Mystery Achiever
Footballguy
He'll have trouble being heard, though, because I can't see any way Bennet makes the next debate.
Also: why does he think they lie to automated recordings and anonymous emails at nearly the exact same rate that they lie to human pollsters?Why do you think they lie to pollsters but not to their UPS guy?
That's surprising. I don't understand people.From Morning Consult:
Second choice for Sanders Supporters-- Biden 30%, Warren, 27%, Harris 7%
I'd guess it is name recognition.Next white guy up? I kid. Mostly. I can't deal with Warren or Sanders, so can't be more insightful.
Not talking everyone. You asked about Trump people. Also how can we trust polls after the last election?Why do you think they lie to pollsters but not to their UPS guy?
easy. you understand how polls work and what they mean.Not talking everyone. You asked about Trump people. Also how can we trust polls after the last election?
Your answers indicated that Trump people didn't mind identifying as such but the theory of the "untruthful to pollsters" Trump voter persists in this forum. And what don't you trust about the polls and why do you think they miss the mark?Not talking everyone. You asked about Trump people. Also how can we trust polls after the last election?
Polls mean nothing to me as I know who I am going to vote for. If Trump is polling at 70% and Biden at 30% I am still voting for Biden.easy. you understand how polls work and what they mean.
This is an interesting answer on two counts. First, I'd like to read more about the AAPOR's analysis. Maybe I'll finally get a definitive answer to my questions about what Trump voters say to pollsters and why.Polls mean nothing to me as I know who I am going to vote for. If Trump is polling at 70% and Biden at 30% I am still voting for Biden.
The analysis released by the American Association for Public Opinion Research, found that the biggest culprit in why the polls were so wildly wrong was the level of Trump's support, most importantly in Pennsylvania, Michigan, and Wisconsin. So many Trump voters failed to reveal their preferences until after the election.
i have no doubt that some people lie in polls. i'm saying just because the 2016 Wisconsin polls were wrong, doesn't mean i stop trusting all polls, because i understand how polls work and what they represent.Polls mean nothing to me as I know who I am going to vote for. If Trump is polling at 70% and Biden at 30% I am still voting for Biden.
The analysis released by the American Association for Public Opinion Research, found that the biggest culprit in why the polls were so wildly wrong was the level of Trump's support, most importantly in Pennsylvania, Michigan, and Wisconsin. So many Trump voters failed to reveal their preferences until after the election.
I have no idea why people say what they do to pollsters. Do they lie? Do they tell the truth? Only the person polled knows.This is an interesting answer on two counts. First, I'd like to read more about the AAPOR's analysis. Maybe I'll finally get a definitive answer to my questions about what Trump voters say to pollsters and why.
Second, your note about voting for the "favorite" took me aback a little. We're not laying five bucks on a horse at the betting window, we're picking the candidate best suited to lead the country. You shouldn't have to defend voting for the losing candidate, I've done it at least half the time. But it takes me back to a guy I knew in college who did in fact vote for the frontrunner regardless of policies; he just couldn't stand to be affiliated with a "loser." Lakers-Yankess-Cowboys guy, too, at a time when that meant success. Guy went on to the FBI.
Here's more on their different basesI'd guess it is name recognition.
If that's the case I'm betting Warren is going to take start taking those people (if the trend continues with Bernie dropping off).
Why wouldn't you trust them? They were predicting Hillary would win the individual vote and she did...by millions of votesNot talking everyone. You asked about Trump people. Also how can we trust polls after the last election?
They're aware of this, and they're ok with it. Leadership like Joe Biden's is the reason we got Trump. They'd rather have a depressed turnout and preserve the status quo than electrify the base and risk changing the system. They recognize that Biden is a reliable keeper for their failed policies. There's really no other explanation for why he is being foisted on the electorate again.Not entirely sure what you are getting at here - but Dems cannot win the Senate without also winning the White House - imo.
I do worry that if the Dems nominate Biden - it will have a negative impact on down-ticket races - because, like it or not, Biden is not bringing the crowds to the voting booths.
I am hopeful that the Dems see this before its too late...
What's the scoop with Steyer? He's advertising in NC right now. Seemed kind of strange to see a political ad now.
Yeah, those ads are his effort to get into the debates. Steyer is loaded and has spent a lot of money on advertising to reach the polling and donor thresholds to make the next debate. It looks like it's going to work, he's very close to qualifying. He basically just bought his way into the top 12 candidates.BassNBrew said:What's the scoop with Steyer? He's advertising in NC right now. Seemed kind of strange to see a political ad now.
Done. Can he use funds raised for Pres'l bid if he run for Senate?Mile High said:Sources say Hickenlooper will drop out of the presidential race today. Expected to run against Cory Gardner for US Senate.
Yes. He can use all of the $150.73 that he raised in his Presidential run.Done. Can he use funds raised for Pres'l bid if he run for Senate?
The Baja Oklahoma electorate is morphing; Beto could do a Hickenlooper and beat John Cornyn.[SIZE=10.5px]Dems basically need CO, AZ, ME, and maybe NC to have any chance to make the Senate 50-50, assuming they lose AL[/SIZE]
Hey, it could buy a couple of drums of toner or something.Yes. He can use all of the $150.73 that he raised in his Presidential run.
I think 2nd quarter # was $1.1 milHey, it could buy a couple of drums of toner or something.
(He actiually raised $2mil 1st qtr. Didn't see 2nd qtr)
This looks like it - 51% to 38% https://www.coloradopols.com/diary/125995/ppp-hickenlooper-51-gardner-38Hick reportedly came out of the gate with about a 13-point lead over Gardner. I'll try to find a link to where I saw that.
When I think of "liberal Colorado geologist and sometime businessman", this is the first guy who comes to mind.Done. Can he use funds raised for Pres'l bid if he run for Senate?
"I’ve heard from so many Coloradans who want me to run for the United States Senate. They remind me how much is at stake for our country and our state. I intend to give that some serious thought. I’ve been a geologist, a small businessman, a mayor, a governor, and a candidate for president of the United States. At each step, I’ve always looked forward with hope. And I always will. Thank you."
This looks like it - 51% to 38% https://www.coloradopols.com/diary/125995/ppp-hickenlooper-51-gardner-38
And he seems to have a clear path to the nomination:
Six hundred likely Democratic primary voters in the state were polled and 61% preferred Hickenlooper, compared to 10% for Mike Johnston and 8% for Andrew Romanoff. Fifteen percent were undecided and 6% favored Secretary of State Jena Griswold, who said Friday that she isn’t running in 2020.
The poll was conducted July 25-28 by the Garin-Hart-Yang Research Group, which has a B+ pollster rating from FiveThirtyEight
To the left of Hickenlooper? Yes - someone to the left of Hickenlooper would wipe out Gardner. Cory Gardner should just start packing up now and send stuff back every week. Then he won't have much to move when he's defeated - any warm liberal body would beat him he's that bad.I don't really know that much about Colorado politics but would someone further left have a chance against Gardner? Obviously the most important thing is for Dems to win the seat but I wouldn't want Senator Hickenlooper getting in the way of President Warren's agenda with all his "socialism" crap.
Not the same poll. Change Research is the same polling company - but different criteria based on the client - in this case Iowa Starting Line.(Maybe I'm just in denial, but) THis seems like a possible outlier poll. It is conducted online and has a C+ rating from 538.
In their July poll, Buttigieg was at 25%.
https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/2020-primaries/democratic/iowa/
OprahAre there any names being thrown around of possible candidates who have yet to declare?
BloombergAre there any names being thrown around of possible candidates who have yet to declare?
Sounds like a Gardner/DiBlasio ticket could bring the nation together.To the left of Hickenlooper? Yes - someone to the left of Hickenlooper would wipe out Gardner. Cory Gardner should just start packing up now and send stuff back every week. Then he won't have much to move when he's defeated - any warm liberal body would beat him he's that bad.
I was actually going to mention him. As a NY'er, I'd have to overlook a few things to consider him but I'd keep an open mind to it.Bloomberg
So many people finding meaning in politics. What could go wrong with that?