And put the franchise qb in. They could really be onto something if they do that.The addition of Cohen makes this offense so much more explosive and fun to watch. Can't wait till they get a standout WR again to go with it.
Glennon played his game. He didn't cost them the game which is what you want from him. They don't have any real downfield threat and are dependent on match-up and/or coaching. They have very few playmakers .I think the Bears are going to be better then most people think. Two drops that should've been TDs at the end cost them the game. Glennon played decent.
Still better than most thinkGlennon played his game. He didn't cost them the game which is what you want from him. They don't have any real downfield threat and are dependent on match-up and/or coaching dependent. They have very few playmakers .
Agreed. They will grind through most games.Still better than most think
Same story. Different yearGlennon 40 attempts
Howard 13 carries
Bad script.
He did have 26 completions. There were at least 4 drops. That puts him at 30-40. A 75% completion percentage is not terrible. His yards per completion are questionable.Glennon 40 attempts
Howard 13 carries
Bad script.
They're more than questionable. Almost all of his passes were short and underneath.He did have 26 completions. There were at least 4 drops. That puts him at 30-40. A 75% completion percentage is not terrible. His yards per completion are questionable.
Said this week's ago. They're a good coach and qb away from being a very good team. Top 10 D!I think the Bears are going to be better then most people think. Two drops that should've been TDs at the end cost them the game. Glennon played decent.
Based on the OL play, you are going to get your wish. Glennon will probably get hurt. But, you'll also get to see Sanchez after Trubisky is hurt.After watching this game, there's even less doubt in my mind Trubisky could run this offense better. Obvious as can be.
Said this week's ago. They're a good coach and qb away from being a very good team. Top 10 D!
I say this in the nicest possible way, but you are delusional. I think trubisky will be the better QB, but a blanket statement like that is just dumb. If you don't think trubisky is going to have his share of rookie mistakes, you are kidding yourself. Just be realistic. When he goes in there will be problems also. You were excited about Watson, and he had one pick with another called back. It's not going to be all green when we change qbs, especially if the ol doesn't play better.If you think Glennon played well because he had a couple good drives and he didn't turn the ball over, you might be a Bears fan. It's hard to recognize there's so much more to having a great qb when you've been through what the Bears have for decades. Bears win this game with Trubisky.
If you think Glennon played well because he had a couple good drives and he didn't turn the ball over, you might be a Bears fan. It's hard to recognize there's so much more to having a great qb when you've been through what the Bears have for decades. Bears win this game with Trubisky.
What part is delusional?I say this in the nicest possible way, but you are delusional. I think trubisky will be the better QB, but a blanket statement like that is just dumb. If you don't think trubisky is going to have his share of rookie mistakes, you are kidding yourself. Just be realistic. When he goes in there will be problems also. You were excited about Watson, and he had one pick with another called back. It's not going to be all green when we change qbs, especially if the ol doesn't play better.
It's easy to assume that the unknown is better than what we have. There's no way to prove you wrong until you get your way. The best analogy I can give is that a lot of marriages end this way. Someone thinks that they would be happier with another partner, only to realize they were wrong.What part is delusional?
You think Glennon played better than Trubisky would have?that you flat out think the outcome of that game would be a win if trubisky started.
He may have done the same, to say he would have won that game, no.You think Glennon played better than Trubisky would have?
How is it unknown? I think there's no way to prove you wrong either. No matter how bad Glennon plays or how many games the Bears lose, it's the OL or wrs or whatever. Excuses already being made for him. If Trubisky comes in and just sucks it up worse than Glennon, I'll be the first to be in here saying he wasn't ready and I was wrong.It's easy to assume that the unknown is better than what we have. There's no way to prove you wrong until you get your way. The best analogy I can give is that a lot of marriages end this way. Someone thinks that they would be happier with another partner, only to realize they were wrong.
Schrodinger's cat is another analogy.
So you do think Trubisky would've played as bad or worse than Glennon. Whenever Mitchell does play, I'll revisit this and admit to being dead wrong on saying he gives us the best chance to win. But that won't happen, because he's already better than Glennon. ST played great. Defense played mostly great. Running game was good when they actually ran it. But still, can't fall on qb. Has to be OL, WRs etc. It's the qb. Deal with it.He may have done the same, to say he would have won that game, no.
He probably would have thrown an interception, as do all rookies.
What are you basing your decision on? His preseason stats? Trubisky had a 68% completion rate. Glennon had the same this game. I'm just not sure that it makes sense to say Trubisky would have won that game. There would be some things he may have done well (moving in the pocket, scrambling) but there would certainly be negatives that you are not taking into account.How is it unknown? I think there's no way to prove you wrong either. No matter how bad Glennon plays or how many games the Bears lose, it's the OL or wrs or whatever. Excuses already being made for him. If Trubisky comes in and just sucks it up worse than Glennon, I'll be the first to be in here saying he wasn't ready and I was wrong.
So you do think Trubisky would've played as bad or worse than Glennon. Whenever Mitchell does play, I'll revisit this and admit to being dead wrong on saying he gives us the best chance to win. But that won't happen, because he's already better than Glennon. ST played great. Defense played mostly great. Running game was good when they actually ran it. But still, can't fall on qb. Has to be OL, WRs etc. It's the qb. Deal with it.
it's all 3, glennon is a mediocre QB, our ol was below average on pass blocking and our wr's blow nuts.So you do think Trubisky would've played as bad or worse than Glennon. Whenever Mitchell does play, I'll revisit this and admit to being dead wrong on saying he gives us the best chance to win. But that won't happen, because he's already better than Glennon. ST played great. Defense played mostly great. Running game was good when they actually ran it. But still, can't fall on qb. Has to be OL, WRs etc. It's the qb. Deal with it.
They aspire to blow nuts.it's all 3, glennon is a mediocre QB, our ol was below average on pass blocking and our wr's blow nuts.