Henry Ford 60,520 Posted March 23, 2016 Share Posted March 23, 2016 2 minutes ago, Gawain said: Not at all what I said and not what I asked. Will hilldog hit the magic number through pledged alone? Maybe, but either way, more pledged delegates is a win. I don't think anyone will be up in arms about the person with the most pledged delegates getting the support of the supers 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
pantagrapher 1,029 Posted March 23, 2016 Share Posted March 23, 2016 This New York Times profile of Bernie voters is pretty interesting. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Henry Ford 60,520 Posted March 23, 2016 Share Posted March 23, 2016 1 minute ago, pantagrapher said: This New York Times profile of Bernie voters is pretty interesting. That's a "profile of Bernie voters"? 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Henry Ford 60,520 Posted March 23, 2016 Share Posted March 23, 2016 I think you're trying too hard to fit a satire piece about millenials into your current mood. That should be in the "why I hate millenials" thread. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Trey 644 Posted March 23, 2016 Share Posted March 23, 2016 7 minutes ago, Gawain said: Not at all what I said and not what I asked. Will hilldog hit the magic number through pledged alone? At her current 58% pace she would fall just short with pledged alone. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
pantagrapher 1,029 Posted March 23, 2016 Share Posted March 23, 2016 1 minute ago, Henry Ford said: I think you're trying too hard to fit a satire piece about millenials into your current mood. That should be in the "why I hate millenials" thread. Uhhh. I think you're trying too hard to be offended. Read it again. The target of its satire is the NYT, not millennials. It's OK to have fun and laugh sometimes. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Henry Ford 60,520 Posted March 23, 2016 Share Posted March 23, 2016 Just now, pantagrapher said: Uhhh. I think you're trying too hard to be offended. Read it again. The target of its satire is the NYT, not millennials. It's OK to have fun and laugh sometimes. I'm not sure why you think I'm offended. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
pantagrapher 1,029 Posted March 23, 2016 Share Posted March 23, 2016 1 minute ago, Henry Ford said: I'm not sure why you think I'm offended. OK, humorless? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
NCCommish 7,522 Posted March 23, 2016 Share Posted March 23, 2016 9 hours ago, tommyGunZ said: Kos calls for Bernie to drop out. Looking forward to NCC and crew labeling him a fake liberal. Actually what NCC would say is I disagree wholeheartedly with Kos and it Isn't the first time. He is very play it safe at times and tends to fret about things I find less than pressing. So not surprised to find him doing so again. So that's what I have to say can't speak for the crew. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
NCCommish 7,522 Posted March 23, 2016 Share Posted March 23, 2016 10 minutes ago, pantagrapher said: This New York Times profile of Bernie voters is pretty interesting. Quite the hatchet job Quote Link to post Share on other sites
cap'n grunge 7,632 Posted March 23, 2016 Share Posted March 23, 2016 Why would he drop out now when she could still be indicted? Probably never happen but it's still possible. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Idiot Boxer 1,677 Posted March 23, 2016 Share Posted March 23, 2016 TIL I'm a 46 year old Millennial 3 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
NCCommish 7,522 Posted March 23, 2016 Share Posted March 23, 2016 I'm a boomer and I support Bernie. I don't ride a hoverboard. I don't Vine. I don't skip work to binge watch a show. I don't care what Lena Dunham has to say about anything. And I know more than a few millenials who would be pissed off to see themselves portrayed the way the NYT did. NYT steady proving it's a propaganda arm of the establishment. 4 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
cap'n grunge 7,632 Posted March 23, 2016 Share Posted March 23, 2016 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
NCCommish 7,522 Posted March 23, 2016 Share Posted March 23, 2016 (edited) Bernie will be appearing live on The Young Turks which is a YouTube channel. He'll be on at 6. I'll be working as I am caught on my binge watching so I'm hoping some.of you will tune in as it were. Should be interesting. Edited March 23, 2016 by NCCommish Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Statorama 2,883 Posted March 23, 2016 Share Posted March 23, 2016 22 minutes ago, cap'n grunge said: Why would he drop out now when she could still be indicted? Probably never happen but it's still possible. He's a better man than I am. I'd be dropping this hammer during every speech, at every rally, and during any media appearance. I think it's going to cost him the nomination. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
pantagrapher 1,029 Posted March 23, 2016 Share Posted March 23, 2016 Honestly don't know how someone could read that and not realize it's satire. I mean c'mon: Quote Beckett Delaney agrees. Delaney lives in the Empire State Building, which his parents bought for him; he often invites fellow millennials, whom he meets on relationship apps, to his bedroom, so that they can kiss. (Occasionally, they copulate.) Quote Link to post Share on other sites
NCCommish 7,522 Posted March 23, 2016 Share Posted March 23, 2016 1 minute ago, pantagrapher said: Honestly don't know how someone could read that and not realize it's satire. I mean c'mon: I assumed they left out a word. With their overriding derision of all things Bernie it's hard to tell what's satire and what isn't. In fact most of the crap they've written about him reads.like a joke. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
NCCommish 7,522 Posted March 23, 2016 Share Posted March 23, 2016 Oh and since we brought in Kos I'd like to point out a place where we agree. On the Garland pick. Kos called it a wasted oppurtunity. I also agree that Bernie shouldn't have endorsed the pick. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Henry Ford 60,520 Posted March 23, 2016 Share Posted March 23, 2016 Current likely results from last night: Arizona: Clinton 46 Sanders 29 Idaho: Clinton 5 Sanders 18 Utah: Clinton 6 Sanders 27 That's Clinton 57, Sanders 74. 74/131 = 56.5% What was the percentage Sanders needs to start winning by, again? 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Henry Ford 60,520 Posted March 23, 2016 Share Posted March 23, 2016 1 hour ago, pantagrapher said: OK, humorless? Seems unlikely. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Trey 644 Posted March 23, 2016 Share Posted March 23, 2016 10 minutes ago, Henry Ford said: Current likely results from last night: Arizona: Clinton 46 Sanders 29 Idaho: Clinton 5 Sanders 18 Utah: Clinton 6 Sanders 27 That's Clinton 57, Sanders 74. 74/131 = 56.5% What was the percentage Sanders needs to start winning by, again? He exactly matched his demographic delegate target for the night from 538. That keeps him right on pace to not accumulate enough delegates. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Henry Ford 60,520 Posted March 23, 2016 Share Posted March 23, 2016 Just now, Trey said: He exactly matched his demographic delegate target for the night from 538. That keeps him right on pace to not accumulate enough delegates. Yes, provided that he only matches his demographic delegate target from this point out. Which I don't anticipate with WA/HI/AK, but could certainly be the case. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Trey 644 Posted March 23, 2016 Share Posted March 23, 2016 2 minutes ago, Henry Ford said: Yes, provided that he only matches his demographic delegate target from this point out. Which I don't anticipate with WA/HI/AK, but could certainly be the case. I agree there. I think the next truly interesting contest in terms of delegate targets will be Wisconsin. The upcoming slate will all be Sanders blowouts. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
NCCommish 7,522 Posted March 23, 2016 Share Posted March 23, 2016 6 minutes ago, Trey said: I agree there. I think the next truly interesting contest in terms of delegate targets will be Wisconsin. The upcoming slate will all be Sanders blowouts. Hope you're right. He needs Washington to be a big win. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Henry Ford 60,520 Posted March 23, 2016 Share Posted March 23, 2016 14 minutes ago, Trey said: I agree there. I think the next truly interesting contest in terms of delegate targets will be Wisconsin. The upcoming slate will all be Sanders blowouts. Yeah, Tulsi Gabbard and Kaniela Ing's endorsements may boost Hawaii pretty heavily and Washington might be a massive blowout for Sanders. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Idiot Boxer 1,677 Posted March 23, 2016 Share Posted March 23, 2016 18 minutes ago, NCCommish said: Hope you're right. He needs Washington to be a big win. From what I'm hearing from friends in WA and OR, he's going to dominate there. 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Statorama 2,883 Posted March 23, 2016 Share Posted March 23, 2016 2 hours ago, Trey said: I agree there. I think the next truly interesting contest in terms of delegate targets will be Wisconsin. The upcoming slate will all be Sanders blowouts. The people that vote on the left here tend to do so with the unions in mind. Bernie has a growing, enthusiastic base here, but I think the unions are going to carry the state for Hillary. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Idiot Boxer 1,677 Posted March 23, 2016 Share Posted March 23, 2016 48 minutes ago, Statorama said: The people that vote on the left here tend to do so with the unions in mind. Bernie has a growing, enthusiastic base here, but I think the unions are going to carry the state for Hillary. Which is ridiculous. One of the things I don't like about Bernie is how pro-union he is. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
squistion 12,451 Posted March 23, 2016 Share Posted March 23, 2016 Jeff Makos @JJmakoj 2h2 hours ago @joanwalsh OK, they've convinced me. If you don't count anyone who voted for HRC, then Bernie is totally winning. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Henry Ford 60,520 Posted March 23, 2016 Share Posted March 23, 2016 4 hours ago, Henry Ford said: Current likely results from last night: Arizona: Clinton 46 Sanders 29 Idaho: Clinton 5 Sanders 18 Utah: Clinton 6 Sanders 27 That's Clinton 57, Sanders 74. 74/131 = 56.5% What was the percentage Sanders needs to start winning by, again? Update with current totals according to CNN: AZ: Clinton 44 Sanders 30, 1 left to be awarded Idaho Clinton 5 Sanders 17, 1 left to be awarded Utah: Clinton 6 Sanders 27 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
cap'n grunge 7,632 Posted March 23, 2016 Share Posted March 23, 2016 John King ran through the math the other night and Sanders would have to get like 65-70 percent margins IIRC and then swing the superdelegates over. Unfortunately i think NY is going to do him in. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Clayton Gray 2,112 Posted March 24, 2016 Share Posted March 24, 2016 No trolling in this thread. I will clean it up after dinner and then reopen it. 5 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Clayton Gray 2,112 Posted March 24, 2016 Share Posted March 24, 2016 And we're back. Please stick to Bernie Sanders topics and be civil. 1 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
HellToupee 15,462 Posted March 24, 2016 Share Posted March 24, 2016 Burnie's 1st career win was by 10 votes for the mayor of Burlington . If Burniev lost that election too where would he be today? Kind of amazing. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
NCCommish 7,522 Posted March 24, 2016 Share Posted March 24, 2016 1 hour ago, cap'n grunge said: John King ran through the math the other night and Sanders would have to get like 65-70 percent margins IIRC and then swing the superdelegates over. Unfortunately i think NY is going to do him in. I have seen others run the numbers and say he needs to win by 20 points on average to get enough. And the Super Delegates will vote for the popular vote winner just like they did before. The party can't afford the #### storm super Delegates overturning the popular vote would bring raining down on them. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
SIDA! 1,141 Posted March 24, 2016 Share Posted March 24, 2016 9 minutes ago, Clayton Gray said: And we're back. Please stick to Bernie Sanders topics and be civil. Did you just go back to a certain point and time and delete every post? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Clayton Gray 2,112 Posted March 24, 2016 Share Posted March 24, 2016 2 minutes ago, SIDA! said: Did you just go back to a certain point and time and delete every post? I left a couple. If the post was a troll or a reply to a troll, I deleted. Sorry if I hit something legit. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
SIDA! 1,141 Posted March 24, 2016 Share Posted March 24, 2016 Just now, Clayton Gray said: I left a couple. If the post was a troll or a reply to a troll, I deleted. Sorry if I hit something legit. Okay. I don't think I have the energy tonight to go back and repost all the links to what a deadbeat/mooch Sanders was so I guess I will take care of it tomorrow. 2 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Homer J Simpson 8,446 Posted March 24, 2016 Share Posted March 24, 2016 2 minutes ago, SIDA! said: Okay. I don't think I have the energy tonight to go back and repost all the links to what a deadbeat/mooch Sanders was so I guess I will take care of it tomorrow. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Card Trader 1,930 Posted March 24, 2016 Share Posted March 24, 2016 2 minutes ago, SIDA! said: Okay. I don't think I have the energy tonight to go back and repost all the links to what a deadbeat/mooch Sanders was so I guess I will take care of it tomorrow. Sadly it's a lot of information, shocking he got to this point in the election cycle considering his moocher past. 3 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
John Bender 6,527 Posted March 24, 2016 Share Posted March 24, 2016 Just now, Homer J Simpson said: Rules Quote Link to post Share on other sites
SIDA! 1,141 Posted March 24, 2016 Share Posted March 24, 2016 (edited) 1 minute ago, Card Trader said: Sadly it's a lot of information, shocking he got to this point in the election cycle considering his moocher past. Dude basically lived in a mud hut, rode a bicycle, and pan handled for 20 years. Edited March 24, 2016 by SIDA! Making the FFA Great Again! Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Henry Ford 60,520 Posted March 24, 2016 Share Posted March 24, 2016 Seriously, though, Bernie looks like a GQ model next to me. Quote Link to post Share on other sites
cap'n grunge 7,632 Posted March 24, 2016 Share Posted March 24, 2016 Scott - What happened yesterday in Arizona should be considered a national disgrace. I got an email last night from a woman who waited five hours to vote in Arizona. Five hours. We don't know how many thousands of people didn't get to cast their ballots yesterday in Arizona because they couldn't afford to wait that long. Scenes on cable news last night showed hundreds of people in line at 11:30pm in Phoenix – more than four hours after polls closed. Voting should not be this difficult. One reason it is so hard to vote in Arizona is because the Supreme Court gutted the Voting Rights Act. There were 70 percent fewer polling places this year than in 2012 in Phoenix's county. They wouldn't have been allowed to cut those polling places if the Voting Rights Act was still in tact. These cuts meant that, in a county with more than 4 million residents, there were just 60 polling places. This is unacceptable, but it's also not an isolated incident. We need to make it easier to vote, not more difficult. One way we can do that is by reaffirming our support for the Voting Rights Act, which, when I am president, I will fight to reinstate. Add your name to say you support reinstating the Voting Rights Act so we can make voting easier for everybody, not more difficult. Add your name » We cannot continue to see democracy undermined in the United States of America. Enough is enough. Make no mistake: the billionaire class does not want Americans to vote. Billions of dollars are being funneled into our elections in a form of legalized bribery, even as American voters — especially minority voters — are being discouraged from voting. It is no wonder that government no longer works for ordinary Americans. Above all, we need to remember the price that was paid for the right to vote. The Voting Rights Act was one of the great victories of the civil rights movement. Now, as then, change comes when the people demand it — in the voting booth, and on the streets in peaceful demonstrations. We must remind ourselves of what’s been achieved in the past, and resolve to do equally great things in the future. Democracy is not a spectator sport. It is my sincere hope that the states that vote in the coming weeks and months do better than what we saw yesterday in Arizona. Too much is at stake for our future. Right now, what we can do is show your support by adding your name to say you want to reinstate the Voting Rights Act. Click here to add your name. No one said a political revolution would be easy. The billionaire class doesn't want to see our movement win, and so we must do everything we can to show them that we have the power. In solidarity, Bernie Sanders Contribute Quote Link to post Share on other sites
HellToupee 15,462 Posted March 24, 2016 Share Posted March 24, 2016 (edited) 12 minutes ago, SIDA! said: Dude basically lived in a mud hut, rode a bicycle, and pan handled for 20 years. Couldn't get elected dog catcher then in a 3 way wins a mayoral election by 10 votes. Launches his career as politician. Mind boggling and yet another American success story I'll give him credit . Burlington was conservative and he changed everything Edited March 24, 2016 by HellToupee Quote Link to post Share on other sites
SIDA! 1,141 Posted March 24, 2016 Share Posted March 24, 2016 It is sad that Bernie Sanders voters can't afford a stamp. They could have voted weeks ago and skipped the lines. 4 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Clayton Gray 2,112 Posted March 24, 2016 Share Posted March 24, 2016 1 minute ago, SIDA! said: It is sad that Bernie Sanders voters can't afford a stamp. They could have voted weeks ago and skipped the lines. Seriously. Please stop. 4 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
SIDA! 1,141 Posted March 24, 2016 Share Posted March 24, 2016 Just now, Clayton Gray said: Seriously. Please stop. What is wrong with this? Seriously? We are going to listen to people ##### about voting being too difficult when they can vote literally for a month via mail and opted not to? Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Henry Ford 60,520 Posted March 24, 2016 Share Posted March 24, 2016 3 minutes ago, HellToupee said: Couldn't get elected dog catcher then in a 3 way wins a mayoral election by 10 votes. Launches his career as politician. Mind boggling and yet another American success story I'll give him credit . Burlington was conservative and he changed everything To be fair, winning an election after a 3-way sounds like a pretty boss way to start a career. 8 Quote Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.