fruity pebbles
Footballguy
Chipotle free delivery
ok, i was critical so i open myself to criticism. but did i suggest that economic concerns were all about people losing half of their 401k or losing all their rental homes? no i did not . that thought never occurred to me. interesting that that is what you thought i was implying. defensive much.?Deaths are obviously very sad. But a deep recession (or depression) ends up leading to a lot of deaths too, in a different way. Economic concerns aren’t all about people losing half of their 401k or losing all their rental homes.
For some people it means they go homeless or struggle to eat or become unhealthy.
You sure it was the 1957 one? I read a st louis comparison for 1918. Compared KC and boston to st Louis.This is definitely possible IMO. Maybe not quite SK, but much better than Italy/Seattle.
All schools in VA, MD and DC are closed already. A lot of people are already doing true social distancing -- basically inside except for groceries and meds. I'm like 99% certain bars, restaurants, churches and other social gatherings will be officially closed in a few days.
We missed the window to have that really halt the spread of the disease, but clamping down earlier rather than later is going to have a big impact.
I don't know what you'll find if you Google it, but I was reading about the 1957 flu pandemic yesterday and there were huge differences in fatalities between cities that had stringent anti-spread measures (St. Louis IIRC) and some that didn't (NYC IIRC).
At some point the negative economic impact is going to cost far more lives than the virus.Should be a national policy
Necessary. It'll be everywhere soon.Illinois closed all bars and dine-in restaurants. Reasonable?
Think you’re underestimating the number of deaths this could cause in short order if we overwhelm the healthcare system and patients are triaged and some left to die.At some point the negative economic impact is going to cost far more lives than the virus.
I'll take a PM too.What restaurant? I live in Boston and want to patronize restaurants who are doing in the right thing now once we get past this. I'll take a PM if you don't to want to post it for the board.
This is what govt. officials are weighing right now.At some point the negative economic impact is going to cost far more lives than the virus.
We're going to have a fascinating natural experiment...They'll start back up in the Fall if I had to guess.Schools are done for the year
The bigger the impact from the health crisis, the bigger the economic crisis will be. People advocating there is a tradeoff are cutting off their nose to spite their face.Think you’re underestimating the number of deaths this could cause in short order if we overwhelm the healthcare system and patients are triaged and some left to die.At some point the negative economic impact is going to cost far more lives than the virus.
Edited 3 minutes ago by fruity pebbles
BS. They are making CYA decisions by the seat of their pants. No one is evaluating the economic tradeoffs in making any of these decisions.This is what govt. officials are weighing right now.
Every single govt. has made the call that slowing the spread is more important than the economic impact. We have to trust that the governments knows more than we do.
We'll agree to disagree here. Trump is Mr. economy and he has backed off of his "this is the flu" stance.BS. They are making CYA decisions by the seat of their pants. No one is evaluating the economic tradeoffs in making any of these decisions.
Makes no sense.The bigger the impact from the health crisis, the bigger the economic crisis will be. People advocating there is a tradeoff are cutting off their nose to spite their face.
AgreedMost, if not all of us, will be. The govt. is slowly phasing this in.
If they did it all at once the country would lose its ####.
Losing a large percentage of the population to death or incapacity can be more harmful to the economy than a 3 or 4 week lock down.Makes no sense.
I worked in government long enough to know how decisions get made. And MOST decisions are based on very shallow and faulty reasoning.We'll agree to disagree here. Trump is Mr. economy and he has backed off of his "this is the flu" stance.
We've already seen the playbook from other countries. It's not very difficult to connect dots here.Agreed
Pence and the Dr both said today “we will have more for you all tomorrow” a few times
Hilarious. Please link your newsletter, I would like to subscribe.Makes no sense.
Child care for children ages 5 through 12 will be available at our elementary schools for the those who work for the following types of employers:
Health care providers and systems, including hospitals and clinics
Post-acute and long-term care facilities, including nursing and assisted living facilities
Other health systems and organizations, such as:
Home Care workers
Personal Care Assistants
Ambulance/emergency
Direct Care and Treatment
Other emergency staff, including:
First responders
Firefighters
Personnel providing correctional services
Essential court personnel
Minnesota State Veterans Homes staff
State and local public health agency employees
MNSure Navigators
County financial/eligibility workers
County case managers
Or any county staff in emergency management or health and human services
Depends. Not to be cold, but killing of the elderly saves huge amounts of money in long term health care costs and pension and social security payments.Losing a large percentage of the population to death or incapacity can be more harmful than a 3 or 4 week lock down.
So old people need to die and that’s a sacrifice you’re willing to make?Depends. Not to be cold, but killing of the elderly saves huge amounts of money in long term health care costs and pension and social security payments.
YepWe've already seen the playbook from other countries. It's not very difficult to connect dots here.
If it was just a small percentage of elderly dying every country that has ever contracted this would not be taking the same extreme measures. The virus is more harmful than what is being reported because they don't want to cause a hysteria. See the Guardian link I provided earlier in this thread if you want to see a worst case scenario. 7.9 million hospitalized just in the UK is a worst case scenario.Depends. Not to be cold, but killing of the elderly saves huge amounts of money in long term health care costs and pension and social security payments.
I made no such arguement.So old people need to die and that’s a sacrifice you’re willing to make?
I have never thought so low of you, and that is saying something!Depends. Not to be cold, but killing of the elderly saves huge amounts of money in long term health care costs and pension and social security payments.
Yeah, I can normally defend jon---but this is beyond the pale disgusting.I have never thought so low of you, and that is saying something!
I think this is the part that is getting eroded away.This is what govt. officials are weighing right now.
Every single govt. has made the call that slowing the spread is more important than the economic impact. We have to trust that the governments knows more than we do.
Get rid of the handicapped and special needs people and the economy will be booming?Depends. Not to be cold, but killing of the elderly saves huge amounts of money in long term health care costs and pension and social security payments.
People don't have an alternative. Going rogue and supporting anarchy certainly isn't the answer.I think this is the part that is getting eroded away.
Yeah, I think part of this has to come with a freeze on prices or you are going to start seeing this ####.A grocery store near me upped their price on milk to 9.99/gallon from 4.99 a couple days ago. They also raised prices on rice, pasta and other essentials 30%. I reported them to the Illinois AGs office. Scumbags.
Not saying that either. Just saying I wish I trusted it more in a time like this. Mostly that they had the country's interests in mind more than their own - which is a sad thing to say.People don't have an alternative. Going rogue and supporting anarchy certainly isn't the answer.
China and South Korea getting back to normal. We'll have a better idea of our timeline as we watch Italy and other countries recover.So this thread is super bleak and I almost can’t read it any longer. Try something different — there has to be a chance for good news right? This isn’t 100% guaranteed to be a total disaster (I hope). So what would good news look like? How would we get there? Just dumb luck?
Not only does it make sense from a pandemic point of view, but from a selfish bored sports fan POV, If I'm gonna be bored then let's get the max benefit. No half measuresShould be a national policy
The federal govt? I swear there are 10-15 posters in this thread that would run laps around Trump and Pence in terms of knowledge of this crisis.This is what govt. officials are weighing right now.
Every single govt. has made the call that slowing the spread is more important than the economic impact. We have to trust that the governments knows more than we do.
Do we have the capability or willpower to follow what they did though?China and South Korea getting back to normal. We'll have a better idea of our timeline as we watch Italy and other countries recover.
We (our company)deal with several factories in China daily. They are getting back to normal operating procedures.So this thread is super bleak and I almost can’t read it any longer. Try something different — there has to be a chance for good news right? This isn’t 100% guaranteed to be a total disaster (I hope). So what would good news look like? How would we get there? Just dumb luck?
The federal govt? I swear there are 10-15 posters in this thread that would run laps around Trump and Pence in terms of knowledge of this crisis.
The USA is currently managing this crisis through governors, mayors and heads of private organizations.
ThisCan we please stop with the "let the old people die so the economy can continue" type of posts?