timschochet
Footballguy
Only one President has ever been censured: Andrew Jackson in 1834. And it was expunged in 1837.
And that will be yet another obvious attempt to cover-up and let Trump get away with anything he wants. The more that we have on official record, the worse it's going to be as facts keep trickling out.I can't imagine that McConnell wants this to go to the floor. He will do everything he can to avoid a vote on a censure that would force the moderate Republicans to publicly repudiate Trump in any way.
People are reporting this. I know it's pretty tame but please don't do this. It does not lead to good discussion.Haaaahaaa
I think you missed some of the unspoken suggestions of the article. This person is poor.Yeah it's funny, I didn't think laws mattered anymore. It's every person for themselves. Take or get taken.
She should just sell some of her stocks then.I think you missed some of the unspoken suggestions of the article. This person is poor.Yeah it's funny, I didn't think laws mattered anymore. It's every person for themselves. Take or get taken.
It helps when common sense is on your side.
https://twitter.com/moscow_project/status/1224417795951202305
Devin NuneZ Cocaine Cow
That would seem to be the precedent he wanted to set, and it seemed like the Senate agreed with him as a matter of legal interpretation.He can argue what he wants. He doesnt actually get a say.
Yes, but that's not what people were discussing. The discussion was about whether it was laughable to think that anyone would ever actually make such a ridiculous argument. The answer is that it's not laughable because somebody (Dershowitz) did in fact make that argument.He can argue what he wants. He doesnt actually get a say.
Yes, because as you yourself pointed out to us a page ago, "Winners win."By what? 2 votes?
So where exactly is the line that the President can't cross before R's finally decide it's too much? The argument is basically that the President has ultimate immunity, and can do whatever he wants, he can't be investigated, he can't be indicted, he can't be impeached. And knowing him he'll game the system and resign the day before he leaves office so Mr. Pence can pardon him for anything anyone may want to come after him for once he's done. I guess that will be cool too right?Yep. That's extremely likely. I'm sick of Alaska anyway.
I'll see my way out.People are reporting this. I know it's pretty tame but please don't do this. It does not lead to good discussion.
Samizdat, FTWI think they've shown they know no shame, but you can bet they're praying that Trump and Barr are successful in making sure Bolton's book never sees the light of day and he is warned that his information is classified information and if he grants interviews, he'll be jailed. Sound extreme? Almost like a country with a dictator? Just watch
Obviously, the answer is yes. The House sets its rules, and the Senate theirs. If there are specific House rules on drafting and voting on articles of impeachment, the new GOP majority in the House can simply change those rules.Hypothetically:
If Biden gets elected but the republicans gain control of the house, could they impeach him without calling any witnesses?
Some are riding the ship all the way down , they’re pot committedHaaaahaaa
Trump lied under oath in his written responses to Mueller. (Mueller said that his answers were generally untruthful.)Lying under oath. A president cant do that.
HT, I'm no Trump alarmist nor am I pot committed to anything, and Dershowitz's performance mixed with the non-calling of witnesses left a sick feeling in my stomach and I could not intellectually rectify it against anything -- even if the move to impeach was pure politics, it sure sounds like they found an issue that could have potentially left the country compromised, had senators admit to such, and still can't even censure him.Some are riding the ship all the way down , they’re pot committed
If only the lousy democrats would let him testify...Lying under oath. A president cant do that.
It feels like you haven't been paying close attention.Lying under oath. A president cant do that.
There isn't one, see Popehat.So where exactly is the line that the President can't cross before R's finally decide it's too much?
Stormy D says that Donald loves getting expunged baths.Only one President has ever been censured: Andrew Jackson in 1834. And it was expunged in 1837.
Yeah, but that was because Henry Clay didn't get his ring kissed like he wanted.Only one President has ever been censured: Andrew Jackson in 1834. And it was expunged in 1837.
!!!Senator Joe Manchin is offering a censure resolution to be voted on.
This is a challenge for those Republicans, like Alexander and Rubio, who have said that Trump's behavior was inappropriate but that impeachment is too high a punishment. Now let's see if they mean it.
If they move from (R) to (D)....that's the line.KPD said:So where exactly is the line that the President can't cross before R's finally decide it's too much? The argument is basically that the President has ultimate immunity, and can do whatever he wants, he can't be investigated, he can't be indicted, he can't be impeached. And knowing him he'll game the system and resign the day before he leaves office so Mr. Pence can pardon him for anything anyone may want to come after him for once he's done. I guess that will be cool too right?
I'd be willing to bet it's the exact opposite. He will refer to it a sham and suggest that Democrats owe HIM an apology. And then hold them responsible for dividing the country. We've all seen his act enough times. And that act never contains an ounce of contrition.You think Trump will apologize tongiht for his role in the impeachment. Call for National unity and healing?
I needed a good laugh this morning. Thank you.You think Trump will apologize tongiht for his role in the impeachment. Call for National unity and healing?
I hope he mentions his enemies list and how he will get revenge. Seriously.You think Trump will apologize tongiht for his role in the impeachment. Call for National unity and healing?
I'm sure Pelosi and Schiff will appologize for their roles in it and ask for Unity and healing. Or is it only the side that you don't support that is supposed to ask for those things?Donald J. Trump didn't get where he is by being the bigger man. His audience and his ego demands that he kick his opponents when they've dared to challenge him. Unity and healing is for losers.
It’s the side that broke the law.I'm sure Pelosi and Schiff will appologize for their roles in it and ask for Unity and healing. Or is it only the side that you don't support that is supposed to ask for those things?
Wait, what would they be apologizing for again?I'm sure Pelosi and Schiff will appologize for their roles in it
Your talking point has been undercut by all the Republicans who have conceded that Trump committed acts of wrongdoing.I'm sure Pelosi and Schiff will appologize for their roles in it and ask for Unity and healing. Or is it only the side that you don't support that is supposed to ask for those things?Donald J. Trump didn't get where he is by being the bigger man. His audience and his ego demands that he kick his opponents when they've dared to challenge him. Unity and healing is for losers.
And yours by all the Dems that said they were going to Impeach Trump shortly after the 2016 election.Your talking point has been undercut by all the Republicans who have conceded that Trump committed acts of wrongdoing.
Huh? You seem to be confusing two separate groups of people.And yours by all the Dems that said they were going to Impeach Trump shortly after the 2016 election.Your talking point has been undercut by all the Republicans who have conceded that Trump committed acts of wrongdoing.
I heard about that. Craaaazy. I mean if you needed any way to put some punctuation on the impeachment trial. It's that the President plans to use the considerable power of his office to punish those involved.I hope he mentions his enemies list and how he will get revenge. Seriously.
Sorry, why is it undercut? I think the argument is that some Dems were pointing to specific behavior, right? Haven't those arguments come to fruition in how Trump has actually behaved in office? Looking at those early articles is illuminating.And yours by all the Dems that said they were going to Impeach Trump shortly after the 2016 election.
I doubt it. It would take some huge stones to stand in that Chamber and go off like that. They all know he did it.I'd be willing to bet it's the exact opposite. He will refer to it a sham and suggest that Democrats owe HIM an apology. And then hold them responsible for dividing the country. We've all seen his act enough times. And that act never contains an ounce of contrition.
I think he might have the stones. He's not a happy camper about having that permanent impeached label. Wouldn't shock me to see the Republicans give him a standing ovation for it either.I doubt it. It would take some huge stones to stand in that Chamber and go off like that. They all know he did it.
"Democrats have been willing to impeach Trump for no reason at all since the day he was elected!"And yours by all the Dems that said they were going to Impeach Trump shortly after the 2016 election.