HellToupee
Footballguy
Palestinian Chicken is my all time favorite Curb episodeNot my quote but
2019... the time of group oppression by a chicken resturant.
Palestinian Chicken is my all time favorite Curb episodeNot my quote but
2019... the time of group oppression by a chicken resturant.
LGBT+ is starting to be the accepted catch all acronym.BTW, the acronym is now officially too long for me.
I had CFA today for lunch, as luck would have it. Our food court has CFA, Panda, and some pita place that kind of blows, so I only have two live options if I want to eat on campus.
The acronym needs it's own acronymBTW, the acronym is now officially too long for me.
Not bad options. Much better than the typical Burger King or Arbys. Grilled chicken salad at CFA in my go to, and I have always like Panda. Black pepper chicken, sweet fire chicken with veggies makes it somewhat healthy.I had CFA today for lunch, as luck would have it. Our food court has CFA, Panda, and some pita place that kind of blows, so I only have two live options if I want to eat on campus.
Here is the Chick-Fil-A thread:Not bad options. Much better than the typical Burger King or Arbys. Grilled chicken salad at CFA in my go to, and I have always like Panda. Black pepper chicken, sweet fire chicken with veggies makes it somewhat healthy.
I was replying to Ivans comments about having CFA and Panda available to him.Here is the Chick-Fil-A thread:
https://forums.footballguys.com/forum/topic/555816-chick-fil-a/
Please use that in the future to discuss it or other fast food choices instead of posting in this thread, which is devoted to LGBT+ discussion and issues. TIA.
Please keep this in the Chick-Fil-A thread.Yes, indeed.
https://www.vox.com/the-goods/2019/3/21/18275850/chick-fil-a-anti-lgbtq-donations
Chick-fil-A’s charitable foundation kept donating to anti-LGBTQ groups
Chick-fil-A, the Georgia-based fast-food chain known for its juicy chicken sandwiches — and for its executives’ conservative strain of Christianity — has continued donating to anti-LGBTQ charities through its foundation despite claiming it had no political affiliation, ThinkProgress reports.
The Chick-fil-A Foundation donated more than $1.8 million to three groups with a history of anti-LGBTQ discrimination in 2017, according to recently released tax filings analyzed by ThinkProgress. That year, Chick-fil-A’s charitable arm gave $1,653,416 to the Fellowship of Christian Athletes, a religious organization that requires its employees to refrain from “homosexual acts”; $150,000 to the Salvation Army, which has been accused of anti-LGBTQ discrimination and advocacy for years and whose media relations director once claimed gay people “deserve death”; and $6,000 to the Paul Anderson Youth Home, a Christian residential home that teaches young boys that same-sex marriage is a “rage against Jesus Christ and His values.”
These donations were made five years after Chick-fil-A CEO Dan Cathy said the US was “inviting God’s judgment on our nation when we shake our fist at him and we say we know better than you as to what constitutes a marriage.” Cathy’s comments prompted a nationwide boycott — as well as a counter-boycott, called “Chick-fil-A Appreciation Day,” created by then-Fox News host Mike Huckabee — and an eventual apology from the company, which claimed it would “leave the policy debate over same-sex marriage to the government and the political arena.”
Still too much overlap. The "plus" is about as hackneyed as Gilligan's "and the rest".LGBT+ is starting to be the accepted catch all acronym.BTW, the acronym is now officially too long for me.
LG? Isnt that a brand?Still too much overlap. The "plus" is about as hackneyed as Gilligan's "and the rest".
Really just need 2 letters here. One to describe sexual orientation and one to describe gender orientation.
"Lesbian" and "Gay" overlap each other. And "Bisexual" overlaps both of them. (All lesbians are gay; all bisexuals are part gay.)LG? Isnt that a brand?Still too much overlap. The "plus" is about as hackneyed as Gilligan's "and the rest".
Really just need 2 letters here. One to describe sexual orientation and one to describe gender orientation.
Just gay probably works."Lesbian" and "Gay" overlap each other. And "Bisexual" overlaps both of them. (All lesbians are gay; all bisexuals are part gay.)
You just need one term to cover all 3 -- Gay, Homosexual, Queer, etc.
What would you suggest? As a historical note, first "homosexual" rights organizations in late 60s just used "gay" in the title, but lesbians objected to that, so they were included in the name (and oddly given first billing) so I don't think one letter would suffice today, at a bare minimum it would have to be LGT.Still too much overlap. The "plus" is about as hackneyed as Gilligan's "and the rest".
Really just need 2 letters here. One to describe sexual orientation and one to describe gender orientation.
Aren't lesbians gay? But what about bisexuals? We can't REALLY call them gay right?What would you suggest? As a historical note, first "homosexual" rights organizations in late 60s just used "gay" in the title, but lesbians objected to that, so they were included in the name (and oddly given first billing) so I don't think one letter would suffice today, at a bare minimum it would have to be LGT.
Why do you care?Aren't lesbians gay? But what about bisexuals? We can't REALLY call them gay right?
So should we go with LGBT? Gee see where this is going?
Why do you care?Still too much overlap. The "plus" is about as hackneyed as Gilligan's "and the rest".
Really just need 2 letters here. One to describe sexual orientation and one to describe gender orientation.
Yes, when the term "gay" was first adopted it was supposed to be all inclusive. However, lesbians of that day objected to being called "gay" (and may still probably do) - they didn't want to be included with the same label as gay men (I have no idea why and don't get the logic either).Aren't lesbians gay? But what about bisexuals? We can't REALLY call them gay right?
So should we go with LGBT? Gee see where this is going?
Let's keep the thread on track, GB.Why do you care?Still too much overlap. The "plus" is about as hackneyed as Gilligan's "and the rest".
Really just need 2 letters here. One to describe sexual orientation and one to describe gender orientation.
My only objection to this is that’s its in the FFA and CFA inevitably touches on politics particularly of the lgbtq+ communityHere is the Chick-Fil-A thread:
https://forums.footballguys.com/forum/topic/555816-chick-fil-a/
Please use that in the future to discuss it or other fast food choices instead of posting in this thread, which is devoted to LGBT+ discussion and issues. TIA.
Queer should be the one umbrella term as its used in the lgbtq+ but historically we know why it’s not the choiceYes, when the term "gay" was first adopted it was supposed to be all inclusive. However, lesbians of that day objected to being called "gay" (and may still probably do) - they didn't want to be included with the same label as gay men (I have no idea why and don't get the logic either).
What would you suggest? As a historical note, first "homosexual" rights organizations in late 60s just used "gay" in the title, but lesbians objected to that, so they were included in the name (and oddly given first billing) so I don't think one letter would suffice today, at a bare minimum it would have to be LGT.Still too much overlap. The "plus" is about as hackneyed as Gilligan's "and the rest".
Really just need 2 letters here. One to describe sexual orientation and one to describe gender orientation.
I agree that "Queer" comes closest to being the one term that could cover everything. And it's a term that has been co-opted by many different groups, both in terms of sexual orientation and gender orientation.Queer should be the one umbrella term as its used in the lgbtq+ but historically we know why it’s not the choiceYes, when the term "gay" was first adopted it was supposed to be all inclusive. However, lesbians of that day objected to being called "gay" (and may still probably do) - they didn't want to be included with the same label as gay men (I have no idea why and don't get the logic either).
Wow, this quote is all kinds of stupid:
It’s unfortunate that this transgender movement is threatening to push aside decades of gains for women.
https://www.breitbart.com/sports/2019/04/21/campaign-launched-to-save-womens-sports-from-infiltration-of-transgender-competitors/
“I do not want to see girls who are playing soccer who are tough face pressure to adopt gender ideology and say they are boys,” Stelzer said.
See I would say gay covers everything better.I agree that "Queer" comes closest to being the one term that could cover everything. And it's a term that has been co-opted by many different groups, both in terms of sexual orientation and gender orientation.
It’s pretty simple. If you are stimulated by anything about someone of the same sex that’s gay. If you are stimulated by acting or dressing like the other sex, that is also gay. All these letters fit under the umbrella of gay.See I would say gay covers everything better.
"Gay" would not cover an asexual person (i.e., not attracted to any sex) or a non-binary person (i.e., not identifying as male or female).See I would say gay covers everything better.I agree that "Queer" comes closest to being the one term that could cover everything. And it's a term that has been co-opted by many different groups, both in terms of sexual orientation and gender orientation.
But queer does?"Gay" would not cover an asexual person (i.e., not attracted to any sex) or a non-binary person (i.e., not identifying as male or female).
"Queer" is a term that has been used by many different groups, including people who identify as non-binary and asexual.But queer does?"Gay" would not cover an asexual person (i.e., not attracted to any sex) or a non-binary person (i.e., not identifying as male or female).
You are confusing sexual attraction or orientation with gender identity. Transgender folks are those whose gender identity or gender expression differs from their assigned sex - it has nothing to do with being "stimulated" by either sex.It’s pretty simple. If you are stimulated by anything about someone of the same sex that’s gay. If you are stimulated by acting or dressing like the other sex, that is also gay. All these letters fit under the umbrella of gay.
Yeah I don't equate the word queer to asexuals....at all........but then again, maybe I have never seen it used in that manner. Can't asexuals just be nothing?"Queer" is a term that has been used by many different groups, including people who identify as non-binary and asexual.
Not everyone likes the word, though.
No because it has a lot of baggage associated with it for being used as a pejorative against gay men for decades."Queer" is a term that has been used by many different groups, including people who identify as non-binary and asexual.
Not everyone likes the word, though.
So Gay and Transgender?You are confusing sexual attraction or orientation with gender identity. Transgender folks are those whose gender identity or gender expression differs from their assigned sex - it has nothing to do with being "stimulated" by either sex.
The Trans people I know aren't "stimulated" by "acting or dessing like the other sex." It's not about sexual behavior at all.It’s pretty simple. If you are stimulated by anything about someone of the same sex that’s gay. If you are stimulated by acting or dressing like the other sex, that is also gay. All these letters fit under the umbrella of gay.
Hey buddy GT is already taken. Find another acronym, pleaseSo Gay and Transgender?
"Gay" and "Transgender" are probably the two most accurate words to use.......although many lesbians don't like the term "Gay", and many non-binary people don't like the term "Transgender" (because it implies that they want to transition from one gender to another).So Gay and Transgender?You are confusing sexual attraction or orientation with gender identity. Transgender folks are those whose gender identity or gender expression differs from their assigned sex - it has nothing to do with being "stimulated" by either sex.
Lesbians don't like gay. Bisexuals would not agree they are gay or transgenderedSo Gay and Transgender?
TG?Hey buddy GT is already taken. Find another acronym, please
A bi would have to have been gay at some point?Lesbians don't like gay. Bisexuals would not agree they are gay or transgendered
I don't know...Not the expert here.A bi would have to have been gay at some point?
I blame the thread title. It's an invitation for questions.I’m glad we could all get back to the real issue. Telling people who feel marginalized and dismissed what they should be allowed to call themselves. Again.
Awe...That's cute.I’m glad we could all get back to the real issue. Telling people who feel marginalized and dismissed what they should be allowed to call themselves. Again.
Well, for many that's what the Q stands for.[scooter] said:I blame the thread title. It's an invitation for questions.
I don't think I even understand what this is asking.knowledge dropper said:A bi would have to have been gay at some point?