lawyer while having no criminal charges brought up cuz the evidence dont exist? 

You hide when you have something to hide. 

What is your name and location?

  • Like 1
  • Laughing 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I find it humorous that some people think it's just an easy thing for a woman to lie about something like this about a high profile person, let alone finding 15+.  Like they just decide they're looking for some easy cash and so they accuse someone and then sit around and wait for the money to roll in.  They get scrutinized heavily, grueling cross examinations, depositions, get hate mail, death threats, risk losing other clients that don't want to be associated with the notoriety.  But it's easy money right?

  • Like 8
  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Razors Edge said:

Brian Banks says hi...

Only in America would we believe unnamed accusers where the accused can not confront the accusations from his accusers cuz they remain unnamed. lolol

But here we are, FBG dont need any more proof other than 14 women they never met who remain unnamed saying so. 

You keep bringing up Brian Banks like it's some sort of comparable example.  He had one woman accusing him, that is way different than 15 or more.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, ghostguy123 said:

I am obviously not saying this is the case, but here is a hypothetical.

Let's say 10 women randomly came out and accused YOU of this stuff.  You were well known around town, known to have a lot of money,  and went to several different massage parlors.  There is documented proof you had a massage from all 10, though nothing inappropriate ever happened. 

What facts could you pound?  What law would you pound?

Serious question.

It's a debacle for sure.

This would be a terrible position to be in.  If you didn't do anything, I think you would be aggressively refuting that anything inappropriate at all happened.

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Soulfly3 said:

Why is sexual misconduct a civil matter and not a criminal matter?

What am I missing here?

It can be both, but civil is easier to win in court and considerably more profitable to the plaintiff.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, JohnnyU said:

Bring me up to speed on something.  Did some of the women say that had consensual sex with Watson during these message encounters?  Or is that just clutter and rumors?

As far as I know Watson is making that claim as well as claiming he has several non-sexual encounters with massage therapist who will testify as such.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, menobrown said:

As far as I know Watson is making that claim as well as claiming he has several non-sexual encounters with massage therapist who will testify as such.

Was it only Watson who said that, or did some of the women also say it?

Edited by JohnnyU
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, JohnnyU said:

Was it only Watson who said that, or did some of the women also say it?

Maybe I'm behind but so far only Watson is saying it or his attorney is saying but since they don't know all the plaintiffs names I think he was just talking about the sole plaintiff they were able to figure out who it was.

They are saying he had a sexual encounter with her it was consensual and then she tried to blackmail him.

Rusty Hardin is putting it out there that the only plaintiff they identified he had consensual sex with and she tried to blackmail him and that sheds light on the others, he just can't verify the other accusations because he does not know who they are.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, menobrown said:

Maybe I'm behind but so far only Watson is saying it or his attorney is saying but since they don't know all the plaintiffs names I think he was just talking about the sole plaintiff they were able to figure out who it was.

They are saying he had a sexual encounter with her it was consensual and then she tried to blackmail him.

Rusty Hardin is putting it out there that the only plaintiff they identified he had consensual sex with and she tried to blackmail him and that sheds light on the others, he just can't verify the other accusations because he does not know who they are.

They're not even sure if she is one of the plaintiffs, they're making an "educated guess".  I would be much more skeptical if this were the only woman, but there are 13 - 15 others, even if she is one of them.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Faust changed the title to QB Deshaun Watson - present at the start of Texans training camp.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
  • Create New...