SlaX
Footballguy
Yes. Practically everybody I come in contact with outside of home.People are still doing the flu comparison stuff?
Yes. Practically everybody I come in contact with outside of home.People are still doing the flu comparison stuff?
You falsely accuse me of not posting facts, then you post this whopper of a lie.2 million is the LOW end of how many this would kill if it spread to even half of the country.
Understatement of the thread?That is not how it works. Yes, a spike could overly stress resources and increase deaths. But that is more like a 10 percent increase no a ten-fold increase.
What the heck are you even talking about?BTW, when you Trump supporters come into the other thread, (the one where we are trying to post facts and keep it non-political) and start criticizing the WHO and China, and parroting Trump ideas, and you know that no one can call you out on your hypocrisy because we "can't talk politics"....we know what you're doing.
It's the HIGH end if we did zero social distancing or any other measures.2 million is the LOW end of how many this would kill if it spread to even half of the country.
The model showed 1.6 to 2.2 million people dead if we did nothing. Only by social distancing does it get down to 80,000 to 160,000. We don't do social distancing really well so the experts in creased those numbers to 100,000 to 200,000.
There really isn't any reason to argue the experts as their model as the model was verified independently. Those are the numbers as we know them right now.
You can argue if shutting down was worth 1,000,000 people, because that's the current price tag.
If you want to watch them explain the number you can here, in 5 minutes.
Think of the outcome for every person that came in and needed a ventilator to live - and did not get one, because there were not enough.It would be a factor in mortality, but not to the extent you think.
Half of the US population is 163 million. With a CFR of 1% (very, very low if half the country had it), that's 1.6 million dead. Even in South Korea their CFR is almost 2%.You falsely accuse me of not posting facts, then you post this whopper of a lie.
This model/study questioned the assumptions made from the original Imperial model which predicted 2m dead. At the time the Oxford study was a hypethetical because we really didn't have too much accurate information. Since then though, it turns out the death rate and hospitalization rate is a lot lower than we thought, confirming what the Oxford Model had questioned. A person can use his reason to make deduction that the 2m was too high. Or you can just wait for the epidemiologists to say it shortly.Link?
link?This model/study questioned the assumptions made from the original Imperial model which predicted 2m dead. At the time the Oxford study was a hypethetical because we really didn't have too much accurate information. Since then though, it turns out the death rate and hospitalization rate is a lot lower than we thought, confirming what the Oxford Model had questioned. A person can use his reason to make deduction that the 2m was too high. Or you can just wait for the epidemiologists to say it shortly.
Also, blood antibody tests have not been done to say how many people have already had it, another thing questioned by the Oxford researcher. There is reason to believe Covid19 has been around longer than we thought. Italian doctors are now looking into increased flu related deaths going back to October 2019.
The original outcome was an unrealistic theoretical prediction based on if us humans were completely ignorant and had no clue what a disease was. It was never a realistic prediction under any circumstances.Think of the outcome for every person that came in and needed a ventilator to live - and did not get one, because there were not enough.
Are you saying that they would all live - because they don't actually need the ventilator?
We are fighting a two-pronged war here, where we are desperately trying to get more ventilators, and fewer patients - so that those who need one will get one. The original model showed the outcome if we did not take both measures.
We can't now fault the country for taking these measures, and thereby reducing the impact of the virus.
Trump supporters believe Trump over the epidemiologists now. Why would you start caring what they supposedly will believe in the future?This model/study questioned the assumptions made from the original Imperial model which predicted 2m dead. At the time the Oxford study was a hypethetical because we really didn't have too much accurate information. Since then though, it turns out the death rate and hospitalization rate is a lot lower than we thought, confirming what the Oxford Model had questioned. A person can use his reason to make deduction that the 2m was too high. Or you can just wait for the epidemiologists to say it shortly.
Also, blood antibody tests have not been done to say how many people have already had it, another thing questioned by the Oxford researcher. There is reason to believe Covid19 has been around longer than we thought. Italian doctors are now looking into increased flu related deaths going back to October 2019.
These are not accurate cfrs outside of Italy or maybe Spain. You can find a link in this thread which says .6%. It's almost certainly less than 1%.Half of the US population is 163 million. With a CFR of 1% (very, very low if half the country had it), that's 1.6 million dead. Even in South Korea their CFR is almost 2%.
That is just naive.The original outcome was an unrealistic theoretical prediction based on if us humans were completely of ignorant and had no clue what a disease was. It was never a realistic prediction under any circumstances.
The global cfr (outside China) is currently 4.9% with over half the active cases in a state where death wouldn't have happened yet. Of course there are also many cases which haven't yet been diagnosed.These are not accurate cfrs outside of Italy or maybe Spain. You can find a link in this thread which says .6%. It's almost certainly less than 1%.
It's a novel virus. That means no one has immunity. Only a complete shutdown, the likes of which none of us have ever seen, kept this from spreading to half of the population very quickly.The original outcome was an unrealistic theoretical prediction based on if us humans were completely of ignorant and had no clue what a disease was. It was never a realistic prediction under any circumstances.
Try to keep up.The global cfr (outside China) is currently 4.9% with over half the active cases in a state where death wouldn't have happened yet. Of course there are also many cases which haven't yet been diagnosed.
The "almost certainly less than 1%" line is a total guess based on zero evidence other than a random study or two.
Putting you on ignore because your line of thinking is not worth listening to. But you're the one rejecting the actual data.Try to keep up.
The HIGH range is 70% of the population at 1%. We are going to do better on both numbers. Not quite jon_mx numbers tho.Half of the US population is 163 million. With a CFR of 1% (very, very low if half the country had it), that's 1.6 million dead. Even in South Korea their CFR is almost 2%.
Click bait. I'll trust US experts that are peer reviewed by Harvard and Columbia.This model/study questioned the assumptions made from the original Imperial model which predicted 2m dead. At the time the Oxford study was a hypethetical because we really didn't have too much accurate information. Since then though, it turns out the death rate and hospitalization rate is a lot lower than we thought, confirming what the Oxford Model had questioned. A person can use his reason to make deduction that the 2m was too high. Or you can just wait for the epidemiologists to say it shortly.
Also, blood antibody tests have not been done to say how many people have already had it, another thing questioned by the Oxford researcher. There is reason to believe Covid19 has been around longer than we thought. Italian doctors are now looking into increased flu related deaths going back to October 2019.
The news article focused on a new study from the University of Oxford, which has not been peer reviewed or published in a scientific journal.
ummmm....have you paid ANY attention to those who still believe this is a hoax to try and tank Trump's chances? Or the people claiming this was going to be the end of the world?The original outcome was an unrealistic theoretical prediction based on if us humans were completely ignorant and had no clue what a disease was. It was never a realistic prediction under any circumstances.
Is this referring to the Trump press conference? Did he replace his cast of characters? I might have to tune in.Anybody actively arguing this right now this second, when you have an opportunity to listen to the top experts in the US explain it to you live, aren't interested in facts.
Shader and jon_mx are both wrong.
Too late - I think the main folks are about done - but I caught the end of Brix, and then Fauci, followed by Pence - still on.Is this referring to the Trump press conference? Did he replace his cast of characters? I might have to tune in.
If you've got something of value to add, make your point and why you think it. Throwing stuff like this is pure trolling and you know it. Stop it.What an All Star line up on this task force starting with the President.
Solid presser. After the rollercoaster of the last couple of weeks, I thought Fauci and Birx would've been gone by now.Too late - I think the main folks are about done - but I caught the end of Brix, and then Fauci, followed by Pence - still on.
Very simply - mitigation efforts are working, we need to maintain in hard hit areas, and we need to get a jump on areas where it has not hit yet to keep the numbers in a manageable range
Trolling? Not at all. Are you watching this press conference? They are illustrating via charts how we can expect the cases to slowdown over the next month. This is something we should all be rooting for.If you've got something of value to add, make your point and why you think it. Throwing stuff like this is pure trolling and you know it. Stop it.
I am 100% confused right now. Calling the President doing a good job is trolling now? There are multiple attacks on the President in this thread and name calling and I don't see them being called out for trolling. I legit did nothing wrong.If you've got something of value to add, make your point and why you think it. Throwing stuff like this is pure trolling and you know it. Stop it.
Interesting. I seem to remember it being an incredibly optimistic estimate, seemingly based on remarks from Fauci - but memory could be faulty. Basically I remember it being if everything works as expected, that's where we'll be in several months.Asked about the projected death toll, Trump invites Birx and Fauci to speak. Birx says again that the range is 100,000 to 240,000, but that doesn't assume every American does everything they're supposed to do, so it can be lower than that.
I think that’s all the moderator wants- some support for the statement and not “X is a superstar” or “Y is a total bum” with no context.Trolling? Not at all. Are you watching this press conference? They are illustrating via charts how we can expect the cases to slowdown over the next month. This is something we should all be rooting for.
I cant listen to him, so not watching. How exactly does he think we expect stuff to slow down during the next month.Trolling? Not at all. Are you watching this press conference? They are illustrating via charts how we can expect the cases to slowdown over the next month. This is something we should all be rooting for.
ExactlyI think that’s all the moderator wants- some support for the statement and not “X is a superstar” or “Y is a total bum” with no context.
This is beyond bizarre. Whole threads dedicated to how horrible Trump is (name calling and all) and one post in here, very accurate in my view, the best press conference and info on this BY FAR. Trump actually behaving honorably, not even talking very much. WOW.I am 100% confused right now. Calling the President doing a good job is trolling now? There are multiple attacks on the President in this thread and name calling and I don't see them being called out for trolling. I legit did nothing wrong.
By continuing the extended social distancing for 30 days. Faucci predicting deaths keep going up but peak in 1-2 weeks and then keep going down.I cant listen to him, so not watching. How exactly does he think we expect stuff to slow down during the next month.
He hasn't even been talking. Hardly. The information is valuable enough to overcome your....um....any issue you have with Trump.I cant listen to him, so not watching. How exactly does he think we expect stuff to slow down during the next month.
Show, don't tellThat is not how it works. Yes, a spike could overly stress resources and increase deaths. But that is more like a 10 percent increase no a ten-fold increase.
Sounds like a book I once read. Don't know for sure since it was probably back in 1984 and I was just a kid.Pres Trump at WH says Dr. Fauci & Dr. Birx will be going over data & models about the coronavirus outbreak in the U.S.
He also reiterated that WH guidelines go through 4/30.
“It’s a matter of life and death frankly,” Trump said. “I know our citizens will rise to the occasion.”
So, now what do we do? Do we keep up the "overreaction" argument, or do we adopt this new approach and say we always knew this was a life or death situation?
I missed his opening remarks, but what I have heard is pretty good stuff trying to explain how the scientists see this playing out, and how that can change with more data.He hasn't even been talking. Hardly. The information is valuable enough to overcome your....um....any issue you have with Trump.