What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.

Foreign Elections Thread - Currently: Brazil 🇧🇷 (3 Viewers)

Wow that’s something. I guess there will be an investigation into the election or maybe there’s been one already. I had thought he was fairly popular but maybe not:
Che also thought he was popular in Bolivia, but he was wrong. The economy has grown during his 14 years, but Bolivians don't want a corrupt voting process. The national budget has deteriorated partly due to a decline in gas exports, and he ignored a 2016 vote on not extending term limits.  https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.bbc.com/news/amp/world-latin-america-50370013

This is people protesting  for democracy. It could happen in the USA.

 
I found this tweet thread to be clear.  Anyone claiming coup want to tell me where it's wrong?  @ren hoek?
Guess the whole thing is wrong.  Looks like a very dense individual judging by his tweets on Trump/Russia, Venezuela/Maduro, and Jeremy Corbyn.  Obviously not a very critical thinker.  He paints the Bolivian govt as the ones instigating violence, when it is the opposition that has burned down diplomats' houses, threatened Bolivian officials with death, and rampaged in the streets.  Tens of thousands of farmers, union workers and indigenous people descended on La Paz to support the democratically-elected president, Morales.  

The OAS is 60% funded by the US govt, the idea being to run Official Washington's line on governments it wants to change.  I'm sure you're familiar with all the US/CIA coups against democractically elected governments in Latin America over the years- that hasn't changed.  

Here's Mark Weisbrot, director of CEPR, on this being a military coup: https://twitter.com/democracynow/status/1193880644616675330

Here is their paper on the 2019 vote count: http://cepr.net/publications/reports/bolivia-elections-2019-11

 
SoBeDad said:
Maybe. But what happened in 2016 when he lost the referendum to run for a 4th term. 
According to Wikipedia:

In September 2017, the Movement for Socialism applied to the Supreme Tribunal of Justice to abolish term limits. In November the court ruled in favour of their abolition, citing the American Convention on Human Rights.[6] The ruling allowed Morales to run for re-election in the 2019 elections.[7]

 
As of today, Evo Morales, the Indigenous president of Bolivia, was forced to resign the presidency. His Vice President, (Alvaro Garcia Linera) also resigned, as did Adrianna Salvatierra, the President of the Senate, who was supposed to assume the presidency in Morales’ absence. At the time of this writing, the Wiphala Indigenous flag, has been lowered throughout the country by the opposition. Morales, the country’s first Indigenous president, is the standard bearer of generations of Indigenous socialists. His removal represents the return of the old oligarchy. This is a coup against the arrival of the Indigenous peoples of Bolivia to the forefront of history.

For weeks, rightwing protestors have targeted Morales’ party, the Movement Toward Socialism (or MAS in Spanish). They have burned down party members’ homes and offices, attacking their supporters.  Recently Patricia Arce, mayor of Vinto, was kidnapped by a mob. They cut her hair, threw paint over her body, and forced her to walk barefoot, publicly humiliating her. The mob has blockaded the headquarters of Bolivia TV and the Patria Nueva radio station. At the time of this writing, right wing forces are ransacking and burning President Morales’ home and are trying to arrest him.


This is not a resignation. No one resigns with a gun to their head.

Bolivia’s political and economic elite support this violence, as part of a resurgence of the far right in Latin America. Activists on the ground are currently getting smashed by these forces. We, the undersigned, denounce this violence, and preemptively denounce the violence that will inevitably escalate in the street. We call on the United Nations to make a statement denouncing the undemocratic nature of the coup and the strong-arm tactics of its backers.

 
@mtracey

The president of Bolivia essentially resigned at gunpoint as violent mobs burn down buildings and drag people through the streets, and the US media is still struggling with how to describe the situation

 
If Morales had groomed a successor instead of trying to be a president for life, maybe this "coup" wouldn't have occurred. 

 
Can't wait for all the crocodile tears from the coup supporters when the inevitable migrant crisis comes.
I'm having trouble picturing a migrant caravan coming all the way from Bolivia.  They'd basically have to go around the Amazon Rainforest through Peru, Ecuador, and Columbia just to get to Panama.

 
Can't wait for all the crocodile tears from the coup supporters when the inevitable migrant crisis comes.
There are very few Bolivians in this country. It's a relatively poor country and many who left in the past worked in neighboring countries, such as Argentia. If they come, we can absorb them. This is not Venezuela, as there are many entrepreneurs and I saw a lot of it first hand in 1992 and 1995 in big and small cities when I visited my ex-wife's family. I think Evo overplayed his hand. 

 
Let's not forget that the OAS found election fraud in favor of Morales before this "coup" took place. (Clearly he had nothing to do with that :rolleyes: )

In other news he has asked for and been granted asylum in Mexico

 
https://twitter.com/vpougy/status/1194006933373620224?s=20

A significant factor in the coup in Bolivia is the reassertion of Christian colonial power over indigenous peoples. The suppression of the indigenous and African components of Latin American cultures is a common thread among the emerging far right.

Here's the self-appointed "new president" of Bolivia walking into the palace with an enormous Bible: "The bible returns to the palace of government".

Mainstream opposition has been sidelined by fringe rightwing. Carlos Mesa, opposition leader who contested the elections w/ Morales and 1st cried foul is mostly erased. Power centre shifted to Military and far-right figures, lead by businessman LF Camacho

 
And here we have the real reason Morales was overthrown: https://youtu.be/O9rFd1RvncI

He actually stood for human rights, supported a free Palestine, criticized US imperialism, and stood up against colonial extraction of Bolivian resources.  

And just like that, a democratically elected leader in Latin America, Bolivia's first and only ever indigenous President, is replaced by a US-backed Christian supremacist nutjob.  

 
And here we have the real reason Morales was overthrown: https://youtu.be/O9rFd1RvncI

He actually stood for human rights, supported a free Palestine, criticized US imperialism, and stood up against colonial extraction of Bolivian resources.  

And just like that, a democratically elected leader in Latin America, Bolivia's first and only ever indigenous President, is replaced by a US-backed Christian supremacist nutjob.  
He shouldn't have fiddled with the elections then....

 
He shouldn't have fiddled with the elections then....
He didn't.  The Supreme Court judged that he could run again.  The CEPR review showed that the voting tallies were correct.  He had JUST AGREED to have a new election, and the military/police went forward with the coup anyway.  

Now this unelected zealot takes over, big shocker, with the support of the Trump administration.  That's the worst part- people who claim to despise Trump becoming his most reliable cheerleaders for his foreign policy brand.  How much delusion does it take to think an administration that imprisons immigrants and treats them like trash, would support actual good things happening to the people of Bolivia?  

Anyone could tell the US was acting in bad faith wrt Latin America when it brought Elliot Abrams back from the grave.  This is a sad state of affairs not just for democracy, but for a corporate media landscape that can't bring themselves to tell the truth.  

 
ren hoek said:
He didn't.  The Supreme Court judged that he could run again.  The CEPR review showed that the voting tallies were correct.  He had JUST AGREED to have a new election, and the military/police went forward with the coup anyway.  

Now this unelected zealot takes over, big shocker, with the support of the Trump administration.  That's the worst part- people who claim to despise Trump becoming his most reliable cheerleaders for his foreign policy brand.  How much delusion does it take to think an administration that imprisons immigrants and treats them like trash, would support actual good things happening to the people of Bolivia?  

Anyone could tell the US was acting in bad faith wrt Latin America when it brought Elliot Abrams back from the grave.  This is a sad state of affairs not just for democracy, but for a corporate media landscape that can't bring themselves to tell the truth.  
The OAS said different

 
I don't approve of the Big Bible theatrics by the Morales replacement. There's lot of Christian hypocrisy in Potosi where they say that God ruled in the dozens of magnificent churches built using the wealth obtain from slave labor, but the devil laughed in the silver mines where the indigenous people were brutally exploited.

Under his leadership, he was successful in preventing foreign exploitation of resources, but he managed to keep the economy strong and utilize the nation's wealth to bring people out of poverty. But "Ego" Morales clearly overplayed his hand several times. He kept changing the rules to stay in power.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.miamiherald.com/latest-news/article218277975.html

 
I don't approve of the Big Bible theatrics by the Morales replacement. There's lot of Christian hypocrisy in Potosi where they say that God ruled in the dozens of magnificent churches built using the wealth obtain from slave labor, but the devil laughed in the silver mines where the indigenous people were brutally exploited.

Under his leadership, he was successful in preventing foreign exploitation of resources, but he managed to keep the economy strong and utilize the nation's wealth to bring people out of poverty. But "Ego" Morales clearly overplayed his hand several times. He kept changing the rules to stay in power.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.miamiherald.com/latest-news/article218277975.html
It would have been wise to groom a successor so he hadn't had to try for more than two terms...

 
Political deal in Bolivia tries to end chaos and secure elections

olivia’s interim government and lawmakers from the party of unseated leader Evo Morales struck a deal late on Thursday to pursue new elections, potentially helping resolve the South American country’s political crisis.

In a late night session of the Bolivian Senate, the chamber’s President, a member of Morales’ Movement for Socialism (MAS) party, said there was agreement to work toward new elections after weeks of protests and violence that led to leftist leader Morales resigning under pressure last Sunday.

“Today is an historic day where we have been able to agree between opposition and government with the sole objective to make new elections as soon as possible, to pacify our country and above all to defend democracy,” said Mónica Eva Copa Murga, who had earlier been confirmed in the her role.

She called on Bolivia’s security forces, who have been facing skirmishes in the streets with pro-Morales supporters, to treat the country’s indigenous groups with respect.

“Let’s get rid of colors, of radical positions, what our country is looking for right now is peace,” she said.
“Evo Morales does not qualify to run for a fourth term,” conservative former senator Anez told a news conference on Thursday, adding the country’s “convulsions” were because he had run in defiance of term limits.

She said MAS, which has a majority in Congress, was welcome to participate in the vote. “They should start searching for a candidate,” she said.

Morales, the charismatic leader of Bolivia since 2006, ran again despite a 2016 referendum against lifting term limits, after a court packed with loyalists gave him a green light to run indefinitely, citing his “human rights.”

Jerjes Justiniano, one of Anez’s newly appointed ministers, earlier told reporters that the interim government was pursuing talks with MAS.

“We are at the dialogue table, we are talking,” he said in comments aired on channel Unitel, adding that MAS had sought assurance that Morales would be able to return freely to Bolivia, which he said would not be an issue.

“There’s no problem with that, it’s just one citizen more.”

Anez did not give a specific date for the election, but under the constitution she has 90 days to do so since declaring herself interim leader by invoking the constitutional line of succession earlier this week.

 
Amid protests, referendum called to dump Pinochet era constitution

  Chilean lawmakers agreed on Friday to hold a referendum next April on replacing the country’s unpopular Pinochet-era constitution, bowing to demands of protesters who say the country’s decades-old social model has created deep inequality.

The move, agreed in the early hours of the morning, boosted the country’s battered markets, with the Chilean peso and the domestic equities market climbing strongly.

Amid protests that have raged for a month in the South American nation, Chile’s existing Magna Carta, written and approved during General Augusto Pinochet’s 1973-1990 military dictatorship, has become a lightning rod for anger.

Voters will be asked whether they approve the idea of a new constitution and whether current lawmakers should serve on the commission that would redraft the document.

 
Divisive candidate wins in Sri Lanka

Sri Lanka's former wartime defence chief Gotabaya Rajapaksa looks set to win a presidential election that has split the country along ethnic lines.

Official results are not confirmed but Mr Rajapaksa claimed victory and his rival Sajith Premadasa conceded.

Analysts say Mr Rajapaksa was the clear victor in Sinhalese majority areas while Mr Premadasa scored better in the Tamil-dominated north.

The election is Sri Lanka's first since a deadly terror attack in April.

Militants linked to the Islamic State group targeted churches and high-end hotels across the island on Easter Sunday, killing more than 250 people

 
Peaceful protests in Czech tepublic on eve of 30 years aniversary of the velvet revolution

At least 200,000 people have protested against the Czech government in the capital, Prague.

Demonstrators are calling for Prime Minister Andrej Babis to resign over allegations of fraud.

It is alleged Mr Babis used European Union subsidies for his private business - something he denies.

The protest was held on the eve of the 30th anniversary of the Velvet Revolution, which ended communist rule in what was then Czechoslovakia.

Saturday's demonstration was held in Letna Park, which was also the site of the biggest rallies of November 1989.

Many people have been chanting "we are here" - an echo of the revolution's protest slogan three decades ago.

And some of the speakers were former dissidents who also addressed the 1989 rallies

Why are they protesting?

As well as being prime minister, Mr Babis is the billionaire founder of a business called Agrofert - a Czech conglomerate holding company based in Prague.

The group that organised the protest, called the Million Moments for Democracy Association, is demanding that Mr Babis either resign by the end of the year or sever ties with the business.

Speakers at the rally also called for Czech President Milos Zeman to stand down.
 
In Belarus there is no opposition....
I'm just gonna say that Belarus seems like a really interesting place - I get the sense Lukashenko would really like to open it up to the west if he didn't have Putin's fist hanging over the country constantly.

I'm definitely not making excuses for the sob but if there were free elections and a western parliament was elected I don't think Putin would tolerate that.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I'm just gonna say that Belarus seems like a really interesting place - I get the sense Lukashenko would really like to open it up to the west if he didn't have Putin's fist hanging over the country constantly.

I'm definitely not making excuses for the sob but if there were free elections and a western parliament was elected I don't think Putin would tolerate that.
I doubt that. . IIRC he was a hardliner even under Jeltsin and has always seemed a better fit as local strongman for the Soviets than a truky independent ruler. That said, there is no doubt Lukashenko is well aware on which side his bread is buttered

 
Hong Kong Voters Strongly Support Pro-Democracy Candidates

Nearly three million people cast their ballots in district races, delivering a rebuke to establishment-allied candidates and Beijing in the largest turnout for any election in the city’s history
IIRC it is only part of the council that is chosen by direct vote. And China can pretty much ignore the council (at their own peril, obviously). But clearly the pro(-democracy)-testers have the popular mandate. 

 
Opposition declares victory

MONTEVIDEO (Reuters) - Uruguay’s conservative opposition party claimed victory and the governing party’s candidate conceded defeat on Thursday after the count of Sunday’s runoff election concluded, marking a rightward shift on a continent torn by social unrest.

First, there was a tweet from the opposition National Party saying its candidate Luis Lacalle Pou had won. “Uruguay now has a new president,” it said.

Minutes later, also by way of Twitter, Daniel Martinez of the ruling Broad Front party conceded defeat.

“We congratulate president elect Luis Lacalle Pou, with whom I will meet tomorrow,” Martinez tweeted.

In a region undergoing political upheaval, Uruguay’s swing to the right marks a shift in the farm-driven South American nation, known for its cattle ranches and liberal policies on legalized marijuana and abortion rights.

Broad Front, the ruling party for 15 years, has overseen a period of stability and growth. But it came under pressure recently from a slowing economy caused in part by global trade woes and bad crop weather that dented agriculture.

A slow count of the vote had been leaning by about 1 percentage point in favor of the conservative candidate since Sunday. “The tendency did not change as the vote count was scrutinized further,” Martinez tweeted.

With economic growth slowing, job security fraying and holes in social safety nets widening, a wave of protests have spanned vast parts of South America including Venezuela, Colombia, Ecuador, Bolivia and Chile.

While neighboring, inflation-hit nation Argentina does a political left-turn back to Peronism, Uruguay has generally been stable despite a lackluster economy that has put upward pressure on unemployment.

 
Peaceful elections in Namibia

"I am just a proud Namibian that we could have free and fair elections, no fighting, no attacking each other, free movement was allowed," said President Geingob after the result was announced.

His main rival Mr Itula is also a Swapo member, but stood as an independent,

The official opposition candidate - McHenry Venaani of the Popular Democratic Movement (PDM) - finished third with 5.3%.

He said he was considering legal action over what he called "anomalies and irregularities" in the election.

Namibia uses electronic voting machines, and Mr Venaani went to court shortly before the election, arguing they were open to manipulation. The court, however, rejected his case.

In parliamentary elections, Swapo lost its two-thirds majority in the 96-member chamber, winning 63 seats instead of its previous 77.

The PDM won 16 seats, increasing its total by 11

 
Bolivian elections: Overwhelming evidence of election fraud in Bolivia, monitors say

An independent international audit of Bolivia's disputed election in October has detailed "deliberate" and "malicious" efforts to rig the vote in favour of then-President Evo Morales.

The Organization of American States (OAS) said the measures included hidden servers and falsified signatures.

Mr Morales fled to Mexico after the army urged him to quit. He has not commented on the report.

The interim president has pledged new elections but no date has yet been set.

Jeanine Áñez, a former right-wing senator, called the OAS findings "frightening". She has previously said Mr Morales, Bolivia's first indigenous president who was seeking a fourth term, should face prosecution if he returns to the country.

According to the OAS, the "intentional manipulation" and "serious irregularities" included "changes in the minutes and the falsification of the signatures of poll officials", making it impossible to validate the official results of the 20 October vote.

In the processing of the results, it said in the 95-page final report (in Spanish), the data was redirected to two hidden servers and not controlled by officials at the Supreme Electoral Tribunal, opening the way for the manipulation of data.

There was also "loss of sensitive material [and] a significant number of errors".

"Based on the overwhelming evidence found," the regional body said, "what can be affirmed is that there has been a series of intentional operations aimed at altering the will expressed at the polls."
Here's hoping the interim government will call elections within the required timeframe and that it will be a free and fair contest

 
Algeria elects new President, but anger remains on the streets

CAIRO — A former prime minister of Algeria's old political guard was declared president Friday in a controversial vote marred by protests and apathy, signaling that the political turmoil is far from over in the North African nation.

The country’s electoral commission announced in preliminary results that former prime minister Abdelmadjid Tebboune, 74, won Thursday’s election outright with 58 percent of the vote, a significant margin of victory that negated the need for a runoff.

Tebboune, as well as his four opponents, served under the regime of Algeria’s longtime autocrat, Abdelaziz Bouteflika, who was toppled by massive street demonstrations this year after he announced that he would seek a fifth term in office. The final voter turnout was 40 percent, electoral commission head Mohamed Charfi announced in a televised address in the capital, Algiers.

Algerian authorities, especially the nation’s powerful military, had championed the election as a way to bring back stability. They also said they hoped it would end nearly 10 months of street demonstrations by opposition parties and activists demanding the erasure of all vestiges of the ruling elite.

On Friday, state television announcers declared Thursday’s voter turnout a satisfactory mandate by the people to move forward. But thousands of Algerians took to the streets again to protest what they have described as a sham election intended to preserve Bouteflika’s ruling clique. All of the candidates, who also included another former prime minister, were widely denounced by street activists as “children of the regime.”

The run-up to the first election since the ouster of the 82-year-old Bouteflika, who ruled Algeria for 20 years, was filled with turmoil and tension. On Thursday, those emotions boiled over as protesters defied a heavy police presence to stage rallies in Algiers and other cities and called for boycotting the election.

Protesters stormed some polling stations, briefly suspending voting, as police used water cannons and batons to disperse crowds.

Protests continue in Algeria. Why?

 For months, thousands of protesters — collectively called the “Hirak” movement — have staged weekly demonstrations. In their minds, the toppling of Bouteflika — the fifth autocrat since the 2011 Arab Spring revolts to fall from power — was only the first notch in their struggle to usher in a more democratic transition. They want an end to the cabal of war veterans, lawmakers, business tycoons and clans that has backed Bouteflika for decades and still retains control of the country. It is collectively known as “le pouvoir” — the power.

 “The system must go,” protesters have chanted at numerous demonstrations.

At a news conference Friday, Tebboune urged protesters to work with him “to open a new page” in the country. He said he would begin discussions to create a new constitution that would be approved by a referendum in the months ahead.

 
https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/the_americas/venezuelas-last-democratic-institution-falls-as-maduro-stages-de-facto-takeover-of-national-assembly/2020/01/05/8ba496fe-2d8f-11ea-bffe-020c88b3f120_story.html

Venezuela’s last democratic institution falls as Maduro stages de facto takeover of National Assembly

By Rachelle Krygier and Anthony Faiola

January 5 at 1:56 PM ET

CARACAS, Venezuela — The government of President Nicolás Maduro staged a de facto takeover of Venezuela's legislature on Sunday, swearing in its own candidate as head of the National Assembly in a move apparently orchestrated to rob international credibility from Juan Guaidó, who had led the body and has staked a rival claim as head of state.

The dramatic events marked a sharp escalation in Maduro’s gambit to end Guaidó’s quest to unseat him and stoked immediate outrage in Washington — which has strongly backed Guaidó and condemned Sunday’s action. Opposition officials declared the move an effective “parliamentary coup” meant to consolidate Maduro’s near-dictatorial powers.

“Parliamentary coup by the Maduro dictatorship against the National Assembly,” Guaidó’s communications team said in a tweet. “Without a vote or quorum, ruling-party lawmakers and corrupt lawmakers swear in a false leader.”

The replacement of Guaidó amounted to a bait and switch. On Sunday, he began the day anticipating his reelection as head of the National Assembly, viewed internationally as the last democratic institution left in the authoritarian South American state. Guaidó’s claim as the nation’s true president — recognized by nearly 60 countries, including the United States — has been based on his status as the assembly’s chief.

But security forces loyal to Maduro formed a cordon around the assembly building in central Caracas, blocking opposition lawmakers — who control the chamber — from entering. Lawmakers who back Maduro — including several allegedly involved in a government plot to buy votes — were allowed to pass. At one point, Guaidó sought to scale the spiked wrought-iron fence surrounding the assembly, trying to force his way in.

[[Guaidó promised to save Venezuela. Now the flame he lit is petering out, and his U.S. backers are weighing their options.]]

At the same time, Luis Parra — a former opposition politician who was one of several lawmakers accused last month of accepting government bribes — announced his surprise candidacy against Guaidó on Twitter on Sunday morning. Hours later, his swearing-in was suddenly shown on state television.

Parra is thought to have had the support of at least 40 lawmakers from Maduro’s party and an unknown number of others who the opposition claims to have been bribed. But there was no evidence that an actual vote had taken place. The opposition insisted that the vote was illegal because there was no quorum of lawmakers in the chamber.

“Today we want to open the doors to the future of this parliament,” Parra said in televised remarks after his swearing-in. “To the people that today expected a different message, we will continue to seek reconciliation”

Opposition officials said Guaidó would seek to counter Sunday’s move by gathering as many lawmakers as possible in an undisclosed location to hold their own vote on the chamber’s leadership.

The government’s action appeared designed to complicate Guaidó’s international recognition and provide some nations that might be considering pulling its support additional legal cover to do so. No longer being the technical head of the chamber could put his constitutional claim to the presidency in question for some nations.

But his strongest backers — particularly in Washington — are likely to continue and perhaps even redouble their support for Guaidó. The move comes as the United States — which has slapped tough sanctions on Maduro’s government, including an oil embargo — is weighing more confrontational steps, including a possible naval blockade of Venezuelan oil being shipped to Cuba, the Maduro government’s chief regional ally.

“What the regime is doing now at the National Assembly goes completely against the will of the people and the laws that govern the process,” the U.S. mission to Venezuela, based in Colombia since the severing of diplomatic ties last year, said in a tweet. “Democracy can’t be intimidated.”

 
Also, updating the OP with a list of 2020 elections to watch from the Council of Foreign Policy.  Link

ETA: Another one not on the CFP list that I’ll add is the Bolivian Presidential election scheduled for May 3 that was just announced.

Millions of people around the world voted in 2019. Nigerians opted for the tried and true when they reelected Muhammadu Buhari, as did Canadians in reelecting Justin Trudeau. Ukrainians opted for a fresh face when they elected Volodymyr Zelenskiy, a newcomer to politics who played a president in a television comedy. Narendra Modi and his BJP Party won an even bigger majority than in 2014, freeing him to pursue his Hindu nationalist agenda. South African voters weren’t as kind to the African National Congress, returning it to power with a reduced majority. Some elections weren’t on the books when 2019 started. Boris Johnson called a snap election for December and British voters rewarded him for it. And some elections left everyone scratching their heads. Israelis went to the polls twice, but the winners couldn’t form a government. Afghanis went to the polls three months ago and the results remain unknown.

Next year will see equally important and consequential elections. Some of those might come as a surprise, just as Britain’s snap elections did this year. But many elections are already on the calendar, though the specific dates could change. Here are ten elections to watch.

Taiwanese Presidential Election, January 11. One 2020 election with potentially significant geopolitical consequences is Taiwan’s presidential race. It pits incumbent President Tsai Ing-wen of the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) against Han Kuo-Yu of the Kuomintang Party (KMT). China forms a main dividing line between the two parties. The DPP contends Taiwan is an independent country, though Taipei has never formally declared independence. The KMT favors strengthening ties with China. Han argues that Tsai has damaged relations with China and that the election is about Taiwan’s “life and death.” However, he has toughened his tone toward China in the wake of the Hong Kong protests. In September, Beijing warned that if Tsai is reelected, Taiwan will lose all of its diplomatic allies, presumably because of Chinese pressure. Just sixteen countries currently maintain diplomatic relations with Taiwan. Tsai accuses China of interfering in Taiwan’s elections, calling it “a brazen challenge and detriment to the international order.” President Xi Jinping likely isn’t deterred. He said at the start of the year that reunification of Taiwan with China remains a “historic task.” He pointedly added: “We make no promise to renounce the use of force and reserve the option of taking all necessary means.”

Guinean Elections, February 16 and October. Guinea looks to be a case study in democratic disappointment. Alpha Condé’s victory in the country’s 2010 elections was seen as breaking the country’s fifty-year history of dictatorship and ushering in a new democratic era. A decade later, that optimism looks misplaced. Guinea’s 2013 parliamentary elections fell short of being free and fair, and the January 2019 parliamentary elections have been pushed back to February 2020. Condé hasn’t ruled out being on the ballot for the October 2020 presidential vote, even though Guinea’s constitution bars him from seeking a third term. Suspicions that he is trying to rewrite the country’s election rules has triggered protests that have turned deadly. The United States has encouraged the eighty-one year old president to retire; in September, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo tweeted that he had told Condé about “the critical need for regular, democratic transitions of power for a thriving democracy.” Russia, however, is encouraging Condé to seek a third term. Why is the Kremlin interested in a West African country of thirteen million people? Guinea possesses the world’s largest proven bauxite reserves, the ore used to make aluminum. Russia gets a quarter of its bauxite from Guinea.

Israeli General Election, March 2, 2020. Will the third time be the charm? Israelis went to the polls twice in 2019. Neither vote produced a clear-cut winner. In the April vote, incumbent Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s right-wing Likud Party and former army chief Benny Gantz’s centrist Blue and White alliance both won thirty-five seats. Securing control of Israel’s 120-member Knesset requires sixty-one seats, however, and neither Netanyahu nor Gantz could build the required coalition. Things didn’t change much when new elections were held in September. Likud won thirty-two seats, while the Blue and White alliance won thirty-three. Once again, neither Netanyahu nor Gantz could assemble a coalition; they also couldn’t agree on forming a national unity government. So Israelis will head back to the polls in March. One thing different this time around is that Netanyahu was indicted in November on charges of fraud, bribery, and breach of trust. He will remain as prime minister through the next election—assuming he survives a challenge for leadership of the Likud Party set for later this month—because the Israeli law that requires public officials to resign when they are charged with a crime exempts the prime minister.

South Korean Legislative Elections, April 15. What happens when a democracy is still debating the rules for allocating seats in its national legislature four months before election day? South Koreans are about to find out. Electoral reform has long been a topic of debate in South Korea. Earlier this year, South Korean President Moon Jae-in and his Democratic Party of Korea (DPK) reached agreement with several smaller parties on a specific reform proposal. Among other things, it would increase from forty-seven to seventy-five the number of seats in South Korea’s 300-member National Assembly that are allocated by proportional representation. However, the conservative Liberal Korea Party (LPK) opposed the plan and used a range of parliamentary tactics to block any changes. The LPK ended its filibuster this week, finally enabling the National Assembly to move forward on a reform bill. If it passes, the DPK may have an easier time winning what it currently lacks, a working majority in the National Assembly. However, Moon’s personal popularity has fallen to new lows because of slowing economic growth, high youth unemployment, and growing income inequality. If the elections don’t give the DPK a working majority, Moon could find himself a lame duck with two years still left in his presidency.

Ethiopian General Election, May. One of the good news stories of recent years has been Ethiopia. Under the leadership of Prime Minister Abiy Ahmed, Africa’s second-most populous country has been experiencing a political opening. Ahmed broke with Ethiopia’s traditional strongman tactics upon assuming office in 2018. He freed thousands of political prisoners and initiated peace talks with Eritrea. He was awarded the 2019 Nobel Peace Prize for the latter effort. Now he hopes to make good on his pledge to bring Ethiopia free and fair elections. Next May’s vote will determine who holds the 547 seats available in the House of People’s Representatives. Abiy faces significant challenges in making good on his promise. Among them is Ethiopia’s history of ethnic tensions, which have killed 1,200 people over the past year and displaced more than a million others. Media mogul Jawar Mohammed, who like Abiy hails from the Oromo, Ethiopia’s largest ethnic group, has criticized Abiy for the violence. Mohammed encouraged demonstrations in late October that left at least sixty-seven people dead and saw protestors burn copies of a recently published book Abiy wrote outlining his political philosophy. Mohammed’s popularity is rising and he has joined the race for prime minister.

Singaporean Parliamentary Elections, May (projected). Could this time be different? Singapore is a textbook example of political stability. Its People’s Action Party (PAP) has won every election since the country’s independence in 1965. Heng Swee Keat, who is expected to become prime minister should the incumbent, Lee Hsien Loong, step down as planned before 2022, hopes the PAP will maintain that victory streak. The odds are good that it will; the PAP currently holds eighty-three of the eighty-nine seats in parliament. However, the PAP can expect to face increased criticism from the Worker’s Party (WP)and the Singapore Democratic Party (SDP). The WP, the only party besides the PAP to hold parliamentary seats, doesn’t expect to win a majority. Its goal is to serve as a check on the PAP. The SDP dreams of a more fundamental challenge to Singaporean politics. The party’s leader, Chee Soon Juan, argues that Singapore badly needs reform because democracy is essential for innovation, change, and progress. That view is popular with many members of Singapore’s intelligentsia. But most voters are more worried about how the U.S.-China trade war might hurt Singapore’s economy, and as a result, they are expected to vote to keep the PAP in power.

Hong Kong Legislative Council Elections, September. It’s an open question whether Hong Kong’s Legislative Council elections will take place as planned. The city has been gripped by protests since last March, when opponents of a controversial extradition bill first went to the streets. The protestors initially objected that Beijing was violating the one country, two systems pledge it made when the United Kingdom handed control of the city back to China in 1997,  thereby undermining the Basic Law that assures Hong Kong’s special status through 2047. As the protests continued, and as Chief Executive Carrie Lam failed to address the protestors’ demands, those demands grew to include making Hong Kong’s government more democratic. Pro-democracy candidates swamped pro-Beijing candidates in Hong Kong’s November district council elections. Beijing might be tempted to block the far more important Legislative Council elections, though that would likely trigger global criticism. Beijing might decide instead that it can control the election outcome. Only half of the seventy seats on the legislative council are chosen by popular vote; the remainder are elected through mechanisms Beijing can influence. And Beijing has shown itself willing to keep candidates it doesn’t like off the Hong Kong ballot.

Myanmar’s General Election, November. Next November’s elections could be pivotal for Myanmar. The country held its first free elections in a quarter century back in 2015. The National League for Democracy Party (NLD) won a majority of seats in both houses of parliament even though 25 percent of the seats were reserved for the military. The victory created an odd situation. The NLD had the votes to make its leader, Nobel Peace Prize winner Aung San Suu Kyi, president. However, the Burmese constitution bars her from being president. The NLD circumvented that rule by making her “state counsellor,” a new position with wide-ranging powers. Suu Kyi’s job performance has disappointed people both inside and outside of Myanmar. She has been harshly criticized for insisting against all evidence that there hasn’t been a genocide against the Rohingya. She is also under fire for failing to curb other ethnic violence—the Burmese government recognizes 135 different ethnic groups—and for not doing more to improve the country’s economic performance. To better challenge the NLD, several ethnically-based political parties merged this summer. The NLD formed an Ethnic Affairs Committee in response to address the concerns of minority ethnic groups. Some political activists have dismissed the move as a ploy to win votes.

Burkina Faso’s Parliamentary Elections, November 2020. Can a fledgling democracy succeed when faced with terrorist violence? Burkina Faso may soon find out. The country formerly known as Upper Volta held its first competitive elections in decades in 2015. The elections came on the heels of mass protests against Blaise Compaoré, who had ruled for twenty-seven years and had no plans to retire. The new president, Roch Marc Christian Kabore, soon faced a surge of terrorist violence conducted by al Qaeda-affiliated jihadist groups. The violence had partly spilled over from neighboring Mali, but the growing weakness of the Burkinan state helped it flourish. The attacks have displaced hundreds of thousands of people and raised fears of a famine. Many terrorist attacks have targeted foreign nationals, seeking to disrupt overseas aid and commercial activity. Burkina Faso’s prime minister and entire cabinet resigned in January 2019 because of their failure to curb terrorist attacks. The change accomplished little, however. Last month, for example, gunmen attacked a convoy affiliated with a Canadian mining company, killing thirty-seven people and injuring sixty more. Kabore has signaled that he plans to run for reelection. Former prime minister Kadré Désiré Ouédraogo has also thrown his hat into the ring.

U.S. General Election, November 3. Can an impeached president win reelection? Donald Trump will find out, assuming—as seems likely—the Senate doesn’t remove him from office. Trump has reason to be optimistic: four of the last five presidents won reelection; Republicans are solidly behind him; and unemployment has hit record lows. Democrats also have reason to be optimistic: they won big in the 2018 midterm elections; a majority of registered voters supported impeachment; and national polls show Trump trailing his main Democratic rivals. Of course, U.S. presidents aren’t elected by the national popular vote but by the Electoral College. That means a handful of battleground states will likely decide the race. Trump could potentially win the Electoral College while losing the popular vote by an even larger margin than he did in 2016. Just as important next November as the presidential race is what happens down ballot. Thirty-four Senate seats are being contested; Republicans currently hold twenty-two of them. Republicans hope to regain control of the House, but twenty-four House Republicans have already decided to retire rather than seek reelection. The outcome of gubernatorial and state house races will determine which party will have the advantage when it comes to congressional redistricting.

 
Last edited by a moderator:

Users who are viewing this thread

Top