Redwes25
Footballguy
On point 1, my idea is to ban guns similar to the AR-15 which was used in the LV attack and many other similar acts. From your other points sounds like you are against that. Is there a specific reason? Would be interested to know. Is there something about these rifles something you wouldn't want banned. The compensation would be designed to compensate folks for the bank.[icon] said:I am wondering could supports of gun rights support any of the following:
1) A ban on semi-automatic rifles with detachable magazines or clips greater than 10 (coupled with a repurchase program funded by the government for all guns banned with reimbursement at the price paid)
This is kind of misworded. Are you trying to ban rifles with detachable magazines, or magazines with a capacity greater than 10. I'm against the ban of either, in any case. I'm also against federal deficit spending on a program like this.
2) A ban on all clips and magazines greater than 10 for any gun
I'm against this personally on pistols as it necessitates me carrying another magazine with my EDC pistol and requires a redesign of many firearms... while likely not really impacting crime much (most firearms used in crimes are not procured through standard channels. IF you'd like to ban extended magazines that extend beyond the designed framework/capacity of the handgun I'm fine with that.
With regard to rifles, 30rd magazine has become the defacto standard for recreational/defense use for the AK and AR platforms. In this particular shooting there were reportedly extended 100rd surefire mags used. I am okay with a ban of "extended capacity" magazines defined as those over the standard 30rds. Extended mags, drum mags, and any hacks around the standard configuration can be banned, IMO.
3) Guns owners should be required to have license (much like a car license with reasonable education and testing requirements)
The license for automobiles is required to drive on public roads, not to own or drive a car. As it stands now there is a fairly in-depth day long training class required to get a concealed carry permit in most states. I'd like to encourage more testing, perhaps a short written test followed by range/shooting test to confirm you are still familiar with the law, and how to safely operate a firearm. Fail an you must go through a full day training course to be certified again.
4) bans on all bump fire stocks and similar devices that can modify a gun to be similar to an automatic weapon and
I am okay with a ban on bump fire and similar devices
5) background checks and waiting periods are required for all sales (public and private)?
I'm not a fan of universal background checks, but do think they should be required for all non-family transactions, so long as there is no storage/tracking of this data for registration purposes.
My personal feelings in red.
I do think smaller magazines would be really preferable and would have thought something like 10 would be reasonable given even for home defense I doubt the bad guys are hanging around even after 1 or 2 shots. Of course if couldn't get people there I would be happy with any limit so think I could live with 30 as it is an improvement.
On 3, I think licenses should be for all ownership? Would you object to that.
I think we are agreed on 4 and 5 as can understand a sale to family should be excluded.