Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.
This is a republican election official who released the entire unedited video and went through it all, debunking every allegation. How does that have anything to do with the MSM? The Ruby Freeman conspiracy has been thoroughly debunked. It's false. It was made up from chopped up video and lies. Like every other claim of voter fraud, it fell apart in the face of factual information. Repeating conspiracies doesn't make them any more true.
During the “hearings”...the full video was not shown, correct?
Ruby Freeman is a 60 year old lady who runs a kiosk in the mall that sells handbags. She was doxed shortly after the election and has pretty much gone into hiding to protect herself from psycopaths like this
Both the FBI and GBI investigated. The unedited video that debunks this conspiracy is available on the SOS website. You are repeating debunked conspiracies. The debunking was done by Republican election officials.
It's hard to know. There are claims made that we never hear the results of. Courts say "no standing" to present it. DOJ doesn't want it.
Can you link me to the GBI and FBI findings?
Do you have a problem with Chris Kreb's, a life-long R with an impeccable record in cyber security, assessment that there was no fraud. Is he in on the game too?
Your answers are all in Gabriel Sterling's press conference. You watched that, right? Every one of your conspiracies is addressed and debunked.
Same Braynard who got destroyed in the hearings? Why continue to believe people who have continued to be proven liars with zero qualifications?
Why? He is highly qualified and looked at actual evidence to come to his conclusion.
No idea, but it was transparently bad.
Do any of the sites you are getting your information talk about Trump losing votes or is this all in his favor?
Some vote totals have moved in Biden's favor after examining them. Braynard's numbers arent tied to a candidate. Which is why it seems so crazy everyone wants to dismiss them. Almost like someone has something to hide.
Are you aware that a Trump PAC hired Rex Briggs as a consultant who reviewed data from each contested state and found no evidence of fraud? He also confirmed that the voting machines were air-gapped (that means they weren't connected to the internet).
Because people have determined he has no scientific basis for his data. Not something to hide...but he continues to be discredited because his analysis is flawed.
Are you implying Braynard is impartial here?
No, Braynard is clearly an R, but his data is calling and examining state voter records. I'm assuming he has a record for each call and address or double vote. Where did you see that information is faulty?
Braynard worked for Trump at one point I thought. Everything I have read about his claims are they are unproven or have been proven incorrect. I can post links later.
This is what happened when Braynard testified in front of the Georgia Senate:
We found some fraud. It's this guy.
Wait...when they tried to contact him...he didn’t respond? Probably has a lawyer too?
The swamp that existed prior to Trump arriving wishes they could grift and flout democratic norms like Trump.
The GOP went down to the crossroads. Only instead of meeting the devil and becoming Robert Johnson, they met Donald Trump and become Matt Gaetz and Lin Wood, et al.
This is pretty much what I read. PolitiFact had some collected a few bits about his claims. They were dubious
HT, you have been pretty silent through this.
it really is this simple
I’m assuming your joking, but since someone will probably believe this...they were not connected to the internet by any means.
Wait, I thought just a couple of months ago you guys were saying that calling people on the telephone and asking them about their voting was ridiculous. Polling numbers were useless for this exact reason if I remember correctly. Do I have the wrong notebook?
Turned out we were right too. Remember the blue wave of 2020?
So calling people on the phone and asking about their politics is stupid and pointless? I guess I'm trying to figure out why you seem to value it in one instance and completely discount it in another.
Both systems have their pros and cons. This is your angle, I dont see them as hand in hand.
How many systems are you talking about? I'm talking about a system where you call people and ask them how they plan/will/have voted. What systems are you talking about?
