There is a really excellent (IMO) article in
The Intercept that updates the debate over the lab leak theory, given the news that EcoHealth apparently wanted to insert a furin cleavage site into SARS-related bat coronaviruses.
The article also quotes lots of scientists who continue to be pretty confident that SARS-CoV-2 evolved naturally and jumped to humans through some as-yet-undiscovered mechanism. That certainly remains plausible. Also, I have absolutely no background on this topic whatsoever, so I'm in no position to adjudicate a "this guy says this thing but this other guy over here says otherwise" debate among academic virologists.
But as an intelligent layman, it's starting to seriously strain credibility to think that it's just a coincidence that a novel bat coronavirus emerged in humans a few miles away from a BSL 4 lab that does research on novel bat coronaviruses and that this particular bat coronavirus just happens to feature a really strange abnormality that makes it more infectious to humans and that nobody could explain where that abnormality came from, except that now we know that WIV's American colleagues were proposing to cultivate exactly that type of virus a year before a virus matching that description emerged a few miles from the BSL 4 lab that employs the people the American researchers regularly work with. I mean, could it be a coincidence? Yeah, sure, I guess so. But surely we should all update our priors at this point and make "lab leak" our default assumption, right?