You ever read the comments from her tweets? There are lots of people who think she is the greatest thing ever. HTH.Media sensation \= greatest thing ever .
HTH
You ever read the comments from her tweets? There are lots of people who think she is the greatest thing ever. HTH.Media sensation \= greatest thing ever .
HTH
Why did you reply to my post to make this comment? To make my point for me?She is the darling of the far-left. She is easily mocked for her ridiculous statements, but yet there is a significant group of people who really thinks she is the greatest thing ever.
No matter how many millions think she is the greatest if less then 30k decides she isn't the greatest for them anymore she is just a 1 and done Congress member.She is the darling of the far-left. She is easily mocked for her ridiculous statements, but yet there is a significant group of people who really thinks she is the greatest thing ever.
She is certainly well regarded by the progressive wing. More significantly, I’ve noticed that my daughter (in college) and her friends mention AOC in positive tones more than they do any other politician, with the possible exception of Bernie Sanders.You projection of how the right things is always off. And it is by far just not conservatives promoting her. She is the darling of the progressive wing.
This is an even more odd than people fretting over some idealistic freshman congresswoman while ignoring the idiots in control this very second. There's zero issue if people decided they wanted to bag on both, but there's clearly a priority issue here and your explanation doesn't help that.Not odd at all, IMO.
Many conservatives believe that AOC is the new face of the Democratic Party. It serves them well to believe this because it will help them win 2020, but even beyond that they need to believe it because it allows them to rationalize the current administration.
I'm pretty sure you're one of them.You ever read the comments from her tweets? There are lots of people who think she is the greatest thing ever. HTH.
THIS is the sort of perspective necessary here, but instead we have guys like jon_mx taking cues from the echo chamber (using movies and twitter followers blah blah blah) that he supposedly thinks is completely off the rails to guide his narrative.....can't really make this sort of contortionary (I might have just made up a word) feat up.No matter how many millions think she is the greatest if less then 30k decides she isn't the greatest for them anymore she is just a 1 and done Congress member.
Of course they’re going to ignore the “idiots in control”; they’re getting what they want from them. Tax cut, tough on immigration, and look at all the judges!This is an even more odd than people fretting over some idealistic freshman congresswoman while ignoring the idiots in control this very second. There's zero issue if people decided they wanted to bag on both, but there's clearly a priority issue here and your explanation doesn't help that.
I wish they would repeal his tax cuts and allow more immigrants in. Trump is a lame duck IMHO.Of course they’re going to ignore the “idiots in control”; they’re getting what they want from them. Tax cut, tough on immigration, and look at all the judges!
Whom am I supposedly echoing? There is not a single right-wing spot i go to to even echo from.THIS is the sort of perspective necessary here, but instead we have guys like jon_mx taking cues from the echo chamber (using movies and twitter followers blah blah blah) that he supposedly thinks is completely off the rails to guide his narrative.....can't really make this sort of contortionary (I might have just made up a word) feat up.
No one is doing that. They are just pointing out how unintelligent she sounds.Not odd at all, IMO.
Many conservatives believe that AOC is the new face of the Democratic Party. It serves them well to believe this because it will help them win 2020, but even beyond that they need to believe it because it allows them to rationalize the current administration.
The question is why is she such a focus of attention?No one is doing that. They are just pointing out how unintelligent she sounds.
Because she's in Congress, this is a political forum, she's outspoken, and she's an easy target? Just like anyone in Congress that says stupid things ends up being talked about here?The question is why is she such a focus of attention?
Not just here and not like this.Because she's in Congress, this is a political forum, she's outspoken, and she's an easy target? Just like anyone in Congress that says stupid things ends up being talked about here?
Do you think people in her district have prepared and eaten more yucca or cauliflower?Yeah makes sense to me. Grow stuff people in the area know how to prepare and like to eat.
Actually agree with this too...bizarre from both the attack and defense positions here.There's an awful lot of people interested in defending someone who's just an unimportant freshman congress woman. Odd they would spend so much time in this thread protecting someone that is meaningless.
read what I actually wroteWhom am I supposedly echoing? There is not a single right-wing spot i go to to even echo from.
So if this is the case there sure are a ton of posters here who think Trump is the greatest thing ever, right?I'm pretty sure you're one of them.
You might not agree with her politics, but you clearly love having her as a punching bag. Hence your 9,000 posts in this thread.
Fair point, however my argument would be that what the leader of the free world says and does is about a million times more consequential than a freshman congresswoman.So if this is the case there sure are a ton of posters here who think Trump is the greatest thing ever, right?
Exactly. She isn't even really popular.There's an awful lot of people interested in defending someone who's just an unimportant freshman congress woman. Odd they would spend so much time in this thread protecting someone that is meaningless.
But he his running foreign policy . He has more power than AOC and is doing more damage.I wish they would repeal his tax cuts and allow more immigrants in. Trump is a lame duck IMHO.
Cauliflower and I don’t think they grow in the same climates. I think her random top of the head example wasn’t a great example but I agree with her sentiment. Also yucca isn’t just for eating, it’s more often just decorative. I don’t know the exact demographic of the green space she’s referring to.Do you think people in her district have prepared and eaten more yucca or cauliflower?
I do kind of think Trump is an exemplar of what can go wrong. I'm leaving Trump as a president and who he is out of this specific point. Some Dems were pretty pleased with Trump's ascendancy because he was such an unlikable person, so they were happy to put him out as the face of the Republican party. But promotion is promotion and he ultimately thrived in that glare. The GOP should also be careful promoting someone who is basically just a frosh from a deep blue district who typically wouldn't have much influence or power.So if this is the case there sure are a ton of posters here who think Trump is the greatest thing ever, right?
Cauliflower seems to be a favorite of gluton-free vegan types often used as a flour subsitute. But it is widely available and is probably a food that is eaten quite often by all groups.Cauliflower and I don’t think they grow in the same climates. I think her random top of the head example wasn’t a great example but I agree with her sentiment. Also yucca isn’t just for eating, it’s more often just decorative. I don’t know the exact demographic of the green space she’s referring to.
I personally think the current ideology being stated by the President is quite radical, like in a Leninist sense.It's like I am watching people get worked up over a freshman congresswoman and her pie in the sky vision of the future vs getting worked up a current threat to our democracy. Let's be honest, the people aren't doing both, so that excuse doesn't fly. It's quite Twilight Zone - esque to watch people who incessantly whine about the "echo chamber" allowing that very "echo chamber" to drive their focus.
She was very influentual in the Amazon fiasco. She is setting the agenda for the presidential election. She spews out a lot of divisive rheotic which gets tons of coverage. She is constantly putting out outrageous statements, it is hardly nitpicking.I don’t think she is a genius or some amazing politician. She’s just a rookie and has had some major bumps. However, I find the quest to knitpick and find fault in everything she does so annoying considering she hasn’t done anything yet.
I personally think the current ideology being stated by the President is quite radical, like in a Leninist sense.
If you look at the Bloomberg piece the worst or most controversial thing Cortez is says is that capitalism is irredeemable. Ok, then she says some other stuff like corporations control our government. I could point to Churchill who said that democracy is completely unworkable but it's the best system we've got. Or similar statements over the last years about the failings of capitalism. The mark of a socialist or communist is the method to resolve that.
Now, take Trump. Trump - right now - is proposing that the executive branch is not answerable to Congress. He just declared a national emergency because he claims he is not beholden to the appropriations clause of the Constitution. This is a man who daily puts the full weight of the presidency towards negating Congressional power and attacking the free press. Personally the only thing I can think that compares is what Chavez did in Venezuela. If anyone wants to battle me on that, fine, I'm not being hyperbolic. The essence of Maduro's argument right now is that the executive branch in VZ is a separate power base not beholden to the Assembly or the constitutionally appointed courts.
I really don't know what is Cortez's end theory for resolving these well known negative effects of capitalism, but I don't get the sense it is anything nearly as radical as that.
I think there are certainly things worth defending that people seem extra sensitive over. Her tweeting not so much and plenty of her ideas deserve criticism and her shoot from the hip mentality.Actually agree with this too...bizarre from both the attack and defense positions here.
She is?She was very influentual in the Amazon fiasco. She is setting the agenda for the presidential election. She spews out a lot of divisive rheotic which gets tons of coverage. She is constantly putting out outrageous statements, it is hardly nitpicking.
Trump is a loony, but he is still bound by all the rules. Trump will lose in court like he usually does. Our Democracy is safe. Trump is no Chavez.I personally think the current ideology being stated by the President is quite radical, like in a Leninist sense.
If you look at the Bloomberg piece the worst or most controversial thing Cortez is says is that capitalism is irredeemable. Ok, then she says some other stuff like corporations control our government. I could point to Churchill who said that democracy is completely unworkable but it's the best system we've got. Or similar statements over the last years about the failings of capitalism. The mark of a socialist or communist is the method to resolve that.
Now, take Trump. Trump - right now - is proposing that the executive branch is not answerable to Congress. He just declared a national emergency because he claims he is not beholden to the appropriations clause of the Constitution. This is a man who daily puts the full weight of the presidency towards negating Congressional power and attacking the free press. Personally the only thing I can think that compares is what Chavez did in Venezuela. If anyone wants to battle me on that, fine, I'm not being hyperbolic. The essence of Maduro's argument right now is that the executive branch in VZ is a separate power base not beholden to the Assembly or the constitutionally appointed courts.
I really don't know what is Cortez's end theory for resolving these well known negative effects of capitalism, but I don't get the sense it is anything nearly as radical as that.
Amazon was a screw up. Talking about planting yucca? Not sure why that’s newsworthy.She was very influentual in the Amazon fiasco. She is setting the agenda for the presidential election. She spews out a lot of divisive rheotic which gets tons of coverage. She is constantly putting out outrageous statements, it is hardly nitpicking.
because it is silly, like many of her statements which she methodically puts out daily to stay in the news.Amazon was a screw up. Talking about planting yucca? Not sure why that’s newsworthy.
First 2 links...you see that first name listed there. That should be your hint that she isn’t.
Because why criticize a guy ignoring congress starting trade wars that hurt our farmers and citizens...and is trying to start a war with Iran when you can just quickly say he is loony and then nitpick AOC over and over and over againAmazon was a screw up. Talking about planting yucca? Not sure why that’s newsworthy.
....she is in the headlines with two of the top three Democratic candidates signing up to her plans looking for her endorsement. You are impossible.First 2 links...you see that first name listed there. That should be your hint that she isn’t.
The third is a laughable opinion piece that doesn’t talk about her setting it even shaping the agenda...just that two progressives may seek her followers.
According to the headline of an article wants and endorsement. Yet you skip over where he didn’t appear with her or even mention her name.Sen. Bernie Sanders and Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez did not appear onstage together Monday night when they took their turns at the mic roughly 45 minutes apart during the rally for the Green New Deal, nor did either mention the other by name. But merely being present in the same auditorium at roughly the same time was enough to spark chatter. Sanders, according to the original headline of a Politico article published right before he delivered his speech, is in “hot pursuit” of AOC’s endorsement. So too, according to the report, is Sen. Elizabeth Warren.
In the headlines does not equal setting an agenda for an election Jon...that is a ridiculous stretch. Neither is going for an endorsement. Just completely illogical.....she is in the headlines with two of the top three Democratic candidates signing up to her plans looking for her endorsement. You are impossible.
Sorry, redo, I didn't mean to be critical. Deleted my post.Trump is a loony, but he is still bound by all the rules. Trump will lose in court like he usually does. Our Democracy is safe. Trump is no Chavez.
Because she referred to growing cauliflower instead of yucca as an example of colonialism. If she was from AZ you could maybe try to find a way to give her a pass on such a statement.Ilov80s said:Amazon was a screw up. Talking about planting yucca? Not sure why that’s newsworthy.
Like many who go into politics she is a creature that feeds not on food, but on attention. She has a fast metabolism and needs lots of attention or she will starve. Now is she the biggest feeder at the attention buffet, not hardly. She does, however, have an impressive appetite for such a petite young thing.timschochet said:The question is why is she such a focus of attention?
It’s certainly mutualism.Like many who go into politics she is a creature that feeds not on food, but on attention. She has a fast metabolism and needs lots of attention or she will starve. Now is she the biggest feeder at the attention buffet, not hardly. She does, however, have an impressive appetite for such a petite young thing.
maybe she is in a growth spurt and needs extra nourishment.
She was referring to the overarching idea and not a specific garden in Brooklyn. I think this is zero in noteworthiness but it made some great headlines like “Cauliflower is racist.” If what she says is dumb, it is almost always followed be equally as dumb reactions.Because she referred to growing cauliflower instead of yucca as an example of colonialism. If she was from AZ you could maybe try to find a way to give her a pass on such a statement.
The overreaching idea is nothing but more rhetoric designed to push how minorities are oppressed in every way.She was referring to the overarching idea and not a specific garden in Brooklyn. I think this is zero in noteworthiness but it made some great headlines like “Cauliflower is racist.” If what she says is dumb, it is almost always followed be equally as dumb reactions.
Yeah I know it was a bad example. We’ve covered that. This is really unimportant in the big picture of the world politics right now imo.The overreaching idea is nothing but more rhetoric designed to push how minorities are oppressed in every way.
It is stupid to bring up. You cant call a place a food desert but then also say that the reason the community garden didnt work is because you had colonialist food. I would bet the number of food items in a gas station convenience store that arent "colonial" is pretty small.
It is especially ridiculous to even use cauliflower as an example.
According to Christine Couvelier, a culinary trendologist (yes, that's the job title, not a word I made up, although somebody surely did) at Metro News, this cruciferous veggie will outdo even kale as a favored recipe and menu ingredient in 2014.
In Mexico, cauliflower has been a market staple for as long as I can remember — since 1987. No hype required, just lovely heads of white florets standing out among the greens in the mercado. When I first started shopping at the Cholula market all those years ago, coliflor was one of the vegetables that were comfortingly familiar, well before even broccoli started showing up on a regular basis.
In fact due to the year round expectation these days of fruits and vegetables there arent very many things that arent regularly grown south of the border. Just look at the produce section labels next time you are at the gas station.