Lol okA lot.
Well done sirThe partner of “pedi”
So I'm asking you. How is the strategy working?Dude. That is NOT the main argument. If you're going to define what can be measured and nothing else then so be it. It seems to me this board has shown consistently that the economic impact doesnt matter much here
I only posted on the health impact. Im sorry I missed your desire to only focus on the economics.So I'm asking you. How is the strategy working?
And I specifically mentioned the economic impact so it does matter.
Educate me.
I think one thing this debate ignores is that strategy <> behavior necessarily. People as a general rule behave as safe as they feel. If Swedes saw that in general the strategy wasn't working they may have began to behave in a manner similar to other Europeans regardless of messages from the government. I have seen some pieces out of Sweden indicating this observation that the Swedes as individuals began to change behavior significantly based on poor results.Orrrrr....don't.
Neighboring countries won't let Sweden citizens enter.
I can look if you want, but they showed that Sweden's economy has been down and hurt just as badly as others. They didn't benefit economically at all by staying open but they have far more deaths and cases. In other words, it was the wrong strategy.
This should be awesome.I don’t think anyone on the task force was invited.
Ok, so how is the strategy working for the health impact?I only posted on the health impact. Im sorry I missed your desire to only focus on the economics.
you are the one who refuted the original post:What's "many"
it's on you to define what "many" refers to and why you think "many" won't die. Once you do that, I think the discussion moves to an acknowledgement that "some" will die (let's toss out "might" because with the millions of parents out there and a non-zero fatality rate, it's statistically certain that there will be deaths).This just isn't a true statement.Yep!
I mean sure, those kids will bring it back to their families and many of those people will die, but most of the kids themselves will be ok.
And the few who aren't? Well we got a stock market to worry about.
Where was this post in April?I only posted on the health impact. Im sorry I missed your desire to only focus on the economics.
Omg I already posted a link.Ok, so how is the strategy working for the health impact?
I see their numbers have slowed down. But they aren't better than other areas. And their previous totals are far worse. So, I'm wondering how their strategy worked. In what way has it worked?
No it isnt. You said many,not meyou are the one who refuted the original post:
it's on you to define what "many" refers to and why you think "many" won't die. Once you do that, I think the discussion moves to an acknowledgement that "some" will die (let's toss out "might" because with the millions of parents out there and a non-zero fatality rate, it's statistically certain that there will be deaths).
If "some" or "many" is acceptable is another debate entirely.
Currently America alone, directly from our admins choices, has "many" being in the vicinity of the total deaths from the dropping 2 Atomic Bombs on Japan. And that is over the early 18 weeks.What's "many"
Excuse me, I'm sorry to bother you, but do you also translate Kanye or know someone who does?Excuse me, Stewardess....I speak Trump.
You have to flip the first two sentences....
"I don’t agree with the statement that if everybody wear a mask everything disappears.......I want people to have a certain freedom"
He's saying "Simply put, the masks aren't going to solve EVERYTHING!!!.....and if they by themselves are unable to make everything alright....then I'd rather allow people to have the freedom to chose to NOT wear the mask."
"Everybody who is saying don’t wear a mask – all of sudden everybody’s got to wear a mask, and as you know masks cause problems, too."
He's saying "There has been great confusion in regards to wearing versus not wear masks. Experts have gone back and forth. Even individuals who have said "don't wear a mask" are now saying "wear a mask". I believe that they're not the cure all that those who say they are think they are AND they have a potential to create other problems"
Wasn't their -1.5% prediction recently revised to approx. -4.5%, or essentially, the same as everyone around them? Outside of this article, which appears to be using outdated information, literally everything I've seen states that, to date, Sweden's approach has given them significantly worse health outcomes and similar economic outcomes to their peer countries.
Sweden ends up overall in a cluster with other Euro nations. - Though per capita they're worse. - I feel like this discussion was more relevant when we the US were picking an avenue to run through to get to where they are. Go high, go low, through the middle, whatever, they chose paths which have left them in a situation to resume normal activity and global interaction. We here in the US have chosen otherwise.
And people like to hold up sweden as an example but they are nothing like the USA. The grand majority of people there understand they are part of a functioning society and are happy to take responsibility for protecting and ensuring that society does well.Sweden ends up overall in a cluster with other Euro nations. - Though per capita they're worse. - I feel like this discussion was more relevant when we the US was picking an avenue to run through to get to where they are. Go high, go low, through the middle, whatever, they chose paths which have left them in a situation to resume normal activity and global interaction. We here in the US have chosen otherwise.
Hard to believe that there are a significant number of people out there who value having a slightly better economy more than protecting human lives.parasaurolophus said:
As that Dan Patrick said if you aren't dying so people can't have cheap plastic crap, then you are unamericanHard to believe that there are a significant number of people out there who value having a slightly better economy more than protecting human lives.
You know this thing isn't over right?Hard to believe that there are a significant number of people out there who value having a slightly better economy more than protecting human lives.
Finland, Norway, and Denmark had 2 deaths combined in the past 5 days. Their combined death rate is 10% the death rate of Sweden.You know this thing isn't over right?Hard to believe that there are a significant number of people out there who value having a slightly better economy more than protecting human lives.
Sweden has 10 deaths in the last 5 days.
So? You don't think a doctor is capable of diagnosing a disease without a test?Some place are counting people as positive for Covid-19 without even testing them
https://www.wsmv.com/news/mt-juliet-man-says-even-with-no-test-he-s-informed-he-is-covid-19/article_f8cf60e6-c886-11ea-8ae0-4ffb48dc9a46.html
1. Chalking you up to you didn't read the article.So? You don't think a doctor is capable of diagnosing a disease without a test?
Because there aren't enough doctors with enough time to do in person diagnosis on the scale/frequency needed. Also, initial diagnosis may be followed/verified by subsequent testing.1. Chalking you up to you didn't read the article.
2. If doctors can diagnose without a test, why all the #####ing about lack of tests all summer long?
Can't tell if this is anti-doctor, anti-science, or shtick.2. If doctors can diagnose without a test, why all the #####ing about lack of tests all summer long?
You ignorantly said it. You decideCan't tell if this is anti-doctor, anti-science, or shtick.
I think you mean 1 place counted 1 person as positive for COVID even though they hadn't tested positive.Some place are counting people as positive for Covid-19 without even testing them
https://www.wsmv.com/news/mt-juliet-man-says-even-with-no-test-he-s-informed-he-is-covid-19/article_f8cf60e6-c886-11ea-8ae0-4ffb48dc9a46.html
Agree that's why it's asinine to ask someone "You don't think a doctor is capable of diagnosing a disease without a test?" regarding covid when a doctor didn't diagnose the guy (incorrectly) in the first place?Because there aren't enough doctors with enough time to do in person diagnosis on the scale/frequency needed. Also, initial diagnosis may be followed/verified by subsequent testing.
According to guy from Mt Juliet (and yes Im well aware of Mt Juliet as well).I think you mean 1 place counted 1 person as positive for COVID even though they hadn't tested positive.
According to the article you posted, anyway.
1 place contacted 1 person several times thinking they were positive. He wasn't counted as the counts are based on lab results.I think you mean 1 place counted 1 person as positive for COVID even though they hadn't tested positive.
According to the article you posted, anyway.
If we save ONE LIFE it's worth it. Why do you want people to die? Shame on you.You know this thing isn't over right?
Sweden has 10 deaths in the last 5 days.
Also I assume that you donate every single dollar of expendable income you have to children around the world for vaccines, hunger and other things right? I mean surely you wouldnt spend any money on black friday instead of saving human lives, right? Right????
Its just attempted deflectionCan't tell if this is anti-doctor, anti-science, or shtick.
OK this seems like a bad thing. But is there a larger argument you’re trying to make?Some place are counting people as positive for Covid-19 without even testing them
https://www.wsmv.com/news/mt-juliet-man-says-even-with-no-test-he-s-informed-he-is-covid-19/article_f8cf60e6-c886-11ea-8ae0-4ffb48dc9a46.html
Sounds like they did great. Now lets compare Sweden to Italy, Spain and France. Lets do it again in a month and again in 6. Lets also examine educational progress in a couple years.Finland, Norway, and Denmark had 2 deaths combined in the past 5 days. Their combined death rate is 10% the death rate of Sweden.
Joseph Fair and his team of doctors sure couldn't.So? You don't think a doctor is capable of diagnosing a disease without a test?
Kinda obvious the numbers are jacked up. No idea by how much though.OK this seems like a bad thing. But is there a larger argument you’re trying to make?
It's not a bad thing. It was a mistakeOK this seems like a bad thing. But is there a larger argument you’re trying to make?
Hey, way to cherry pick 2 of the 4 deadliest countries.Sounds like they did great. Now lets compare Sweden to Italy, Spain and France. Lets do it again in a month and again in 6. Lets also examine educational progress in a couple years.Finland, Norway, and Denmark had 2 deaths combined in the past 5 days. Their combined death rate is 10% the death rate of Sweden.
Jacked up? UmmKinda obvious the numbers are jacked up. No idea by how much though.
I have a better Idea. Why don’t you explain what you would like to see happen here? Because I still don’t understand the point you’re trying to make.Sounds like they did great. Now lets compare Sweden to Italy, Spain and France. Lets do it again in a month and again in 6. Lets also examine educational progress in a couple years.
Well we've seen cases where a guy will die in a car accident and get labelled a corona death too.