It’s certainly partisan, of that there is no question.worried no - it will be 100% partisan voting and Trump will laugh at this impeachment like many American's will
but it IS a conflict of interest to be voting to remove the person you'd be running against, of COURSE you want to remove him - duh
If anything has been proven, 2016 proved we live in a simulation. Come on man.link to the universe actually existing?
Wanting to know the truth is frowned upon, just parrot the talking points.It’s certainly partisan, of that there is no question.
Please show me where I’ve said I want him removed. I’ll save you some time, never have. I despise him, no question, but all I’ve ever said is I want to see all the info. I do believe is guilty based on what I’ve seen so far but am undecided on removal. So not duh.
Not so much 2016, as there being a tweet for literally everything Trump has done or said that contradicts what he does or says.If anything has been proven, 2016 proved we live in a simulation. Come on man.
Hence the mad genius of the programmers. They’re clearly stretching the boundaries to find the breaking point. Genius.Not so much 2016, as there being a tweet for literally everything Trump has done or said that contradicts what he does or says.
I mean, writers couldn't have developed a more consistent foil for Trump from 2016-present than Trump before 2016.
The key to a good movie is not to disrupt the viewers suspension of disbelief.Hence the mad genius of the programmers. They’re clearly stretching the boundaries to find the breaking point. Genius.
Between Trump tweets and Seinfeld episodes there is a quote for everything known to man. Only a master programmer could come up with something so fantastic.The key to a good movie is not to disrupt the viewers suspension of disbelief.
I mean, there are these kinds of videos everywhere.
It's as if they're not even trying anymore.
I mean c'mon.Between Trump tweets and Seinfeld episodes there is a quote for everything known to man. Only a master programmer could come up with something so fantastic.The key to a good movie is not to disrupt the viewers suspension of disbelief.
I mean, there are these kinds of videos everywhere.
It's as if they're not even trying anymore.
I never said you did I ?It’s certainly partisan, of that there is no question.
Please show me where I’ve said I want him removed. I’ll save you some time, never have. I despise him, no question, but all I’ve ever said is I want to see all the info. I do believe he’s guilty based on what I’ve seen so far but am undecided on removal. So not duh.
The White House has a copy of the book. Trump said Bolton was lying, he didn't say Bolton never said it. What do you take from that?Link to disprove?
Joe didn't do anything that could get Trump impeached.I'll say this - if there is any witnesses called, it better include Joe "hairy legs" Biden and his son ... since they're literally at the core of this whole deal too
I apologize. With the comma in your first post I read it as you were referring to me being the one wanting him removed. In rereading it I clearly misinterpreted it.I never said you did I ?
sure he worked with other Govt's .... just like THEY ALL DO
I'll say this - if there is any witnesses called, it better include Joe "hairy legs" Biden and his son ... since they're literally at the core of this whole deal too
Under oath.... which doesn’t apply to his bookWhy not just get Bolton to testify and hear it straight from his mouth and be able to ask followups?
Goalposts? We don't need no stinkin' goalposts!It's official, Trump and the GOP have left their supporters out to dry. Again.
GOP concedes Trump may have withheld aid for probes but says it's not impeachable
I think this is something we might need to explore.Joe "hairy legs" Biden
No,please!I think this is something we might need to explore.
No, they’re literally not.I never said you did I ?
sure he worked with other Govt's .... just like THEY ALL DO
I'll say this - if there is any witnesses called, it better include Joe "hairy legs" Biden and his son ... since they're literally at the core of this whole deal too
Stlrams appears to be glitching.If anything has been proven, 2016 proved we live in a simulation. Come on man.
This all reminds me of an abusive relationship. One party repeatedly hurts the other physically, mentally, or both and the abused always takes them back because "they've changed and love me". It's really sad and concerning. (No sarcasm intended)Guys, remember when Trump had nothing to do with Russia? And then it turns out that he had a lot to do with Russia? Deny, Deny, Deny, ...can't deny anymore? Admit it but claim it's not wrong!
We're there again. NO QUID PRO QUO. NONE....didn't happen. Well, OK, something did happen but it wasn't that. OK, so it was that, it was quid pro quo, but it wasn't wrong, it shouldn't be impeachable.
God...how many times do we have to go through the same charade?
I’ve got “ladons” alias in the bufferIt’s all about accuracy right.
People are buggy. They trust people they shouldn't. Trump is clearly a person who should not be trusted, yet many do. He connects with people in ways they long for, and in ways that prevent them from being able to see him for who he is.This all reminds me of an abusive relationship. One party repeatedly hurts the other physically, mentally, or both and the abused always takes them back because "they've changed and love me". It's really sad and concerning. (No sarcasm intended)
It is the typical con. People rather dig deeper rather than admit they are a fool.People are buggy. They trust people they shouldn't. Trump is clearly a person who should not be trusted, yet many do. He connects with people in ways they long for, and in ways that prevent them from being able to see him for who he is.
"But he loves me"...is the equivalent to what many folks say about him.
So we are back to “get over it”?It's official, Trump and the GOP have left their supporters out to dry. Again.
GOP concedes Trump may have withheld aid for probes but says it's not impeachable
I'm guessing you would tell us that the democrat candidates are all running on nothing but "I'm not Trump". That the have no ideas except trying to make this a referendum on Trump. So of course they want to remove the entire theme of their campaigns.worried no - it will be 100% partisan voting and Trump will laugh at this impeachment like many American's will
but it IS a conflict of interest to be voting to remove the person you'd be running against, of COURSE you want to remove him - duh
I wish she would shut up and let them answer (or give non answers). Did the reporter ever stop talking?https://twitter.com/nbcpolitics/status/1222295395679854592?s=21
This Q&A feels so familiar. Can’t quite figure it out.
I said I was considering it but we never fully came to terms yetI thought you had said before that you were taking the high ground and releasing him from that punitive wager?
i might be wrong. But I thought you said that.
Honestly the damage is done already. Just the fact that anyone knows about Hunter Biden means that it worked. There doesn’t need to be legitimate investigation for Trump to create the doubt that he needs. The goal is to make it a repeat of 2016 and make the average voter chose the lesser of two evils and I think they’ve already done that if Biden is the nominee.I still think the whole Hunter Biden thing is a ruse. But if they do call him, then the Senate will be doing exactly what Trump was impeached for: using a fake scandal to try and bring down the Bidens.
And assuming Trump is acquitted, and the Hunter Biden thing hurts his dad just enough to make Bernie the nominee and Trump is then re-elected, this whole thing becomes mission accomplished for Donald Trump.
Has Bolton testified or have we seen manuscript yet. Until either happens it’s hersey.Wait...what? Bolton hasn't supported it...so the whole argument is bs? Come on man...
The trial is about his impeachable offenses.
You have nice and are a good dancer. Should be proud.,
Please provide copy of book so you can support your point.The White House has a copy of the book. Trump said Bolton was lying, he didn't say Bolton never said it. What do you take from that?
Cause the pilot let them upgrade from Economy to First Class, as long as they keep bringing him drinks. What could go wrong?We all on the same plane with a drunk pilot. Yet one side thinks they are winning.
I read a WSJ opinion the other day that argued that there is actually no vote required, and that it was within Roberts' purview to call witnesses. I'll see if I can dig it up.No. The Senate sets the rules for the impeachment.
Yet Republican members of the Senate have signaled that they intend to uphold Mr. Trump’s unprecedented decision to block all of this material.
But it turns out they don’t get to make that choice — Chief Justice John Roberts does. This isn’t a matter of Democrats needing four “moderate” Republicans to vote for subpoenas and witnesses, as the Trump lawyers have been claiming. Rather, the impeachment rules, like all trial systems, put a large thumb on the scale of issuing subpoenas and place that power within the authority of the judge, in this case the chief justice.