bagger
Footballguy
Just stayed in the Le Meridian across the street from it last week. One of my best friends went there as well.Miller attended my wife'a high school, Santa Monica. She went a few years before though.
Just stayed in the Le Meridian across the street from it last week. One of my best friends went there as well.Miller attended my wife'a high school, Santa Monica. She went a few years before though.
Thanks Rogue POTUS Staff.....Because of your leaks...we'll now be building a wall on the North border.Unlikely to be real, but:
Rogue POTUS Staff @RoguePOTUSStaff 40m40 minutes ago
"This guy is an idiot. He has no idea what he's doing." Overheard by Trudeau to Freeland.
Rogue POTUS Staff @RoguePOTUSStaff 34m34 minutes ago
Trudeau overheard expressing offense to his cabinet members @ POTUS handshake games. Finds is "disrespectful and tasteless."
Rogue POTUS Staff @RoguePOTUSStaff 30m30 minutes ago
PM Tru likens POTUS to "that one kid who never got beaten up only because everyone else thought he was too pathetic to be worth it. (cont)
"...And now he thinks it's because they all were scared of him. But the whole time they were just laughing at him."
It was the time in his high school, not the transition, but you always have to mischaracterize any argument against you, thinking it gives you the win.Basically, Trump ran a campaign based on open hostility toward Muslims. He explicitly called for a ban on them entering the country. One of his first acts in office was to impose such a ban for seven majority-Muslim countries. One of his advisors actually stated on television that the aim of this was to ban Muslims in a way that might pass legal scrutiny. And you dip#### Sherlock Holmes wannabe's are digging back into some guy's middle-school-to-high-school transition to piece together the clues.
Oh come on. I mean high school? College?
:cstu:It was the time in his high school, not the transition, but you always have to mischaracterize any argument against you, thinking it gives you the win,
I don't think this got answered.I honestly have no idea, so bear with me.... Obama was being criticized for profiting from it?The same criticisms were levied on Obama. I can't blame them for going where they choose. Security expense is part of the package.
I'm pretty sure you're kidding, but if not, it was 2007. He's only 31.Oh come on. I mean high school? College?
That's like 30 years ago now. And he's renounced all those statements. Plus there's nothing in his recent good acts that suggest he's anything other than a fine, upstanding human being.
It's not like there's a consistent racist or fascist thread to his thoughts going back thru the last 15 years or anything.
Last weekend was probably a bit more - as the US has to foot Abe's bill...because it would be an illegal gift if the Japanese government paid for the stay at Trump's resort. It is possible that Trump "comped" Abe's visit - but that would not be in keeping with Trump's personality...http://www.politico.com/story/2017/02/trump-mar-lago-taxpayers-234562
This politico story takes an educated guess at the amount of money that a weekend trip to Mar-a-Lago costs. Interestingly, an article in the NYT https://www.nytimes.com/2017/02/10/opinion/footing-the-bill-for-trumps.html treats that Politico 3M figure as gospel.
Has anyone found verified numbers? It would be interesting to see how Trump owning the facility might change the price-tag.
That is why people are bringing this stuff up about Miller. Yes, if you are 50 years ago college is about 30 years behind you. At age 31, it is 8-13 and is more relevant. High school is not exactly the distant past either for a 31 year old.I'm pretty sure you're kidding, but if not, it was 2007. He's only 31.
Um, yeah.... Does. Not. Compute.Imagine Milo Yiannopoulos, but for the educated set.
Hell no. Obama was a miserable failure.I am sure you said the same thing when Obama as SCOTUS went to Hawaii.
100% of past expenses did not go into the POTUS' pockets.How does that compare to past expenses?
Pantsuits, emails, etc.....100% of past expenses did not go into the POTUS' pockets.
I guess we can put to rest the thought of Trump having some sort of intel where this just needed badly to be done?"SEE YOU IN COURT" has now become "well hold on there, not so fast, can't we just put this case off awhile, we're not sure what to do yet". http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/government-lawyers-call-delay-trump-immigration-order-case/story
Most people have their most open mind while attending college. They are away from home, interacting with people from all across the world, drinking all sorts of domestic beers and learning from professors who probably have more worldly views than any teacher they have had before.
The Politico story (widely quoted) is based on a 2013 GAO report on an identical trip by Obama to Palm Beach.http://www.politico.com/story/2017/02/trump-mar-lago-taxpayers-234562
This politico story takes an educated guess at the amount of money that a weekend trip to Mar-a-Lago costs. Interestingly, an article in the NYT https://www.nytimes.com/2017/02/10/opinion/footing-the-bill-for-trumps.html treats that Politico 3M figure as gospel.
Has anyone found verified numbers? It would be interesting to see how Trump owning the facility might change the price-tag.
It's been a while since I took Latin. What does that mean again?Inside our borders, the nation of E Pluribus Unum threatens to be fractured across ethnic lines by racial animus and divisive multiculturalism
Below is from the 2006 Stephen Miller article that Ivan K says we should dismiss because he was just a immature child at Duke University, but this was only 11 years ago and sounds similar to me to the "white pride" stuff we heard on this forum from SIDA:Most people have their most open mind while attending college. They are away from home, interacting with people from all across the world, drinking all sorts of domestic beers and learning from professors who probably have more worldly views than any teacher they have had before.
So this was him at his most open mindedness , let that sink in
If he doesn't care about poor people, then why should he care about disenfranchising people? That doesn't matter. It's clear who has perspective on this issue and who doesn't.Matthias said:No shtick you should do your homework. We shouldn't require an ID to vote because it disenfranchises hundreds of thousands of voters while purporting to solve fake votes by dozens.
Then he should report people that hurt his feelings.Matthias said:After being obnoxious you probably should do another long post about civility.
Most people are at their most extreme political position as well. And do really stupid things.Most people have their most open mind while attending college. They are away from home, interacting with people from all across the world, drinking all sorts of domestic beers and learning from professors who probably have more worldly views than any teacher they have had before.
So this was him at his most open mindedness , let that sink in
Meh a couple extra felonies every 4 years doesn't even move my needle.Would you commit a felony to vote two or three times for the candidate you want to win?
No? Because it would be completely f###ing stupid and pointless to do so?
FYI, that's the same conclusion that everyone else came up with too, junior.
Yowsers...just in credible that they fired Yates and kept Flynn. What does Putin have on Trump?
It never did. Retroactively validating that idiotic position of theirs isn't a good thing.Seems to me the right went crazy wanting to see Obama's college papers and records.
Now college doesn't matter apparently.
But they aren't one of the presidents top advisors, nor drafting an arguably bigoted travel ban on immigrants 10 years later.Most people are at their most extreme political position as well. And do really stupid things.
"Arguably"?But they aren't one of the presidents top advisors, nor drafting an arguably bigoted/racist travel ban on immigrants 10 years later.
Hard to fire Flynn when you told him to have those discussions on sanctions.Seriously, the Justice department tells the White House counsel that Flynn might be compromised and they don't do anything. What the hell is going on in the White House?
If he doesn't care about poor people, then why should he care about disenfranchising people? That doesn't matter. It's clear who has perspective on this issue and who doesn't.
You should call him and tell him how good you are on finding useless things on Twitter, pretty sure you'll be offered a job on the spot!Of course I did. But I am not a key advisor to the President, nor am I involved in drafting the travel ban. If I was, then all my past would be fair game.
And Byrd... :cstu:
That's something that is mind-blowing to me. The intelligence community says they don't want to share top secret info with the White House because they feel the WH is compromised.Seriously, the Justice department tells the White House counsel that Flynn might be compromised and they don't do anything. What the hell is going on in the White House?
This is the most reasonable conclusion. But if it's true then President Trump has committed a impeachable offense, I think.Hard to fire Flynn when you told him to have those discussions on sanctions.
It's not impeachable if there is no impeachment, and there won't be.This is the most reasonable conclusion. But if it's true then President Trump has committed a impeachable offense, I think.
I won't be shocked if there is a Special Prosecutor.It's not impeachable if there is no impeachment, and there won't be.
Not with this congress. He could tell them all to murder a puppy and they'd just nod yes and start looking for puppies.This is the most reasonable conclusion. But if it's true then President Trump has committed a impeachable offense, I think.
The Kennedy name means little to nothing these days for most voters and is only of nostalgic value for Democrats at best.Chris Kennedy, RFK's son, in his 50s now, is going to run for governor of Illinois. I think obviously he's setting up for a run at the white house. I mean, as a Kennedy, he'd probably have to issue a statement where he clearly denies it before anyone would think otherwise. What do you think, is the Trump era the right time for another Kennedy to run? Him or the congressman from Massachusetts. Joesph kennedy III. Do you think a Kennedy could take back the Great Lakes states for the democrats? Or is the value of the Kennedy name today not worth enough in that area to make them flip?
Sounds like a tremendous thread idea. Truly great.Chris Kennedy, RFK's son, in his 50s now, is going to run for governor of Illinois. I think obviously he's setting up for a run at the white house. I mean, as a Kennedy, he'd probably have to issue a statement where he clearly denies it before anyone would think otherwise. What do you think, is the Trump era the right time for another Kennedy to run? Him or the congressman from Massachusetts. Joesph kennedy III. Do you think a Kennedy could take back the Great Lakes states for the democrats? Or is the value of the Kennedy name today not worth enough in that area to make them flip?
I think the Republicans think they damage their brand more by investigating or attempting to remove a Republican President more than just letting the scandals fester. Afterall, most of their voters reject mainstream journalists anyway, so why would they worry about any blowback from that?I won't be shocked if there is a Special Prosecutor.
That is becoming increasingly difficult to nail down.yup, that's a bull#### move and I hate it. Republicans suck but they don't represent republican voter views or people on this board with that move.