dozer
Footballguy
You asked if I would feel the same. I said no.And you don’t see this as racist?
You asked if I would feel the same. I said no.And you don’t see this as racist?
You asked if I would feel the same. I said no.
I shouldn't go here, but like who, what groups? Are there people hanging anti Norwegian flags on their lawns?I guess I just don’t have the hate in my heart to cancel someone for a select slur as many lefties do. Would you feel the same if it was a slur against a white person or against a predominantly white ethnic group?
Jewish, Italian, Irish, Amish, etc.I shouldn't go here, but like who, what groups? Are there people hanging anti Norwegian flags on their lawns?
Thsts not the point. Answer the question.I shouldn't go here, but like who, what groups? Are there people hanging anti Norwegian flags on their lawns?
Yeah, the Amish and those damn horse buggies that slow up traffic!Jewish, Italian, Irish, Amish, etc.
You get the picture.
By definition this is a racist comment. Lump together a whole group based upon your stereotype.Yeah, the Amish and those damn horse buggies that slow up traffic!
I never knew Amish was a race. TILBy definition this is a racist comment. Lump together a whole group based upon your stereotype.
Keep trying KDBy definition this is a racist comment. Lump together a whole group based upon your stereotype.
Amish Rake Fighters took me down in the championship game in 2006. I'm still pretty hateful. Them and their fabulous furniture.Keep trying KD
I used to live near Lancaster and very familiar with the Amish. Actually purchased a hickory rocker and high chair for our first born back in the day. Wonderful people. I am unaware of any directed hate towards this group however.
this thread is going about as ridiculously as I expected
No, I take it to mean that there is nuance and you can’t just automatically treat all things the sameAgreed. We have a few posters that think racism is okay as long as it fits THE MESSAGETM.
It is common for people to retroactively characterize the anarchists who contributed to the 1999 WTO riots and violent protests after that as Antifa, even though Antifa did not exist. Those anarchists also wore black and covered their faces, so it was easy for irresponsible right-leaning news outlets to mischaracterize them as Antifa, creating a whole new boogeyman for their fearmongering.The last 15 years? Has anyone ever heard of Antifa before 2016 and Trump?
My girlfriend is from Amish country. I've been slowed by numerous Amish traffic jams, created by one buggy going in each direction on a two-lane road. Amish is not a race, and stating that they drive buggies is not a racist comment. They do drive buggies, and nobody else does.Keep trying KD
I used to live near Lancaster and very familiar with the Amish. Actually purchased a hickory rocker and high chair for our first born back in the day. Wonderful people. I am unaware of any directed hate towards this group however.
It is common for people to retroactively characterize the anarchists who contributed to the 1999 WTO riots and violent protests after that as Antifa, even though Antifa did not exist. Those anarchists also wore black and covered their faces, so it was easy for irresponsible right-leaning news outlets to mischaracterize them as Antifa, creating a whole new boogeyman for their fearmongering.
It's well documented if you actually care about facts. Anarchist groups like the Youth Liberation Front have been inciting violence at protests in the Pacific Northwest for 20 years or more. They have nothing whatsoever to do with Antifa.Wow. Look at this guy make stuff up.
I can’t speak for other cities, but when we had BLM protests in Oakland, almost all of the looting and vandalism took place away from the protests while the police were distracted. I’m sure the Bladerunners of the world count them as Antifa/BLM, but they looked like professional criminals seizing an opportunityAnarchists
This link shows the anarchists that insert themselves into nearly every protest in Seattle and Oregon, with the sole goal of causing damage. They have nothing to do with Antifa. But they wear black so they must be Antifa, whatever that is supposed to be.
The police identify the same people at all of these events.
yep. but they wear black! antifa! zomg!I can’t speak for other cities, but when we had BLM protests in Oakland, almost all of the looting and vandalism took place away from the protests while the police were distracted. I’m sure the Bladerunners of the world count them as Antifa/BLM, but they looked like professional criminals seizing an opportunity
They weren't called antifa back then, they were "anti-globalists" and "anti-capitalists" and anarchists. Don't you remember the WTO protests in Seattle back in the day?I took a 4 course graduate program on Terrorism Analysis in 2008-2010. There wasn't any Antifa then, we spent significant time looking at domestic terror groups. They definitely did not exist at that point.
They weren't a domestic terrorism organization.They weren't called antifa back then, they were "anti-globalists" and "anti-capitalists" and anarchists. Don't you remember the WTO protests in Seattle back in the day?
These are the people that just want to "mess stuff up" (in PG terms) and take down the system. They were around breaking windows when I was in college pre 9-11.
Never heard the University of Maryland described that way, but to each their own.Liberal hippy grad school. Of course they wouldn't mention their brethren
There has been violent leftism for a long time. Going back to the 60s you can find examples. That doesn't make them Antifa though.Playing dumb is no way to go thru life.
I know you've heard of them. Ever hear of Occupy Wall Street? Yeah. They are at all of the world Summits (G20, G7, WTO, etc...) too for at least the last 20 as well as all of the riots in the US. But Antifa has been around far longer than that, just not as high profile and vocal as they are now since they've been supported by liberal and Democrats leaders (and the rank and file).
Let's not play that game, please, where you pretend something doesn't exist because you've never heard of them until yesterday - and then you still pretend they don't exist.
Also: https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2017/09/the-rise-of-the-violent-left/534192/
They weren't called antifa because they weren't the same people. Maybe there is some overlap, but they're different groups.They weren't called antifa back then, they were "anti-globalists" and "anti-capitalists" and anarchists. Don't you remember the WTO protests in Seattle back in the day?
These are the people that just want to "mess stuff up" (in PG terms) and take down the system. They were around breaking windows when I was in college pre 9-11.
Would you feel better if they wore white?yep. but they wear black! antifa! zomg!
The point is people started claiming anyone wearing black was antifa.Would you feel better if they wore white?
Sure. They also suck in general.They weren't a domestic terrorism organization.
I'm not even sure they meet that definition even today. The organization portion is at question, they don't seem to be particularly organized. They remind me more of Anonymous, picking up a banner to use for whatever their local agenda happens to be.
I think it's likely the anti-globalists of 15 years ago simply became Antifa-ites, which also gained adherents that weren't involved in left wing direct action prior to 5-8 or so years ago.They weren't called antifa because they weren't the same people. Maybe there is some overlap, but they're different groups.
Do you have a point? What does this have to do with my post?Jewish a race or religion?
Do you have a point? What does this have to do with my post?
@jon_mx
Lets take this to the appropriate thread. You claim 95% of the charges were dropped against people charged in relation to the BLM riots. Got any data to back that up?
You claim 0% of people charged in relation to Jan 6 have had their cases dropped. A quick Google search shows that to be a lie. I’m sure there are more, I just don’t feel like looking into it
@jon_mx
Lets take this to the appropriate thread. You claim 95% of the charges were dropped against people charged in relation to the BLM riots. Got any data to back that up?
You claim 0% of people charged in relation to Jan 6 have had their cases dropped. A quick Google search shows that to be a lie. I’m sure there are more, I just don’t feel like looking into it
Don't hold your breath on seeing documentation for that.
How does a police raid occur if its not a surprise?https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2021/apr/17/george-floyd-protesters-charges-citations-analysis
The vast majority of citations and charges against George Floyd protesters were ultimately dropped, dismissed or otherwise not filed, according to a Guardian analysis of law enforcement records and media reports in a dozen jurisdictions around the nation.
After Breonna Taylor's death, activists fought to ban surprise police raids. One year later, they're winning
But some prosecutors and law enforcement observers charge that departments carried out mass arrests as a crowd control tactic, as a means to silence peaceful protesters, and as a public relations strategy designed to turn the public against demonstrators by making them appear more violent than they were. And what’s more – some of the citing officers never witnessed the protests in the first place.
“It sends a message that you might get arrested if you express your views and first amendment rights,” said Vera Eidelman, staff attorney with the ACLU’s speech, privacy and technology project. “Police absolutely should not be relying on mass arrests to control a crowd or silence people who they disagree with.”
In most of a dozen jurisdictions examined, at least 90% of cases were dropped or dismissed. In some cities, like Dallas and Philadelphia, as many as 95% of citations were dropped or not prosecuted.
How does a police raid occur if its not a surprise?
Right there in your supposed proof is the reason why these cases were dropped. They weren't legitimate arrests and prosecutors knew it. I'm no lawyer but I know well enough that any prosecutor worth a damn wouldn't prosecute any case based on an illegitimate arrest.https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2021/apr/17/george-floyd-protesters-charges-citations-analysis
The vast majority of citations and charges against George Floyd protesters were ultimately dropped, dismissed or otherwise not filed, according to a Guardian analysis of law enforcement records and media reports in a dozen jurisdictions around the nation.
After Breonna Taylor's death, activists fought to ban surprise police raids. One year later, they're winning
But some prosecutors and law enforcement observers charge that departments carried out mass arrests as a crowd control tactic, as a means to silence peaceful protesters, and as a public relations strategy designed to turn the public against demonstrators by making them appear more violent than they were. And what’s more – some of the citing officers never witnessed the protests in the first place.
“It sends a message that you might get arrested if you express your views and first amendment rights,” said Vera Eidelman, staff attorney with the ACLU’s speech, privacy and technology project. “Police absolutely should not be relying on mass arrests to control a crowd or silence people who they disagree with.”
In most of a dozen jurisdictions examined, at least 90% of cases were dropped or dismissed. In some cities, like Dallas and Philadelphia, as many as 95% of citations were dropped or not prosecuted.
Right there in your supposed proof is the reason why these cases were dropped. They weren't legitimate arrests and prosecutors knew it. I'm no lawyer but I know well enough that any prosecutor worth a damn wouldn't prosecute any case based on an illegitimate arrest.
Right there in your supposed proof is the reason why these cases were dropped. They weren't legitimate arrests and prosecutors knew it. I'm no lawyer but I know well enough that any prosecutor worth a damn wouldn't prosecute any case based on an illegitimate arrest.
You mean like 1/6 threads that turn into “yeah, but what about BLM/Antifa”?You guys should start a "Yeah, but...." thread.
You sure nailed him with that oneYou mean like 1/6 threads that turn into “yeah, but what about BLM/Antifa”?
I read nothing in that link to indicate the political leanings of those prosecutors. Nonetheless, prosecutorial ethics rate higher on the scale than party affiliation when it comes to doing one's job.That was the excuse given by liberal prosecutors who have no interest in filing charges. These are the same prosecutors who refuse to charge any thiefs who steal less than $1000.