renesauz
IBL Representative
So a team couldn't challenge that it was a catch and NOT a fumble?Based on the language of the rulebook, the play shouldn't have even been reviewed:
"When a pass is ruled incomplete, either team can challenge that it was a catch and fumble and that they gained possession of the ball, if there is a clear recovery."
Since there was no clear recovery, the referee could have announced to the crowd that the ball was not recovered and therefore the play will not be reviewed. But there was no harm in reviewing the play anyway, just to confirm that there was, indeed, no clear recovery.
My point is that it would have been physically impossible for any Bear player to make a clear recovery on this play, since the ball was flung several yards away and the referee blew the whistle before any Bear had a chance to pick it up. In order to qualify as a "clear recovery", the ball must be recovered BEFORE the whistle is blown (or in the immediate moments after the whistle). That wasn't possible in this case, as the ref blew the whistle as soon as the ball touched the ground.
There's a lot going on with this play...seems a stretch to say it couldn't be reviewed at all....and again...no Bear would have recovered as there were 3 or 4 Eagles upright and closer to the ball then any Bear.