This is the obvious question based on his recent usage. Assuming 12-team PPR, how many of you are stashing him and how many are dropping this week for someone else? Realize everyone may have different needs. Just curious.I'm dropping him for Mack.
Rookie wall? He's not used to playing 5 games a year?Cohen has hit a rookie wall and the return of Cunningham doesn't help. It was evident last night that he tried to dance too much against a good Vikings defense. He will learn that sometimes just go through your blockers and take what's there. Hit that home run at the right time. He is a hold for me. But he will ride my bench. He will be relevant again sometime this year when that learning curve passes. Based on the interviews I have seen he has a mind for football and we'll talk about him again in a few weeks.
The rookie wall for an NFL back surrounds the player learning defensive schemes and the NFL teams. Like a rookie MLB pitcher learning about the hitters. You just can't dance that much in the NFL.Rookie wall? He's not used to playing 5 games a year?
The way I see it, it's also 2 weeks in a row where their team looked pretty bad offensively. The less they use Cohen the less successful the offense is. I don't know what the deal with Cunningham is but I have to think Fox gets canned at some point and the guy taking over plays Cohen more, or the GM just flat out tells Fox to play Cohen. Not like the Bears are winning the division, but they have to figure out an offensive identity.I think I'm dropping Cohen at this point. It's a small bench league (15 starting spots, 5 bench), so I can't say I would recommend it for everyone. But Cohen's trade value is pretty low. I've been shopping him for 2 weeks to teams desperate for RB and they aren't giving anything up for him. Two weeks in a row that Cohen wasn't very involved in the offense, and now Bennie Cunningham is getting touches as well. I'm sure that with me dropping him, he's going to have a breakout game, so you can thank me later.
Any talk locally about this? If everyone else sees it, you have to think the coaches/GM do and there has to be talk on local radio etc.They need to get back to having Cohen in the passing game more. Not just in the backfield but split out wide. Get him in open space.
They've talked about it some this morning.Any talk locally about this? If everyone else sees it, you have to think the coaches/GM do and there has to be talk on local radio etc.
I just don't think the targets he was getting the first couple weeks were sustainable (that's kinda obvious with how high they were). Teams figured out yea we need to cover this guy and he's just not open as much now.They need to get back to having Cohen in the passing game more. Not just in the backfield but split out wide. Get him in open space.
Hard to get open standing on the sidelines between the 20s...I just don't think the targets he was getting the first couple weeks were sustainable (that's kinda obvious with how high they were). Teams figured out yea we need to cover this guy and he's just not open as much now.
And as for the Cunningham thing, I am assuming the coaches are seeing the same thing I am, this kid is tiny and is going to get killed if they use him to much. They want him on special teams too....
He's a talented rookie third down/scat back with an established starter in front of him (who looks a lot better running the ball). He's not going to be out there all the time, or even half the time. I think people were over estimating his floor from the start thinking he would automatically catch 5+ balls a game.Hard to get open standing on the sidelines between the 20s...
Yeah this is where I'm at too... I don't know. Depends if Diggs plays for meCunningham getting the 2 minute drill both halfs last night and at least one in the Green Bay game is what scares me. That is basically ruining what should be 3 or 4 catches and an extra 6 or 7 pts for a nice floor.
That being said I'm rolling him out again next week. Call me crazy as a fox but I think he sees more time next week.
I think if anything we just overestimated the competency of the coaching staff. Was never a reason to scale back his workload like they did the previous few weeks which I"ll more to below.He's a talented rookie third down/scat back with an established starter in front of him (who looks a lot better running the ball). He's not going to be out there all the time, or even half the time. I think people were over estimating his floor from the start thinking he would automatically catch 5+ balls a game.
I heard the bolded during the game telecast and thought to myself that just made Loggains look bad on many levels. He allowed the defense to dictate the game to him was his first mistake. Secondly if the offense was off balance that was always on him. Cohen may be a rookie but like Tyrek last season he's a very versatile player who can be used in a variety of ways, he's a weapon as much as just being the COP/third down back. There was never a reason to not play him often with Howard, which would have done a much better job of keeping the defense guessing. When your best receiver looks like Kendall Wright and you have a rookie QB there is zero justification for reducing his role in the offense, especially so you can increase Cunningham's role.During the telecast, one of the commentators said this..
“(Bears OC) Loggains told us the gig was up Cohen. Whenever he was in the game Defenses knew we were going to pass the football. Today we’re gonna give him more hand offs and see if we can keep defenses off balance.”
—
Cohen caught a screen broke a few tackles, gained 14 on 3rd and 20, was a shoelace away from breaking for TD.
Cunningham would have had 3 yards.
I think so.sneakerfreak said:Maybe Cunningham is just a better passblocker? Seems pretty reasonable to me. Why risk your franchise QB?
He may get his but I think it is pretty clear that the offense runs through Howard no matter what.Anyone thinking of throwing him into their lineups this next week? NO's offense can move the ball, which I would imagine Chicago would be throwing more as a result. Cohen is their play maker, but just not getting the touches...
But then again we've seen Fox run the ball down 2-3 scores
Yeah it's pretty crazy, honestly. Cohen is quite clearly their best/second best playmaker. There's room for him and Howard to both be featured (especially considering there are no WRs, and the TE is mediocre at best). Fox hates rookies, so ... there's little hope until he gets canned.He played on 18% of the snaps and was utilized 3 times (3 targets) vs. CAR, both are season lows. The entire CHI offense really is just Howard.
As a Panthers fan, I (miserably) watched a good chunk of that game when not flipping over to better games. I honestly thought Cohen was hurt with as little as they had him on the field.busts a 70yd catch w his only touch, but ya....
let's keep him in check on the bench. bears be bears for a reason
Oh man, you told us. Seven games in and it's clear to see he's McCluster. Instead of tooting your own horn, why don't you give the guy a full season before crowning him the next big bust.I tried to tell everyone you're going crazy over Dexter McCluster II but hardly anyone would listen.
I'm rolling him out and have no idea what to expect. I fell it's safe to assume he has high upside this week, but like you said block head John Fox literally killed the clock in the 2nd quarter a few weeks back in Green Bay down by 28pts.Dr. Dan said:Anyone thinking of throwing him into their lineups this next week? NO's offense can move the ball, which I would imagine Chicago would be throwing more as a result. Cohen is their play maker, but just not getting the touches...
But then again we've seen Fox run the ball down 2-3 scores
Same hereJFS171 said:As a Panthers fan, I (miserably) watched a good chunk of that game when not flipping over to better games. I honestly thought Cohen was hurt with as little as they had him on the field.
I wasn't going to start him with Cunningham, but Cunningham was inactive, so ... in he goes in a couple leagues over the question mark that was Aaron Jones.
McCluster was never a RB2 in FF....which Cohen is 7 weeks into the season. Hope you didn't pull a muscle trying to pat yourself on the back.NREC34 said:I tried to tell everyone you're going crazy over Dexter McCluster II but hardly anyone would listen.
Hey, that was like 50% of the bears non-running offensive plays, so I'd say he's pretty heavily in the game plan .He played on 18% of the snaps and was utilized 3 times (3 targets) vs. CAR, both are season lows. The entire CHI offense really is just Howard.
That is all valid and one way of looking at it.He played on 18% of the snaps and was utilized 3 times (3 targets) vs. CAR, both are season lows. The entire CHI offense really is just Howard.