Jump to content
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

*** OFFICIAL *** FFA WAGERING THREAD - Merry Christmas!!!


The Ref

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Donkey Derp said:

Circle announced today it would no longer operate as a tradition bitcoin exchange for those who primarily use that site.  They recommend transferring to someone such as Coinbase.

:wall: I liked Circle. Oh well, it was a run. https://techcrunch.com/2016/12/07/circle-removes-ability-to-buy-and-sell-bitcoin-as-it-doubles-down-on-mobile-payments/

Edited by mquinnjr
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, got_nugs said:

Los you celebrating this Porto result?

Happy the Portuguese are moving on. Sadly I never picked up on a big Portuguese team. Been following Chaves past 4 years. They were promoted this year and that is closest town dad's little village was near....but yea, generally speaking always support the Portugal teams in CL and Europa. 

On a side note. I should have bet porto. 

Aj is a big fan and was telling me Leicester wasn't traveling like 6 starters as they clinched the group and Porto had to win to secure advancement. 

They were -380 or -1.5

I got busy and that ML scared me off to put something in when I checked.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, The Busy, The Tired said:

Boston playing without Isaiah Thomas. Traveling to Orlando who are coming off a B2B. Magic are traveling from Washington.

 

What'a the lean geniuses?

That's why you're here dippy. If you ain't going to give us NBA picks what good are ya?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The game matches one of the league's best shooting teams (Indiana, 45.5 percent from the field) against one of the league's worst defensive clubs (Phoenix, 46.4 percent allowed).

The Pacers are 7-3 following a defeat this season.

The schedule could help the visitors improve upon that stat Wednesday night. While the Pacers were resting in their hotel Tuesday, the Suns were dueling the Jazz in Utah, and losing 112-105.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, WilliamBonney said:

:goodposting:

 

I have coinbase and have deposited into a couple of books. What are the steps involved in withdrawing via bitcoin?

FWIW, the internet recommends not to directly deposit from coinbase into Sportsbooks as they frown upon those things.  Suggest a "Wallet" like blockchain to be the intermediary

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, Engelberg said:

Are there any sites you can bet on The Batcheler? (yes I spelled it wrong)

 

  Reveal hidden contents

I know someone on there this year, work with her dad. He can't and won't say anything, but I've got some "feelings"

My old lady and the #####es she works with so pools at work with this, survivor, and other ####. I try to find out spoilers online and tell her what happens. She gets all mad for a minute, but I just tell her to real way to get back at me is to give me spoilers on the 4:00 games. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

There's some strong history with both coaches tonight - so there's more - but this one stuck out the most. It's a small sample size, but Jack Del Rio/Raiders 9-4 SU and 11-2 ATS away, losing by margins of 2,3,5,6 (9-2 SU and 11-0 ATS lined > -3). That seems strong and to the point.

On the flip side, you've got Andy Reid, who since November 30, 2014 - the last 755 days - has gone 10-2 SU and 7-5 ATS versus the AFC West (9-0 SU and 6-3 ATS against everyone besides Peyton). So it's like, who do you trust - who is due.

A couple more:
Reid/Chiefs as the fave laying ≤ 6 points: 18-4 SU and 17-5 ATS.
Reid and the Chiefs 1-8 ATS home with a total > 44 (0-8 ATS scoring < 41).

:shrug:

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Engelberg said:

Are there any sites you can bet on The Batcheler? (yes I spelled it wrong)

 

  Hide contents

I know someone on there this year, work with her dad. He can't and won't say anything, but I've got some "feelings"

We're sure this isn't Em, right?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, JaxBill said:

So Caps had 13 shots in the first, only 7 more combined in next 2 periods plus OT.

And the #######s still won.

Shots on goal are in some ways like QB completions.  If your team gets up the later in the game they are more concerned about you not scoring than scoring themselves.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×
  • Create New...