Two things:
1) Tim's statement had some opinion (that there was nothing to Barr's instruction beyond politics) but the core thing he was pointing out was that for all of the deep investigation that Barr said he was going to do -- in the face of 16 AGs writing to protest it given the lack of any evidence whatsoever -- that Barr’s investigation has led to nothing.
2) I don't think it's fair to label that as a "dishonest intellectualism," whatever that means to you (I am not sure I understand what you mean by this). I do think you have a point that you didn't "ignore" anything as much as you side-stepped and didn't address Tim's statement that while you used Barr's investigation as a clear sign there must be malfeasance afoot, you also don't believe the corollary -- that when no clear evidence of momentum of that investigation ensues, it's a clear sign that there might not be anything to those allegations. Instead, it's on to the next claim.
The only point I am trying to make by pointing this out is simply this:
We have long past reached the point where it seems ongoing accusations continue unabated, but without clear evidence or resulting proof. In fact, everything that US election security officials, the Dept. of Homeland Security, and so forth have found was that this seemed to have been the most secure and uncompromised election to date.
At some point, acceptance of results has to happen -- I mean, what's the alternative?
I didn't take Tim's replay as opinion. I asked a question and received an "it's over. Period". That is a statement.
I also don't put much stock in the whole democrat signature stuff. It's a played out angle to me. 2,000 lawyer's signed a form that Bill Barr was acting in a partisan fashion. It was all just show. 50 former intelligence agents signed a form saying the Hunter Biden Laptop was Russian disinformation (even though it isn't). It's what they do when they disagree with something and not proof of anything.
Has Barr's investigation concluded? I haven't seen an update on it. It's still only a week old, so saying it has led too nothing seems like jumping the gun to me.
I meant to say intellectually dishonest. I was kind of seeing red at the moment. I know Tim didn't mean any disrespect with his post, I just found it less than excellent.
I never felt like I side stepped the claim andI explained above my take on the signatures above. I get a lot of replies to my wildly unpopular opinion and sometimes have to pick and choose my battles here. I have full time family and job responsibilities that take up a lot of my time and I can't reply to everything here.
You guys keep saying there is no evidence of fraud and all of the election officials agree is simply not a true statement. Leading up to this election there are countless articles and pieces on the potential for fraud in our voting system.
Now 3 days post an election were 10,000+ people are willing to make claims of fraud, the govt comes out and says "nothing to see here", "most secure ever"... I'm not buying it.
I've said I'll accept the results once they are certified as per our constitution. I find it more shocking that people can't accept that stance.