This is not a he said/she said. This is a "he said/she said she said she said she said she said she said she said she said she said she said she said she said she said she said she said she said she said she said she said she said she said she said she said she said" and on and on and on, because there are a ton of accusations and virtually all of them have corroborating evidence. And it's also a "she said/he admitted it on tape to Billy Bush while ogling a soap opera star." And also a "she said/he is currently getting sued for defamation for claiming one of the assaults didn't happen and his defense is that the false denial was protected 'political speech.'" And also a "he said/she said but she is a widely respected journalist and he tells multiple confirmed lies every day."
Also "lack of proof" should not be a problem in a case like this. Even in a court of law you need only to prove something beyond a reasonable doubt, not prove it with 100% certainty. And this is not a court of law where the accused faces the prospect of incarceration, this is a court of public opinion where if the accused is most likely guilty and nobody cares it sends a strong message to our children that men can assault women with impunity. The burden in that situation should be at most whether it is "more likely than not" that the incident took place.
I get that it's hard for people to reconcile what this man is all about with the fact that people they love and respect support Trump. I am very fortunate to not be in that position,
and you and others have my sympathy. But IMO there's very little question that some measure of resentment of "others" and the bonds forged by coming together to do so, as detailed in
this famous article. I don't know whether that describes your friends and family- obviously I hope it doesn't, and I have no reason to doubt you when you say that. But it sure rings true based on everything I've seen and heard from Trump reporters here and everywhere else.