seems like Lammey makes a stand on a guy and sticks to it like concrete. Siemian hasn't looked great. He hasn't looked like a starter, but he hasn't looked any worse than Sanchez. Kubiak has a way of protecting his QB, whether it be Plummer, an aged Manning, Brosweiler, or possibly Siemian. The QBs threw the ball 57(!) times in the last preseason game for evaluation purposes. that's not happening in a regular-season game, not with this D. Siemian (or Sanchez) probably isn't going to be startable in most fantasy leagues, but if he can take care of the ball, that's likely what Kubes will settle for to begin the season. Sanchez has proven throughout the offseason proces that he's not a guy who is going to take care of the ball.Cecil's hatred for Seimian is paralleled only by his love affair with Ronnie Hillman.
Biased much? Geez...
The FBG braintrust of Denver sets themselves up for failure attaching numbers to this. If he's wrong, it's going to look very stupid.FWIW Cecil Lamey said today that Sanchez wasn't benched and that the snaps were predetermined before practice. He also said that Sanchez is ahead of him and he give's Siemian a 5% chance of winning job.
More like apples to a ham sandwich.I remember a thread once, where a few knew his name rookie QB in SEA would never get the start over the FA QB signed from GB
until R.Wilson did
not apples to apples .... but not apples to tomatoes either
Jeff Legwold @Jeff_Legwold 26m26 minutes ago
Broncos coach Gary Kubiak said Trevor Siemian did about "80 percent" of the scheduled work for the starting... http://es.pn/2bh4TBH
Appearing on Mike Clay's Sirius Fantasy show, ESPN Broncos reporter Jeff Legwold stated that Trevor Siemian "has won the starting job."
Siemian apparently "won the starting job" in a preseason game he was pick sixed by 49ers FS Eric Reid. More accurately, Mark Sanchez outright lost the starting job with three turnovers in Denver's first two exhibitions, and Paxton Lynch isn't quite ready yet. Siemian is on track to start Week 1, but if he starts the season slow, coach Gary Kubiak could have a quick hook.
Source: Mike Clay on Twitter
Aug 25 - 6:25 PM
Most did not take him seriously. Still hard to be believe.My apologies, Trevor, I didn't take you seriously.
I was surely a non-believer. I even went against my mantra of "never speaking in absolutes" about this game in saying there's no way he beats out Sanchez.Glad I picked this guy in a one league, another one didn't put enough dough to get him and still kind of mad to myself.
For all the non-believers, nothing is certain in NFL- every year something strange like this and selling DGB happens and the fantasy community is blind to see what's happening until it's too late.
Mark Sanchez is your answer...enjoyFor all of us former non-believers, where do we go from here with this guy?
Turns out I was pretty much spot on when referring to Cecil's 5% nonsense.I give you an F- for this post, if I'm giving arbitrary grades.
I think he has a legit shot at fantasy relevance with those weapons.For all of us former non-believers, where do we go from here with this guy?
I don't know why I ever aligned myself with Cecil. Lesson learned.Turns out I was pretty much spot on when referring to Cecil's 5% nonsense.
He means well. I just think people tend to overlook the obvious trying to get a scoop. Did you know he was talking with Demarcus Ware the other day and also he was doing a mock draft with Adam Schefter? He's all about the name drop. And good on him to be quite honest. Guy has a way ####### cooler job than me. He's living the dream. He's just not a great source for fantasy information.I don't know why I ever aligned myself with Cecil. Lesson learned.
How's a roster size of 53. At the moment 65. So, kind of as deep as it gets. But the thing is, even if he's a starter, that does not make him Rodgers. In the other hand, Rodgers wasn't Rodgers until he was. But still glad I saw this coming as no way Sanchez should play as a starter in this league anymore if you ask me.I was surely a non-believer. I even went against my mantra of "never speaking in absolutes" about this game in saying there's no way he beats out Sanchez.
Unless you are in a very deep league or a start 2QB league I wouldn't kick myself too hard about getting outbid. I can't see him really being a difference maker as far as fantasy football is concerned and it's pretty likely that Lynch takes over eventually, even if that's not until next season.
Some one offered him to me for a third round pick in a league where Sanchez was to be my backup - I immediately declined it. To me it was a no brainer even if it wasn't a team that was in a rebuilding stage where I didn't care much about my backup QB yet.
sanchez hasn't made the team yet. He still may not earn that $4.5M.Which is more surprising? Siemian winning the starting job or Sanchez still somehow earning $4.5M per year to not play
I think Jeff Tuel did get to play in the NFL, and Steven Jyles has played several years in the CFL, not sure about those others but they don't ring a bell,Not the sort of QB comparison chart that would give you lots of good fantasy vibes.
https://twitter.com/LordReebs/status/770282352232632322
Rich Hribar@LordReebs
Not that it's a tell all, but Siemian's collegiate portfolio is one of the most grotesque things I've ever looked at
To be fair you are showing him against the Wisconsin Badgers who have had one of the top 3-5 defenses the last few years..... He was also at Northwestern not exactly crawling with big time pass catchers.
I know. For some bizarre reason I've actually seen a few NW games too, probably because I'm always pulling for underdogs. I remember him. He doesn't look "bad" in that video either. My question was more swerious though, what has stood out for people who have seen him this PS or in college?To be fair you are showing him against the Wisconsin Badgers who have had one of the top 3-5 defenses the last few years..... He was also at Northwestern not exactly crawling with big time pass catchers.
It's not that pretty but he has a unflappable quality to just keep playing consistently even after a bad play.I know. For some bizarre reason I've actually seen a few NW games too, probably because I'm always pulling for underdogs. I remember him. He doesn't look "bad" in that video either. My question was more swerious though, what has stood out for people who have seen him this PS or in college?
I like what I saw from him. Kid is ice.Kids got ice on his veins. Throws a nice ball. He made some rookie mistakes, but he looks adequate as a caretaker/game manager QB. The only really bad play I saw was the pick he threw off his heels. Can't get away with that.
The first pick - that was bad luck. Who throws an int to a DL on a screen? Sometimes #### happens.
Outside of that, he just got the W against a very good, SB caliber team, on the largest regular season stage, against last year's MVP, erasing a 10 point 2nf half defecit...all in his first NFL start. Not bad.
my take as wellgame 1 far exceeded my expectations. he was poised and made a lot of plays. looked really confident out there. nice work