I like to target DEF, kickers, and RBs at home and that I think will win, unless there is a special value I see on a road game.How much does everyone take into consideration road games and divisional opponents?
He played well but the Chiefs turned it around with the Allen injury. He was definitely used heavily though.Looks like the rumors of Ware's demise were greatly over exaggerated.
Even before the injury he was doing work though.He played well but the Chiefs turned it around with the Allen injury. He was definitely used heavily though.
I am sorry for your loss.I've gone all-in on Keenan Allen in my season-long leagues this year, so I'm concerned that I may not be objective in my assessment of him. I'm leaning towards him over Alshon, but I'm afraid that may just be optimism on my part. I like Alshon and the Bears should be behind for approximately 55 minutes of game time. But Cutler sucks.
Thanks. I am the kiss of death. People should pool money and pay me to acquire key players on their rivals' teams.JTK said:I am sorry for your loss.
Good luck. 25 points is definitely doable and then some... pretty high Vegas total.Currently 9th in a 1176 player tourney with brown and Jesse James to go. If I can get 25 points from them there are only 5 teams with a chance to keep me from taking 1st
I guess he's the perfect contrarian play. Low-owned WR1, in a game with a moderate team total.I had 26 tickets this week. Despite looking at breaking even, I don't regret many of my choices EXCEPT benching AJ Green. There's a guy that I heard so much negative buzz because of Revis Island that I took him off all my teams. Big mistake not going with my gut and playing the stud.
If I recall, Revis got badly burned a few times last year.I guess he's the perfect contrarian play. Low-owned WR1, in a game with a moderate team total.I had 26 tickets this week. Despite looking at breaking even, I don't regret many of my choices EXCEPT benching AJ Green. There's a guy that I heard so much negative buzz because of Revis Island that I took him off all my teams. Big mistake not going with my gut and playing the stud.
Of course, after the fact I read that while Revis was one of the better corner backs in the league last year through week 9, from week 10 on he was actually in the bottom 5. I'm not sure if he was injured or what but he may not be an avoid match-up these days. We'll see.
Good luck.Currently 10 points back with Reed to go for a trip to LA. On top of that I would also need Reed to out score AB and out score Gurley. There are some other things in play here, but hey, I got a shot.
I can't stand the ability to make late changes. I like larger slates, so I never play early only on Sunday. I don't have the ability to commit time on Sunday afternoon to check late status of players, so I'm at a huge disadvantage if my opponents can. If there was a site that locked on Saturday night I would be all over that.I dabbled a little last year, and seemed to do a lot better w/ DKs than Fanduel. This seems to be more popular, more info, etc so I am going to try again. I think I just didn't like the PK and I am used to full ppr scoring when thinking about players. Couple questions:
1. Why do you guys prefer FD over DK?
2. Any rhyme or reason to picking your PKs, or do you just trot out whatever is left after you set the rest of your lineup?
I'm sorry.That didn't work out so well.
1. I just cant seem to win on DK. As Im watching the game Im thinking my guys are killing it and when I check the scores Im no where near the cut lines. Those same weeks I check Fanduel and have alot more sucess. It just a slightly different game. Ones like limit hold'em and the other like no limit.KarmaPolice said:I dabbled a little last year, and seemed to do a lot better w/ DKs than Fanduel. This seems to be more popular, more info, etc so I am going to try again. I think I just didn't like the PK and I am used to full ppr scoring when thinking about players. Couple questions:
1. Why do you guys prefer FD over DK?
2. Any rhyme or reason to picking your PKs, or do you just trot out whatever is left after you set the rest of your lineup?
Thanks for the tip on the Ks. I think I read in one of the article to pair your Rb with your Pk too, since you are probably going with a Rb at home, favored, with high o/u?1. I just cant seem to win on DK. As Im watching the game Im thinking my guys are killing it and when I check the scores Im no where near the cut lines. Those same weeks I check Fanduel and have alot more sucess. It just a slightly different game. Ones like limit hold'em and the other like no limit.
2. Kickers on teams with high O/Us that are projected to win by atleast 3 points. Preferably in a dome.
I like the looks of RB this week. David Johnson $9000, CJ Anderson $7800, Lamar Miller $7700, DeAngelo WIlliams $7600, Ware if Charles is still limited $6800, Abdullah $6700. CJ feels a free square to me at first glance, then who else among the other 5 options? Im probably leaning CJ and Miller right now.lets get a consensus roster to roll out and dominate the 50/50's
There is a positive correlation between RBs and kickers, but I wouldnt go out of my way to match them.Thanks for the tip on the Ks. I think I read in one of the article to pair your Rb with your Pk too, since you are probably going with a Rb at home, favored, with high o/u?
It feels like picking the undervalued players helps win money during the season. Problem with week 1 is we've all had weeks to sort out who is undervalued. As the season progresses, the FanDuel pricing seems to lag at the same rate the general public does. Last year this meant that even though Davonte Freeman was playing like the #1 fantasy RB, he was still priced below the top three until the pricing finally caught up with him.Maurile Tremblay said:I had pretty good luck in Week 1. But I think the luck-skill ratio is definitely higher in Week 1 than in other weeks. For one thing, Week 1 is less predictable than future weeks in a lot of ways. Randomness de-emphasizes skill. For another thing, FanDuel does Week 1 pricing so far ahead of time that the pricing ends up being soft. This means that a lot of rosters have a lot of overlap, and often you are competing based on just a few different players.
The skill-luck ratio is highest when the pricing is not too soft and not too tight. If it's too tight, it will protect your newbie opponents against making bad mistakes. They can select players randomly and still score about the same expected points as everyone else if they use all their salary. If the pricing is too soft, the obvious value plays are so obvious that even your newbie opponents will find them, and there will be a lot of roster overlap giving you fewer opportunities for advantageous differentiation. So you want the sweet spot between the extremes. We didn't have that in Week 1.