I agree with a lot of your post, but what is the market for the sort of GM you would hope to land in week 7? Would a guy jump from a job on an aspiring team? Seems like a job better filled just after a season.Call me crazy but I don't think the Wilfs should be sitting on their hands. Vikings schedule isn't getting any easier. They should fire Spielman during the buy and replace him right away.
This is like a reverse Sophie's Choice where you dislike both your children and don't care one way or the other which one guys.Say you can only get rid of one of Zimmer or Spielman. Who goes first? I'm thinking it has to be Zimmer. I've supported him a long time, but it's getting harder to do so. The situation feels similar to Thibodeau with the Wolves where you have a stubborn coach who refuses to adapt to a changing league or tailor schemes and play style to fit his roster. I think for the most part, over the years Spielman has done a good job of getting players that fit the way Zimmer wants to play, when there's any deviation from that the team suffers significantly like we're seeing now. Talent wise this is better than a 1 win team. That's on the coach.
IMO...I think Zimmer, thanks to Wilf's encouragement, plays "Co-GM" to the point where Speilman drafts that which Zimmer wants, rather then that which the Team needs.This is like a reverse Sophie's Choice where you dislike both your children and don't care one way or the other which one guys.
100% Spielman for me. You need to believe in a GM to believe in the new coach, and I don't. We have a whole team of curmudgeon coaches today, and a roster complied by Spielman that does not fit at all what a curmudgeon coach wants to do. Top down change is needed.Say you can only get rid of one of Zimmer or Spielman. Who goes first? I'm thinking it has to be Zimmer.
JMHO, this is more an indictment on Spielman. It's my issue if I feed my kids candy for dinner just because they want it. It's my job as a parent to know what is best for them. That's Spielman's job, and who he takes input from is on him alone.IMO...I think Zimmer, thanks to Wilf's encouragement, plays "Co-GM" to the point where Speilman drafts that which Zimmer wants, rather then that which the Team needs.
No worries. My initial reply was snarky but I deleted because we both want the same thing, and I don't want to misdirect my frustration at another fan.Biabreakable said:Sorry if I made you mad BigJim.
The Vikings offensive line is poor at pass protection still, again in the bottom part of the league according to FBO
3rd best in adjusted line yards (run blocking) but 27th in pass protection. Right now the Bengals are 31st in pass protection. Is this not good enough for Joe Burrow to have a chance to develop? His career is over because he doesn't have good protection?
If I were to agree with you about the offensive line then that would mean the Vikings wont be able to develop a QB for another 2 seasons IF they can get the offensive line to be playing good by then.
Its just too much to ask as important as I do think it is for them to improve there. We have been talking about this for almost a decade now.
I understand that, but what can you do? It was a 1 year deal and if he wont be back, you get what you can for him. What you initially gave up at this point is irrelevant.A high second for a low third. Yikes.
Getting what they could is fine. Sunk cost and all that. It was giving up the 2nd for a rental in the first place that was the problem.I understand that, but what can you do? It was a 1 year deal and if he wont be back, you get what you can for him. What you initially gave up at this point is irrelevant.
More likely a high second for 2 4th's, a 5th, 6th and 2 7th's by the time Rick is done with it...A high second for a low third. Yikes.
Traded a 2nd and conditional 5th for him and got a 3rd and conditional 5th back. Moving backwards but they weren't going to be able to resign him anyway so I'll take it. Danielle Hunter had surgery, ending any chance he would return this season. Looks like the rebuild is on.And Ngakoue is gone....
Better to get the higher 3rd rounder in 2021, than in 2022 I guess.Getting what they could is fine. Sunk cost and all that. It was giving up the 2nd for a rental in the first place that was the problem.
They must not expect him to get much in a FA contact since they'd get a compensatory 3rd if he diddid.
I agree the handling of the back up QB position has not been good and the attempts at using high draft picks at the position has not worked either, although I would have liked to see what Teddy could have done if he didn't get injured.No worries. My initial reply was snarky but I deleted because we both want the same thing, and I don't want to misdirect my frustration at another fan.
The success running the ball is a bit of a head scratcher for me, given that this team can't even make a single critical yard running when games are on the line.
I probably won't see eye to eye on any justification to deprioritize line. I've always been a delayed gratification guy, I'm not in a real hurry as long as there's a light at the end of the tunnel. We've waited this long, what's the rush to embrace groundhog day? I'd welcome one or two 4-12 seasons if I saw groundwork being laid to provide a future rookie QB the protection he needs to develop. Short term lumps are needed sometimes.
And here's the real problem in my mind: You are hanging your hopes on a GM who has no track record finding a franchise (or developmental) QB for teams desperately seeking one. Well, even that is maybe too nice. In his various personnel positions in Chicago/Miami/Minnesota since 1997, he's been associated with the following draft picks (to whatever extent):
Chicago 1997-1999: Moses Moreno (7th), Cade McNown (1st)
Miami 2000-2005: Josh Heupel (6th) [Jay Fiedler was made starter in 2000 and no other rookies drafted to challenge his role]
Minnesota 2006-current: Tarvaris Jackson (2nd), Tyler Thigpen (7th), John David Booty (5th), Joe Webb (6th), Christian Ponder (1st), Teddy Bridgewater (1st), Nathan Stanley (7th). This is of course ignoring the long list of UDFA's Spielman has signed in his tenure in Minnesota as developmental hopefuls.
JMHO, that's a putrid record - both using early draft picks for a franchise starter, and late picks for a developmental QB. You mentioned Burrows, the consensus #1 pick from 2020 draft, and I think it's a bit of a red herring unless you believe the Vikes are going to be positioned for Lawrence... I just don't see it. More likely we're relying on Spielman's judgment selecting a non-consensus #1 pick, and hitching our wagon to that guy for the next 3-4 years, OL still in shambles for that guy.
I wonder if the Michael Pierce deal being tolled to next season is part of this equation?Getting what they could is fine. Sunk cost and all that. It was giving up the 2nd for a rental in the first place that was the problem.
They must not expect him to get much in a FA contact since they'd get a compensatory 3rd if he diddid.
But there is the possibility of signing him in the offseason anyway...if that is the case then the deal is gold!!I wonder if the Michael Pierce deal being tolled to next season is part of this equation?
The Vikings lost a lot of free agents in 2020 and some of them signed to big contracts like Trey Waynes. Those signings get offset by big money contract the Vikings give to free agents. So maybe in their calculus of this they didn't see themselves getting the 3rd round comp pick for him?
It doesn't really make sense to me to take so little when they could play him all year and still get similar return. It definitely signals that the Vikings have given up on contending this year.
I think it is probably true that the streets are littered with potentially successful QBs who were put in bad situations and failed. 7 games in is awfully early to know whether Burrow will develop fine. Blake Bortles looked promising his first two years, but was sacked 55 (2014) and 51 (2015) times. Sack numbers went down from there, but so too did his performance (went from 4500/35 TDs to out of work). David Carr had sack totals in the 60's if I recall, and he never had a prayer to develop. Deshaun Watson, on the other hand, seems to be handling lack of protection (for now). I just don't think it's logical to choose the approach of putting a hopeful QB behind a bad line on the merit that it can work out. It's a multi year commitment to a guy, and odds are against success. Reading route progressions and dictating movement/placement of safeties are critical to QB success unless he is a freak of nature (I think of Russell Wilson). Most QBs are going to require pass protection to develop.I think you miss my point about Joe Burrow. You previously said that unless the Vikings fix their offensive line that they wont be able to develop a new QB. The Bengals have a worse offensive line than the Vikings do right now but I do not think that will prevent Burrow from developing. If you really think that is a necessary component for a QB to develop, then most of the QBs in the league never have a chance to develop either.
I suppose that is possible. Seems unlikely they would let him go if they wanted to keep him.But there is the possibility of signing him in the offseason anyway...if that is the case then the deal is gold!!
I don;t think it helps a QBs development to be too often under pressure and having to think about other things than reading the defense and getting the ball out on time.I think it is probably true that the streets are littered with potentially successful QBs who were put in bad situations and failed. 7 games in is awfully early to know whether Burrow will develop fine. Blake Bortles looked promising his first two years, but was sacked 55 (2014) and 51 (2015) times. Sack numbers went down from there, but so too did his performance (went from 4500/35 TDs to out of work). David Carr had sack totals in the 60's if I recall, and he never had a prayer to develop. Deshaun Watson, on the other hand, seems to be handling lack of protection (for now). I just don't think it's logical to choose the approach of putting a hopeful QB behind a bad line on the merit that it can work out. It's a multi year commitment to a guy, and odds are against success. Reading route progressions and dictating movement/placement of safeties are critical to QB success unless he is a freak of nature (I think of Russell Wilson). Most QBs are going to require pass protection to develop.
They try to push Rudolph but the guy we want is (Irv) Smith one GM said. They don't want to trade the young guys. But yeah they will push out more salary if they can.
I have no idea how I would assign probability to this.What's the likelihood Rudolph gets traded & what are the expected landing spots?
Chicago, where else?What's the likelihood Rudolph gets traded & what are the expected landing spots?
There are rumors about them trading Thielen also. I would expect the price to be high for him. Like a 1st or 2nd round pick at least.Chicago, where else?
Kidding...I'm kid. How much will you take for Thielen?
Thats a good question. I heard some folks talking about opening up the doors at the bank so the wind can help again.Tells you about this season.. Vikings stop their losing streak against the Rival Packers and .
two losses this year by a combined 2 points, against two playoff bound teams.. Still at a loss to explain the falcons game.
So.. will the team that bet the Packers, and almost beat the Seahawks and Titans show up against Detroit..
or the one that showed up vs. Falcons, Colts and the Packers the first week?
Don't forget that the VIkes still have the "just when you think they are turning it around" gut punch left at some point this season. I am predicting that to be the Jags game.COOK!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Still VERY about this defense.. So many young players and missing many due to injuries/trade/Covid-Opt out ..
What once looked like an imposing schedule at the beginning of the year, isn't looking as scary now..
@ Bears - Defense is great, but they have no Offense.. Think they get a W
Cowboys - Played tough vs. Steelers.. I think this will be tougher then it looked last week, but think the Vikings get the W to get them back to .500 at 5-5
Panthers - Teddy returns and McCaffery ,, Toss-up
Jags - W
@ Bucs - L
Bears - W
@Saints - L
@Lions - W
So, with my Purple Googles, I have them at 8-8 or 9-7.. Considering how they started the season I'll take that..
With an extra team going to the Playoffs this year, and the Putrid NFC East, 8-8 might just get them into the playoffs.
Don't forget that the VIkes still have the "just when you think they are turning it around" gut punch left at some point this season. I am predicting that to be the Jags game.COOK!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Still VERY about this defense.. So many young players and missing many due to injuries/trade/Covid-Opt out ..
What once looked like an imposing schedule at the beginning of the year, isn't looking as scary now..
@ Bears - Defense is great, but they have no Offense.. Think they get a W
Cowboys - Played tough vs. Steelers.. I think this will be tougher then it looked last week, but think the Vikings get the W to get them back to .500 at 5-5
Panthers - Teddy returns and McCaffery ,, Toss-up
Jags - W
@ Bucs - L
Bears - W
@Saints - L
@Lions - W
So, with my Purple Googles, I have them at 8-8 or 9-7.. Considering how they started the season I'll take that..
With an extra team going to the Playoffs this year, and the Putrid NFC East, 8-8 might just get them into the playoffs.
At the halfway point in the season, the Vikings offense leads the league in rushing yards per attempt (5.5), yards per passing attempt (8.9), and yards per reception (13.5). That’s a formidable trifecta any way you slice it. Gary Kubiak has taken advantage of all the weapons given him, which include the best running back in the league, the best receiving tandem, and a QB that can distribute the ball effectively when given time to throw. Overall the Vikings offense grades 3rd best in the league according to PFF, and is also third best in the red zone.
Hi.Elflein is just another average, undersized, unathletic lineman that Spielman always whiffs on.
My take on the game as a Bears fan, is that the Vikings would be very wise to take advantage of the mismatches in the passing game. Cook is probably not going to sniff what he did the last 2 weeks(Bears front 7 is light years ahead of GB/Det) but at the same time, the Bears will have zero rushing success against the Vikings. Montgomery(despite his poor stats) is a sizeable loss, as he's been breaking tackles just to get to the LOS. Not sure Nall/Patterson can do that. Bears OL is just awful right now, in every way possible. This is a game Nkagoue would have been a monster in.I am pretty much in one game at a time mode. Not counting any chickens yet. This is the way the Vikings are approaching things which makes sense. When you are trying to achieve a ;long term goal (make it to the playoffs, win in the playoffs) its always good to set several short term goals along the way that can keep you on track of making progress towards your goal.
The game against the Bears is critical I think. If they can actually win this game in Soldier Field they will be 3-1 in the division and make up some ground on the Bears.
The Vikings have struggled playing there for many years now. They did get a win and got that monkey off their back a bit, but the Bears defense is still very good.
Cook has been amazing. I think the Vikings can win every game he plays like this. I think the Bears defense is too good though and the Vikings will actually need Captain Kirk to do something to win this game.