Long Ball Larry
Footballguy
I kind of agree. My biggest issue is that CHI has a bye after next week, which is kind of annoying.I dropped BALT D in favor of CHI myself. Also think CHI is a better long term play.
I kind of agree. My biggest issue is that CHI has a bye after next week, which is kind of annoying.I dropped BALT D in favor of CHI myself. Also think CHI is a better long term play.
I took that into consideration as well, but I see other streamable D's out there two weeks out.I kind of agree. My biggest issue is that CHI has a bye after next week, which is kind of annoying.
Yeah about that...I've preemptively grabbed GB in almost every league I'm in. Have to keep following around BUF.
I still kind of want to target them..Yeah about that...
what a league.
Grabbed them too, but then someone dropped Denver and I picked them up. Thank goodness. Green Bay blowsYeah about that...
what a league.
So I guess you haven't looked at next week's schedule, huh?Grabbed them too, but then someone dropped Denver and I picked them up.
I'm giving them a shot this week -- I'd like to see Josh Allen do that again before I stop viewing Buffalo's opponent as an auto stream -- but Detroit is not a good matchup (and GB's D isn't very good.)I like the Packers for the next three weeks:
Week 4: Bills @ home
Week 5: @ Detroit
Week 6: C. J. Beathard led SF squad the week after, at home.
Seattle is absolutely worth a grab this week for the opponent alone.I'm stubborn. Still think Denver & Houston will come around, too much talent to not round into form.
CLE & SEA are on the WW - maybe drop the Broncos with the Chiefs coming up?
I may just stand pat there.Seattle is absolutely worth a grab this week for the opponent alone.
Tough call dropping the Donkeys though.
Might as well go ahead & carry 3 then for the 2 game the Seahawks get against the Niners. It’ll be Beathard or Savage - that’s fantasy gold, Jerry.I may just stand pat there.
HOU has a ton of bad offenses coming up on the schedule, and I love the DEN playoff schedule.
Normally don't carry two Ds but - stubbornly - really think this could be a killer combo if they start playing better.
Haha well I guess Dede is my WR7 is Alshon ever plays so maybe I'll do itMight as well go ahead & carry 3 then for the 2 game the Seahawks get against the Niners. It’ll be Beathard or Savage - that’s fantasy gold, Jerry.
The Vikings totally slept on the Bills and lost. Now they have to play @ Rams without star defender E. Griffin.I still kind of want to target them..
Yeah, I mean I preemptively picked up GB in a majority of my leagues last week. I see that they're -10 at home, I don't think I would ever shy away from something like that. It sucks that they lost Wilkerson though.The Vikings totally slept on the Bills and lost. Now they have to play @ Rams without star defender E. Griffin.
Which leads me to GB. I expect Rodgers and company to take care of business at home vs Bills. Game script should flip with Josh Allen playing catch up. The Bills were leading the entire freaking game against the Vikings. Are we expecting the same at GB? No I don't think so. GB D should be one of the top streamers of the week. Don't overthink it.
So glad we killed the IR in both my leagues.. Silly IR rules been messing me up for weeks.
You have the order right.Alright, there are three no brain streamers this week -- LAC vs SF, GB vs BUF, and SEA @AZ -- how do you rank them? I'll give it a shot.
1. LAC -- Gotta think SF is a bit in disarray. C. Beathard is not a good matchup for this secondary. And LAC has to crush this one.
2. GB vs BUF -- Counting on the MN game being an anomaly. GB D not great by any means, but they are much better at home and thinking BUF comes down to earth. They wont sneak up on GB.
3. SEA -- Think this is a solid play, but Rosen actually looks like he can be competent. Always wary of a D playing away as well.
What ya got?
Looks good to me --and all available in my league -Just need to decide if I should just roll with Ravens anyway--Alright, there are three no brain streamers this week -- LAC vs SF, GB vs BUF, and SEA @AZ -- how do you rank them? I'll give it a shot.
1. LAC -- Gotta think SF is a bit in disarray. C. Beathard is not a good matchup for this secondary. And LAC has to crush this one.
2. GB vs BUF -- Counting on the MN game being an anomaly. GB D not great by any means, but they are much better at home and thinking BUF comes down to earth. They wont sneak up on GB.
3. SEA -- Think this is a solid play, but Rosen actually looks like he can be competent. Always wary of a D playing away as well.
What ya got?
:XI'm stubborn. Still think Denver & Houston will come around, too much talent to not round into form.
CLE & SEA are on the WW - maybe drop the Broncos with the Chiefs coming up?
Their defense has looked legit as well. Might be worth picking up after NE if you can get them.Indy - HOU, ne, NYJ, Buf, Oak coming up
My thoughts exactly. BAL-Bolts or BAL -Sea. Ravens need Mosely back. J Smith will be back Week 5 I think. If he behaves.How do people see BAL? They got gashed in Week 2 but were solid WK1 and would have been a top-ranked D last week had a return for a TD been upheld given penalty.
I was thinking of holding and platooning with SD for the year as I think both of these Ds grade out as Top 10 Ds ROS, rather than the added variance streaming might get. But wanted to get the experts' view in this thread.
They (HOU) were drafted in my league and I'm already their fourth owner.:X
turrible!!
Torn between GB and Seattle this week.
Chargers have a good run coming up before their bye...SF, Oak, Cle on the road and Ten1. LAC -- Gotta think SF is a bit in disarray. C. Beathard is not a good matchup for this secondary. And LAC has to crush this one.
Man, I want to believe that with Baltimore but I just don't see it. Even worse, I'm having a real hard time seeing any great defenses or who the true marks are (bad teams) to play against. I've never gone this far into the season and STILL have been so uncertain. Oye vey.How do people see BAL? They got gashed in Week 2 but were solid WK1 and would have been a top-ranked D last week had a return for a TD been upheld given penalty.
I was thinking of holding and platooning with SD for the year as I think both of these Ds grade out as Top 10 Ds ROS, rather than the added variance streaming might get. But wanted to get the experts' view in this thread.
Yeah, six teams pulled off huge upsets last week.Man, I want to believe that with Baltimore but I just don't see it. Even worse, I'm having a real hard time seeing any great defenses or who the true marks are (bad teams) to play against. I've never gone this far into the season and STILL have been so uncertain. Oye vey.
On the verge of dropping them for weekly matchups.........are they good enough to hang on to a roster a 2nd defence this week? Anyone have the stones to play them against Steelers?How do people see BAL? They got gashed in Week 2 but were solid WK1 and would have been a top-ranked D last week had a return for a TD been upheld given penalty.
I was thinking of holding and platooning with SD for the year as I think both of these Ds grade out as Top 10 Ds ROS, rather than the added variance streaming might get. But wanted to get the experts' view in this thread.
Starting CHI with confidence. Steelers showed Fitz will turn it over/take sacks under pressure.Are Bears owners sticking or streaming this week vs TB? I also have Cinci but they're @ATL. Could pick up someone else, but I'm thinking Chicago could be OK. First of all, Fitz could implode any time. Second, even if he goes four-large again, it doesn't mean there won't be sacks and TOs.
Not loving CHI D. Couple of Fitzy's INTs were fluky. They still put up a ton of yards and points.Starting CHI with confidence. Steelers showed Fitz will turn it over/take sacks under pressure.
I see Arizona highly ranked.......how with a non existent offense and a rookie QB that can turnover and leave a short field?Challenge with Chicago is they’re facing a potentially difficult matchup v TB and then a bye. So you’re gonna have to drop them at the bye or carry 2 Ds. Not awesome
Thinking of dropping Chicago, yes it hurts, targeting GB or Az and riding them for a couple of weeks
I chose Pitt over them for this very reason.I see Arizona highly ranked.......how with a non existent offense and a rookie QB that can turnover and leave a short field?
NoOn the verge of dropping them for weekly matchups.........are they good enough to hang on to a roster a 2nd defence this week? Anyone have the stones to play them against Steelers?
All those options are gone in our league, Texans were dropped anyone like them or see anything deeper?I chose Pitt over them for this very reason.
I don’t think Pitt is a great choice either but Arizona defense seems like asking for trouble.
Seattle and Green Bay got snagged off waivers.
What are you thinking for next week when they're on bye? SF/AZ have a "pick either side" matchup, as do Tenn/Buffalo.Starting CHI with confidence. Steelers showed Fitz will turn it over/take sacks under pressure.