This one?There was almost a coup prior to Trump but the takedown is bein done legally with Trump. There is a great video but for the life of me I cannot find it. Will have to look again.
This one?There was almost a coup prior to Trump but the takedown is bein done legally with Trump. There is a great video but for the life of me I cannot find it. Will have to look again.
What exactly is the challenge? It doesn’t take intellect to dismiss facts that disagree with your narrative. You’re demanding we take a lot on faith without much explanation of how or why we should blindly follow Q. You can’t even acknowledge your factual errors or contradictions, save one really obvious one you tried to plea down to a lesser charge.No
I am done until around midnight.
Thanks all, appreciate the challenge.
If the Mililary is running things thru Trump...that is not technically legal. They were not elected.There was almost a coup prior to Trump but the takedown is bein done legally with Trump. There is a great video but for the life of me I cannot find it. Will have to look again.
You scamp, you.It looks like Trump's signature obscured by the pen.
#1776 starts with 17, and Q is the 17th letter of the alphabet. Moreover, the year 1776 was when American independence was declared. But it was also the year when George Washington's army was defeated in its attempt to invade Quebec, which starts with the letter ... [checks notes] ... Q!
That video is the best thing I’ve seen so far to explain the tremendous draw people are having to all this. I’m anxious to read @Qanon‘s thoughts on it.
Darn you roped me back in with this post, but just temporarily or I will be looking at kitchen knife real close.It looks like Trump's signature obscured by the pen.
#1776 starts with 17, and Q is the 17th letter of the alphabet. Moreover, the year 1776 was when American independence was declared. But it was also the year when George Washington's army was defeated in its attempt to invade Quebec, which starts with the letter ... [checks notes] ... Q!
Perfect decode.Trump signed his name and wrote 1776 for Q to share for Q’s 1,776th post?
Q was the nickname Frank Sinatra bestowed upon Quincy Jones.I read Qanon’s posts in the voice of Dwight Shrute.
I have actual, verifiable proof of my source’s bona fides.Your choice. I prefer Military Intel.
Whom amongst ourselves hasn't come across as a big come across as a big poopy head?Clearly as that’s how I come across in my posts.
Wild speculation is offended.I have actual, verifiable proof of my source’s bona fides.
You’ve got, at best, wild speculation.
If Trump could play the media like a fiddle then the media would not be able to portray him as a fool.Trump plays the media like a fiddle. He is not the fool the MSM portrays him
Unless manipulating the media into portraying him as a fool is part of his plan.If Trump could play the media like a fiddle then the media would not be able to portray him as a fool.
Hahaha! He has them right where he wants them!Unless manipulating the media into portraying him as a fool is part of his plan.
You have the ability to make stuff up too.We do not make predictions, I would not expect anything until January 2019 which is when Trumps EO come into effect. Even that is a guess.Q, based on your knowledge could you make some specific predictions? Preferably with some sort of rough time frame (weeks, months, years, etc)?
But many things have already happened, just not the "big" things you are looking for. I think I have already pasted some Q posts to show some stuff that has already happened. You have more than you know.
Most of the world is carpeted...You have the ability to make stuff up too.
Love the repeated slogans. Not creepy at all.
.... and one day, we will do the cleaning.Most of the world is carpeted...
Damn that is a really disturbing video. What unnerved me is that the narrator kept stating that this is a war between good and evil, and used apocalyptic terms.
They'll just predict new arrests for a new set of enemies. That's how conspiracy theories work. They never make definitive predictions so their worldview can never be shattered.How are these people going to react if the “enemies” aren’t arrested as they predict?
This is my answer to all your questions. It started with Trumps candidacy.You obviously don't mean this question literally. (The report that Trump won the electoral college wasn't a lie.) Can I rephrase it into a more interesting question for @Qanon?
Consider an individual reporter. He double-majors in journalism and English composition in college (writes for the school paper, of course) and gets his first job covering local issues for the local paper. Crime, mostly. After a while, he starts getting assigned to more important matters, including coverage of local politicians. Later on, he gets called up to the big leagues, getting a job at the Wall Street Journal. He's at the Washington D.C. desk of the Journal, in fact, covering major political stories.
My questions are: (1) Does he ever get a formal, explicit instruction (from an editor maybe?) to create fake news rather than covering real news, or is it just something he's supposed to pick up on his own? (2) If he gets an explicit instruction, exactly where along the way did he get it? At the local paper or the national one? (Or maybe at the school paper?) When he was covering crime, or not until he was covering politics? Finally, (3) If he didn't get an explicit instruction but was just supposed to pick the fake news idea up on his own ... is every single mainstream journalist capable of getting the message, with no exceptions? How do the Rothschilds (or whoever) prevent somebody from falling through the cracks and doing a competent, diligent job of reporting real news, oblivious to the unspoken rule that everyone's supposed to be making things up?
Correct should have read this first before answering. I will see if I can delete that reply. Not needed thanks to you sir.This isn't that hard, guys. All MSM news outlets are fake 90% of the time. (And 90% isn't necessarily exact -- it just means "often.")
When did MSM become Fake News?All MSM is Fake News, 10% is a general concept of real coverage by Fake News. Sorry for the confusion.
I cannot see all of what you are referring to but from what I can see, NOTHING there is false.Multiple people took issue with this.
I pointed out it was false and you argued it wasn’t and called me a troll.
How will the people know the truth if they shut this down? Maybe you want this shut down because....https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MMzd40i8TfAMods: shut it down
Never got in a league yet, so I guess there will be none.When's your draft, Qanon?
If you aren’t willing to be accountable for your own posts, why should we believe what you say?I cannot see all of what you are referring to but from what I can see, NOTHING there is false.
Actually a lot has already happened if you follow the news.Yeah, that's what I figured.
Can't tell if you're bull####ting yourself or think you're bull####ting the world, but in 2018 it doesn't really matter.
Just in passing, more a computer YT and CNN, MSNBC and FOX home pages kind of guy.How many hours per month do you spend watching and reading MSM?
Are YT and FOX MSM?Just in passing, more a computer YT and CNN, MSNBC and FOX home pages kind of guy.
Absolutely false, Obama had a GDP of less than 2% and the market was if I remember around 1500 or so.True or false...the economy (can talk market, jobs...) is following th trends from before Trump took office?
Already quickly acknowledged your decode but feel the need to address is again. That was a "relatively" easy one but you are definitely on the right track if you understood that post. Do you agree it is a Proof?gTrump signed his name and wrote 1776 for Q to share for Q’s 1,776th post?
Cite, please.Absolutely false, Obama had a GDP of less than 2% and the market was if I remember around 1500 or so.
It really is irrelevant. Trump did the deal in late 2017. That is what counts. Remember it would take over 4 launches every month for the rest of the year.But it isn’t irrelevant. It’s a pattern they engage in, like promising to stop with the nukes but, you know, not doing that.
Qanon. I’ve repeatedly and respectfully asked you now 3 times to prove facts that the MSM is fake ( or 90% as you say) yet my question continues to get ignored. I’ll give you the benefit of the doubt that you’ve been bombarded here and just keep missing it. But it’s late now and the board is pretty mellow. Really would love to see the facts so I can understand. ThanksCorrect should have read this first before answering. I will see if I can delete that reply. Not needed thanks to you sir.
The "mission statement" if that is what you want to call it, is two posts after yours. Watch the video.Hey Chief, does Qanon (the group, not you personally), have a mission statement? And if not, what do you think it would be if they did?
Absolutely the one, thank you very much for posting it.
You don't think it is difficult to keep up with you all? really?What exactly is the challenge? It doesn’t take intellect to dismiss facts that disagree with your narrative. You’re demanding we take a lot on faith without much explanation of how or why we should blindly follow Q. You can’t even acknowledge your factual errors or contradictions, save one really obvious one you tried to plea down to a lesser charge.
Nothing you are doing is difficult.
I don't believe that is what I said, I believe I said they were working together.If the Mililary is running things thru Trump...that is not technically legal. They were not elected.