Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.
Agree especially if it's 1.5 per solo. I like Williamson a lot and Davis was a stud from that spot so I think he can repeat, but Hyde is a solid all-around talent and that offense should grow. Drafting Barkley is still a threat which is probably why the Hyde owner jumped ship but it's worth the risk.
I agree with the consensus at this point that Hyde would be the side I want to be on. Williamson is good but generally you can find LB talent in 10 team leagues to cover that position. RB's are always hard to find. That is they main reason I would lean towards Hyde.
I am not sold that Gordon will be all that he is hyped to be. I think that is paying way too much to find out. Give me Mosley/Cole. I wouldn't be surprised if Cole is 75% of Gordon and Mosley makes up that difference easily.
I think both teams are happy with it.
Yeah he took some grief for that one.I'm sure I'll get slated for mine, but the bottom one is pretty bad
I think that is a terrible trade in a 2 QB league for the guy giving up Newton. What QB's did giving up Newton leave him with? I don't think Flowers is a big enough upgrade on Charlton to warrant this even with the addition of Evans. Losing a guy like Newton in a 2QB league is tough to recover from without getting any QB in return.
Jeesh.....the guy had Brady, A-Rod, AND Newton. I would say the trade looks much better with that information. The fact that he has Garropolo as well is just icing and gives some future in case Brady walks away. That is crazy QB depth in a 2 QB league.
When you say much better, I assume you’re saying it’s more of a 50/50 deal now. As the commissioner of the league some owners Said they felt it was still 70/30 Newton side.... I told them when you have QB capital like that, you can make moves like that
Mosley easily.
Yeah, that info changes everything. Deep QB draft coming up as well makes it even more reasonable.
True, and the reality is that anyone upset with it probably didn't get involved in trade discussions and are kicking themselves. I'll bet the owner that was deep at QB had them listed as trade bait and fielded minimal offers.... then catches flak when they make the trade that improves their team but looks a bit out of balance.
The deal is still lopsided but it is understandably lopsided now. The only way a trade should be talked about with regards to fairness is if there is a hint of collusion. The bolded above is absolutely true. Obviously when a team has that type of QB depth giving one away to improve your roster somewhere else will lead to "unfair" trades because sometimes you have to overpay for what you want.
Trade 1: I would lean towards Clark especially if I had solid LB's to cover for losing Trevathan. I don't think Trevathan can stay healthy and Clark will have more opportunity with Bennett gone.
Exactly my point...he scored .5ppg more than Blake freaking Martinez, who would cost, idk, a ham sandwich....if you own him and anyone in your league lives him like this thread does, sell him NOW!Hankmoody said:
As mentioned by Arodin it somewhat depends on how offensive players are valued to defensive players. If IDP's are drafted relatively high to push some of the offensive talent down in the draft the 2 rd upgrade doesn't make up the difference for me in the more proven Jones to Jack. If IDP's are somewhat of an afterthought then I would make that trade because of the pick upgrade and I don't have to worry about a replacement IDP if Jack doesn't pan out because it is easier to replace.
Seems good depending on what "early" means with respect to the 2019 first rounder. Collins should be good when healthy but replaceable in most cases.
I think it's worth the risk for you. Mack is a stud especially in Big Play scoring leagues and if he does go DE (which he should) all the better. I am assuming there are no restrictions like salary cap or round lost or length of keeper status skewing one way or the other.
All depends on scoring. In my leagues he was LB39 which is low-end starter (12x3 with a 4th flexable) so even if he doesn't get the DE he's still worth carrying. I have zero faith in back injuries for big guys so would take Mack handily here.
Looks like a classic "veteran star to contender, high level draft prospect to rebuilder" deal.
I think this is bordering on robbery (albeit a minor robbery like some cash and CD's out of a car that was left unlocked but leaving the car itself). Cobb is JAG and Suh is a top notch DT and should be better with the talent around him with the Rams now. If he had the roster space to take on the players this is a great trade for Team B with little to no risk and a decent upside.
Nice12tm ppr
Gave: A.Amos, 3.06
Got: L.Miller
Only enquired about Miller for a bit of vet depth....he offered me this....I didn't ponder too long
Definitely worth the risk to see if Vernon gets the DE designation again. I don't think Milano is anything special and is just filler.
