He is both. Master at selling his political influence. Bumbling idiot at spying on Americans.LOl, is Biden a corrupt mastermind in the middle of international intrigue, or a mere bumbling footnote?
Trump has been claiming Obama spying since 2016. I think this timing has more to do with the Flynn case.Do you honestly believe this push against Obama has zero to do with Biden being the candidate against Trump?
Where is it being pushed? It has been pushed in this thread. It has been pushed by POTUS.
He knows he will never actually get to Obama on anything...you know it too.
You're accusing him of being a schizophrenic then. This is the stuff of comic books, or maybe the SNL skit where Reagan was deviously devising arms sales in Urdu to Iran while babbling in front of girl scout photo ops.He is both. Master at selling his political influence. Bumbling idiot at spying on Americans.
It's the exact same thing the left does with Trump. He is an idiot who also hatched an international plan to steal an election. Which is it?You're accusing him of being a schizophrenic then. This is the stuff of comic books, or maybe the SNL skit where Reagan was deviously devising arms sales in Urdu to Iran while babbling in front of girl scout photo ops.
The which is it is answered by looking at the facts and the reports. He's a man who sells heavily laundered real estate and yet also doesn't understand that Russia invaded Ukraine or how viruses are spread. Being a winner at real estate and not knowing jack about geography, policies, science and history are compatible. Setting the Constitution on fire is a blunt force act, it doesn't require finesse. Firing 5 IG's separately investigating his administration takes zero depth. Etc. I think the picture of him in the reporting is pretty consistent with who he is as a person.It's the exact same thing the left does with Trump. He is an idiot who also hatched an international plan to steal an election. Which is it?
Let's wait until the smoke clears before we render any judgements about first. We get AT LEAST 3.5 years of hysteria though. So we will revisit in 2024.So sound like your coming over to our side. Good for you.
https://mobile.twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1261751862027595776
It started in 2017.Let's wait until the smoke clears before we render any judgements about first. We get AT LEAST 3.5 years of hysteria though. So we will revisit in 2024.
I heard Iran has video of Obama peeing on hookers. Sounds legit. That's why he sent all that cash to them on pallets. To cover that up.
Agreed. Will be a nothing burger like Biden's sexual assault because his voters literally don't careIn the next 6 months I think this continues to fade away...maybe a ramp up around election time because it is what Trump has to have to paint Biden as bad and corrupt. In the end...it will be a flash in the pan and quite literally a nothing burger.
How's the Ukraine scandal coming? Bombshell news coming any day?Agreed. Will be a nothing burger like Biden's sexual assault because his voters literally don't care
Isn’t that EXACTLY what those following Russiagate said as the investigation was going on too. Can’t have it both ways my friend. And the smoke has cleared on Obama (and Biden), Barr has already said as much. So tell me how can you have Obamagate without the Obama?Let's wait until the smoke clears before we render any judgements about first.
No idea haven't been in that thread in forever. Is there even a thread? Did I predict bombshell news?How's the Ukraine scandal coming? Bombshell news coming any day?
Hilarious when the Russiaguys attempt a zinger isn’t it?No idea haven't been in that thread in forever. Is there even a thread? Did I predict bombshell news?
We were told Rudy and his guys were going to expose the Bidens. It was in all the papers.No idea haven't been in that thread in forever. Is there even a thread? Did I predict bombshell news?
I'm sorry, we were talking about "nothingburgers". Thought I'd throw one on the pile.Hilarious when the Russiaguys attempt a zinger isn’t it?
It's amusing to death.Hilarious when the Russiaguys attempt a zinger isn’t it?
Wrong thread. Last post on the Ukraine situation is here, and there's a good bit of detail throughout, including, to his credit, by Max.No idea haven't been in that thread in forever. Is there even a thread? Did I predict bombshell news?How's the Ukraine scandal coming? Bombshell news coming any day?
Did I predict bombshell news in there? I have no idea what's coming on that -gate. It's probably a nothing burger like 80% or more things that get freaked out about on this forumWrong thread. Last post on the Ukraine situation is here, and there's a good bit of detail throughout, including, to his credit, by Max.
Sorry, didn't mean to imply you did. As I said, I was just adding to list of "nothingburgers".Did I predict bombshell news in there? I have no idea what's coming on that -gate. It's probably a nothing burger like 80% or more things that get freaked out about on this forum
It took Mueller 100 pages of his report to describe all the contacts between Trump campaign personnel and Russians. In setting up the Trump Tower NY meeting, Don Jr. expressed delight at the prospect of receiving disparaging information about Hillary Clinton from Russia as part of Russia's ongoing efforts to help the Trump campaign. Trump falsely claimed he had nothing to do with Russia while, throughout the campaign, he was negotiating to construct a Trump Tower in Moscow. Paul Manafort provided internal Trump campaign polling data to Konstantin Kilimnik for purposes unknown (because Manafort won't say).The meeting at Trump tower itself is evidence of possible Trump collusion. What are you talking about?
I think the timing of the Flynn thing as well as this is all about deflection and distraction and to build towards the election. Its coming down from the top and Barr is pushing it likely because its what Trump wants.Trump has been claiming Obama spying since 2016. I think this timing has more to do with the Flynn case.
I haven't seen Trump push Biden's name in this. He might have when the unmasking list came out. Otherwise you'll have to point me to it.
And I have no doubt Obama is safe. The Rice email confirms that. Hence its purpose.
It took Mueller 100 pages of his report to describe all the contacts between Trump campaign personnel and Russians. In setting up the Trump Tower NY meeting, Don Jr. expressed delight at the prospect of receiving disparaging information about Hillary Clinton from Russia as part of Russia's ongoing efforts to help the Trump campaign. Trump falsely claimed he had nothing to do with Russia while, throughout the campaign, he was negotiating to construct a Trump Tower in Moscow. Paul Manafort provided internal Trump campaign polling data to Konstantin Kilimnik for purposes unknown (because Manafort won't say).
There was insufficient evidence of conspiracy to bring criminal charges against Americans. Insufficient evidence doesn't mean no evidence.
tough to unmask the unmaskedHas this been discussed?
“When the FBI circulated [the report], they included Flynn’s name from the beginning,” a former senior U.S. official said. “There were therefore no requests for the unmasking of that information.”
https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/michael-flynns-name-wasnt-masked-in-fbi-report-on-contacts-with-russian-envoy
1. ObamaI keep hearing about this. What are the main points?
Doesn't quite flow like Water & gate, but close enough.1. Obama
2. gate
We're using the Hillary Clinton Standards of Evidence: no conviction = innocent.It took Mueller 100 pages of his report to describe all the contacts between Trump campaign personnel and Russians. In setting up the Trump Tower NY meeting, Don Jr. expressed delight at the prospect of receiving disparaging information about Hillary Clinton from Russia as part of Russia's ongoing efforts to help the Trump campaign. Trump falsely claimed he had nothing to do with Russia while, throughout the campaign, he was negotiating to construct a Trump Tower in Moscow. Paul Manafort provided internal Trump campaign polling data to Konstantin Kilimnik for purposes unknown (because Manafort won't say).
There was insufficient evidence of conspiracy to bring criminal charges against Americans. Insufficient evidence doesn't mean no evidence.
Question:It's going to be interesting once Flynn is able to do interviews.
If he does an interview that isn’t Hannity or Rush I will be impressed.It's going to be interesting once Flynn is able to do interviews.
Of course convictions and innocence is not what we were discussing, evidence was.We're using the Hillary Clinton Standards of Evidence: no conviction = innocent.
Side thought, do you think Cuomo will do an interview with someone besides his brother? Its nice his brother made jokes about his big nose but I would like for him to be given a real interview on why he was so wreckless with people in the nursing homes. I know if I lost a loved one over Cumo's incompetence id be fuming to see him being interviewed by his brother and laughing it up.If he does an interview that isn’t Hannity or Rush I will be impressed.
well there was the whole tan suit thing. that’s still out thereSo, I'm guessing Obamagate is dead?
Doesn’t something have to been alive first to be dead? Or I guess a better question is can something that never existed die?So, I'm guessing Obamagate is dead?
Yeah, we heard this for the last 3.5 years about Trump.“Any day now.”
No evidence either.Of course convictions and innocence is not what we were discussing, evidence was.
Were you asleep through all of the charges that were brought, and convictions made?Yeah, we heard this for the last 3.5 years about Trump.
The irony is so thick with you guys you can cut it with a knife.
The goal was always to "Get Trump". Getting low-level flunkies is not a reason to declare victory. It was always about getting Trump HIMSELF for collusion. They failed with their fake evidence and sham investigations.Were you asleep through all of the charges that were brought, and convictions made?
Not sure I see the irony when one group took action on their claims.
“The biggest scandal in US history” should be acted upon. I’m all for it, if true.
First campaign manager and 4th campaign manager convicted. The 2nd and 3rd campaign managers testified against them. The personal attorney convicted. The chief foreign policy advisor turned NSA convicted. The campaign treasurer and inauguration director convicted.low-level flunkies
While I don’t agree, I’ll respect the take. Looking forward to the GOP “getting Obama” here. LFG!The goal was always to "Get Trump". Getting low-level flunkies is not a reason to declare victory. It was always about getting Trump HIMSELF for collusion. They failed with their fake evidence and shame investigations.
Like I said, so thick you could cut it with a knife.
You mean the campaign manager who served for what - like 2 weeks?First campaign manager and 4th campaign manager convicted. The 2nd and 3rd campaign managers testified against them. The personal attorney convicted. The chief foreign policy advisor turned NSA convicted. The campaign treasurer and inauguration director convicted.
Aren't low level flunkies usually more than one degree from the principle?
Stone, with Caputo, started up Trump's campaign. He's looking at 3-4 years.You mean the campaign manager who served for what - like 2 weeks?
You may have to wait up to 3.5 years - the same amount of time it took (and failed) to "Get Trump".While I don’t agree, I’ll respect the take. Looking forward to the GOP “getting Obama” here. LFG!
Ok if someone reporting directly to a principle is a flunky then there is no such thing as non-flunkies.Yes, low-level flunkies.