Jump to content
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

​ 🏛️ ​Official Supreme Court nomination thread - Amy Coney Barrett


Sinn Fein

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, parasaurolophus said:

These women said "he didnt rape me"? I thought it said he treated women with respect. Those things are different. 

Fair enough, but the argument is the same. Treating some or even most of the women in your life with respect is nice but it is not in any way exonerating, and the implication that it somehow discredits a sexual assault accusation is outdated and ugly. Imagine what all the women out there who have been sexually assaulted by respected authority figures must feel like hearing that line of defense. It just encourages them to keep quiet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, TobiasFunke said:

You investigate its veracity and proceed accordingly. If the investigation stalls because the alleged victim is unwilling to testify, there's no corroborating evidence and the accused denies the charges under oath, so be it.  But what the hell does "he didn't rape me!"  have to do with anything, ever?  I'm pretty sure I could find 65 people who knew Jeffrey Dahmer that weren't killed and eaten by him.

Imagine if something like this had surfaced during the Merrick Garland confirmation hearings.  “If Garland wants to be on the Supreme Court, don’t you think he could find more than just 65 women who say he treated them with respect?”

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, fatness said:

Apparently this woman contacted her Representative awhile back via letter. The Representative forwarded it to Feinstein, who has had it since July and did nothing with it due to the woman not wanting her name public. Other Democrats on the committee felt she was holding back information from them through and after the hearings, asked for it, and she gave it to the FBI. Democrats on the committee wanted information from her on what it was and she finally briefed them.

That committee needs younger leadership from each party. Grassley and Feinstein are old and slow and both remind me of Grandfather Clock on Captain Kangaroo.

I know this isn't your intent, but the old and slow and having it since july comments sound funny to me together. Like she moves soooooo sloooooow that it took her two months just to be able to read some emails and move forward with this. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, parasaurolophus said:

A 5 minute investigation. 

Do you have this incident recorded? Did you report it to the police when it happened? Was anybody else in the room that will corroborate your story? If the answer to these three questions is no, which it likely is, then the response should be, Ok, we are done here.  

There is literally no other way to corroborate a 35 year old story and be able to come to a reasonable conclusion. Having a long drawn out public investigation gives the media an excuse for clickbait headlines and serves as a guilt sentence. 

There’s one question you’re missing: “Did you tell anyone at the time or shortly after it occurred?” If the answer is no, then I would agree that would end the investigation. But of the incident really did occur then the answer is almost certainly yes, at which point you have to interview whoever she told as well. And so forth. 

Either way, this will take a lot longer than 5 minutes. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, TobiasFunke said:

Fair enough, but the argument is the same. Treating some or even most of the women in your life with respect is nice but it is not in any way exonerating, and the implication that it somehow discredits a sexual assault accusation is outdated and ugly. Imagine what all the women out there who have been sexually assaulted by respected authority figures must feel like hearing that line of defense. It just encourages them to keep quiet.

I am not saying this is some end all be all, but I think when dealing with an abstract issue from long ago getting statements from women that were in the same high school class to say he treated women with respect isn't some ugly tactic. It is basically a nothingburger(pretty sure that is the first time I have used that term). It isnt some Trump card (i kid, i kid) that he is innocent, but it certainly isn't an ugly tactic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, timschochet said:

There’s one question you’re missing: “Did you tell anyone at the time or shortly after it occurred?” If the answer is no, then I would agree that would end the investigation. But of the incident really did occur then the answer is almost certainly yes, at which point you have to interview whoever she told as well. And so forth. 

Either way, this will take a lot longer than 5 minutes. 

I know this has become "proof" in the #metoo era, but it shouldnt be. 

"Hey sally remember when I called you 35 years ago and I told you about my interaction with harry at that party?" 

Coerced memories are a real thing. 

And for the record I said these same things in defense of Al Franken. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, parasaurolophus said:

I know this isn't your intent, but the old and slow and having it since july comments sound funny to me together. Like she moves soooooo sloooooow that it took her two months just to be able to read some emails and move forward with this. 

Lol. I meant it as a comment on taking all this long to just decide what to do with it. My mom got like that until we (I) finally had to move her into assisted living --- she just kept everything and never decided anything any more.

I do highly recommend watching any old clips of Captain Kangaroo featuring Grandfather Clock. He'd wake up, talk clearly for a few minutes, and then just nod off mid-sentence until the next show.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, timschochet said:

Well we disagree. There’s an allegation of rape. I want to know how credible it is. This is a lifetime appointment to the most powerful court in the land. It can wait a week or so while this gets sorted out. If it turns out to be nothing, fine. But it should not be ignored. 

I agree with this.

Its actually better for this to be dealt with now - even from a GOP perspective, than later in an impeachment hearing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I will say this - I find the perjury allegations far more disqualifying for a SC nominee, than allegations of sexual misconduct while a teenager.

I realize I am in the minority here, but that is also probably why the sexual misconduct allegations were leaked - nobody cares anymore if people blatantly lie.  Its more surprising when people tell the truth. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Sinn Fein said:

I will say this - I find the perjury allegations far more disqualifying for a SC nominee, than allegations of sexual misconduct while a teenager.

This. Especially when the perjury occurred in his Senate confirmation for his first judicial appointment.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Henry Ford said:

"He should be a supreme court justice because he didn't get the woman drunk enough to be incapacitated before he tried to gang rape her with a buddy" is not a legitimate line of discussion.

I can only assume this is directed at me.  Can you provide a link to where I said anything resembling that quote?  All I asked is that tim get his facts straight.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, IvanKaramazov said:

I can only assume this is directed at me.  Can you provide a link to where I said anything resembling that quote?  All I asked is that tim get his facts straight.

For purposes of this conversation, why does it matter if she alleges he raped her versus attempted to rape her?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Henry Ford said:

For purposes of this conversation, why does it matter if she alleges he raped her versus attempted to rape her?

For the purposes of this conversation, why does it matter if Kavanaugh is accused of rape or whether he's accused of murder?

Personally, I like to be accurate when I say things.  I'm picky that way.  If Kavanaugh were accused of rape, I would say things like "Kavanaugh has been accused of rape" as opposed to "Kavanaugh has been accused of attempted rape."  (Technically that latter statement would still be true but highly misleading).  Kavanaugh has not been accused of rape, so it seems odd to say that he has.

It seems bizarre to me to draw any moral inference from that.

Edited by IvanKaramazov
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, IvanKaramazov said:

For the purposes of this conversation, why does it matter if Kavanaugh is accused of rape or whether he's accused of murder?

Personally, I like to be accurate when I say things.  I'm picky that way.  If Kavanaugh were accused of rape, I would say things like "Kavanaugh has been accused of rape" as opposed to "Kavanaugh has been accused of attempted rape."  (Technically that latter statement would still be true but highly misleading).  Kavanaugh has not been accused of rape, so it seems odd to say that he has.

 

Do you believe that attempted rape would disqualify him from being a Supreme Court Justice?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Henry Ford said:

 

Do you believe that attempted rape would disqualify him from being a Supreme Court Justice?

Yes.  

I also think attempted murder would disqualify a nominee.  I wouldn't refer to that person as a murderer.  Not because attempted murder is okay (nobody thinks that), but because it would be factually wrong.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, IvanKaramazov said:

Yes.  

I also think attempted murder would disqualify a nominee.  I wouldn't refer to that person as a murderer.  Not because attempted murder is okay (nobody thinks that), but because it would be factually wrong.

Except in this instance we don't actually know that it's factually wrong, and if it happened in D.C. your distinction about legal differences being what matters means no one can be called a rapist.  Because there's no conviction for "rape" in D.C.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, IvanKaramazov said:

To put it differently, if you think that attempted rape should be disqualifying, then why make the leap from "attempted rape" to "rape?"  Why muddy the water?

Because the word "rape" means different things to different people, she may have actually been raped despite having not had his genitals inside hers, and creating that distinction before the actual allegations are known is, in fact, making a factual determination prior to knowing the facts on something that doesn't matter to the discussion and is absolutely going to be a talking point for the GOP as this moves forward.

Edit: and I didn't make the leap to "rape", tim did. 

Edited by Henry Ford
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, IvanKaramazov said:

To put it differently, if you think that attempted rape should be disqualifying, then why make the leap from "attempted rape" to "rape?"  Why muddy the water?

Also to put it differently, as to your question earlier, "No, if you're in Washington, D.C., there is no legal distinction between rape and attempted rape.  Neither one is a crime."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sam Stein‏Verified account @samstein 1h1 hour ago

Republicans having 65 signatories ready to go to attest to Kavanaugh’s high school conduct suggests that they too knew about the outlines of these allegations and have chosen strategically to play defense.

https://www.politico.com/story/2018/09/14/gop-kavanaugh-sexual-assault-allegation-824699

An anonymous woman alleges Brett Kavanaugh tried to rape her when the two were in high school.

Republicans released a letter from 65 women, who knew him in his high school years, defending his character 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Henry Ford said:

Because the word "rape" means different things to different people, she may have actually been raped despite having not had his genitals inside hers, and creating that distinction before the actual allegations are known is, in fact, making a factual determination prior to knowing the facts on something that doesn't matter to the discussion.

There it is. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, squistion said:

Sam Stein‏Verified account @samstein 1h1 hour ago

Republicans having 65 signatories ready to go to attest to Kavanaugh’s high school conduct suggests that they too knew about the outlines of these allegations and have chosen strategically to play defense.

https://www.politico.com/story/2018/09/14/gop-kavanaugh-sexual-assault-allegation-824699

An anonymous woman alleges Brett Kavanaugh tried to rape her when the two were in high school.

Republicans released a letter from 65 women, who knew him in his high school years, defending his character 

Breaking news: Brett Kavanaugh knew 65 different women well enough when he was a teenager for them to testify about his character, despite going to an all-boys school.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Sand said:

The whole premise of the secret letter kept secretly but leaked out to create a last second ruckus is the very epitome of not credible.  Try to find any credibility in the whole sad situation and work your way from there.  Once you find nothing but fog and hot air you'll maybe come to the conclusion that there is no need to search for credence in anything here.   It's all a wisp of air.

Seems a lot more than a wisp now...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, IvanKaramazov said:

For the purposes of this conversation, why does it matter if Kavanaugh is accused of rape or whether he's accused of murder?

Personally, I like to be accurate when I say things.  I'm picky that way.  If Kavanaugh were accused of rape, I would say things like "Kavanaugh has been accused of rape" as opposed to "Kavanaugh has been accused of attempted rape."  (Technically that latter statement would still be true but highly misleading).  Kavanaugh has not been accused of rape, so it seems odd to say that he has.

It seems bizarre to me to draw any moral inference from that.

Then why did you say earlier that Feinstein accused Kavanaugh of raping somebody when in fact Feinstein hadn’t made any public statements about the content of the letter?  Wouldn’t someone trying to be accurate when they say things try harder than that?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Bruce Dickinson said:

Then why did you say earlier that Feinstein accused Kavanaugh of raping somebody when in fact Feinstein hadn’t made any public statements about the content of the letter?  Wouldn’t someone trying to be accurate when they say things try harder than that?

Because it's accurate to say that innuendo is a deliberate and cowardly attempt to make people believe the worst.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, timschochet said:

And this is why, @HellToupee that I wrote last night that Laura Ingraham has no credibility and Diane Feinstein does. You need to stop basing your trust of people on how closely they share your political opinions. 

Feinstein , a crooked hack pol has been on the take from the Chinese. But she’s one of the good guys 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Henry Ford said:
17 minutes ago, IvanKaramazov said:

Because it's accurate to say that innuendo is a deliberate and cowardly attempt to make people believe the worst.

I'd love to see what statement you're referring to.  

He said something critical of Feinstein that's unsupported by anything he's found that she said, probably out of dislike for Feinstein I guess. He hasn't conceded that, probably because it seems like ceding ground in a political debate, I guess again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, squistion said:

Sam Stein‏Verified account @samstein 1h1 hour ago

Republicans having 65 signatories ready to go to attest to Kavanaugh’s high school conduct suggests that they too knew about the outlines of these allegations and have chosen strategically to play defense.

https://www.politico.com/story/2018/09/14/gop-kavanaugh-sexual-assault-allegation-824699

An anonymous woman alleges Brett Kavanaugh tried to rape her when the two were in high school.

Republicans released a letter from 65 women, who knew him in his high school years, defending his character 

That was quick.  Seems like they already knew about it and had defense already lined up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, fatness said:

He said something critical of Feinstein that's unsupported by anything he's found that she said, probably out of dislike for Feinstein I guess. He hasn't conceded that, probably because it seems like ceding ground in a political debate, I guess again.

Well, it's no longer innuendo so the point is moot anyway.  I have nothing in particular against Feinstein otherwise.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, sn0mm1s said:

What are you expecting in November? Seriously, what are your expectations? The Dems get a slim majority in the House? Take back the Senate?

I expect the Dems to take the House easily, and to either take the Senate or remain very close, setting themselves up to take it in 2020. (The Senate is a long game.)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Henry Ford said:

Jesus Christ.

Well, I guess that could be the difference, though I doubt it's admissible in a court of law.

 

1 hour ago, Henry Ford said:

Breaking news: Brett Kavanaugh knew 65 different women well enough when he was a teenager for them to testify about his character, despite going to an all-boys school.

I went to an all boys HS and I sure as heck didn't know 65 girls.  :kicksrock:

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Clayton Gray changed the title to ***Official Supreme Court nomination thread: Welcome New Justice

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
  • Create New...