cstu
Footballguy
We've been getting recorded calls seemingly non-stop telling us to vote against Prop 61 - all paid for by drug companies (they are require to state this at the end of the call).
A few examples
- Woman claiming to be calling on behalf of the NAACP says it will raise drug prices.
- Gay man claims people with HIV will not be able to get their medicine.
- Doctor claims it will raise costs.
What can be so threatening to drug companies that they are spending over $100M to fight it you ask?
A few examples
- Woman claiming to be calling on behalf of the NAACP says it will raise drug prices.
- Gay man claims people with HIV will not be able to get their medicine.
- Doctor claims it will raise costs.
What can be so threatening to drug companies that they are spending over $100M to fight it you ask?
This initiative was designed to restrict the amount that any state agency could pay for drugs, tying it to the price paid by the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs—an organization that falls under certain state laws regarding drug price negotiations. Specifically, it would forbid state agencies to enter into any purchasing agreement with drug manufacturers unless the net cost of the drug is the same or less than that paid by the VA. The measure would apply in any case in which the state ultimately provides funding for the purchase of drugs, even if the drugs are not purchased directly by a government agency. The measure only applies to the purchasing of drugs by state agencies and does not apply to purchases made by individuals. Medicaid managed care programs would be exempt from drug price regulations required by Proposition 61.[2]
Last edited by a moderator: