What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.

California Proposition 60...Rubbers in Porn (1 Viewer)

Baloney Sandwich

Footballguy
So it looks like Proposition 60 is on course to narrowly pass in California.  This measure will affect people in all 50 states and I'm astonished it looks like it will pass. It will require porn stars to wear rubbers in movies.  This is opposed by the Democratic & Republican state parties as well as anyone who has ever watched porn.  It will kill the porn industry in the state.  Two thing I don't get...who is in favor of this and why didn't they name it Proposition 69?

 
So it looks like Proposition 60 is on course to narrowly pass in California.  This measure will affect people in all 50 states and I'm astonished it looks like it will pass. It will require porn stars to wear rubbers in movies.  This is opposed by the Democratic & Republican state parties as well as anyone who has ever watched porn.  It will kill the porn industry in the state.  Two thing I don't get...who is in favor of this and why didn't they name it Proposition 69?

 
Nobody watches mainstream porn anymore anyway.  If you look at pornhub it's all "Daddy sneaks into step-daughter's room" or "Brother and Sister incest"  homemade porn.  

That said, my wife and I are voting NO.

 
Do they have to wear them for only anal and ######l relations, or does that also include oral and hand/foot/breast stimulation?

There is already so much pron out there that even if they never made anything new there's a lifetime of current content to "use".

 
Can't the porn industry just move to another state.  Seems like opportunity knocking and perhaps an idea for the Otis thread.  

 
Nobody watches mainstream porn anymore anyway.  If you look at pornhub it's all "Daddy sneaks into step-daughter's room" or "Brother and Sister incest"  homemade porn.  

That said, my wife and I are voting NO.
Maybe you need to refine your key word search. :oldunsure:  

 
Nobody watches mainstream porn anymore anyway.  If you look at pornhub it's all "Daddy sneaks into step-daughter's room" or "Brother and Sister incest"  homemade porn.  

That said, my wife and I are voting NO.
Yeah, but you know that is not really home made right

 
Industry exodus from Los Angeles County



2013

Industry and agency officials claim that there has been a shift in where porn is made, but the long-term effect on the county’s economy has yet to be determined. This potential economic impact is estimated at US$6 billion.[23] In November 2013, Diane Duke, executive director of industry trade group Free Speech Coalition, said, "Fewer people are shooting (adult film) in L.A. County, and some have moved to other areas around California or other states...".[24] Two months later, The Verge reported, "in the midst of rampant piracy on top of Measure B, many studios have relocated to Las Vegas, where filmmaking is cheaper and regulations are more lax."[17] Then in September 2014, Robert Lang, director of Brookings Mountain West (a collaboration of UNLV and the Brookings Institution to study issues facing the Intermountain West region), was quoted as saying, "Some big part of it will stay (in LA) and production companies will continue to be based there, so it’s not accurate to say that all of that $6 billion translates to Southern Nevada. But what it also gives to Las Vegas is that it’s building technical capacity that undergirds non-pornographic production and media. It adds some competitive advantage in scale to Los Angeles."[23]

In the months after the measure passed, production companies began seeking shooting locations outside of Los Angeles County.[25] In the Ventura County city of Camarillo, CA, the city council passed a forty-five-day moratorium on the issuance of film permits, including special-event and conditional-use permits, for porn productions due to the increased number of applications.[26]

A year after the passing of the measure, it was reported that prior to Measure B typically up to 500 permits would be applied for in Los Angeles County with FilmL.A., the nonprofit that processes permits for motion picture, television and commercial productions. In 2013, applications were received for twenty-four permits.[27] A spokesman with the county’s Department of Public Health said that eleven health permits were requested by adult-film studios.


2014

One of the industry's largest producers, Vivid Entertainment, has gone outside Los Angeles County since the law took effect. Co-founder Steven Hirsch said, "We will not be shooting in L.A. under the current situation, which is too bad," "There’s a uniqueness to L.A. you can’t find anywhere such as backdrops. It’s also impacted us financially because shooting outside the county can become more expensive." Some production moved to Las Vegas citing a more favorable environment.[28]Clark County, where Las Vegas is located, does not require health permits and gives out location licenses for a nominal fee; filming permits in Los Angeles County can cost hundreds of dollars.[28]

In September 2014, the Las Vegas Sun featured an article about the adult industry's possible relocation from Southern California to Las Vegas.[23] According to commentary by AVN magazine's political analyst Mark Kernes, the author of the Sun article, Andrea Domanick, "manages to make a few good points—and snags some quotes from Kink.com CEO Peter Acworth".[29] In the article Acworth is quoted as saying, "Vegas is looking more and more attractive as time goes by... I think that a lot of companies are doing what we’re doing. They’re setting up satellite offices and getting their feet wet with Vegas as a potential place to shoot. The move is happening, but quietly. They don’t want a target on their back."[23] Acworth had announced several weeks earlier that he was shopping for office/production space in Las Vegas.[29] The article also mentions the ease of production relative to California by stating that Nevada requires film permits only for specific locations and conditions. It states, "Shooting on private property, frequently the choice of porn producers, requires no permit or notification, and the state has no explicit regulations about condom use."[23] The article also quotes a technician with knowledge of the mainstream film industry in Southern California and Nevada. Jim Reid of JR Lighting, one of Nevada's largest production rental companies stated, "A lot of people I know in the mainstream industry started out in the adult industry in California. It’s a very good training ground."[23]

In December, after the ruling of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals regarding the measure, it was announced that applications for permits for pornographic productions has reduced by 95%.[30]

 
AIDS Project Los Angeles slammed the measure for its condoms-only approach, which "completely ignores recent developments in HIV biomedical prevention," such as pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP)—a position taken by multiple AIDS groups.
So require all actors/actresses to take PrEp - problem solved. 

 
People aren't going to watch porn anymore because rubbers?
There are tens of millions of hours of non-rubber porn and I'd rather watch that than anything new with the rule.

I imagine there are plenty more people like that, thus it puts a damper on new content.

Now I know there are a lot of people hanging on the rich plotlines they've developed in Massive Mammeries 1 through 23, and will still watch 24 and beyond...  but I'd rather re-watch 1-23... 

That being said, I haven't gotten into VR content yet.. and that might sway me to watch rubberized pr0n

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I dunno - I really doubt this passes.  Most of the newspapers including LA Times are putting out a no recommendation, as have other sites.  

Besides - how does this affect the good amateur stuff? 

 
Do they have to wear them for only anal and ######l relations, or does that also include oral and hand/foot/breast stimulation?
Good news, I really dug into this bill and looked it over.   Handies, oral, and titty ####### won't require condoms.

Still unclear on how this affects bukkake scenes

 
Good news, I really dug into this bill and looked it over.   Handies, oral, and titty ####### won't require condoms.

Still unclear on how this affects bukkake scenes
Shouldn't really change what you watch though. German porn is pretty far away from the rules of California.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top