jamny
Footballguy
Last edited by a moderator:
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums
Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.
#QAnon (2 Viewers)
- Thread starter Juxtatarot
- Start date
Bruce Dickinson
Footballguy
Bruce Dickinson
Footballguy
Q is the one doing the deflecting. His McCain shtick didn't go over well, so now he's throwing out Hillary is a criminal material to distract people who didn't like being told McCain was a pedophile. By shifting their focus to how much they hate Hillary, they won't spend too much time thinking about how ridiculous and repugnant the McCain stuff was - so bad even an all-in devotee like you can't repeat it.
Other 2000 candidates were:
Withdrew at convention
Alan Keyes
Withdrew during primary elections
John McCain
Steve Forbes
Gary Bauer
Orrin Hatch
Withdrew before primary elections
Lamar Alexander
Pat Buchanan
Elizabeth Dole
John Kasich
Dan Quayle
Bob Smith
Herman Cain
Declined to run:
John Ashcroft
Newt Gingrich
Jack Kemp
George Pataki
Harold E. Stassen
Donald Trump
Fred Thompson
Tommy Thompson
Christine Todd Whitman
Your Welcome
Radio Free Homer
Footballguy
Bruce Dickinson
Footballguy
That's very fascinating to me. I read a lot myself. Some people think I'm too intellectual. But I think reading is a fabulous way to spend your spare time... I also play racquetball. Do you ever play? It's a great game! You should play sometime. I bet you'd be good. You seem very athletic. Do you have any hobbies?Sigh. I miss Print Is Dead.
Radio Free Homer
Footballguy
dkp993
Footballguy
Not true there are 35 Q posts concerning McCain starting in December of 2017 and ending August 27th.
He is no longer an issue at this time, unless he is brought up concerning something else.
Q never posted connecting McCain to pedophilia.
ZERO times so that is a lie.
If you find please link please send it to me, you can't
IT NEVER HAPPENED.
Q Posts
Last edited by a moderator:
SaintsInDome2006
Footballguy
Eh wasn’t this the Reform Party? He was on the ballot in CA iirc also. And he didn’t decline to run, they kicked him out for being a huckster.
Last edited by a moderator:
Yes it was the Reform Party.
Not really a legitimate run like Bruce seemed to be insinuating.
SaintsInDome2006
Footballguy
Ok he *ran for President and he was considered a fraud by a tinpot party. Deserves ‘ran’ with an asterisk I’ll give you that.
Last edited by a moderator:
SaintsInDome2006
Footballguy
LOL.
- Yes, he ran folks, he had a campaign logo, and I’m sure then like now it involved selling hats & tshirts.
Bruce Dickinson
Footballguy
You said Trump hadn’t even thought about running for President. Trump’s actions in 1999 and 2000 show that is clearly not the case. He even published the book “The America We Deserve” devoted to the subject.
Osaurus
Footballguy
Bruce Dickinson
Footballguy
And a book. “The America We Deserve” doesn’t look as good on a hat as “Make America Great Again”, even with the hat made in China.
Some of the themes were similar. He promised to self-fund his campaign to innoculate himself from special interests, and criticized USA performance in world trade.
Last edited by a moderator:
SaintsInDome2006
Footballguy
Bruce Dickinson
Footballguy
Then what did happen?
Why is this such a struggle to get a straight answer out of you? Too scared to admit the MSM got the story right? Or was all the coverage of McCain’s funeral today staged?
Hey Bruce why is it you can never show a link. If I said what you say, please show me where so that I can see the context in which it was used. No I don't consider 2000 a legitimate run for president
Last edited by a moderator:
whoknew
Footballguy
Bruce Dickinson
Footballguy
Bruce I provided a link, told you the number of times he mentioned McCain in a Q post. You said Q posted McCain was a pedo.
You cannot show me where he posted that.
So yes it is a lie until you show me different.
I even provided everything you need.
Bruce Dickinson
Footballguy
I did tell you and said your post as was a lie.
What am I supposed to tell you?
Bruce Dickinson
Footballguy
Circumstances of John McCain’s death. Did he die of cancer like the MSM is saying, or is there more to the story?
Bruce Dickinson
Footballguy
So you’re saying Trump ran for President for 5 months without even thinking about running for President. Not the most nonsensical thing you’ll post today.
Bruce Dickinson
Footballguy
Your opinion and you are welcome to it.
That was and is my opinion.
It is irrelevant to the conversation, but feel free to keep relying on it.
Bruce Dickinson
Footballguy
If I conclude that McCain died of brain cancer and there is no nefarious conspiracy surrounding the circumstances of his death, have we concluded the same thing?
Bruce quit trying to get me into a conservation that we may or may not agree on.
We are each both entitled to our own opinion.
I would rather you reply to the post in which you said Q posted that McCain was a pedo.
That is not based on anyone's opinion.
Van Dyman
Footballguy
So you said something wrong and someone corrected it. Shouldn't be a big deal for most people. Simply acknowledge the mistake and move on like an adult, right? Nope, you come back with this little turd of a post:
"Trump ran for President in 2000" is about as straightforward as could be. Nothing in that 6-word post indicates that Trump's 2000 campaign was serious. You're intentionally mischaracterizing someone's post in order to argue against something that nobody even said. This isn't the first time you've done that, not even the first time TODAY. It's childish. Please stop.
TIA
You seem to have no clue what the original post was concerning. Here it is:So you said something wrong and someone corrected it. Shouldn't be a big deal for most people. Simply acknowledge the mistake and move on like an adult, right? Nope, you come back with this little turd of a post:
"Trump ran for President in 2000" is about as straightforward as could be. Nothing in that 6-word post indicates that Trump's 2000 campaign was serious. You're intentionally mischaracterizing someone's post in order to argue against something that nobody even said. This isn't the first time you've done that, not even the first time TODAY. It's childish. Please stop.
TIA
2 hours ago, Bruce Dickinson said:
Is the NY Times part of the MSM you tell us not to read because it is FAKE NEWS? Or is the NY Times not MSM because Print Is Dead?
That incident occurred long before Trump was even thinking of running.
Different circumstances altogether.
Therefore we were discussing Fake News which DID NOT occur until Trump was a serious candidate in 2016. This should not be difficult to understand or admit to. 2000 was totally irrelevant to the conversation
I absolutely stand by statement FAKE NEWS started this election cycle. Period
Please inform me of your second accusation?
randall146
Footballguy
For my money, this is the dumbest part about this whole thing. The Qanon wackadoodles believe that Q posts in riddles that they, but not the entire deep state intelligence community, can decipher.
It’s like little kids thinking their parents can’t understand pig latin
SaintsInDome2006
Footballguy
SaintsInDome2006
Footballguy
You linked directly to Gomer?
- If the IG reported this to Strzok why the
do you think Horowitz didn't put it in his report to Congress?
Last edited by a moderator:
Bruce Dickinson
Footballguy
When did you make that statement previously? And when you say "this election cycle", do you mean the 2018 midterms?
Bruce Dickinson
Footballguy
I swear from the bottom of my heart I am NOT trying to get into a conservation (sic). I am genuinely curious if you think the MSM reporting of McCain's death is accurate or not. I don't get why that is such a difficult question for you to answer. Maybe if you were straight with all of us from the outset there wouldn't be so much confusion. Your elusiveness on this rather straightforward question leads me to believe you don't believe Q's version of the events but you don't feel comfortable contradicting him.
Radio Free Homer
Footballguy
Bruce Dickinson
Footballguy
"I didn't know Trump tried to run for President in 2000. Since he was out of the race by spring, it isn't mentioned much by history. Had I known that, I wouldn't have used the 'hadn't even thought about it' turn of phrase, as that obviously isn't the case. Sorry about that. Still, I don't want that error to distract from my greater point, which is..."So you said something wrong and someone corrected it. Shouldn't be a big deal for most people. Simply acknowledge the mistake and move on like an adult, right? Nope, you come back with this little turd of a post:
"Trump ran for President in 2000" is about as straightforward as could be. Nothing in that 6-word post indicates that Trump's 2000 campaign was serious. You're intentionally mischaracterizing someone's post in order to argue against something that nobody even said. This isn't the first time you've done that, not even the first time TODAY. It's childish. Please stop.
TIA
Could have been over real easy. I would have mentioned that had Trump not run in 2016, I doubt I would have revisited his 2000 run. I remember it happening because I was living in Minnesota in 1999 and 2000 and at the time the state governor was a Reform Party guy. Governor Jesse Ventura (wow, has that gotten easier to type the last couple years) spoke about wanting to get a Reform candidate on the Presidential ballot. But it wasn't a cultural moment nationally. Almost all of the compelling theater of the 2000 election happened after Election Day.
Last edited by a moderator:
Bruce Dickinson
Footballguy
I have shown links. You use of "never" in this context is demonstrably false. I probably am slow to link back to a lot of your previous posts because the board software doesn't accommodate more than one quote very well on mobile. Also, you're the only user I encounter here who routinely denies making posts made that day, so you make points of contention out of things other users here don't. And while we're on the subject, when users here bring the receipts you are prone to ignoring them or changing the subject rather than deal with information that doesn't fit the narrative you're trying to push.
This isn't the first time I've mentioned how fast and loose you play with extreme language and how you get in the way of your own points when you use it. I swear I'm trying to help you communicate better when I bring it up. But it's on you to listen, I guess.
sho nuff
Footballguy
Intelligence community can’t crack the code but Janet from West Virginia has it all figured out on her YouTube channel (also funny thing she can’t work a search function or quotes on a basic message board)
Henry Ford
Footballguy
And thank goodness the deep state hasn’t found a way to shut down Janet. Or watch her videos to know what to do next.
Stupid deep state.
