trader jake
Footballguy
Not really. Yards per carry is almost a completely meaningless statistic when it comes to fantasy football prognostication.Like most stats, it has utility when presented with proper context.
Not really. Yards per carry is almost a completely meaningless statistic when it comes to fantasy football prognostication.Like most stats, it has utility when presented with proper context.
It's by no means my favorite stat, but with the proper context it is far from meaningless.trader jake said:Not really. Yards per carry is almost a completely meaningless statistic when it comes to fantasy football prognostication.
I will be honest I had him on my want list, but with Cohen right behind him I didn't take him. I do think as you said he will continue to be a RB2 guy and have some decent weeks, but his snaps is what scares me.Looks super average and this is an absolutely terrible offense. He can be a fantasy RB2 type just on volume but not much upside here IMO.
Unless Nagy changes his approach (and NFL coaches are some of the most stubborn people on the planet), this offense will continue to be bad.While Trubisky is not that great, I think the offense will improve. They played what appears to be a vastly-improved Packers D Week 1, and then the Broncos defense, which is still tough, in week 2. With games coming up against Washington and Oakland, the offense should get right soon. Not saying they are going to turn into the Chiefs or Patriots, but sunny days should be ahead, and Montgomery should reap some of the benefits.
I have issue with Nagy's play-calling, but as I said after the week 1 game, I think he recognizes the limitations of his QB and has adjusted his calling of plays as a result, so we are not seeing his full playbook.Unless Nagy changes his approach (and NFL coaches are some of the most stubborn people on the planet), this offense will continue to be bad.
I personally think it's more that he wants to just play a grind it out style where the team relies on the defense to win games. He throws in a few funky plays here and there to maintain his 'offensive genius' rep, but really he's overdoing it a bit and it's all a bit overcomplicated right now. You can see that guys are getting in each other's way, things aren't in sync.I have issue with Nagy's play-calling, but as I said after the week 1 game, I think he recognizes the limitations of his QB and has adjusted his calling of plays as a result, so we are not seeing his full playbook.
I don't see Montgomery turning into a fantasy stud over night, but I think he'll be a good RB2 this season, unless Nagy goes brain dead and decides to give Mike Davis a bunch of touches again.
good post! I agree with all of it. Way too conservative & that will not get you as far as you want to get.I personally think it's more that he wants to just play a grind it out style where the team relies on the defense to win games. He throws in a few funky plays here and there to maintain his 'offensive genius' rep, but really he's overdoing it a bit and it's all a bit overcomplicated right now. You can see that guys are getting in each other's way, things aren't in sync.
I guess I'm the last guy who still defends Trubisky, but I truly think he's getting a rough deal here. He's a player who needs to free wheel a bit and take on a defense. When he does that, he can succeed. He might make mistakes, but that approach brings out the best in him. Right now, he's simply asked to be a game manager, move the chains excruciatingly, bit by bit, and that's it. It magnifies every mistake and doesn't allow him to do anything that will threaten a defense.
IMO Trubisky looks like he can't do anything because the NFL has already figured Nagy out. WRs are never open, teams know Nagy is not going to challenge them beyond 10-15 yards and that's why everything is so difficult and they look slow and stuck in mud.
This is fair. While he had 18 carries and 3 targets, he only played 27 snaps. That's a 78% utilization and is seriously tipping your hand to the defense. Any DC worth his salt is going to pick up on that going forward and will lock in on Monty, making his life pretty difficult. As a fantasy owner, you always want your guys to get touches, but personally I prefer not to see utilization go above 50%. You gotta at least keep the defense guessing!I will be honest I had him on my want list, but with Cohen right behind him I didn't take him. I do think as you said he will continue to be a RB2 guy and have some decent weeks, but his snaps is what scares me.
That's also Michel in a nutshell. Red herring a bit, I know, but that's what I immediately thought of.This is fair. While he had 18 carries and 3 targets, he only played 27 snaps. That's a 78% utilization and is seriously tipping your hand to the defense. Any DC worth his salt is going to pick up on that going forward and will lock in on Monty, making his life pretty difficult. As a fantasy owner, you always want your guys to get touches, but personally I prefer not to see utilization go above 50%. You gotta at least keep the defense guessing!
I've seen a few players suffer from it throughout my fantasy days. Mark Ingram early in his career pretty much ran the ball every time he was in the game. Ryan Mathews also had a super high utilization throughout his career in San Diego. Both of those guys had 3 down ability. I don't understand why coaches didn't utilize it... although Payton did later in Ingram's career and it paid off.That's also Michel in a nutshell. Red herring a bit, I know, but that's what I immediately thought of.
Ingram I also got to see that happen to. Mathews was West Coast (I was East) in a smaller market so I never really got to watch that.I've seen a few players suffer from it throughout my fantasy days. Mark Ingram early in his career pretty much ran the ball every time he was in the game. Ryan Mathews also had a super high utilization throughout his career in San Diego. Both of those guys had 3 down ability. I don't understand why coaches didn't utilize it... although Payton did later in Ingram's career and it paid off.
I just looked up Michel (don't have him in any leagues) - he's at 62% with zero targets. I don't mean to sidetrack this thread, but wtf? His scouting report said he was the most pro-ready pass blocker out of that whole class and NE is using him as a grinder. BB is so weird. It reminds me of when he had Dion Lewis, one of the most dynamic players in space, and he primarily utilized him in between the tackles and gave all the targets to James White. Sure, White had good hands and good routes (so did Dion), but he didn't have nearly the moves Dion did in space.Ingram I also got to see that happen to. Mathews was West Coast (I was East) in a smaller market so I never really got to watch that.
It's strange. It looks like BB wants him for three-four yards and a cloud and is satisfied with that. All I can do is shrug and tip my cap. Too bad I drafted him 2.11. He's a TD-dependent RB2/3 it seems so far. Thank God I'm not PPR in the league I have him (did that on purpose, actually) and Jacobs. Anyway, I won't derail any longer. Thanks for looking that up. It's at least a relevant and salient point.I just looked up Michel (don't have him in any leagues) - he's at 62% with zero targets. I don't mean to sidetrack this thread, but wtf? His scouting report said he was the most pro-ready pass blocker out of that whole class and NE is using him as a grinder. BB is so weird. It reminds me of when he had Dion Lewis, one of the most dynamic players in space, and he primarily utilized him in between the tackles and gave all the targets to James White. Sure, White had good hands and good routes (so did Dion), but he didn't have nearly the moves Dion did in space.
He's not a bad player, but definitely a pure handcuff at this point. Given Cohen's snaps in the slot, Davis is probably one of the best injury handcuffs out there... solid talent, great OL, great defense... He's a step below Penny/Pollard level handcuff, but he'd be a hot commodity should an unthinkable injury occur.don't know how good Monty will be going forward, but i know i'm bailing on Mike Davis across the board.
Yeah, that's what I was talking about here:Looking at snap counts, he had 7 touches in 28 snaps week one, and 19 touches in only 27 snaps week two? Over 2/3 of the time he was in, he touched it.
I'd like to see him get some more play action snaps and/or pass blocking.While he had 18 carries and 3 targets, he only played 27 snaps. That's a 78% utilization and is seriously tipping your hand to the defense. Any DC worth his salt is going to pick up on that going forward and will lock in on Monty, making his life pretty difficult. As a fantasy owner, you always want your guys to get touches, but personally I prefer not to see utilization go above 50%. You gotta at least keep the defense guessing!
Sadly, I just traded him in ppr, so I'll only be watching as a Bears fan now. Was hurting at qb and traded Montgomery and Trubisky for Mayfield and Marquise GoodwinHas anyone moved him? If so, what did you get in return?
Nice.Sadly, I just traded him in ppr, so I'll only be watching as a Bears fan now. Was hurting at qb and traded Montgomery and Trubisky for Mayfield and Marquise Goodwin
Was offered Waller and Lindsay for him but gonna hold.
Damn. I would've loved that. Need a TE extremely bad.Was offered Waller and Lindsay for him but gonna hold.
What? Hopkins?I’m getting quite a few offers in dynasty for him...Hopkins and Garrapolo for Montgomery and Mahomes as an example... not a lot of one for one offers
Same guy also offered engram/Melvin for Gurley/goedertDamn. I would've loved that. Need a TE extremely bad.
Damn. I couldn't pry a decent TE away from anyone in my league. Most just no responses. UghSame guy also offered engram/Melvin for Gurley/goedert
Clearlyobviously you want more carries to adequately see if he's got it or not, but he does not look impressive to me. I think Sigmund was right on this guy
I just said you want to see more carries for the guy, no? It was a good run.Clearly
No. You prematurely blew that assessment.I just said you want to see more carries for the guy, no? It was a good run.
my assessment was when I watched him in college. Admittedly, I've never been a big fan. Great vision, great stop-starts, great at breaking tackles. Athletic ability and burst/acceleration always concerned me and still does. Outside that run (which is his forte, his patience) I still have not been overly impressed.No. You prematurely blew that assessment.
Has your assessment of Montgomery changed meaningfully in the last 30 minutes?No. You prematurely blew that assessment.
Nope. You?Has your assessment of Montgomery changed meaningfully in the last 30 minutes?
Of course not.Nope. You?
David Montgomery rushed 13 times for 67 yards and caught all three of his targets for 14 yards in the Bears' Week 3 win over the Redskins.
A great percentage of those yards, including a patient 25-yard run, came on the meaningless final drive with the Bears salting away a 16-point win. Still, Montgomery dominated backfield touches 16-6-1 over Tarik Cohen and Mike Davis. He's yet to really pop for a big game, but one is surely coming. Montgomery runs with ferocity and is easily the best back on the team. He draws another tough test against the Vikings in Week 4 as a borderline RB2/3. Mitchell Trubisky showing competence would go a long way for the run game.
Sep 23, 2019, 11:41 PM ET