supermike80
Footballguy
Yeah. I see it there.Dude, you used "opinion" right in your post.
Yeah. I see it there.Dude, you used "opinion" right in your post.
Researching this a bit ... the Atlanta Journal-Constitution's DeKalb County reporter Tyler Estep DID address this matter on his own Twitter feed.Were they?I'm still wondering how 10,000ish votes were certified correct, with only 1,000ish ballots in the batch. That is more than a simple error and needs serious investigation.
I really don't want to go off tweets to inform myself of what happened here. But the tweets posted in thread make me think nothing untoward happened.
Are we ever going to see old-line media report on this story?
Are you claiming that opinions are always true statements then?Yeah. I see it there.
Huh?Are you claiming that opinions are always true statements then?
Read his whole thread. It wasn't off a typo. His final total was 1,081. That isnt a digit in the wrong place.We have no source for the part in red. Here is David Shafer's original tweet:
Admittedly speculation, but I offer it anyway: One easy way for 1,077 to turn into 10,707 is to type numbers in sloppily on a ten-key (adding machine or computer keyboard). You're typing in "1-0-" but then you don't release the zero quick enough before hitting the seven, which yields "1-0-7-0-". Then press the seven to complete the entry, and "1,077" renders as "10,707".
It's his opinion and it's shared by millions. So calling it a lie is extreme.
You said it's extreme to call it a lie. So why is it extreme? It seems to be from your sentence that it's either because it can't be a lie because it's his opinion or that it can't be a lie because too many people believe it.Huh?
I'd suggest if someone posts something that is intentionally inflammatory, untrue, and provides no evidence to back it up, the post should be deleted and/or the poster given a timeout. I don't think "the Earth is flat" rises to the level of inflammatory, as it would more likely be seen as unserious and a joke. If someone repeated it multiple times, then yes, the poster should be given a timeout as it would clearly be trolling.Sooo if someone comes on this board and says the earth is flat they should be banned by the moderators? Is that what you are saying here?
I dont know what you are trying to do here. But I will just stay out of it. Go pick on someone else. I am not even a tiny bit interested in this conversation. Sorry I replied.You said it's extreme to call it a lie. So why is it extreme? It seems to be from your sentence that it's either because it can't be a lie because it's his opinion or that it can't be a lie because too many people believe it.
You want to blame a single digit typo when it wasnt that.I think you've misinterpreted what appears to have happened here.
- Original count came back as 1077 votes for Biden
- Hand recount confirmed 1077 votes for Biden
- Poll worker mistakenly keyed in 10707 votes for Biden as result of hand recount
- Significant discrepancy between original count and recount created an alert for someone to review
- Reviewer noticed the error and corrected it back to 1077, which is what the original count said all along
Again, no malfeasance, no issue, everything worked exactly as designed to ensure votes were tabulated correctly.
Well I don't agree. There are many that feel this way about Biden. You may not like it, but that doesn't change it. And being censored because someone wants to share their opinion, is just wrong. Way way wrong.I'd suggest if someone posts something that is intentionally inflammatory, untrue, and provides no evidence to back it up, the post should be deleted and/or the poster given a timeout. I don't think "the Earth is flat" rises to the level of inflammatory, as it would more likely be seen as unserious and a joke. If someone repeated it multiple times, then yes, the poster should be given a timeout as it would clearly be trolling.
Also, like it or not..there really are people who believe the earth is flat. Seriously believe it. So if they post that here and aren't joking, you're saying their posts should be deleted and they get suspended from posting? No way man.I'd suggest if someone posts something that is intentionally inflammatory, untrue, and provides no evidence to back it up, the post should be deleted and/or the poster given a timeout. I don't think "the Earth is flat" rises to the level of inflammatory, as it would more likely be seen as unserious and a joke. If someone repeated it multiple times, then yes, the poster should be given a timeout as it would clearly be trolling.
No one signed off on anything, which is the point. Literally the opposite happened.You want to blame a single digit typo when it wasnt that.I think you've misinterpreted what appears to have happened here.
- Original count came back as 1077 votes for Biden
- Hand recount confirmed 1077 votes for Biden
- Poll worker mistakenly keyed in 10707 votes for Biden as result of hand recount
- Significant discrepancy between original count and recount created an alert for someone to review
- Reviewer noticed the error and corrected it back to 1077, which is what the original count said all along
Again, no malfeasance, no issue, everything worked exactly as designed to ensure votes were tabulated correctly.
Back to the question is how did this get signed off on?
, glass houses and all that etc@FBG Moderator is it o.k. to post lies like this on the board? Just checking for future reference.
I agree with Supermike here. if someone believes the earth is flat they shouldnt get suspended nor should there post be deleted, but then again no one should be suspended for openly mocking their ignorance either.Also, like it or not..there really are people who believe the earth is flat. Seriously believe it. So if they post that here and aren't joking, you're saying their posts should be deleted and they get suspended from posting? No way man.
If all of the following are true:Also, like it or not..there really are people who believe the earth is flat. Seriously believe it. So if they post that here and aren't joking, you're saying their posts should be deleted and they get suspended from posting? No way man.I'd suggest if someone posts something that is intentionally inflammatory, untrue, and provides no evidence to back it up, the post should be deleted and/or the poster given a timeout. I don't think "the Earth is flat" rises to the level of inflammatory, as it would more likely be seen as unserious and a joke. If someone repeated it multiple times, then yes, the poster should be given a timeout as it would clearly be trolling.
Well that's your opinion and I disagree. Thanks for the opinion however.If all of the following are true:
- The posts are intentionally inflammatory
- The posts are verifiable untrue
- The poster provides no evidence of the claim
Yes, the poster should be suspended. I'm unclear why that would be controversial.
First of all I'd be embarrassed to be part of a party who's leader acted like Trump. There is literally zero concrete evidence of any significant, and barely any insignificant, fraud. He's just stalling and trying to get lucky by throwing anything against the wall he can. Hillary lost by much less than him and acted with much more class than him. He was afforded all the rights and privileges as a president elect that he's withholding from good ol' Joe. imho, Trump is an embarrassment to our nation and to Republicans in general.Would you say the same if the election positions were REVERSED?
If someone called out 10K for Trump instead of 1K? If the situation was those votes would be critical for a Biden scenario where he would mirror Trump's current position?
Or would most of you be enraged and up in arms about it?
What about the dead people voting if they voted for Trump and the situation was reversed?
What about if the count stopped in the middle of the night, the vote count swung in the opposite direction as it did, but this time for Trump and the situation was reversed?
What about the cases were observers were not given access or were put into logistics that were untenable and the situation was reversed?
What about the gaggle of ballots found in dumpsters and the situation was reversed?
What about the accusations that late mail ballots were stamped with an early date postmark and the situation was reversed?
Would the army of hardened liberals in this forum ( some not all) just say , "Hey, absolutely nothing nefarious!" Or would some of you be climbing the walls and be frothing at the teeth?
The machine count came in at 1k, the hand count came in at 1k, when the handcount was written down it was written as 10k. This mistake was immediately caught and corrected. It never was intended nor did it ever have a chance to impact the vote count. Checks and balances worked as prescribed.You want to blame a single digit typo when it wasnt that.
Back to the question is how did this get signed off on?
Openly inflammatory is of course not cool.I agree with Supermike here. if someone believes the earth is flat they shouldnt get suspended nor should there post be deleted, but then again no one should be suspended for openly mocking there ignorance either.
I’m sure this posting of this the 8th time it will get through.I think you've misinterpreted what appears to have happened here.
- Original count came back as 1077 votes for Biden
- Hand recount confirmed 1077 votes for Biden
- Poll worker mistakenly keyed in 10707 votes for Biden as result of hand recount
- Significant discrepancy between original count and recount created an alert for someone to review
- Reviewer noticed the error and corrected it back to 1077, which is what the original count said all along
Again, no malfeasance, no issue, everything worked exactly as designed to ensure votes were tabulated correctly.
Ouch. This could actually be nominated for post / burn of the week.
I agree with this. Many in here were suggesting that Trump directly colluded with Russia.Openly inflammatory is of course not cool.
But someone saying "Biden's Presidency is fradulent" because they believe the election was rife with fraud, is NOT inflammatory. In my opinion of course.
Edited because it was already covered by othersRead his whole thread. It wasn't off a typo. His final total was 1,081. That isnt a digit in the wrong place.
David shafer is also the source for the red highlight. It's in that same tweet thread.
Here is his whole thread.No one signed off on anything, which is the point. Literally the opposite happened.
Change any one of the "1077" in my post to "1081" or "1073" if you want. Are you arguing the chain of events was different than what I wrote above? If yes, then what was the chain of events as you understand them? If no, then how do you get to malfeasance or "helps Biden"?
Yeah but my thing is, was, and will be..Say what you feel. Share your opinions. When we start banning people for sharing their opinions? What kind of world is that?I agree with this. Many in here were suggesting that Trump directly colluded with Russia.
Not me of course...
Yes it was. That’s exactly what happened.You want to blame a single digit typo when it wasnt that.
Back to the question is how did this get signed off on?
You still seem to be ignoring the actual chain of events.Here is his whole thread.
One of our monitors discovered a 9,626 vote error in the DeKalb County hand count. One batch was labeled 10,707 for Biden and 13 for Trump - an improbable margin even by DeKalb standards. The actual count for the batch was 1,081 for Biden and 13 for Trump.
Had this counting error not been discovered, Biden would have gained enough votes from this one batch alone to cancel out Trump’s gains from Fayette, Floyd and Walton.
We were limited to 1 monitor for every 10 counting tables and we were kept some distance from the tables. There is no telling what we missed under these unreasonable restrictions. The miscounted batch had been be signed off by two official counters.
Biden’s margin of victory in this batch of votes (99.9%) bested Bashar al-Assad’s 2007 margin (97.6%) and Raul Castro’s 2008 margin (99.4%). It matched Kim Jong-il’s 2009 margin (99.9%).
Our attorneys have turned over an affidavit from our monitor to the Secretary of State and requested an investigation.
Here is the full text of the affidavit that Shafer was tweeting about (posted by Stephen Fowler of Georgia Public Broadcasting). It's a quick read and an interesting behind-the-scenes look at how ballot-counting information gets contested in real time. Of note to me is that the Republican observer who filled out the affidavit reported a spirit of cooperation between he and a supervisor after some initial distrust conveyed by one of the counters -- people are still people, after all.Read his whole thread. It wasn't off a typo. His final total was 1,081. That isn't a digit in the wrong place.
Caught by poll watchers and not the certification is the concerning part.The machine count came in at 1k, the hand count came in at 1k, when the handcount was written down it was written as 10k. This mistake was immediately caught and corrected. It never was intended nor did it ever have a chance to impact the vote count. Checks and balances worked as prescribed.
I do'nt understand these little snippets that are being thrown in."Inadequate men in big jobs are always dangerous. President Trump has cemented his legacy as an inadequate man who lacks the mental faculties and strength of character necessary for the job. How many others will prove, by saying and doing nothing, that they too are inadequate?"
- Carly Fiorina
The 10k number wasn't part of the machine count nor part of the hand count. How is it concerning? That number would never have made it's way into the vote count. The large discrepancy between the 3 numbers would have been investigated and corrected.Caught by poll watchers and not the certification is the concerning part.
Mike- as someone here who likes to call out the hypocrisy and ridiculousness (which I enjoy about your posts honestly) why aren’t you doing the same for the obvious hypocrisy and ridiculousness going on now with the “just want a fair election” schtick?I do'nt understand these little snippets that are being thrown in.
Is that to say that even if there were true election fraud, who cares because Trump is terrible?
I won't make posts like that anymore if you won't. Deal?
What?Mike- as someone here who likes to call out the hypocrisy and r
Accidentally hit the send before I was finished. Please see the post nowWhat?
Well because I have for the most part stayed out of it.Mike- as someone here who likes to call out the hypocrisy and ridiculousness (which I enjoy about your posts honestly) why aren’t you doing the same for the obvious hypocrisy and ridiculousness going on now with the “just want a fair election” schtick?
I don't think Ms. Fiorina was specifically referring to how President Trump handled the election. It seems more like a general comment about being inadequate to handle the job of being President.I do'nt understand these little snippets that are being thrown in."Inadequate men in big jobs are always dangerous. President Trump has cemented his legacy as an inadequate man who lacks the mental faculties and strength of character necessary for the job. How many others will prove, by saying and doing nothing, that they too are inadequate?"
- Carly Fiorina
Is that to say that even if there were true election fraud, who cares because Trump is terrible?
Thanks for the answer.Well because I have for the most part stayed out of it.
However...On the other board..I have ripped into my fellow conservative posters for doing exactly that. They are repeating the same thing the liberals did in 2016 and embarrassing themselves in the process.
So why post it in the middle of a conversation about election fraud--and in this thread? Just liked the quote I guess?I don't think Ms. Fiorina was specifically referring to how President Trump handled the election. It seems more like a general comment about being inadequate to handle the job of being President.
Well I stay true to form. Hypocrisy makes me nuts.Thanks for the answer.
So why post it in the middle of a conversation about election fraud--and in this thread? Just liked the quote I guess?I don't think Ms. Fiorina was specifically referring to how President Trump handled the election. It seems more like a general comment about being inadequate to handle the job of being President.
I see.
This isn't the election fraud thread. It's the Trump 2020 thread. It's the only thread left in the forum relating to the general topic of Donald Trump. I have to presume by the moderator actions that they expect general Trump discussion to be consolidated into this thread. I saw the quote from Fiorina this morning and I thought it was relevant to the topic of Donald Trump, since she had previously endorsed him.
Also, the quote does have an indirect connection to the topic of election fraud, as Fiorina was Ted Cruz's pick for Vice President, and Cruz has not only endorsed some of Trump's fraud claims, but it's possible, if not likely, that Fiorina was referring to Cruz and others like him when she wrote, "How many others will prove, by saying and doing nothing, that they too are inadequate?"
I am not sure I understand his point either. The original count was 1k for Biden. On recount it was erroneously reported as 10k, they found the issue and corrected it back to 1k.The 10k number wasn't part of the machine count nor part of the hand count. How is it concerning? That number would never have made it's way into the vote count. The large discrepancy between the 3 numbers would have been investigated and corrected.
Brutal article, just brutalTrump just bunkered down in the White House
All the more tragic as lives are being lost as he sits there and does nothing but obstruct the incoming administration
It was signed off as accurate before caught by a watcher. The hand recount looks worse than the machines.I am not sure I understand his point either. The original count was 1k for Biden. On recount it was erroneously reported as 10k, they found the issue and corrected it back to 1k.
The net result was the original count was correct and validated in the recount. What exactly is the problem here?
thisThe two are unrelated but at least the Russian investigation resulted in indictments. How many indictments do you think the 2020 election will result in?I bet there's fewer post about it than the four years worth of Russia nothing burger that the Dems clinged to