If money doesn't solve the problem of not having enough money, what does?Money doesn't solve the police/justice/political system, as they don't have nearly enough money or resources to wholesale change those institutions.
If money doesn't solve the problem of not having enough money, what does?Money doesn't solve the police/justice/political system, as they don't have nearly enough money or resources to wholesale change those institutions.
I meant the amount of money (resources) they have doesn't do it. Maybe owner level money/resources/influence would. We are talking about changing nationwide police and judicial systems.If money doesn't solve the problem of not having enough money, what does?
Networks are eating this up. They aren't going to commercial.1 minute after they're in commercial.
Maybe because they aren't protesting the NFL and they're there for their teammates. Maybe they could donate more but this isn't really about the money.Why aren't any of these players protesting by not playing, or donating their game checks to the cause?
D: wait until the end of the game when your team has a lead and have the most visible player take a knee with the ball in his hands.Option C: All the players can just take a knee DURING the game in unison. At the first snap of each teams first possession.
That would be the "nothing" option.D: wait until the end of the game when your team has a lead and have the most visible player take a knee with the ball in his hands.
That would truly make an impact. If for no other reason than most of those guys are whiteD: wait until the end of the game when your team has a lead and have the most visible player take a knee with the ball in his hands.
But they would be. If the players had their protest the networks would show it. They're not going to commercial if that happens. And you know it."Why can't they protest when no one is watching?"
But nobody is talking about that or the very reason they are protesting. The narrative has changed to disrespecting the flag and national anthem. By doing it the way they are, they have completely lost their message. There are other avenues to get their point across.Contrary to what everyone is saying, the reason it's during the anthem is not because that's the most visible time. It's much more organic than that.
It developed that way because CK didn't feel right "standing and honoring America" when there was so much police mistreatment of minorities going on here. So he stayed seated on the bench while others stood for the anthem.
Then he spoke to a green beret who told him about soldiers "taking a knee" and suggested he do that instead of just sitting during the anthem.
So it has to be during the anthem because the anthem is specifically what he's not standing for.
Me and you - we're talking about it right now. Lots of other people are too.But nobody is talking about that or the very reason they are protesting. The narrative has changed to disrespecting the flag and national anthem. By doing it the way they are, they have completely lost their message. There are other avenues to get their point across.
Are we? What are we talking about?Me and you - we're talking about it right now. Lots of other people are too.
People are trying to deflect and make the protest about the anthem or the flag precisely because they don't want to focus on the real cause. The message isn't being lost, it's being ignored, as it has been with other less provocative forms of protest. That's why they've take a different approach.But nobody is talking about that or the very reason they are protesting. The narrative has changed to disrespecting the flag and national anthem. By doing it the way they are, they have completely lost their message. There are other avenues to get their point across.
Racial injustice. Many of the last few pages are all about that. We've got statistics and policy discussions and everything.Are we? What are we talking about?
And?MaxThreshold said:Well, it's clear from your post that at the very least you believe it's NOT America.
Yes, maybe in this thread. But I don't think these are the people that need to be reached.Racial injustice. Many of the last few pages are all about that. We've got statistics and policy discussions and everything.
You're at least one step closer to actually understanding by finally admitting that people are indeed talking about it.Yes, maybe in this thread. But I don't think these are the people that need to be reached.
OK, so the message isn't being lost. It's being ignored. Is the result any different? I just think that it's not the best way to bring about change if you chose a method of protest that allows itself to be so easily manipulated or morphed into something else that allows the message to be lost or ignored. You could have your protest before or after the national anthem or take 1 or 2 minutes before the teams go into the locker room at half and the networks would still cover it and it wouldn't get confused into the National Anthem controversy.People are trying to deflect and make the protest about the anthem or the flag precisely because they don't want to focus on the real cause. The message isn't being lost, it's being ignored, as it has been with other less provocative forms of protest. That's why they've take a different approach.
Neither does Trump. Is that the kind of person you want to assciate with?And?
It sounds like he just was -- the fans are the communityOK, so the message isn't being lost. It's being ignored. Is the result any different? I just think that it's not the best way to bring about change if you chose a method of protest that allows itself to be so easily manipulated or morphed into something else that allows the message to be lost or ignored. You could have your protest before or after the national anthem or take 1 or 2 minutes before the teams go into the locker room at half and the networks would still cover it and it wouldn't get confused into the National Anthem controversy.
Just curious,Aaron Rodgers came out this week and asked the fans to join in the players protest tonight. When was the last time (or first time) Aaron Rodgers spent some time in the community talking about this?
I'd wager that a majority of the people saying things like that or "ok, we need to figure out what the issues are" fully get what the protests are about, they just want to continue ignoring them and maintaining the status quo.The talking points of "they could make their point more effectively" and "if they're so offended, why aren't they out in the community?" are so disingenuous.
Both talking points inherently mean you understand what the protest is about. If you get it, then talk about it. Agree or disagree or have a nuanced opinion. The talking points are just a diversion tactic - pretending to be sympathetic while refusing to actually address the issue. Shooting the messenger instead of dealing with the message.
The impact of Aaron Rodgers taking a knee tonight will be huuuuge.That would truly make an impact. If for no other reason than most of those guys are white
Maybe he'll link arms with his FBThe impact of Aaron Rodgers taking a knee tonight will be huuuuge.
It was mentioned upthread that the goalsof the Washington march were "Jobs and Freedom". Yet that seemed a pivotal event nonethelessThe main problem with the protests, IMO, has always been that there's no specific goal. It reminds me very much of the Occupy Wall Street movement, which I thought was well-intentioned, but seemed to have no specific demands.
They probably don't have enough gunsWhy couldn't these guys have just staged an armed takeover of a government-owned bird sanctuary in Oregon?
Says someone with over 30,000 posts.As opposed to posting on a message board all day?
No, they wouldn't.But they would be. If the players had their protest the networks would show it. They're not going to commercial if that happens. And you know it.
This is the NFL we're talking about -- I'm sure they have plenty of guns. Just ask PlaxicoThey probably don't have enough guns
Are felons allowed to have guns?This is the NFL we're talking about -- I'm sure they have plenty of guns. Just ask Plaxico
Horse Feathers!After giving it some more thought, here's the worst way the weekend spirals into chaos. Fans run onto the field to confront the players when they kneel. The players tackle those fans. This causes more fans to run onto the field to defend them. The cops are in the middle of this, and in the heat of the moment and in the confusion, some players tackle the cops. Then a lvery large number of fans run onto the field to protect the cops. Games are never played and we have civil unrest.
I mean, now they might. But they never would have without a year and a half of this.No, they wouldn't.
It sounds like that is what they are doing with the TV turned off.Can't these people hold their protest in their living room with the blinds closed? Seems that would be most effective as it's guaranteed not to ruffle anyone's feathers.
in your mind I guess that's the way it appearsNo. When someone repeatedly posts absolutely nothing other than provocative one-liners or " ," I call them a troll. Which they are.
sure, that's part of it, its the same with everybodyperhaps you're only hearing that because of who you're listening to
you available for kids parties?After giving it some more thought, here's the worst way the weekend spirals into chaos. Fans run onto the field to confront the players when they kneel. The players tackle those fans. This causes more fans to run onto the field to defend them. The cops are in the middle of this, and in the heat of the moment and in the confusion, some players tackle the cops. Then a lvery large number of fans run onto the field to protect the cops. Games are never played and we have civil unrest.
I think you will find most of the players ARE doing a lot to help the cause.Why aren't any of these players protesting by not playing, or donating their game checks to the cause?
If that were the case, wouldn't I be dismissing you as a troll and putting you on ignore, since we obviously disagree. The guy I was referring to in that post is someone with probably a dozen accounts that has never engaged in any meaningful discussion with any of them. He's obviously here to stir the pot and nothing else, hence the need for so many accounts to dodge the bannings and continue his useless nonsense.in your mind I guess that's the way it appears
I guess I'm overly sensitive because of all the names I've been called.If that were the case, wouldn't I be dismissing you as a troll and putting you on ignore, since we obviously disagree. The guy I was referring to in that post is someone with probably a dozen accounts that has never engaged in any meaningful discussion with any of them. He's obviously here to stir the pot and nothing else, hence the need for so many accounts to dodge the bannings and continue his useless nonsense
Yeah, I mean, those silly black folks who protested at restaurants, they were just looking to offend the white folks right?I'm confused now on what the protests are for
are they to bring awareness to issues or to give the middle finger to Trump ? sounds like its in retaliation to Trump now
I was talking to my brother this morning .... it seems in today's world if you want to protest, you pick an action that causes the most offensive, hurts the most feelings, pisses the most people off ......... what a fantastic way to bring unity huh ?
Your willingness to engage in discussion is appreciated and improves the forum, if nothing else.I guess I'm overly sensitive because of all the names I've been called.
perhaps part of the fault lies with the people getting pissed off even though the protest is not affecting them in any way?I'm confused now on what the protests are for
are they to bring awareness to issues or to give the middle finger to Trump ? sounds like its in retaliation to Trump now
I was talking to my brother this morning .... it seems in today's world if you want to protest, you pick an action that causes the most offensive, hurts the most feelings, pisses the most people off ......... what a fantastic way to bring unity huh ?