Jump to content
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

Tyreek Hill

amnesiac

By amnesiac,
in The Shark Pool (NFL Talk)

 Share Followers 11

Recommended Posts

unckeyherb

unckeyherb 1,445

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, TZMarkie said:

I'm debating firing up Hill myself in one league over the bust known as JuJu. (but thats Big Ben's fault too)

 

But if you are starting Hill over Brown , who is likely guaranteed 13-15 touches or more.....well, ya got faith I guess.

Any other week I might agree, but NO GURLEY + HILL LIKELY LIMITED........ :oldunsure:            

 I bet its close, but you are going for upside I reckon. I like the gutsy call, not sure if I could stomach it though.

 

 TZM

I’m starting hill over juju.  

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 5.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

Dr. Octopus

Thanks everyone for the kind words. It was a very weak banning but I’ve done my time and I’m ready to move on. Hopefully the irony of banning someone for defending themselves over the course of t

Max Power

You just fractured his ankle

Soulfly3

Tyreek: "Cherished Crystal. Thou knowest I had rather a thousand ruffians accost me than I harm the babe. The wheels of injustice turn unabated." Crystal:"Forsooth, my dove. I alone bear the blam

ConnSKINS26

ConnSKINS26 5,718

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, The Man With No Name said:

i don't believe a thing Schefter says without confirmation from a real source. He has been wrong too often in the past

 

Schefter is by far the best in the business, have you been screwed by his info before or something?

Never mind that on a thing like this he's just saying what people with the team are leaking to him--it's unreliable because they could be lying for any reason if this is what they want out there, or because Hill really is a true gametime decision and may or may not play. 

So for me it's not about this "scoop" that isn't even a scoop--Schefter can be right and Hill still doesn't play. I only commented because I've never seen someone say this about Schefter. He's the Woj of the NFL. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
flapgreen

flapgreen 5,933

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, ConnSKINS26 said:

 

Schefter is by far the best in the business, have you been screwed by his info before or something?

Never mind that on a thing like this he's just saying what people with the team are leaking to him--it's unreliable because they could be lying for any reason if this is what they want out there, or because Hill really is a true gametime decision and may or may not play. 

So for me it's not about this "scoop" that isn't even a scoop--Schefter can be right and Hill still doesn't play. I only commented because I've never seen someone say this about Schefter. He's the Woj of the NFL. 

Outside of a coaches themselves, Schefter is THE guy to get news from. I know quite a few people in the league. All say the same thing. He's the guy. Some of the GMs hate Rappaport.  All of them hate freaking Laconfora.  Shefty has build a solid reputation for years and is trusted by the GMs and other guys for a reason.  

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
TZMarkie

TZMarkie 608

Posted
Posted
4 hours ago, unckeyherb said:

I’m starting hill over juju.  

I am too.

 So fully expect Hill to run one route as a decoy then sit until next week.     :lol:

 

 

 TZM

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
Team Smokin'

Team Smokin' 256

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, IheartGuinness said:

Not sure yet. Just not sure if his involvement will be limited. Thinking about sitting him for Chark. 

No matter what I do, I feel like it's going to be the wrong call...

C'mon ya gotta believe. Accept the good decisions with the poor ones. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
az_prof

az_prof 510

Posted
Posted

HIll in and Watkins out. How will this affect Hardman and Robinson?

Am I crazy to think this might be best scenario for them?  Hill opens up the field and they should have an easier go plus with Watkins out they should both still be on field plenty.

Is Pringles the loser here?  Chief fans have any insights?

Link to post
Share on other sites
conlilnew

conlilnew 400

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, az_prof said:

HIll in and Watkins out. How will this affect Hardman and Robinson?

Am I crazy to think this might be best scenario for them?  Hill opens up the field and they should have an easier go plus with Watkins out they should both still be on field plenty.

Is Pringles the loser here?  Chief fans have any insights?

I'd like to hear from any Chiefs fans as well. I've got both Tyreek and Hardman. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
Morton Muffley

Morton Muffley 1,480

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, conlilnew said:

I'd like to hear from any Chiefs fans as well. I've got both Tyreek and Hardman. 

Me too.  Am considering sitting Golladay in favor of Hardman.  Probably won't do it but my gut tells me that Hill will open up opps for others.  In the end just can't be sure it'll be Hardman

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
az_prof

az_prof 510

Posted
Posted
19 minutes ago, Morton Muffley said:

Me too.  Am considering sitting Golladay in favor of Hardman.  Probably won't do it but my gut tells me that Hill will open up opps for others.  In the end just can't be sure it'll be Hardman

I've been going back and forth between Robinson vs Robby Anderson but in the end, this is a good matchup for KC and should be a high scoring game. Hill will get his but there is a good chance Robinson and/or Hardman will have a solid day too and possibly both.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Phantom Knight

Phantom Knight 113

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, IheartGuinness said:

Not sure yet. Just not sure if his involvement will be limited. Thinking about sitting him for Chark. 

No matter what I do, I feel like it's going to be the wrong call...

This was my choice as well. In the end went Hill with trepidation.

Link to post
Share on other sites
az_prof

az_prof 510

Posted
Posted
8 minutes ago, conlilnew said:

I guess if Hill is playing he's too good to sit for Hardman even though it might be Hardman that benefits from having Hill on the field. Shouldn't be this tough of a decision but it is. Should probably always start Hill if he's active.

You have to go with your stud if he is playing.  I'm troubled that KC says they will "rotate Hill in" as that sounds limited, but still, he is such a big play maker that you have to play him over Hardman who hasn't been consistent even with Hill out.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Stompin' Tom Connors

Stompin' Tom Connors 4,242

Posted
Posted

That was sick. The amount of air Hill got on that jump was impressive.

Looked like he jumped his height to get that. Not bad for a 5'10 wideout. Not bad at all.

Guy looks good out there. No hesitation in contact, speedy and crisp.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Followers 11
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...