Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums
Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.
The Nancy Pelosi thread (2 Viewers)
- Thread starter timschochet
- Start date
OrtonToOlsen
Footballguy
timschochet
Footballguy
Wow, Trump released a video of Nancy Pelosi stammering. Stable genius at work.
squistion
Footballguy
It is hilarious when you stop to think about it. Pelosi got Trump to make his staff publicly vouch for his mental capacity.
Tell me again, who is playing chess and who is playing checkers.
Last edited by a moderator:
Joe Summer
Footballguy
knowledge dropper
Footballguy
Whether you agree or disagree with Pelosi, if she was a PSF poster and Trump was a PSF poster, how many days would she get in timeout for her comments?
The Commish
Footballguy
SaintsInDome2006
Footballguy
Dinsy Ejotuz
Footballguy
She wasn't the hero they wanted, but it turned out she was the hero they needed.
roadkill1292
Footballguy
I don't think there's any downside to an elected official with real power and influence on a national scale, one that Donald can't eliminate just because he wants to, calmly casting shade and inciting an unfit President into nakedly revealing how easy it is to put him on tilt. Losing his mind publicly with ever increasing frequency just cements in voters' mind that the guy is in way over his head.
Pelosi and House Dems need to keep rolling out legislation, though, and making a show of it. "We can walk and chew gum. The man in the White House apparently can't."
Pelosi and House Dems need to keep rolling out legislation, though, and making a show of it. "We can walk and chew gum. The man in the White House apparently can't."
John Blutarsky
Footballguy
CONTINUE to roll out legislation, stop with the tax returns and Russia nonsense, and then maybe they can address getting things done to help the country instead of focusing on 2020.
Last edited by a moderator:
sho nuff
Footballguy
They really just need to keep publicizing what they have rolled out and how McConnell has held it all up.
Hell they can do that and throw shade by making a little podium sign and reference how much they liked Trump’s sign but how theirs is using factual information.
Last edited by a moderator:
knowledge dropper
Footballguy
The Commish
Footballguy
Why would she be banned or even given a TO for something like that? It doesn't violate the TOS
The most recent comments about an intervention that was all the buzz yesterday.
ETA: At worst we'd see a "Don't" from FBG Moderator.
Last edited by a moderator:
sho nuff
Footballguy
Depends how many back and forth posts with someone and if it was messing up a topic. Then a “stop it” followed by a day and a half sounds about what happens.Why would she be banned or even given a TO for something like that? It doesn't violate the TOS
Trump...he would have been permabanned long ago.
Last edited by a moderator:
Ilov80s
Footballguy
Not many because Trump would have been kicked off the site a long time ago. Though knowing his history of assuming fake identities, he probably would be on alias 30 by now.
Last edited by a moderator:
knowledge dropper
Footballguy
:whoosh:Why would she be banned or even given a TO for something like that? It doesn't violate the TOS
As a test, please go ahead and question the mental stability of another poster.
The Commish
Footballguy
sorry....I thought you were talking about the comments where she suggested an intervention might do some good....now we are talking about mental stability? Sorry...not following.
This is what she said:
Nothing there is talking about "mental stability"
knowledge dropper
Footballguy
What do you think she is saying?sorry....I thought you were talking about the comments where she suggested an intervention might do some good....now we are talking about mental stability? Sorry...not following.
This is what she said:
Nothing there is talking about "mental stability"
timschochet
Footballguy
How many times are people going to be repeat this lie?
The House has passed, since January, tons of legislation: on drug pricing. On Obamacare. On energy. On background checks. Mitch McConnell refuses to take up ANY of it.
The Commish
Footballguy
That someone needs to talk some sense into him. This kind of behavior is exactly what you get when you surround yourself with yes men/women. You become codependents and anything outside those relationships is attacked. A way to fix that is an intervention. The problem, of course, is she's asking his codependents to do the intervention which isn't particularly bright on her part.
timschochet
Footballguy
Sure. First you have to post that you are an extremely mentally stable person. Also, call yourself a genius.
I will then reply to your post and make fun of you. I guarantee you I will not be suspended for doing so.
sho nuff
Footballguy
As many times as possible. Along with many others. Because it’s easier than having honest discussion about Trump and the GOP (McConnell).
Its proving that no matter how bs the propaganda, repeating it over and over works and others will repeat it. Doesn’t matter how untrue.
sho nuff
Footballguy
Also he would probably have to come up with a fun nickname for you first.
Crotchety timschocet? Yeah, it needs work.
knowledge dropper
Footballguy
sho nuff
Footballguy
No. It’s like people saying the Mueller report said no collusion and no obstruction.
Or more correctly it’s direct proof that measures Russians took to spread propaganda during the election was done because propaganda works.
timschochet
Footballguy
The Commish
Footballguy
knowledge dropper
Footballguy
sho nuff
Footballguy
Yeah, you got all of that one.
Also you didn’t fully change subject. It was about the reason lies keep getting repeated.
Last edited by a moderator:
knowledge dropper
Footballguy
I would say the chances are the boys would smash the report button on me for “trolling,” and I would get benched.
Down the road suggest someone needs an intervention and let’s see what happens.
John Blutarsky
Footballguy
But what do we hear about? Russia, impeaching Trump, interventions etc. That isn't a good look for the Dems.
knowledge dropper
Footballguy
timschochet
Footballguy
Well now you’re changing your tune.
Of course that’s what we hear about. Why would the news report about legislation that’s doomed to go nowhere in the Senate?
John Blutarsky
Footballguy
Maybe because that isn't the message the Dems are sending right now. The message is Trump bad, Russia, and impeachment....oh and the Green New Deal
Last edited by a moderator:
knowledge dropper
Footballguy
timschochet
Footballguy
Well Trump IS bad.Maybe because that isn't the message the Dems are sending right now. The message is Trump bad, Russia, and impeachment....oh and the Green New Deal
But again, it’s one thing to criticize messaging, and quite another for you to assert that the Democrats have offered no legislation. The latter is a lie.
timschochet
Footballguy
John Blutarsky
Footballguy
I never said they haven't offered legislation. Read it again. My point was I feel the message they are currently getting out isn't helping them and I think will hurt them in the future.
The Commish
Footballguy
meh....your complaint is with the echo chamber you insist on using. There's plenty of coverage of the things passed by the house and being ignored by the senate. Just go out to BBC and/or Reuters. You hear about these things in our national media because that's what drives the most clicks. The sooner you learn this and go elsewhere, the better.
ETA: Let's be honest, the usual suspects will also ignore "we're doing our part but the GOP isn't doing theirs".
Last edited by a moderator:
knowledge dropper
Footballguy
Sorry. Was trying to add some levity after I was told my Sho softball comment was a whiff.
John Blutarsky
Footballguy
meh...Based on the echo chamber here the message is what I have been talking about and the usual suspects will continue to push that narrative.meh....your complaint is with the echo chamber you insist on using. There's plenty of coverage of the things passed by the house and being ignored by the senate. Just go out to BBC and/or Reuters. You hear about these things in our national media because that's what drives the most clicks. The sooner you learn this and go elsewhere, the better.
ETA: Let's be honest, the usual suspects will also ignore "we're doing our part but the GOP isn't doing theirs".
Last edited by a moderator:
timschochet
Footballguy
This is what you wrote. It’s a lie. Or else (more likely) you were lied to and bought it and repeated it here. Why can’t you just admit it?
John Blutarsky
Footballguy
That doesn't say they haven't rolled anything out. Shall I edit it to say continue to roll out legislation?
timschochet
Footballguy
Do what you want. Except that wouldn’t be an edit, it would be a significant change, and it would pretty much destroy your entire point. Because once you concede that they are able to investigate Trump AND roll out legislation at the same time, your complaint becomes meaningless.
John Blutarsky
Footballguy
Lighten up Tim. Wow. My intent was never to say or imply they haven't rolled out legislation. And my point wasn't they can't investigate and roll out legislation. My point is in my opinion and many others the other message I referred to seems to be hurting them as well as potentially harming them in 2020.
squistion
Footballguy
Yes, that indeed is a mystery...No no..next they will call you an alias...I don't know why that happens so much here, nor why it seems to be so horrible..But there are lot of people wh must have liked that TV show or something
The point is moot however because @Maurile Tremblay recently said in another thread (unless I misunderstood him) that alias accounts are now acceptable and you can post under two or more handles simultaneously, provided one of them is not banned or suspended. Bozeman (or whatever he goes by) was posting under two accounts and that was deemed OK since neither was under suspension.
If actually I did misunderstand Maurile, I wish he or another mod would clarify this as IMHO it seems contrary to prior forum policy.
Last edited by a moderator:
Henry Ford
Footballguy
I believe it's been acceptable for some time as long as:
1. the accounts aren't intended to be used to bolster one another/pretend there are multiple people agreeing with the same thing; and
2. the user is using multiple devices, browsers, or IP addresses for whatever reason and it allows them to just stay logged in and not have to mess with logging in and out on multiple devices.
There was a period of time on the board after the upgrade that if you logged into your account on a computer, you'd get logged out on your phone/tablet/whatever. It was a PITA. I think that's when they relaxed the rules on it.
timschochet
Footballguy
Sarah Sanders said yesterday they haven’t rolled out any legislation. Donald Trump said the same thing. So did Sean Hannity. So did Laura Ingraham. So did Rush. It’s a talking point that had been repeated endlessly in the last 24 hours, so when you write the same thing here and then later claim it was “never your intent”, forgive me if I doubt your sincerity.
John Blutarsky
Footballguy
Give me a break Tim. Get off your high horse judgemental self. What I wrote was sincere. You are one angry dude today. Seems to me you are using the talking point that Trump will only use money for the immigration problem to build a wall.
Last edited by a moderator:
Similar threads
