SaintsInDome2006
Footballguy
I'll say. You just showed you get your information from a Russian state propaganda organ.Game over
I'll say. You just showed you get your information from a Russian state propaganda organ.Game over
Ivanka, Eric, Don jr, Tiffany and Barron do tooJeez, I wish I could make that kind of money with my last name.
Yeah that was a bad time for the editors.Nice 13 year run there until Mr. Ulyanov took over editorial control.
The cutbacks were murder.Yeah that was a bad time for the editors.
1) incorrectLet's list the facts shall we.
1) Not one witness alleges quid quo pro in regards to military aid or bribery
2) Aid was delivered and no investigation into Burisma took place
3) Only person who spoke to Trump, aka first hand witness, testified Trump told him he wanted nothing from Ukraine, no quid quo pro.
4) transcript of call does not show any wrongdoing
Game over
It would help if you watched the hearings and didn't get your info from CNN. All my facts are correct.1) incorrect
2) doesn't matter. Attempting a crime is still a crime.
3) Trump also said tell Z to "do the right thing". Also the aides closest to Trump have been barred from testifying.
4) incorrect
Game over. Yeah almost. On the House side anyways.
So it’s a game?1) incorrect
2) doesn't matter. Attempting a crime is still a crime.
3) Trump also said tell Z to "do the right thing". Also the aides closest to Trump have been barred from testifying.
4) incorrect
Game over. Yeah almost. On the House side anyways.
Also I use this word in the loosest terms in describing Joe Biden.Did he delay it in order to have an announcement of an investigation into his political rival?
To the elite that know they will never face real consequences, of course.So it’s a game?
So it’s a game?
Let's list the facts shall we.
1) Not one witness alleges quid quo pro in regards to military aid or bribery
2) Aid was delivered and no investigation into Burisma took place
3) Only person who spoke to Trump, aka first hand witness, testified Trump told him he wanted nothing from Ukraine, no quid quo pro.
4) transcript of call does not show any wrongdoing
Game over
They can invent a conspiracy for each country. Brilliant!There are 10 Democratic Candidates debating tonight. Coincidence?
Maybe John B has Noonan on ignore.So it’s a game?
Let's list the facts shall we.
1) Not one witness alleges quid quo pro in regards to military aid or bribery
2) Aid was delivered and no investigation into Burisma took place
3) Only person who spoke to Trump, aka first hand witness, testified Trump told him he wanted nothing from Ukraine, no quid quo pro.
4) transcript of call does not show any wrongdoing
Game over
Unfortunately my DirecTV package doesn't include Russia Today.It would help if you watched the hearings and didn't get your info from CNN. All my facts are correct.
Maybe John B is Noonan?Maybe John B has Noonan on ignore.
eh?Also I use this word in the loosest terms in describing Joe Biden.
SERIOUSLYHow many times are they going to repeat this javelin argument? So tiresome.
Eh, yeah, and I think Trump suffers from that too, which is that by and large - as Holmes indicated Sondland told him - they do not give a flip about the actual situation there. So they don't bother to understand it. - It's not an insult, I'm not dragging anyone, but it's a feature of this administration, and it's kind of the point. It's about Trump, not Ukraine.Is it driving anyone else crazy that republicans keep trashing Obama for not giving weapons to THE PREVIOUS administration that was known to be very corrupt while at the same time acting like they are heroes for giving to the NEW administration that is known to NOT be corrupt while also charging the Hunter is up to something fishy because of rampant corruption in the Ukraine?
Oh, as I'm learning now the Obama administration provided a ton more than just blankets as republican members have inferred a dozen times in these hearings. Shame on me, I should know better than to believe them.Eh, yeah, and I think Trump suffers from that too, which is that by and large - as Holmes indicated Sondland told him - they do not give a flip about the actual situation there. So they don't bother to understand it. - It's not an insult, I'm not dragging anyone, but it's a feature of this administration, and it's kind of the point. It's about Trump, not Ukraine.Is it driving anyone else crazy that republicans keep trashing Obama for not giving weapons to THE PREVIOUS administration that was known to be very corrupt while at the same time acting like they are heroes for giving to the NEW administration that is known to NOT be corrupt while also charging the Hunter is up to something fishy because of rampant corruption in the Ukraine?
I appreciate it for the reasons stated in my previous post.Now Swalwell is going down the which administration gave what rabbit hole.
I would have left Schiff to just briefly refute the points in one of his closing arguments instead of giving it air time with the witnesses as if it matters at all.Oh, as I'm learning now the Obama administration provided a ton more than just blankets as republican members have inferred a dozen times in these hearings. Shame on me, I should know better than to believe them.
Hadn't really thought of it this way.Is it driving anyone else crazy that republicans keep trashing Obama for not giving weapons to THE PREVIOUS administration that was known to be very corrupt while at the same time acting like they are heroes for giving to the NEW administration that is known to NOT be corrupt while also charging the Hunter is up to something fishy because of rampant corruption in the Ukraine?
Sometimes they do. Not in any of these instances.Yea...documenting facts and lies don't come out in opinion pieces.
Ok, thought you had forgotten it all in your move to Texas.I am quite familiar with NY's demos, but was mistaken in where she was. Didn't realize how upstate / rural, totally my bad.
Dr. Fiona Hill - who the Dems presumably thought would be their closerWho's on deck for tomorrow?
Kind of all the Republicans are left to hope for. Russian media reports and Swalwell farts.Every time Swalwell pauses I’m just waiting for him to rip one again.
Narrator: They were caught. The gig was up.Let's list the facts shall we.
1) Not one witness alleges quid quo pro in regards to military aid or bribery
2) Aid was delivered and no investigation into Burisma took place
3) Only person who spoke to Trump, aka first hand witness, testified Trump told him he wanted nothing from Ukraine, no quid quo pro.
4) transcript of call does not show any wrongdoing
Game over
At this point, does anyone anticipate additional new information from these two, or will it just be confirmation of what we already know/have heard?Dr. Fiona Hill - who the Dems presumably thought would be their closer
And, David Holmes, who overheard the phone conversation with Sondland and Trump (and which Sondland now acknowledges)
Nope. Anything north of Yonkers is Upstate.Ok, thought you had forgotten it all in your move to Texas.
Hard to say - until Sondland, there has not been much in the way of new information, but each witness it seems has dropped one nugget or two.At this point, does anyone anticipate additional new information from these two, or will it just be confirmation of what we already know/have heard?
Is the issue bad taste in donuts?Democrats are accusing the president of abusing his power for personal gain.
Republicans counter that he gave Ukraine Javelins, and Obama didn't.
That's how abuse of power works, though, isn't it? This isn't a debate over whether Ukraine should have Javelins. The president is accused of offering Ukraine things and making them conditional on something that benefited him personally.
If I offered the town money to give my business a difficult to obtain license, that might be corrupt. But if I offered money directly to a member of the zoning committee, it's clearly a bribe. And if Steve from the zoning commitee came to me and said if you give me free donuts for a year I'll let you open your new Krispy Kreme, it wouldn't be a good defense to say "but Steve really likes donuts". You'd say Steve's a criminal. You wouldn't care if I told you later that I didn't feel pressured to give Steve the donuts. And you wouldn't care if I said that the town really wanted a new Krispy Kreme. The issue would obviously be Steve.
Not really...this one was started because of major concerns. Concerns that are consistent among the testimony of relevant witnesses.I don’t know, maybe Democrats need to start an investigation looking for announcements about investigations that never happened. I’m sure the fishing trips are being set up as we speak for when this fails.
Wait? We haven't had impeachment hearings every month since Trump was elected?Not really...this one was started because of major concerns. Concerns that are consistent among the testimony of relevant witnesses.
Whether the investigation happened or not isn’t relevant...and according to testimony that part didn't even matter to Trump either. Only an announcement...and apparently the inly reason it wasnt announced was because the scheme got exposed.
Have we talked about Trump letting them have Javelins - as long as they don't actually use them in the conflict?Officer: I have you going 70 in a 55. I'll let you off with a warning if you give me a hundred dollars cash.
That's legal because I really can't afford a ticket right now.
That seems to be the argument the Republicans are making when they say that the Ukraine needed the Javelins and that Obama didn't give them Javelins.
It's not about the Javelins. It's about the abuse of power for personal gain.