GoBirds
Footballguy
I tried to cut and paste from it but couldn’t, second to last paragraph.I’m not avoiding anything. I have no idea what you’re referring to. Please be explicit.
I tried to cut and paste from it but couldn’t, second to last paragraph.I’m not avoiding anything. I have no idea what you’re referring to. Please be explicit.
Sorry but the source I have isn’t divided into paragraphs. Is there a sentence or something you can simply recite? Because I honestly have no idea where you’re going here.I tried to cut and paste from it but couldn’t, second to last paragraph.
There was a link in other thread but looks like it’s deleted and probably wasn’t allowed. Unfortunately there are posters that follow me 24/7 trying to get me banned so not risking posting it. Just work from the end and look for Trump’s name, clearly states his opinions predate Trump and attempts to tie it to his rhetoric would be inaccurate.Sorry but the source I have isn’t divided into paragraphs. Is there a sentence or something you can simply recite? Because I honestly have no idea where you’re going here.
I can’t find that. But in any case we all know that this rhetoric predates Trump, which is part of the reason I don’t hold Trump responsible.There was a link in other thread but looks like it’s deleted and probably wasn’t allowed. Unfortunately there are posters that follow me 24/7 trying to get me banned so not risking posting it. Just work from the end and look for Trump’s name, clearly states his opinions predate Trump and attempts to tie it to his rhetoric would be inaccurate.
I believe at the end of the manifesto there was a blurb about the fake news trying to spin this as Trump's fault when it wasn't.I haven’t seen this.
The SOB was pro-Trump, that's obvious through his social media, but the argument can be made that his being pro-Trump didn't influence his actions or wasn't a motive for it.I believe at the end of the manifesto there was a blurb about the fake news trying to spin this as Trump's fault when it wasn't.
Gotcha - so the other social media stuff that was taken down was leaning one way, but specifically in the manifesto he put in the blurb about not blaming Trump?The SOB was pro-Trump, that's obvious through his social media, but the argument can be made that his being pro-Trump didn't influence his actions or wasn't a motive for it.
That's as fair and right as one can get on this I think. It would help the Trump argument if Trump had not said inflammatory things about Hispanics.
Yes, that's what's probably going on here.Gotcha - so the other social media stuff that was taken down was leaning one way, but specifically in the manifesto he put in the blurb about not blaming Trump?
Based on what I’m seeing and reading, they’re behaving as if Trump is the victim here and that Democratic politicians are to blame for attempting to politicize these shootings.Can Trump supporters at least agree his rhetoric has to change?
Seems pretty reasonable.Paraphrasing Mayor Pete:
We can't just social media our way out of a problem when rhetoric coming out of the white house is stoking hate.
No one should have access to a weapon that can shoot 35 people in under one minute.
We need political will, courage, common sense reform gun control. Democracy is not working when 90% of the people support something, but congress can get it done.
He espoused the same hateful views towards immigrants as Trump.
I don't expect anyone to answer, but I hope when they hear language like 'invasion', 'infestation/infest', 'send them back', they just realize what is going on here.Can Trump supporters at least agree his rhetoric has to change?
Everyone's rhetoric needs to change. Trump does. Trump guys do. The left BS with all the racist, sexist, etc.. attacks every time something happens to a minority, woman, etc... These awful D candidates need to start selling their plans and ideals and stop with the "I'm not Trump" shtick that isn't going to convince anyone that already isn't brainwashed to join their side.Can Trump supporters at least agree his rhetoric has to change?
At least Hillary can sleep well at night.Some people want our president to dominate through the strength of character and through superior ideas and vision for America.
others prefer domination by physical intimidation tactics, bullying, name calling and insults.
How you “win” matters.
What does that mean?At least Hillary can sleep well at night.
You are dead on and the bolded is a very good point. If the left is serious about a solution and not just scoring political points stop fighting “the wall” just cause it means Trump didn’t deliver on a promise. It’s happening anyways and a focus on border security is a good thing.....work together on that (toned down from original wall) and come to a compromise on guns. Makes too much sense so will never happen.Everyone's rhetoric needs to change. Trump does. Trump guys do. The left BS with all the racist, sexist, etc.. attacks every time something happens to a minority, woman, etc... These awful D candidates need to start selling their plans and ideals and stop with the "I'm not Trump" shtick that isn't going to convince anyone that already isn't brainwashed to join their side.
All the awful zingers when something bad happens.... not one god dang person is going to change their minds on guns over smart ### classless comments like "More thoughts and prayers". We aren't banning any guns or getting restrictions until the left dominates the government (and even then I'm skeptical) or until some negotiation occurs (come on left give the right something they want in exchange for gun restrictions if it's that important) or until money is out of politics which all we know is never going to happen because every single one of those guys in DC are paid off.
You'd have to read several posts in the discussion last night to understand the context. HTH.What does that mean?
No nevermind, I don't care, its a total deflection
Their base eats it up.Whole bunch of people dead and CNN can't stop talking about Trump.
No he didn’t. That photo was on reddit before yesterdayHe spelled out Trump in guns on his FB. No, this guy didn't "hate both political parties."
You’re the arbiter of the “right thing”??So, is this guy going to do the right thing and get off of Twitter, and in front of a camera, and try to unite us like a leader should?
You would think a smart guy like would know thatNo he didn’t. That photo was on reddit before yesterday
Have a great day
Question was kinda rhetorical, but I’ll put you in the “no” camp.You’re the arbiter of the “right thing”??
PM me a link? I learn a lot by reading these things. I dont understand why they are taboo.There was a link in other thread but looks like it’s deleted and probably wasn’t allowed. Unfortunately there are posters that follow me 24/7 trying to get me banned so not risking posting it. Just work from the end and look for Trump’s name, clearly states his opinions predate Trump and attempts to tie it to his rhetoric would be inaccurate.
It was a make-up call. Daulton had been crying all day about the suspension he just got off of.Careful guys, some that try hard to come across as tough go running to mods in a heartbeat. Be safe this close to football season and mind the trolling.
Amazing how quick he can get someone suspended with the way he acts in here. It’s been a free for all in his thread and as far as reigning it in until that. He’s a good one to ignore, never used the function before but time to figure out I guess.It was a make-up call. Daulton had been crying all day about the suspension he just got off of.
Sorry but the source I have isn’t divided into paragraphs. Is there a sentence or something you can simply recite? Because I honestly have no idea where you’re going here.
My ideology has not changed for several years. My opinions on automation, immigration, and the rest
predate Trump and his campaign for president. I putting this here because some people will blame the
President or certain presidential candidates for the attack. This is not the case. I know that the media
will probably call me a white supremacist anyway and blame Trump’s rhetoric. The media is infamous
for fake news. Their reaction to this attack will likely just confirm that.
They should be taboo, it’s a manifesto that instructs and indoctrinates on mass murder.PM me a link? I learn a lot by reading these things. I dont understand why they are taboo.
Someone already posted to this. This is is quintessential Trumpspeak.fake news.
There’s no debate here - the mfer is a white supremacist.I know that the media will probably call me a white supremacist anyway
GoBirds finds this funny; not sure why.Thanks. But Trump is repeating the same rhetoric.
Do you guys not see the problem in the logic here?My ideology has not changed for several years. My opinions on automation, immigration, and the rest
predate Trump and his campaign for president. I putting this here because some people will blame the
President or certain presidential candidates for the attack.
Just what we would expect you to say.GoBirds finds this funny; not sure why.
That's what him and a few others do to mock posts because they will get a TO if they reply with . Which is kind of dumb but hey, not my board.GoBirds finds this funny; not sure why.
Not true, stay on topic instead of insulting posters as a friend of mine says please.That's what him and a few others do to mock posts because they will get a TO if they reply with . Which is kind of dumb but hey, not my board.
BS...and IMO this is pretty disgusting to suggest give up on opposing the wall to get somewhere in safety and gun control.You are dead on and the bolded is a very good point. If the left is serious about a solution and not just scoring political points stop fighting “the wall” just cause it means Trump didn’t deliver on a promise. It’s happening anyways and a focus on border security is a good thing.....work together on that (toned down from original wall) and come to a compromise on guns. Makes too much sense so will never happen.
Don'tBS...and IMO this is pretty dosgissltingbti suggest give up on opposing the wall to get somewhere in safety and gun control.
There should be a compromise in guns for the good of the nation. And should not be conflated with the ridiculous wall.
I need a translator here.BS...and IMO this is pretty dosgissltingbti suggest give up on opposing the wall to get somewhere in safety and gun control.
There should be a compromise in guns for the good of the nation. And should not be conflated with the ridiculous wall.
Address what i posted...and i edited the typos since that is all some want to focus on.Don't
Well fix your spell checker. It's every postAddress what i posted...and i edited the typos sonce that is all some want to focus on.
Started a post with BS is disrespectful and uncalled for and exactly why I've respectfully asked you not to follow me around. I appreciate your cooperation.Address what i posted...and i edited the typos sonce that is all some want to focus on.
How don't care if you felt disrespected by it. I clearly explained why I felt it was.Started a post with BS is disrespectful and uncalled for and exactly why I've respectfully asked you not to follow me around. I appreciate your cooperation.
As I posted earlier, politics are about compromise. No one is changing sides or opinions when people do what you just did here calling someone's opinion disgusting. There's plenty the right can use the same tactic and call the left disgusting like abortion, for example. All that does is make everyone tune the rest of you out and assume you're full of nonsense. Everyone doesn't see the world the same. If one side is serious about gun control then offer the right something they want (wall or something else) to get there. If you were in charge, what are you willing to negotiate with to get there? Find a real solution that will work instead of more insults, more division, more deaths, and more nonsense.BS...and IMO this is pretty disgusting to suggest give up on opposing the wall to get somewhere in safety and gun control.
There should be a compromise on guns for the good of the nation. And should not be conflated with the ridiculous wall.
I don't know what this means but it doesn't feel excellent.......I'll ask again nicely please move along. Thanks.How don't care if you felt disrespected by it. I clearly explained why I felt it was.
And nobody is following you around.
That's the problem. And no one cares what you think is BS either. It's the same old back and forth here like it is the real world. Just a giant waste of time repeating the same stupid crap over and over and over. Because everyone wants to claim some moral high ground and "win". Who's winning?How don't care if you felt disrespected by it. I clearly explained why I felt it was.
And nobody is following you around.