Jump to content
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

The Nancy Pelosi thread


Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, timschochet said:

Sarah Sanders said yesterday they haven’t rolled out any legislation. Donald Trump said the same thing. So did Sean Hannity. So did Laura Ingraham. So did Rush. It’s a talking point that had been repeated endlessly in the last 24 hours, so when you write the same thing here and then later claim it was “never your intent”, forgive me if I doubt your sincerity. 

Hey..it wouldn't be a day on FBG if this guy wasn't telling people what they think.    Nice to know there are things you can count on in life.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 1.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

Mister Blutarsky: zero-point-zero.

Yeah, she sure zinged Trump.  That was a doozy. In the meantime, we get to keep a dangerously incompetent and historically corrupt president in office for two more years.  But wow what a burn.

If only there were some remedy available in situations where a President commits crimes... Mitch McConnell has destroyed a number of procedural norms for partisan gain, but he has not destroyed a

14 minutes ago, John Blutarsky said:

Give me a break Tim. Get off your high horse judgemental self. What I wrote was sincere. You are one angry dude today. Seems to me you are using the talking point that Trump will only use money for the immigration problem to build a wall.

All I can do is call it as I see it, GB. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
19 minutes ago, timschochet said:

Trump went off again just now: “She said terrible things about me...you think Nancy’s the same? She’s not.” 

What does he mean by "you think Nancy's the same"?

Does he mean "Do you really think Nancy is the same person that she used to be?"

Or does he mean "Do you really think Nancy is the same as me?"

I mean, both quotes are bad for Trump. I just need to know which direction to go with my response.

  • Thanks 1
  • Thinking 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
34 minutes ago, squistion said:
40 minutes ago, [scooter] said:

What does he mean by "you think Nancy's the same"?

Does he mean "Do you really think Nancy is the same person that she used to be?"

Or does he mean "Do you really think Nancy is the same as me?"

I mean, both quotes are bad for Trump. I just need to know which direction to go with my response.

The exact quote was "Do you think Nancy is the same as she was?" After 6:00 minute mark in below clip:

https://twitter.com/JamesWRipley2/status/1131984334804738048

Oh.

So, basically, Trump made a medical diagnosis about Nancy Pelosi based solely on how mean she was to him.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, [scooter] said:

Oh.

So, basically, Trump made a medical diagnosis about Nancy Pelosi based solely on how mean she was to him.

I could've swore the other side was all upset when people pointed out that Donald was losing it, must've been mistaken because if that was the case I'm sure they would be up in arms about someone saying something similar about Nancy.

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
47 minutes ago, yak651 said:

I could've swore the other side was all upset when people pointed out that Donald was losing it, must've been mistaken because if that was the case I'm sure they would be up in arms about someone saying something similar about Nancy.

The guy who said "Little Adam Schitt" can't believe a politician would talk so nastily about one of his opponents.

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
  • Laughing 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, squistion said:

Yes, that indeed is a mystery...

The point is moot however because @Maurile Tremblay  recently said in another thread (unless I misunderstood him) that alias accounts are now acceptable and you can post under two or more handles simultaneously, provided one of them is not banned or suspended. Bozeman (or whatever he goes by) was posting under two accounts and that was deemed OK since neither was under suspension.

If actually I did misunderstand Maurile, I wish he or another mod would clarify this as IMHO it seems contrary to prior forum policy.

Correct, because the rule against aliases was heavily abused by the regulars they had to make up new rules.  

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, squistion said:

Yes, that indeed is a mystery...

The point is moot however because @Maurile Tremblay  recently said in another thread (unless I misunderstood him) that alias accounts are now acceptable and you can post under two or more handles simultaneously, provided one of them is not banned or suspended. Bozeman (or whatever he goes by) was posting under two accounts and that was deemed OK since neither was under suspension.

If actually I did misunderstand Maurile, I wish he or another mod would clarify this as IMHO it seems contrary to prior forum policy.

What's the other name you post under ?

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Cowboysfan8 said:

What's the other name you post under ?

It appears I can use it now to log in on my laptop on wifi while visiting family at Balboa Island as long as this handle is not under suspension.

Edited by squistion
Link to post
Share on other sites

Somebody should alert ESPN SportsCenter that what they call highlights are really just doctored versions of sports events..

Edited by Rove!
Link to post
Share on other sites
12 minutes ago, Rove! said:

Somebody should alert ESPN SportsCenter that what they call highlights are really just doctored versions of sports events..

I’m sure if Espn slowed video of a game winning shot by Curry and said he had gotten away with traveling that’d go over real well.

Link to post
Share on other sites
35 minutes ago, Rove! said:

Somebody should alert ESPN SportsCenter that what they call highlights are really just doctored versions of sports events..

Is there anything this guy does that you won’t defend? I mean it’s really embarrassing at this point. 

  • Like 7
Link to post
Share on other sites
50 minutes ago, Rove! said:

Somebody should alert ESPN SportsCenter that what they call highlights are really just doctored versions of sports events..

I'm pretty sure they, along with everyone else in the world, know that,  no?  Are they claiming the things they showing are something else?  :confused:

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Rove! said:

The video in the CNN story is a completely different video than the one Trump tweeted

Fake News gotta fake fake fake fake

The Trump video was doctored also. Are you ok with the President of the United States doing this?

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, badmojo1006 said:

The Trump video was doctored also. Are you ok with the President of the United States doing this?

Not that I give two ####s one way or the other, but do you have any evidence that the one Trump tweeted was doctored?  It seems a few months back there were claims about video of Acosta assaulting a WH intern being “doctored” that turned out to be false claims...

Link to post
Share on other sites
33 minutes ago, Rove! said:

Not that I give two ####s one way or the other, but do you have any evidence that the one Trump tweeted was doctored?  It seems a few months back there were claims about video of Acosta assaulting a WH intern being “doctored” that turned out to be false claims...

Thanks,  you just proved my point 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
35 minutes ago, Rove! said:

Not that I give two ####s one way or the other, but do you have any evidence that the one Trump tweeted was doctored?  It seems a few months back there were claims about video of Acosta assaulting a WH intern being “doctored” that turned out to be false claims...

If "doctored" means altered from its original format, no...it did not turn out to be a false claim.  I remember because the "it was just sped up" nonsense was prolific around here.  Though, as it turns out, over time, that's one of the more reasonable claims made by those guys.  The one Trump tweeted is different from the original....call it whatever you want.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
33 minutes ago, The Commish said:

If "doctored" means altered from its original format, no...it did not turn out to be a false claim.  I remember because the "it was just sped up" nonsense was prolific around here.  Though, as it turns out, over time, that's one of the more reasonable claims made by those guys.  The one Trump tweeted is different from the original....call it whatever you want.

https://mobile.twitter.com/imbadatlife/status/1060534039403212800?ref_src=twsrc^tfw|twcamp^tweetembed&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.buzzfeednews.com%2Farticle%2Fcharliewarzel%2Facosta-video-trump-cnn-aide-sarah-sanders

https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2018/11/white-house-jim-acosta-video-manipulated-doctored-analysis.html

https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/qvqpp5/no-evidence-the-white-house-video-of-jim-acosta-was-doctored-forensic-expert-says

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

At this point in time.  If you're "challenged" enough to support Trump you're all in.  Doctored videos, idiotic name calling, daily lying, promises not kept, nothing matters.

He's their master and they must do as told.

It's so SAD.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, Rove! said:

Not that I give two ####s one way or the other, but do you have any evidence that the one Trump tweeted was doctored?  It seems a few months back there were claims about video of Acosta assaulting a WH intern being “doctored” that turned out to be false claims...

Which claims turned out to be false, again?

Edited by Henry Ford
Link to post
Share on other sites
14 hours ago, Rove! said:

Not that I give two ####s one way or the other, but do you have any evidence that the one Trump tweeted was doctored?  It seems a few months back there were claims about video of Acosta assaulting a WH intern being “doctored” that turned out to be false claims...

You can know it was doctored because when they got in front of a judge Trump’s own lawyers completely dropped the claim that Acosta had touched the WH intern. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
35 minutes ago, SaintsInDome2006 said:

You can know it was doctored because when they got in front of a judge Trump’s own lawyers completely dropped the claim that Acosta had touched the WH intern. 

Wat?  Even those who claimed it “doctored” agreed that he touched her...c’mon man 

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Rove! said:

Wat?  Even those who claimed it “doctored” agreed that he touched her...c’mon man 

I’m telling you what happened in court, under oath. Trump’s lawyers refused to make that claim. That’s why Acosta got his credentials back.

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, SaintsInDome2006 said:

I’m telling you what happened in court, under oath. Trump’s lawyers refused to make that claim. That’s why Acosta got his credentials back.

Funny how all these lawyers refuse to actually bring up Trump's lies in a court of law.

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

She’s definitely facing a problem. Pelosi was a speaker today in San Francisco, along with almost all of the candidates, at the Democratic convention. It’s Nancy’s home turf, but the crowd kept interrupting her. “Impeach! Impeach!” they kept yelling. They wouldn’t let her finish. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.


×
×
  • Create New...