Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.
Pretty even to me. I prefer Henry but could see both sides.Dr. Dan said:
I don't care as much about a TE's rookie season as his second season and Engram was a lot more efficient last season so not really holding his rookie year against him.
FBG March chart has Jones at "16" (rb 17) and Henry at "12' (rb 22). curious. trying to work a trade
Mizelle ADP has Jones going 4.2 and Henry 4.10 in startups as of last month. I wouldn't expect much spread between them unless someone is all in on one of them.
We held a two person dispersal draft over the course of the last couple days. Conner went 1st overall. Field included Chubb, Mixon, Julio. FWIW.Flying Elvis said:
Don’t know the league format, but give me Mixon/Chubb, Julio, Conner, in that order.
Yeah I took Mixon/Chubb at 1.2 and 2.1. I was a little surprised he took Conner. It is FFPC style, so PPR, 1.5 for TEs.
It'd be tough for me to choose between Mixon & Conner if it's PPR. Conner outscored him by about 4 PPG, but I don't think we've seen Mixon hit his ceiling yet. I would put Chubb a distant 3rd since he's not going to catch many balls and Hunt is still a threat IMO. Julio slightly behind Chubb due to age and RB scarcity.
In my full PPR league, Chubb averaged 22.55 PPG from Weeks 7-16. RB6
Yeah I like Conner a lot as well. I didn't think it was a bad pick at 1.1 I was just surprised a little. I would take either Mixon or Chubb first and Julio vs Conner would have been tough for me.
I moved him for 2019 1.07 and a late 2020 1st. Some thought it was cheap but I am happy. I did not have a lot of interest and thought I'd take the 2 picks.
I own all 3 of these guys in various leagues so no bias here, but I don't see Chubb sustaining his '18 second half numbers with Hunt there in the second half of the '19 season. I think Hunt is a talented guy that can still thrive outside KC's great situation. I could easily be wrong of course. I am trying to acquire Chubb in more leagues after the Hunt news so I'd be happy to be wrong if I can get him in more places.
Funchess could end up being a glorified TE and score a bunch of red zone TDs. I think he’s pretty much useless as a WR, but I think he’s worth at least a better 2nd than what you’ve been offered.
With Ebron and Doyle there I don’t even think he gets glorified te touches. However, the depth chart in Indy is pretty light, and luck looks like he’s healthy. I suppose I wouldn’t expect a better offer to come through this offseason, and I think I’d likely take it.
McCoy at least has a chance to be useful for this season - I'm not sure Foreman ever does after that injury.
Fair offer IMO.
If I’m win now, and I’m looking for a vet, Shady still wouldn’t make the list since the McCoy owner probably still wants too much. I’d pay a 3rd for him but that’s probably it. I’d rather pay a higher price for a more stable kind of guy to win. Foreman at least has a chance to help long term (especially if he survives the draft) if he’s healthy. I’d take foreman in a vacuum.
I'm an owner and kind of see this both ways. I'm a fan of his game and actually think he was under-utilised in the passing game so there's still some upside there if they figure that out. He's also such a fan favourite and success story for the Broncos as a UDFA that I don't think they'd actively marginalise him in favour of Freeman, despite his lack of 'status'.
I have no confidence McCoy has anything left. Not high on Foreman but worth a shot just in case the extra time to recover helps him and if McCoy is the cost of the risk that's not much of a cost.
I agree with this. I've been trying to move him all off season. Nobody seems to want him.
Seems fair. If you really need the depth keep funches but he just isn't worth much as you don't want to start him.
Seems to have stayed about the same. I’m in a startup now, rookies are going off the board starting in the 4th, but there have been multiple trade downs from the 3rd to 4th including a 2020 1st. Nobody did any deals straight up for a 1st yet (we’re in the mid 4th) but maybe soon. I’ll update when/if something happens.
Graham Barfield posted that Flacco targets RB’s at ~24% over the past three seasons. Someone is going to be valuable in that backfield.
For the entertainment value of sitting on that pick for next month I'd not give it up for Lindsay. Though when it actually comes time to make the pick I'm pretty sure I'd rather have Lindsay, especially in a typical PPR league.
This. Unless it’s a superflex, I’d almost always take the young top 10 dynasty running back.
I prefer Lindsay to any rookie running back in this class, but if I needed a wide receiver I wouldn’t trade that pick for Lindsay. Could see either way really.
I should have mentioned that it was a PPR league. I'm in decent shape at WR but really desperate at RB.
I'm assuming that if Jacobs ends up in a reasonable situation he will be gone by pick 4. Not sure I'd take a different RB at that point and probably wouldn't want one compared to Lindsay.
