Jump to content
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

TRUMP TO INFINITY AND BEYOND HQ - The Great and Positive Place


Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, the moops said:

You guys sure do find every single post hilarious. It is quite amazing. 

I dont follow tim around quite like you do, so i don't know specifics of when he changed his mind. The important part is he did change his mind. How many more women will it take before you change your mind about Trump?

Tim?  You dont have to look for Tim, do you realize what thread he, and you, are posting in?  JFC. :lol:

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 33.6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • knowledge dropper

    2524

  • timschochet

    1857

  • SaintsInDome2006

    1688

  • The General

    1661

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

For anyone who has ever wondered how authoritarians manage to take power in "modern" democracies, here's your first hand evidence that the USA is not immune. Thankfully it appears that the system is h

Following in the footsteps of Twitter, Facebook, MySpace, Friendster, and Google Plus, the Footballguys Forum hereby suspends President Trump's posting privileges. The suspension takes effect immediat

Are we sure it isn't Alamo Landscaping?

1 hour ago, Bucsfan5493 said:

Incredible that this post got the laughing emoji from the usual suspect. You used to support a candidate, after learning more you questioned that decision and now you can see he is a garbage candidate and want him out of office. Shouldn’t this be the exact behavior we want from people when it comes to politics?

Nah, we do tribes in this country.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Sea Duck said:

President Trump has been presented with The National Republican Senate Committee's Inaugural Champion For Freedom Award.

(Rumor has it that they originally wanted to call it The First Annual NRSC Award For Outstanding Achievement In The Field Of Excellence, but they had to change the title for copyright reasons.)

Such a diminutive award. Couldn’t they have made it bigger?  At least the size of the Stanley Cup for Pete’s sake. 

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Sea Duck said:

President Trump has been presented with The National Republican Senate Committee's Inaugural Champion For Freedom Award.

(Rumor has it that they originally wanted to call it The First Annual NRSC Award For Outstanding Achievement In The Field Of Excellence, but they had to change the title for copyright reasons.)

Wow, it looks like he has aged 10+ years.

Link to post
Share on other sites
23 minutes ago, 2Squirrels1Nut said:

Wow, it looks like he has aged 10+ years.

I actually thought he looked a lot trimmer and in better shape. 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, bigbottom said:

I actually thought he looked a lot trimmer and in better shape. 

Definitely. Look how big his belt is on him. He doesn't look well. 

ETA

Definitely trimmer. 

Edited by 2Squirrels1Nut
Link to post
Share on other sites

Tweet from the UAE Ambassador to israel:

"On my way to a meeting in Jerusalem, I stopped by one of the oldest and best falafel shops in the city, and enjoyed the warm conversation with the friendly owner."

LINK

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
54 minutes ago, knowledge dropper said:

https://pjmedia.com/columns/stephen-kruiser/2021/04/14/the-morning-briefing-project-veritas-confirms-cnn-is-a-cesspool-of-biased-lies-n1439714

The irrefutable truth eventually comes out.  Shame on anyone forming an opinion based on anything they hear from CNN.  

But RUSSIA!!!!

PJMedia is certainly a name you can trust for unbiased reporting.

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, the moops said:

A video by Project Veritas reported on by PJ Media. 

 

36 minutes ago, Godsbrother said:

PJMedia is certainly a name you can trust for unbiased reporting.

 

Who the heck do you guys think is going to report on this, 60 Minutes?

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
44 minutes ago, knowledge dropper said:

You can always count on the source police to make valuable contributions.  

Hey I admit CNN is biased but just take a look at some of the stories on the front page of PJmedia.  Do you think it might be possible that PJMedia could be a teensy weensy bit biased against the left?

Woke British Leftist Say the Horrible, Genocidal Part Out Load

Stiletto Combat? Now Pelosi Thinks She's a 'Street Fighter' Who Could Have Fought Off Capitol Rioters

Biden's Team of Racists and Anti-Semites: An Anti-American Coalition in the Heart of the White House

CNN Director Admits That Their Coverage of Matt Gaetz Is 'Propaganda' to Help Democrats

CNN Director Admits Network Ran 'Propaganda' to Get Trump 'Voted Out'

Insanity Wrap #186: Woke Corporations Hand Out Millions to Rioters, Get Looted Anyway

GOP Sellout John Boehner Reveals Who He Voted for in 2020

Trump Destroys 'Fake News CNN,' Calls for Eric Swalwell to Be Removed From House Intel Committee

Edited by Godsbrother
  • Like 1
  • Thanks 2
  • Laughing 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
48 minutes ago, knowledge dropper said:

You can always count on the source police to make valuable contributions.  

Its not a reputable source at all.  And if you are going to refuse things from NYT and Washington Post and anything even leaning left...going to worse sources that are extreme right biased is not a good move.  It is extremely hypocritical.

 

Edited by sho nuff
  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, sho nuff said:

Its not a reputable source at all.  And if you are going to refuse things from NYT and Washington Post and anything even leaning left...going to worse sources that are extreme right biased is not a good move.  It is extremely hypocritical.

 

You being the source cop isn't reputable

Link to post
Share on other sites
15 minutes ago, sho nuff said:

Its not a reputable source at all.  And if you are going to refuse things from NYT and Washington Post and anything even leaning left...going to worse sources that are extreme right biased is not a good move.  It is extremely hypocritical.

 

It's a great distraction tool that's for sure.  

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
19 minutes ago, Godsbrother said:

Hey I admit CNN is biased but just take a look at some of the stories on the front page of PJmedia.  Do you think it might be possible that PJMedia could be a teensy weensy bit biased against the left?

Woke British Leftist Say the Horrible, Genocidal Part Out Load

Stiletto Combat? Now Pelosi Thinks She's a 'Street Fighter' Who Could Have Fought Off Capitol Rioters

Biden's Team of Racists and Anti-Semites: An Anti-American Coalition in the Heart of the White House

CNN Director Admits That Their Coverage of Matt Gaetz Is 'Propaganda' to Help Democrats

CNN Director Admits Network Ran 'Propaganda' to Get Trump 'Voted Out'

Insanity Wrap #186: Woke Corporations Hand Out Millions to Rioters, Get Looted Anyway

GOP Sellout John Boehner Reveals Who He Voted for in 2020

Trump Destroys 'Fake News CNN,' Calls for Eric Swalwell to Be Removed From House Intel Committee

Hey, PJMedia pushed the report from Project Veritas.  Project Veritas has recordings that should speak for themselves.  CNN does that occasionally.  It's not hard to discuss the facts if you put forth a little effort instead of attacking the source.

Link to post
Share on other sites
25 minutes ago, sho nuff said:

Its not a reputable source at all.  And if you are going to refuse things from NYT and Washington Post and anything even leaning left...going to worse sources that are extreme right biased is not a good move.  It is extremely hypocritical.

 

Hint:  Watch the videos and make up your own mind instead of tripping over whomever brought the videos to your attention. 

  • Love 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, tonydead said:

Hint:  Watch the videos and make up your own mind instead of tripping over whomever brought the videos to your attention. 

Just like the pro-Trump crowd does when The Lincoln Project puts out a video?  Please. Bias people gonna bias. 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
20 minutes ago, tonydead said:

Every single time when they can't dispute the evidence.

When the evidence is produced by a lying selective editing OKeefe...it isn’t trustworthy evidence. Far less trustworthy than unnamed sources at this point.

CNN is biased...cool. Totally new information.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, tonydead said:

Hint:  Watch the videos and make up your own mind instead of tripping over whomever brought the videos to your attention. 

Why would I watch edited videos from Okeefe who has pushed false narratives many times over?

You know it isn’t trustworthy...come on, you have to know that by now.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I’ll take tapper on cnn credibility over just about anyone.

so instead of posting a lol emoji cause you don’t have a point, quote my post and name someone you consider more credible

take the challenge

  • Laughing 1
  • Sad 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Zigg said:

Spring love is in the air.  

I have it on good authority that Wreck's profile pics on Facebook are from 20 years ago and he hasn't aged well.  But if you're into that sort of thing.

Link to post
Share on other sites
57 minutes ago, sho nuff said:

Its not a reputable source at all.  And if you are going to refuse things from NYT and Washington Post and anything even leaning left...going to worse sources that are extreme right biased is not a good move.  It is extremely hypocritical.

 

Please stop this schtick.  If you cannot refute the story, then attacking the source simply makes you a lazy poster triggered by “bad” news.  

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
  • Love 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, knowledge dropper said:

Lincoln Project?  I’m pretty glad those guys are on the other team

Sure.  Certainly your right. Not my point thought.  

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, knowledge dropper said:

You can always count on the source police to make valuable contributions.  

Slow day? All the regular :fishing:are busy in here today. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
59 minutes ago, tonydead said:

Hey, PJMedia pushed the report from Project Veritas.  Project Veritas has recordings that should speak for themselves.  CNN does that occasionally.  It's not hard to discuss the facts if you put forth a little effort instead of attacking the source.

Come On Tony.  If you want to bash CNN for being biased and pushing propaganda okay but Project Veritas doesn't even try to hide the fact that they purposely doctor up videos and they do so as a matter of practice.  

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, knowledge dropper said:

Did you even read the article you linked?  The headline doesn't match the question posed.

"Rasmussen Reports: By a margin of 51% – 44%, voters said it is “likely” that cheating affected the 2020 election outcome. That includes 74% of Republicans, 30% of Democrats and 51% of independent voters."

The question doesn't specify which side did the cheating.

Link to post
Share on other sites
58 minutes ago, knowledge dropper said:

Please stop this schtick.  If you cannot refute the story, then attacking the source simply makes you a lazy poster triggered by “bad” news.  

Its not schtick...its the truth about PJ and Veritas.  And its hypocritical from those who refuse to entertain anything from NYT or the Washington Post to expect others to accept sources that are far worse.  This has been explained ad nauseum and Im obviously not the only person feeling that way.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
37 minutes ago, Dickies said:

Did you even read the article you linked?  The headline doesn't match the question posed.

"Rasmussen Reports: By a margin of 51% – 44%, voters said it is “likely” that cheating affected the 2020 election outcome. That includes 74% of Republicans, 30% of Democrats and 51% of independent voters."

The question doesn't specify which side did the cheating.

That’s pretty obvious. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
23 minutes ago, sho nuff said:

Its not schtick...its the truth about PJ and Veritas.  And its hypocritical from those who refuse to entertain anything from NYT or the Washington Post to expect others to accept sources that are far worse.  This has been explained ad nauseum and Im obviously not the only person feeling that way.

 

You have refuted nothing and your posts seem to be intended to chill honest discourse on news you don’t like.  Please stop.  

Link to post
Share on other sites
25 minutes ago, sho nuff said:

Yeah I saw your fishing in there.  Such a super cool thing to do.

Why didn't you turn on the Sherriff siren and call out New Republic as poor sourcing?  Poor sourcing usually gets you uptight.  Or is this the part of hypocritical Sho?

Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, tonydead said:

Why didn't you turn on the Sherriff siren and call out New Republic as poor sourcing?  Poor sourcing usually gets you uptight.  Or is this the part of hypocritical Sho?

He uses ESQUIRE to support his points.   That should tell you enough.  

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, knowledge dropper said:

100% of the election results view Biden as the legitimate President.

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, knowledge dropper said:

A majority of the American people feel 100% sure the election results are tainted.  

A lot of gullable people believing the lies of a crybaby traitor is nothing to brag about

  • Like 4
Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...